Expectancy value theory is often evoked by educational psychologists to explain gender differences in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) variables. Yet gender does not operate in isolation. Nor are gender effects likely to be context free. In the current meta-analysis, we explore gender differences in STEM-related expectancy for success, and the task values of intrinsic, utility, attainment, and cost. We find that gender differences were generally small in size. Invoking the concept of intersectionality, we find that heterogeneity in gender effect sizes are large and gender differences are moderated, primarily, by socioeconomic status, ethnic diversity, and somewhat by national gender equality.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Heterogeneity estimates for Math Cost were regarded with caution because of the small number of studies in analyses (see von Hippel 2015 for a discussion of I2 biases in small meta-analyses).
Heterogeneity estimates for Math Cost were regarded with caution because of the small number of studies in analyses (see von Hippel 2015, for a discussion of I2 biases in small meta-analyses).
Alon, S., & DiPrete, T. A. (2015). Gender differences in the formation of field of study choice set. Sociological Science, 2, 50–81. https://doi.org/10.15195/v2.a5.
Auwarter, A. E., & Aruguete, M. S. (2008). Effects of student gender and socioeconomic status on teacher perceptions. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(4), 242–246. https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.101.4.243-246.
Baker, D. P., & Jones, D. P. (1993). Creating gender equality: Cross-national gender stratification and mathematical performance. Sociology of Education, 66(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112795.
Bönte, W. (2015). Gender differences in competitive preferences: New cross-country empirical evidence. Applied Economics Letters, 22(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2014.927560.
Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black+ lesbian+ woman≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59(5-6), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z.
Catsambis, S. (1994). The path to math: Gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112791.
Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320305.
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology., 114(4), 924–976. https://doi.org/10.1086/595942.
Charles, M., Harr, B., Cech, E., & Hendley, A. (2014). Who likes math where? Gender differences in eighth-graders’ attitudes around the world. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2014.895140.
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052.
Cheung, M. (2011). metaSEM: Meta-analysis: A structural equation modelling approach. R package version 0.5–3. Retrieved from http://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/psycwlm/Internet/metaSEM.
Cheung, M. (2014). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level metaanalyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032968.
Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coley, R. J. (2001). Differences in the gender gap: Comparisons across racial/ethnic groups in education and work. ETS Policy Information Report. Princeton, NJ: educational testing service.
Collier, A. (1994). Critical realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy. London: Verso.
Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. U. Chi. Legal F., 139–67.
Eagly, A. H., Eaton, A., Rose, S. M., Riger, S., & McHugh, M. C. (2012). Feminism and psychology: Analysis of a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist, 67(3), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027260.
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x.
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Handbook of Competence and Motivation, 105–121.
Eccles, J. S., & Hoffman, L. W. (1984). Socialization and the maintenance of a sex-segregated labor market. In H. W. Stevenson & A. E. Siegel (Eds.), Research in child development and social policy (Vol. 1, pp. 367–420). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eccles, J. S., & Jacobs, J. E. (1986). Social forces shape math attitudes and performance. Signs, 11(2), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1086/494229.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.
Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents' socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb01929.x.
Else-Quest, N. M., & Grabe, S. (2012). The political is personal: Measurement and application of nation-level indicators of gender equity in psychological research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312441592.
Else-Quest, N. M., & Hamilton, V. (2018). Measurement and analysis of nation-level gender equity in the psychology of women. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women (pp. 545–563). Washington, DC: APA Press.
Else-Quest, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2016a). Intersectionality in quantitative psychological research I. Theoretical and epistemological issues. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316629797.
Else-Quest, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2016b). Intersectionality in quantitative psychological research II. Methods and techniques. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316647953.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018053.
Few-Demo, A. L. (2014). Intersectionality as the “new” critical approach in feminist family studies: Evolving racial/ethnic feminisms and critical race theories. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12039.
Field, A. P. (2003). The problems in using fixed-effects models of metaanalysis on real-world data. Understanding Statistics: Statistical Issues in Psychology, Education, and the Social Sciences, 2(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0202_02.
Fox, D., Prilleltensky, I., & Austin, S. (Eds.). (2009). Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.
Fryer, R. G., Jr., & Levitt, S. D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), 210–240.
Fu, R., Gartlehner, G., Grant, M., Shamliyan, T., Sedrakyan, A., Wilt, T. J., et al. (2011). Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health care program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 1187–1197.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109.
Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1049–1074. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360698496.
Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold.
Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320(5880), 1164–1165. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154094.
Gunnarsson, L. (2011). A defence of the category ‘women’. Feminist Theory, 12(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700110390604.
Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2015). Directionality of the associations of high school expectancy-value, aspirations, and attainment: A longitudinal study. American Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 371–402.
Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Dicke, T., & Van Zanden, B. (2019). Countries, parental occupation, and girls' interest in science. The Lancet, 393(10171), e6–e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30210-7.
Haines, E., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing … or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081.
Hancock, A. (2016). Intersectionality: An intellectual history. Oxford University Press: Kindle Edition.
Hawken, A., & Munck, G. L. (2013). Cross-national indices with gender-differentiated data: What do they measure? How valid are they? Social Indicators Research, 111(3), 801–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0035-7.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
Higgins, J., Thompson, S., Deeks, J., & Altman, D. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
Hull, G. T., Scott, P. B., & Smith, B. (1982). All the women are white, all the men are black, but some of us are brave. New York: Feminist.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.
Hyde, J. S. (2007). New directions in the study of gender similarities and differences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00516.x.
Hyde, J. S. (2012). Nation-level indicators of gender equality in psychological research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(2), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312441448.
Hyde, J. S. (2013). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057.
Hyde, J. S., & Mertz, J. E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 8801–8807.
Ireson, G. (2017). Gender achievement and social, political and economic equality: A European perspective. Educational Studies, 43(1), 40–50.
Jenkins, S. R. (2000). Introduction to the special issue: Defining gender, relationships, and power. Sex Roles, 42, 467–493. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007010604246.
Kane, J. M., & Mertz, J. E. (2012). Debunking myths about gender and mathematics performance. Notices of the AMS, 59(01), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti790.
Kennedy, J. P., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60, 34–46.
Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Race, class and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lauermann, F., Tsai, Y. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2017). Math-related career aspirations and choices within Eccles et al.’s expectancy–value theory of achievement-related behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 53(8), 1540–1559.
Lubienski, S. T., Crane, C. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2011). A longitudinal study of gender and mathematics using ECLS data. In Final report (grant# R305A080147) submitted to the National Center for Education Research. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
Lubienski, S. T., Robinson, J. P., Crane, C. C., & Ganley, C. M. (2013). Girls’ and boys’ mathematics achievement, affect, and experiences: Findings from ECLS-K. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 634–645. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0634.
Lykes, M. B. (2000). Possible contributions of a psychology of liberation: Whither health and human rights? Journal of Health Psychology, 5(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910530000500312.
Mack, J. & Wilson, R. (2015). Trends in mathematics and science subject combinations in the NSW HSC 2001–2014 by gender. Technical paper, University of Sydney. Retrieved from: http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/SMS/MMW2015.pdf.
Mann, A., & DiPrete, T. A. (2016). The consequences of the national math and science performance environment for gender differences in STEM aspiration. Sociological Science, 3, 568. https://doi.org/10.15195/v3.a25.
Marks, J. L., Lam, C. B., & McHale, S. M. (2009). Family patterns of gender role attitudes. Sex Roles, 61(3-4), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9619-3.
Martinez Dy, A., Martin, L., & Marlow, S. (2014). Developing a critical realist positional approach to intersectionality. Journal of Critical Realism, 13(5), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1179/1476743014Z.00000000043.
Marsh, H. W., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Daniel, H. D., & O’Mara, A. (2009). Gender effects in the peer reviews of grant proposals: A comprehensive metaanalysis comparing traditional and multilevel approaches. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1290–1326.
McGraw, R., Lubienski, S. T., & Strutchens, M. E. (2006). A closer look at gender in NAEP mathematics achievement and affect data: Intersections with achievement, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 129–150 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/s7/30034845.
Muntaner, C., & Augustinavicius, J. (2019). Intersectionality: A scientific realist critique. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(2), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1557296.
Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., Xu, M. K., Hau, K. T., & Trautwein, U. (2011). Who took the “×” out of expectancy-value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive-methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1058–1066.
National Innovation and Science Agenda, Australian Government (2017). National innovation and science agenda. Retrieved from http://www.innovation.gov.au/page/agenda
National Science and Technology Council, Office of science technology policy, US. Government Washington D.C. (2013). https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/stem_stratplan_2013.pdf.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2012). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (Special Report NSF 11-309). Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/sex.
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 10671101–10671101. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067.
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.129.
Office of the Chief Scientist (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Australia’s future. Australian Government, Canberra. Retrieved from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp- content/uploads/STEM_AustraliasFuture_Sept2014_Web.pdf.
Parker, R., Larkin, T., & Cockburn, J. (2017). A visual analysis of gender bias in contemporary anatomy textbooks. Social Science & Medicine, 180, 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.032.
Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Anders, J., Shure, N., & Dicke, T. (2018a). An information distortion model of social class differences in math self-concept, intrinsic value, and utility value. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(3), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000215.
Parker, P. D., Van Zanden, B., & Parker, R. B. (2018b). Girls get smart, boys get smug: Historical changes in gender differences in math, literacy, and academic social comparison and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 54, 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.002.
Penner, A. M. (2008). Gender differences in extreme mathematical achievement: An international perspective on biological and social factors. American Journal of Sociology, 114(S1), S138–S170. https://doi.org/10.1086/589252.
Prilleltensky, I. (2008). The role of power in wellness, oppression, and liberation: The promise of psychopolitical validity. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(2), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20225.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (1985). Empirical Bayes meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 10(2), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164836.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Vol. 6). Newbury Park: Sage.
Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Sáinz, M., & López-Sáez, M. (2010). Gender differences in computer attitudes and the choice of technology-related occupations in a sample of secondary students in Spain. Computers & Education, 54(2), 578–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.007.
Sinclair, S., Hardin, C. D., & Lowery, B. S. (2006). Self-stereotyping in the context of multiple social identities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.119.
Spierings, N. (2012). The inclusion of quantitative techniques and diversity in the mainstream of feminist research. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 19(3), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506812443621.
Sterne, J. A. C., Egger, M., & Moher, D. (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1. 0.
Stevenson, H. W., Chen, C., & Booth, J. (1990). Influences of schooling and urban-rural residence on gender differences in cognitive abilities and academic achievement. Sex Roles, 23(9-10), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289767.
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological science, 29(4), 581–593.
Stotsky, J., Shibuya, S., Kolovich, L., & Kebhaj, S. (2016). Trends in women’s advancement and gender equality. International Monentary Fund Working Paper, Washington DC, IMF).
Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy–value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 763–777.
Van Den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2003). Multilevel meta-analysis: A comparison with traditional meta-analytical procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(5), 765–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402251027.
Van Zanden (2018). Understanding the psychological and social origins of gender disparities in self-beliefs, motivation, and educational attainment. Unpublished Dissertation.
von Hippel, P. (2015). The heterogeneity statistic I2 can be biased in small meta-analyses. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0024-z.
Wenner, G. (2003). Comparing poor, minority elementary students’ interest and background in science with that of their white, affluent peers. Urban Education, 38(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085902250483.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.
Zarrett, N., Malanchuk, O., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. (2006). Examining the gender gap in IT by race: Young adults’ decisions to pursue an IT career. In J. McGrath & W. Asprey (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zurbriggen, E. L., & Capdevila, R. (2010). The personal and the political are feminist: Exploring the relationships among feminism, psychology, and political life. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 458–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01595.x.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Parker, P.D., Van Zanden, B., Marsh, H.W. et al. The Intersection of Gender, Social Class, and Cultural Context: a Meta-Analysis. Educ Psychol Rev 32, 197–228 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09493-1
- Gender differences
- Expectancy value theory
- STEM education