The Intersection of Gender, Social Class, and Cultural Context: a Meta-Analysis
Expectancy value theory is often evoked by educational psychologists to explain gender differences in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) variables. Yet gender does not operate in isolation. Nor are gender effects likely to be context free. In the current meta-analysis, we explore gender differences in STEM-related expectancy for success, and the task values of intrinsic, utility, attainment, and cost. We find that gender differences were generally small in size. Invoking the concept of intersectionality, we find that heterogeneity in gender effect sizes are large and gender differences are moderated, primarily, by socioeconomic status, ethnic diversity, and somewhat by national gender equality.
KeywordsGender differences Expectancy value theory STEM education Intersectionality
- Catsambis, S. (1994). The path to math: Gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112791.
- Cheung, M. (2011). metaSEM: Meta-analysis: A structural equation modelling approach. R package version 0.5–3. Retrieved from http://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/psycwlm/Internet/metaSEM.
- Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Coley, R. J. (2001). Differences in the gender gap: Comparisons across racial/ethnic groups in education and work. ETS Policy Information Report. Princeton, NJ: educational testing service.Google Scholar
- Collier, A. (1994). Critical realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. U. Chi. Legal F., 139–67.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Handbook of Competence and Motivation, 105–121.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., & Hoffman, L. W. (1984). Socialization and the maintenance of a sex-segregated labor market. In H. W. Stevenson & A. E. Siegel (Eds.), Research in child development and social policy (Vol. 1, pp. 367–420). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents' socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb01929.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Else-Quest, N. M., & Hamilton, V. (2018). Measurement and analysis of nation-level gender equity in the psychology of women. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women (pp. 545–563). Washington, DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
- Fox, D., Prilleltensky, I., & Austin, S. (Eds.). (2009). Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fryer, R. G., Jr., & Levitt, S. D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), 210–240.Google Scholar
- Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
- Hancock, A. (2016). Intersectionality: An intellectual history. Oxford University Press: Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
- Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
- Hull, G. T., Scott, P. B., & Smith, B. (1982). All the women are white, all the men are black, but some of us are brave. New York: Feminist.Google Scholar
- Hyde, J. S. (2013). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy, J. P., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60, 34–46.Google Scholar
- Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Race, class and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Lubienski, S. T., Crane, C. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2011). A longitudinal study of gender and mathematics using ECLS data. In Final report (grant# R305A080147) submitted to the National Center for Education Research. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.Google Scholar
- Mack, J. & Wilson, R. (2015). Trends in mathematics and science subject combinations in the NSW HSC 2001–2014 by gender. Technical paper, University of Sydney. Retrieved from: http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/SMS/MMW2015.pdf.
- McGraw, R., Lubienski, S. T., & Strutchens, M. E. (2006). A closer look at gender in NAEP mathematics achievement and affect data: Intersections with achievement, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 129–150 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/s7/30034845.Google Scholar
- Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., Xu, M. K., Hau, K. T., & Trautwein, U. (2011). Who took the “×” out of expectancy-value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive-methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1058–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Innovation and Science Agenda, Australian Government (2017). National innovation and science agenda. Retrieved from http://www.innovation.gov.au/page/agenda
- National Science and Technology Council, Office of science technology policy, US. Government Washington D.C. (2013). https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/stem_stratplan_2013.pdf.
- National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2012). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (Special Report NSF 11-309). Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/sex.
- Office of the Chief Scientist (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Australia’s future. Australian Government, Canberra. Retrieved from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp- content/uploads/STEM_AustraliasFuture_Sept2014_Web.pdf.
- Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Anders, J., Shure, N., & Dicke, T. (2018a). An information distortion model of social class differences in math self-concept, intrinsic value, and utility value. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(3), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parker, P. D., Van Zanden, B., & Parker, R. B. (2018b). Girls get smart, boys get smug: Historical changes in gender differences in math, literacy, and academic social comparison and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 54, 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Sterne, J. A. C., Egger, M., & Moher, D. (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1. 0.Google Scholar
- Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological science, 29(4), 581–593.Google Scholar
- Stotsky, J., Shibuya, S., Kolovich, L., & Kebhaj, S. (2016). Trends in women’s advancement and gender equality. International Monentary Fund Working Paper, Washington DC, IMF).Google Scholar
- Van Zanden (2018). Understanding the psychological and social origins of gender disparities in self-beliefs, motivation, and educational attainment. Unpublished Dissertation. Google Scholar
- Zarrett, N., Malanchuk, O., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. (2006). Examining the gender gap in IT by race: Young adults’ decisions to pursue an IT career. In J. McGrath & W. Asprey (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar