Theory of Mind: a Hidden Factor in Reading Comprehension?
- 1.5k Downloads
Theory of mind is the understanding that other people have mental states that drive their actions and that those mental states can be different from one’s own. Without understanding theory of mind and being able to take others’ perspectives, it could be difficult for children to read and understand narrative texts. This paper posits that children’s understanding of others’ minds may be a potential missing piece in current accounts of reading comprehension. Indeed, the typical progression of children’s theory of mind abilities across childhood is closely aligned with the development of narrative processing skills. Furthermore, emerging evidence shows that both narrative processing and theory of mind are predictive of children’s reading comprehension, both concurrently and longitudinally. We present a possible explanation for why such a link exists and propose a causal framework of this relation in which increased ToM leads to increased understanding of and inferencing about characters’ mental states. Understanding characters’ mental states then leads to better reading comprehension. The framework makes novel, testable predictions and provides directions for future research.
KeywordsReading comprehension Theory of mind Perspective taking Narratives
This research was supported by an Institute of Education Sciences training Grant No. R305B130012 supporting fellow RAD, awarded to the third author (with N. Jordan and H. May), and an Institute of Education Sciences Grant No. R305A150435 awarded to the third and fourth authors (with D. Dickinson).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research ((pp. 255–291). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Barnes, M. a., Raghubar, K. P., Faulkner, H., & Denton, C. a. (2013). The construction of visual–spatial situation models in children’s reading and their relation to reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 119, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen year review. In G. L. Masters (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 23, pp. 169–184). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger’s syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boerma, I. E., Mol, S. E., & Jolles, J. (2017). The role of home literacy environment, mentalizing, expressive verbal ability, and print exposure in third and fourth graders’ reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 0(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1277727.
- Bruner, J. S. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54(1), 11–32.Google Scholar
- Cartwright, K. B. (2015). Social understanding: the importance of mind reading for reading comprehension. In Executive skills and reading comprehension: a guide for educators (pp. 201–228).Google Scholar
- Diergarten, A. K., & Nieding, G. (2013). Children’s and adults’ ability to build online emotional inferences during comprehension of audiovisual and auditory texts. Journal of Cognition and Development, (October), null-null. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2013.848871.
- Duke, N. K. (2005). Comprehension of what for what: comprehension as a nonunitary construct. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.Google Scholar
- Dunn, J., & Cutting, A. L. (1999). Understanding others, and individual differences in friendship interactions in young children. Psychiatry Research.Google Scholar
- Flavell, J. H. (1988). The development of children’s knowledge about the mind: from cognitive connections to mental representations. In Developing theories of mind (pp. 244–268).Google Scholar
- Foorman, B. R., Koon, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). Examining general and specific factors in the dimensionality of oral language and reading in 4th–10th grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 884–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Foorman, B., Beyler, N., Borradaile, K., Coyne, M., Denton, C. A., Dimino, J., … Wissel, S. (2017). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade: educator’s practice guide. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguide/21
- Frederiksen, C. H. (1975). Semantic structure from discourse H. Cognitive Psychology, 458.Google Scholar
- Frederiksen, C. (1979). Discourse comprehension and early reading. In L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (pp. 155–186). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years q, 32, 282–313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004, 3.
- Happé, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hofmann, S. G., Doan, S. N., Sprung, M., Wilson, A., Ebesutani, C., Andrews, L. A., … Harris, P. L. (2016). Training children’s theory-of-mind: a meta-analysis of controlled studies. Cognition, 150, 200–212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.006.
- Johnson, D. D., & Johnson, B. (1986). Highlighting vocabulary in inferential comprehension instruction. Journal of Reading, 29(7), 622–625.Google Scholar
- Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: the independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lecce, S., Bianco, F., & Hughes, C. (2017). Reading minds and stories: theory of mind predicts reading in middle childhood.Google Scholar
- Lillard, A. S., & Kavanaugh, R. D. (2012). The contribution of symbolic skills to the development of an explicit theory of mind: scale models, language, and pretend play.Google Scholar
- Lindgren, K. A., Folstein, S. E., Tomblin, J. B., & Tager-flusberg, H. (2009). Language and reading abilities of children with autism spectrum disorders and specific language impairment and their first-degree relatives, (March), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.63.
- Lysaker, J. T., Shaw, K., & Alicia, Z. A. (2016). Emergent reading comprehension: social imagination and kindergarteners’ readings of a wordless picture book. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 2016(OCT), 245–256.Google Scholar
- Mar, R. a., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., Peterson, J. B., Delapaz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McAlister, A. R., & Peterson, C. C. (2012). Siblings, theory of mind, and executive functioning in children aged 3-6 years: new longitudinal evidence. Child Development, 0(0), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12043.
- Nation, K., Clarke, Æ. P., & Wright, Æ. B. (2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder, 911–919. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0130-1.
- National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2015). The Nation’s Report Card. Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Neale, M. D. (1999) Neale analysis of reading ability: Manual. Retrieved May 28, 2018 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED431178
- Nyhout, A. (2015). Imagining story spaces: young readers’ ability to construct spatial representations of narrative. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
- Nyhout, A., & O’Neill, D. K. (2013). Constructing spatial representations from narratives and non-narrative descriptions: evidence from 7-year-olds. OASIcs-OpenAccess Series in Informatics, 32, 158–165.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from 2015. Retrieved May 28, 2018 from https://www.oecd.org/pisa
- Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: the role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension, 98(3), 554–566. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0622.214.171.1244.
- Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46–e54. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: a blueprint of the reader. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167–208). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Perner, J., Ruffman, T., & Leekam, S. R. S. R. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: you catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65(4), 1228–1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00814.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Towards an R&D program in reading comprehension. Retrieved May 28, 2018 from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/MR1465.pdf
- Ricketts, J., Jones, C. R. G., Charman, T., & Happe, F. (2013). Reading comprehension in autism spectrum disorders: the role of oral language and social functioning, 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1619-4.
- Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: the transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois: University Press.Google Scholar
- Scarborough, H. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: evidence, theory and practice. In S. Neumann. & D. Dickinson (Ed.), Handbook of early literacy research. (pp. 97–110). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- The campaign for grade-level reading. (2017). Retrieved March 20, 2017, from http://gradelevelreading.net/
- Trabasso, T. (1981). On the making of inferences during reading and their assessment. Comprehension in Teaching: Research Reviews. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED181429
- Weekers, A., Groenen, I., Kleintjes, F., & Feenstra, H. (2011). Wetenschappelijke verantwoording papieren toetsen begrijpend lezen voor groep 7 en 8 [Scientific background of paper-based reading comprehension tests for Grade 5 and 6]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito. Retrieved from http://toetswijzer.kennisnet.nl/html/tg/21.pdf