Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 1067–1089 | Cite as

Theory of Mind: a Hidden Factor in Reading Comprehension?

  • Rebecca A. DoreEmail author
  • Steven J. Amendum
  • Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
  • Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
Review Article

Abstract

Theory of mind is the understanding that other people have mental states that drive their actions and that those mental states can be different from one’s own. Without understanding theory of mind and being able to take others’ perspectives, it could be difficult for children to read and understand narrative texts. This paper posits that children’s understanding of others’ minds may be a potential missing piece in current accounts of reading comprehension. Indeed, the typical progression of children’s theory of mind abilities across childhood is closely aligned with the development of narrative processing skills. Furthermore, emerging evidence shows that both narrative processing and theory of mind are predictive of children’s reading comprehension, both concurrently and longitudinally. We present a possible explanation for why such a link exists and propose a causal framework of this relation in which increased ToM leads to increased understanding of and inferencing about characters’ mental states. Understanding characters’ mental states then leads to better reading comprehension. The framework makes novel, testable predictions and provides directions for future research.

Keywords

Reading comprehension Theory of mind Perspective taking Narratives 

Notes

Funding information

This research was supported by an Institute of Education Sciences training Grant No. R305B130012 supporting fellow RAD, awarded to the third author (with N. Jordan and H. May), and an Institute of Education Sciences Grant No. R305A150435 awarded to the third and fourth authors (with D. Dickinson).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adrian, J. E., Clemente, R. A., Villanueva, L., & Rieffe, C. (2005). Parent–child picture-book reading, mothers’ mental state language and children’s theory of mind. Journal of Child Language, 32(3), 673.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000905006963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research ((pp. 255–291). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Arvelo Alicea, Z. R., & Lysaker, J. T. (2017). Landscapes of consciousness: reading theory of mind in Dear Juno and Chato and the party animals. Children’s Literature in Education, 48(3), 262–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-016-9295-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, L., Slade, L., Powell, D., & Levy, J. P. (2017). Theory of mind in emerging reading comprehension: a longitudinal study of early indirect and direct effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 225–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banerjee, R., Watling, D., & Caputi, M. (2011). Peer relations and the understanding of faux pas: Longitudinal evidence for bidirectional associations. Child Development, 82(6), 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01669.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes, M. a., Raghubar, K. P., Faulkner, H., & Denton, C. a. (2013). The construction of visual–spatial situation models in children’s reading and their relation to reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 119, 101–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen year review. In G. L. Masters (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 23, pp. 169–184). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger’s syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boerma, I. E., Mol, S. E., & Jolles, J. (2017). The role of home literacy environment, mentalizing, expressive verbal ability, and print exposure in third and fourth graders’ reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 0(0), 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1277727.
  10. Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science (New York, N.Y.), 247(4938), 44–48.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2403694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruner, J. S. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54(1), 11–32.Google Scholar
  12. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caputi, M., Lecce, S., Pagnin, A., & Banerjee, R. (2011). Longitudinal effects of theory of mind on later peer relations: the role of prosocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 257–270.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cartwright, K. B. (2015). Social understanding: the importance of mind reading for reading comprehension. In Executive skills and reading comprehension: a guide for educators (pp. 201–228).Google Scholar
  15. Chen, R. S., & Vellutino, F. R. (1997). Prediction of reading ability: a cross-validation study of the simple view of reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 29(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2013). Silent films and strange stories: Theory of mind, gender, and social experiences in middle childhood. Child Development, 84(3), 989–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2016). Measuring theory of mind across middle childhood: reliability and validity of the silent films and strange stories tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 23–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Devine, R. T., White, N., Ensor, R., & Hughes, C. (2016). Theory of mind in middle childhood: longitudinal associations with executive function and social competence. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 758–771.  https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diergarten, A. K., & Nieding, G. (2013). Children’s and adults’ ability to build online emotional inferences during comprehension of audiovisual and auditory texts. Journal of Cognition and Development, (October), null-null.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2013.848871.
  20. Duke, N. K. (2005). Comprehension of what for what: comprehension as a nonunitary construct. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Dunn, J., & Cutting, A. L. (1999). Understanding others, and individual differences in friendship interactions in young children. Psychiatry Research.Google Scholar
  22. Fecica, A. M., & O’Neill, D. K. (2010). A step at a time: preliterate children’s simulation of narrative movement during story comprehension. Cognition, 116(3), 368–381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flavell, J. H. (1988). The development of children’s knowledge about the mind: from cognitive connections to mental representations. In Developing theories of mind (pp. 244–268).Google Scholar
  24. Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory-of-mind development: retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), 274–290.  https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2004.0018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flavell, J. H., Everett, B. a., Croft, K., & Flavell, E. R. (1981). Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence for the level 1-level 2 distinction. Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 99–103.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.17.1.99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Foorman, B. R., Koon, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). Examining general and specific factors in the dimensionality of oral language and reading in 4th–10th grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 884–899.  https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foorman, B., Beyler, N., Borradaile, K., Coyne, M., Denton, C. A., Dimino, J., … Wissel, S. (2017). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade: educator’s practice guide. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguide/21
  28. Frederiksen, C. H. (1975). Semantic structure from discourse H. Cognitive Psychology, 458.Google Scholar
  29. Frederiksen, C. (1979). Discourse comprehension and early reading. In L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (pp. 155–186). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Palfai, T. (1995). Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cognitive Development, 10(4), 483–527.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(95)90024-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as a structure building. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gernsbacher, M. A., Goldsmith, H. H., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1992). Do readers mentally represent characters’ emotional states? Cognition & Emotion, 6(2), 89–111.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(1), 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.  https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grissmer, D., Grimm, K. J., Aiyer, S. M., Murrah, W. M., & Steele, J. S. (2010). Fine motor skills and early comprehension of the world: two new school readiness indicators. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1008–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years q, 32, 282–313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004, 3.
  38. Happé, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hofmann, S. G., Doan, S. N., Sprung, M., Wilson, A., Ebesutani, C., Andrews, L. A., … Harris, P. L. (2016). Training children’s theory-of-mind: a meta-analysis of controlled studies. Cognition, 150, 200–212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.006.
  40. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 127–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hughes, C., & Devine, R. T. (2015). Individual differences in theory of mind from preschool to adolescence: achievements and directions. Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 149–153.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ivey, G., & Johnston, P. H. (2013). Engagement with young adult literature: outcomes and processes. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 255–275.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. W. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in \bung children. Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 70–78.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johnson, D. D., & Johnson, B. (1986). Highlighting vocabulary in inferential comprehension instruction. Journal of Reading, 29(7), 622–625.Google Scholar
  45. Kendeou, P., Bohn-gettler, C., White, M. J., & Van Den Broek, P. (2008). Children’s inference generation across media. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 259–272.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00370.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: the independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 765–778.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kennedy, K., Lagattuta, K. H., & Sayfan, L. (2015). Sibling composition, executive function, and children’s thinking about mental diversity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 121–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(October), 377–380.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kim, Y. (2015). Language and cognitive predictors of text comprehension: evidence from multivariate analysis. Child Development, 86(1), 128–144.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kim, Y.-S. G. (2016). Direct and mediated effects of language and cognitive skills on comprehension of oral narrative texts (listening comprehension) for children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 101–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kim, Y.-S. G. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 0(0), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643.Google Scholar
  52. Kim, Y. S., & Phillips, B. (2014). Cognitive correlates of listening comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(3), 269–281.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kim, Y., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2012). Developmental relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension: a longitudinal study from grade 1 to grade 2. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(1), 93–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.95.2.163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lecce, S., Caputi, M., & Hughes, C. (2011). Does sensitivity to criticism mediate the relationship between theory of mind and academic achievement? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(3), 313–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lecce, S., Bianco, F., Devine, R. T., Hughes, C., & Banerjee, R. (2014). Promoting theory of mind during middle childhood: a training program. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126C, 52–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lecce, S., Bianco, F., & Hughes, C. (2017). Reading minds and stories: theory of mind predicts reading in middle childhood.Google Scholar
  58. Lillard, A. S., & Kavanaugh, R. D. (2012). The contribution of symbolic skills to the development of an explicit theory of mind: scale models, language, and pretend play.Google Scholar
  59. Lindgren, K. A., Folstein, S. E., Tomblin, J. B., & Tager-flusberg, H. (2009). Language and reading abilities of children with autism spectrum disorders and specific language impairment and their first-degree relatives, (March), 22–38.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.63.
  60. Lysaker, J. T., & Arvelo Alicea, Z. (2017). Theorizing fiction reading engagement during wordless book reading. Linguistics and Education, 37, 42–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lysaker, J. T., & Miller, A. (2013). Engaging social imagination: the developmental work of wordless book reading. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 13(2), 147–174.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798411430425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lysaker, J. T., & Nie, A. Y. (2017). Social and relational aspects of comprehending in one fourth grader’s unaided and illustration-aided picturebook retellings. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(1), 38–67.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X16684583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lysaker, J. T., Tonge, C., Gauson, D., & Miller, A. (2011). Reading and social imagination: what relationally oriented reading instruction can do for children. Reading Psychology, 32, 520–566.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2010.507589.Google Scholar
  64. Lysaker, J. T., Shaw, K., & Alicia, Z. A. (2016). Emergent reading comprehension: social imagination and kindergarteners’ readings of a wordless picture book. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 2016(OCT), 245–256.Google Scholar
  65. Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mar, R. a., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., Peterson, J. B., Delapaz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mar, R. a., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407–428.  https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mar, R. A., Tackett, J. L., & Moore, C. (2010). Exposure to media and theory-of-mind development in preschoolers. Cognitive Development, 25(1), 69–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Masangkay, Z. S., Mccluskey, K. a., McIntyre, C. W., Sims-Knight, J., Vaughn, B. E., & Flavell, J. H. (1974). The early development of inferences about the visual percepts of others. Child Development, 45(2), 357–366.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.ep12154629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McAlister, A. R., & Peterson, C. C. (2012). Siblings, theory of mind, and executive functioning in children aged 3-6 years: new longitudinal evidence. Child Development, 0(0), n/a-n/a.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12043.
  71. Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Johnson, F., & Lidstone, J. (2006). Mind-mindedness in children: individual differences in internal-state talk in middle childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 181–196.  https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X80174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78(2), 622–646.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nation, K., Clarke, Æ. P., & Wright, Æ. B. (2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder, 911–919. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0130-1.
  74. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2015). The Nation’s Report Card. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  75. Neale, M. D. (1999) Neale analysis of reading ability: Manual. Retrieved May 28, 2018 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED431178
  76. Nicolopoulou, A., & Richner, E. S. (2007). From actors to agents to persons: the development of character representation in young children’s narratives. Child Development, 78(2), 412–429.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01006.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Nyhout, A. (2015). Imagining story spaces: young readers’ ability to construct spatial representations of narrative.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
  78. Nyhout, A., & O’Neill, D. K. (2013). Constructing spatial representations from narratives and non-narrative descriptions: evidence from 7-year-olds. OASIcs-OpenAccess Series in Informatics, 32, 158–165.Google Scholar
  79. O’Hare, A. E., Bremner, L., Nash, M., Happé, F. G. E., & Pettigrew, L. M. (2009). A clinical assessment tool for advanced theory of mind performance in 5 to 12 year olds. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(6), 916–928.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0699-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. O’Neill, D. K., & Shultis, R. M. (2007). The emergence of the ability to track a character’s mental perspective in narrative. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1032–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science (New York, N.Y.), 308(5719), 255–258.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from 2015. Retrieved May 28, 2018 from https://www.oecd.org/pisa
  83. Ornaghi, V., Brockmeier, J., & Grazzani, I. (2014). Enhancing social cognition by training children in emotion understanding: a primary school study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 119, 26–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: the role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension, 98(3), 554–566. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554.
  85. Ouellette, G., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: how oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 189–208.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46–e54.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pears, K. C., & Moses, L. J. (2003). Demographics, parenting, and theory of mind in preschool children. Social Development, 12(1), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: a blueprint of the reader. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167–208). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2013). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Perner, J., Ruffman, T., & Leekam, S. R. S. R. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: you catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65(4), 1228–1238.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00814.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pino, M. C., & Mazza, M. (2016). The use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PLoS One, 11(8), e0160254.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pons, F., Harris, P. L., & Rosnay, M. D. (2004). Emotion comprehension between 3 and 11 years: developmental periods and hierarchical organization. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1(2), 127–152.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620344000022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Towards an R&D program in reading comprehension. Retrieved May 28, 2018 from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/MR1465.pdf
  94. Rall, J., & Harris, P. L. (2000). In Cinderella’s slippers? Story comprehension from the protagonist’s point of view. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 202–208.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.36.2.202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Repacholi, B. M., & Gopnik, a. (1997). Early reasoning about desires: evidence from 14- and 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 12–21.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.1.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Richner, E. S., & Nicolopoulou, A. (2001). The narrative construction of differing conceptions of the person in the development of young children’s social understanding. Early Education and Development, 12(3), 37–41.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ricketts, J., Jones, C. R. G., Charman, T., & Happe, F. (2013). Reading comprehension in autism spectrum disorders: the role of oral language and social functioning, 807–816.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1619-4.
  98. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: the transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois: University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Naito, M., Parkin, L., & Clements, W. A. (1998). Older (but not younger) siblings facilitate false belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 34(1), 161–174.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.1.161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Ruffman, T., Slade, L., & Crowe, E. (2013). The relation between children’s and mothers’ mental state language and theory-of-mind understanding. Child Development, 73(3), 734–751.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Scarborough, H. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: evidence, theory and practice. In S. Neumann. & D. Dickinson (Ed.), Handbook of early literacy research. (pp. 97–110). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  102. Shatz, M., Diesendruck, G., Martinez-Beck, I., & Akar, D. (2003). The influence of language and socioeconomic status on children’s understanding of false belief. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 717–729.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. The campaign for grade-level reading. (2017). Retrieved March 20, 2017, from http://gradelevelreading.net/
  105. Trabasso, T. (1981). On the making of inferences during reading and their assessment. Comprehension in Teaching: Research Reviews. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED181429
  106. Watson, A. C., Painter, K. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2001). Longitudinal relations between 2-year-olds’ language and 4-year-olds’ theory of mind. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2(4), 449–457.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0204_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wellman, H. M. (2014). Making minds: how theory of mind develops. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523–541.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Weekers, A., Groenen, I., Kleintjes, F., & Feenstra, H. (2011). Wetenschappelijke verantwoording papieren toetsen begrijpend lezen voor groep 7 en 8 [Scientific background of paper-based reading comprehension tests for Grade 5 and 6]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito. Retrieved from http://toetswijzer.kennisnet.nl/html/tg/21.pdf
  110. White, S., Hill, E., Happé, F. G. E., & Frith, U. (2009). Revisiting the strange stories: revealing mentalizing impairments in autism. Child Development, 80(4), 1097–1117.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01319.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Ziegler, F. V., Mitchell, P., & Currie, G. (2005). How does narrative cue children’s perspective taking? Developmental Psychology, 41(1), 115–123.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.1.115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Zwaan, R. a., & Radvansky, G. a. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Temple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations