Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 801–826 | Cite as

The Role of Executive Functions in Reading Comprehension

  • Reese Butterfuss
  • Panayiota Kendeou
Review Article

Abstract

Our goal in this paper is to understand the extent to which, and under what conditions, executive functions (EFs) play a role in reading comprehension processes. We begin with a brief review of core components of EF (inhibition, shifting, and updating) and reading comprehension. We then discuss the status of EFs in process models of reading comprehension. Next, we review and synthesize empirical evidence in the extant literature for the involvement of core components of EF in reading comprehension processes under different reading conditions and across different populations. In conclusion, we propose that EFs may help explain complex interactions between the reader, the text, and the discourse situation, and call for both existing and future models of reading comprehension to include EFs as explicit components.

Keywords

Executive functions Reading comprehension Discourse processes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Writing of this paper was supported by grant R324A160064 from the US Department of Education to the University of Minnesota. The opinions are those of the authors and do not represent the policies of the US Department of Education.

References

*Indicates an article that was derived from our systematic literature database searches.

  1. *Aboud, K., Bailey, S., Petrill, S., & Cutting, L. E. (2016). Comprehending text versus reading words in young readers with varying reading ability: distinct patterns of functional connectivity from common processing hubs. Developmental Science, 632–656.  https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12422.
  2. Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1061.Google Scholar
  3. *Altemeier, L. E., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2008). Executive functions for reading and writing in typical literacy development and dyslexia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 588–606.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390701562818.
  4. August, D., Francis, D. J., Hsu, H. A., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Assessing reading comprehension in bilinguals. The Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 221–238.  https://doi.org/10.1086/510656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49, 5–28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713755608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Random generation and the executive control of working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51(A), 819–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barnes, M.A. (2015). What do models of reading comprehension and its development have to contribute to a science of comprehension practice and assessment for adolescent students? In K. Santi and D. Reed (Eds.), Improving comprehension for middle and high school students (pp. 1–18). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Jones, L. L. (2009). Executive functions after age 5: changes and correlates. Developmental Review, 29, 180–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in children’s gender stereotyping: Theoretical and educational implications of a cognitive-based intervention. Child Development, 63, 1351–1363.Google Scholar
  14. Blair, C., Zelazo, P. D., & Greenberg, M. T. (2005). The measurement of executive function in early childhood. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 561–571.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2802_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bohn-Gettler, C., Rapp, D., van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & White, M. (2011). Adult’s and children’s monitoring of story events in the service of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 39, 992–1011.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0085-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. *Borella, E., Carretti, B., & Pelegrina, S. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 541–552.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410371676.
  17. Budd, D., Whitney, P., & Turley, K. J. (1995). Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23, 735–748.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burgess, P. W., & Shallice, T. (1996). Bizarre responses, rule detection and frontal lobe lesions. Cortex, 32(2), 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2016). The role of executive function in knowledge revision. Paper presented at the Society of Text and Discourse Annual Conference, Kassel, Germany.Google Scholar
  20. Cain, K. (2006). Individual differences in children’s memory and reading comprehension: an investigation of semantic and inhibitory deficits. Memory, 14(5), 553–569.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210600624481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–43.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children’s theory of mind. Child Development, 72, 1032–1053.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. *Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Palladino, P. (2004). What happens to information to be suppressed in working‐memory tasks? Short and long term effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(6), 1059–1084.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000684.
  24. *Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Romanò, M. (2005). Updating in working memory: a comparison of good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 45–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.005.
  25. Carretti, B., Borella, E., & Beni, D. (2007). Does a strategic memory training improve the working memory performance of younger and older adults? Experimental Psychology, 54, 311–320.Google Scholar
  26. *Carretti, B., Borella, E., Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. (2009). Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties: a meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 246–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.002.
  27. *Cartoceti, R., Sampedro, B., Abusamra, V., & Ferreres, A. (2009). Evaluacion de la iniciación y supresión de respuesta verbal en niños. Revista Fonoaudiologica, 52(2), 9–24.Google Scholar
  28. Cartwright, K. B. (2002). Cognitive development and reading: The relation of reading-specific multiple classification skill to reading comprehension in elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 56–63.Google Scholar
  29. *Cartwright, K. B. (2006). Fostering flexibility and comprehension in elementary students. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 628–634.  https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.59.7.2.
  30. *Cartwright, K. B. (2007). The contribution of graphophonological-semantic flexibility to reading comprehension in college students: implications for a less simple view of reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 39, 173–193.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960701331902.
  31. *Cartwright, K. B. (2008). Cognitive flexibility and reading comprehension. In C.C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 50–64). New York: Guilford. Google Scholar
  32. *Cartwright, K. B. (2015). Executive function and reading comprehension: the critical role of cognitive flexibility. In S. R. Parris & K. Headley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (3rd ed., pp. 56–71). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  33. *Cartwright, K., Hodgekiss, M. D., & Isaac, M. C. (2008). Graphophonological-semantic flexibility: contributions to skilled reading across the lifespan. In K. B. Cartwright (Ed.), Literacy processes: Cognitive flexibility in learning and teaching. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  34. *Cartwright, K. B., Marshall, T. R., Dandy, K. L., & Isaac, M. C. (2010). The development of graphophonological-semantic cognitive flexibility and its contribution to reading comprehension in beginning readers. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(1), 61–85.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15248370903453584.
  35. *Chiappe, P., Siegel, L. S., & Hasher, L. (2000). Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 8–17.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211570.
  36. *Christopher, M. E., Miyake, A., Keenan, J. M., Pennington, B., DeFries, J. C., Wadsworth, S. J., ... & Olson, R. K. (2012). Predicting word reading and comprehension with executive function and speed measures across development: a latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 470–488.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027375.
  37. Cohen, J. D., Perlstein, W. M., Braver, T. S., Nystrom, L. E., Noll, D. C., Jonides, J., & Smith, E. E. (1997). Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task. Nature, 386(6625), 604–608.  https://doi.org/10.1038/386604a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Connelly, S. L., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Age and reading: the impact of distraction. Psychology and Aging, 6, 533–541.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.6.4.533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. *Conners, F. A. (2009). Attentional control and the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 591–613.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9126-x.
  40. *Cutting, L. E., Materek, A., Cole, C. A., Levine, T. M., & Mahone, E. M. (2009). Effects of fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 34–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0022-0.
  41. *Cutting, L.E., Bailey, S.K., Barquero, L.A., & Aboud, K. (2015). Neurobiological bases of word recognition and reading comprehension. In C.M. Connor & P. McCardle (Eds.), Advances in reading intervention: Research to practice to research (pp. 73–84). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. *Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6.
  43. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(4), 561–584.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.561.Google Scholar
  44. Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422–433.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: the PASS theory of intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  46. Davelaar, E. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ashkenazi, A., Haarmann, H. J., & Usher, M. (2005). The demise of short-term memory revisited: empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. Psychological Review, 112, 3–42.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2037–2078.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. *De Beni, R., & Palladino, P. (2000). Intrusion errors in working memory tasks: are they related to reading comprehension ability? Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 131–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(01)00033-4.
  49. *Demagistri, M. S., Richards, M. M., & Juric, L. C. (2014). Incidencia del funcionamiento ejecutivo en el rendimiento en comprensión lectora en behaviorits. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 12(33), 1–27.Google Scholar
  50. Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid ‘automatized’ naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14(4), 471–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0.
  51. Denckla, M. B. (1996). A theory and model of executive function: a neuropsychological perspective. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 263–278). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  52. *Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader–text interactions: how differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 515–528.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027182.
  53. Fisk, J. E., & Sharp, C. A. (2004). Age-related impairment in executive functioning: updating, inhibition, shifting, and access. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26(7), 874–890.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490510680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101–135.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. *Fuhs, M. W., Nesbitt, K. T., Farran, D. C., & Dong, N. (2014). Longitudinal associations between executive functioning and academic skills across content areas. Developmental psychology. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036633.
  56. *García-Madruga, J. A., Vila, J. O., Gómez-Veiga, I., Duque, G., & Elosúa, M. R. (2014). Executive processes, reading comprehension and academic achievement in 3th grade primary students. Learning and individual differences, 35, 41–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.07.013.
  57. Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: a review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 31–60.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. *Georgiou, G. K., & Das, J. P. (2016). What component of executive functions contributes to normal and impaired reading comprehension in young adults? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 49, 118–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.12.001.
  59. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1991). Cognitive processes and mechanisms in language comprehension: the structure building framework. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 217–263). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  60. *Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: a component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245–262.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.245.
  61. *Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430–445.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.430.
  62. Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 2–7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 53, 129–153.Google Scholar
  63. Goldman, S. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2015). Research on learning and instruction: implications for curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 33–41.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215601866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Gordon, M. (1983). The Gordon diagnostic system. DeWitt: Gordon Systems.Google Scholar
  65. Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: theories, interventions, and technologies. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  66. Graesser, A. C. (2015). Deeper learning with advances in discourse science and technology. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 42–50.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. A. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 404–411.Google Scholar
  69. *Guajardo, N. R., & Cartwright, K. B. (2016). The contribution of theory of mind, counterfactual reasoning, and executive function to pre-readers’ language comprehension and later reading awareness and comprehension in elementary school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 144, 27–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.004.
  70. Hallet, P. E. (1978). Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research, 18(10), 1279–1296.Google Scholar
  71. Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 103–128.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance. Attention and performance XVII: cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653–675). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  73. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Huizinga, M., Dolan, C. V., & van der Molen, M. W. (2006). Age-related change in executive function: developmental trends and a latent variable analysis. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2017–2036.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Injoque-Ricle, I., Calero, A. D., Alloway, T. P., & Burín, D. I. (2011). Assesing working memory in Spanish-speaking children: automated working memory assessment battery adaptation. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 78–84.  https://doi.org/10.5872/psiencia/7.3.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Jonides, J., & Nee, D. E. (2006). Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory. Neuroscience, 139(1), 181–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R., Miura, T. K., & Colflesh, G. J. (2007). Working memory, attention control, and the Nback task: a question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 615–622  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.615.
  79. Kane, M. J., Meier, M. E., Smeekens, B. A., Gross, G. M., Chun, C. A., Silvia, P. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (2016). Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 1017–1048.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E. J. (2017). Theories of text processing: a view from the top-down. In M. Schober, D. N. Rapp, & M. A. Britt (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2005). The effects of readers’ misconceptions on comprehension of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 235–245.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Kendeou, P., *Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J. (2013). Updating during reading comprehension: why causality matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 39, 854–865.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029468.
  83. Kendeou, P., Walsh, E., Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51, 374–397.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.913961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Kendeou, P., Papadopoulos, T. C., & Spanoudis, G. (2015). Reading comprehension and PASS theory. In T. C. Papadopoulos, R. Parrila, & J. R. Kirby (Eds.), Cognition, intelligence, and achievement (pp. 117–136).Google Scholar
  85. Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., & Christ, T. J. (2016). Reading comprehension: core components and processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 62–69.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. *Kieffer, M. J., Vukovic, R. K., & Berry, D. (2013). Roles of attention shifting and inhibitory control in fourth-grade reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 333–348.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.54.
  87. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kintsch, W. (1998) Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Kongs, S. K., Thompson, L. L., Iverson, G. L., & Heaton, R. K. (2000). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 card version: professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  91. Korkman, M., Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. (2007). NEPSY II. Clinical and interpretative manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
  92. Larson, G. E., Merritt, C. R., & Williams, S. E. (1988). Information processing and intelligence: some implications of task complexity. Intelligence, 12(2), 131–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(88)90012-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Lehto, J. E., Juujärvi, P., Kooistra, L., & Pulkkinen, L. (2003). Dimensions of executive functioning: evidence from children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 59–80.  https://doi.org/10.1348/026151003321164627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. *Locascio, G., Mahone, E. M., Eason, S., & Cutting, L. (2010). Executive dysfunction among children with reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 441–454.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355476.
  95. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a user’s guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189–239). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  96. MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (fourth ed.). Itasica: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
  97. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114(2), 159–188.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.114.2.159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. McLean, J. F., & Hitch, G. J. (1999). Working memory impairments in children with specific arithmetic learning difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74(3), 240–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 297–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. McNamara, D. S., Jacovina, M. E., & Allen, L. K. (2015). Higher order thinking in comprehension. In P. Afflerbach (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading: text and context (pp. 164–176). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  101. McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 196–204  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014104.
  102. McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 302–320.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.  https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind: tutorial essays in cognition (pp. 93–148). Hove: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  106. Morris, N., & Jones, D. M. (1990). Memory updating in working memory: the role of the central executive. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 111–121.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02349.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. *Muijselaar, M. M., & de Jong, P. F. (2015). The effects of updating ability and knowledge of reading strategies on reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 111–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.011.
  108. Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Nation, K., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C. A., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 139–158.Google Scholar
  110. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 220–246.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  113. *Nouwens, S., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). How storage and executive functions contribute to children’s reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 96–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.008.
  114. *O’Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E., Hakala, C. M., & Rizzella, M. L. (1995). Activation and suppression of antecedents during reinstatement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 626–634.Google Scholar
  115. *Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29, 344–354.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194929.
  116. *Pelegrina, S., Capodieci, A., Carretti, B., & Cornoldi, C. (2014). Magnitude representation and working memory updating in children with arithmetic and reading comprehension disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 658–668.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414527480.
  117. Pennington, B. F. (1997). Dimensions of executive functions in normal and abnormal development. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Development of the prefrontal cortex: evolution, neurobiology, and behavior (pp. 265–281). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  118. Pickering, S. J., & Gathercole, S. E. (2001). The Working Memory Test Battery for Children. London: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  119. *Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2010). Suppressing irrelevant information from working memory: evidence for domain-specific deficits in poor comprehenders. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(4), 380–391.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.005.
  120. *Potocki, A., Sanchez, M., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2017). Linguistic and cognitive profiles of 8-to 15-year-old children with specific reading comprehension difficulties: the role of executive functions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 128–142.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415613080.
  121. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: the nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  122. *Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2001). Working memory and situation model updating. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1073–1080.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206375.
  123. Rapp, D. N. (2016). The consequences of reading inaccurate information. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 281–285.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416649347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Redick, T. S., & Lindsey, D. R. (2013). Complex span and n-back measures of working memory: a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(6), 1102–1113.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0453-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1993). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation (2nd ed.). Tucson: Neuropsychology Press.Google Scholar
  126. Roberts, R. J., Hager, L. D., & Heron, C. (1994). Prefrontal cognitive processes: working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 374–393.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.123.4.374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207–231.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. *Savage, R., Cornish, K., Manly, T., & Hollis, C. (2006). Cognitive processes in children’s reading and attention: the role of working memory, divided attention, and response inhibition. British Journal of Psychology, 97(3), 365–385.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000712605X81370.
  129. Schmiedek, F., Hildebrandt, A., Lövdén, M., Wilhelm, O., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: the gap is not that deep. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(4), 1089–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015730.Google Scholar
  130. *Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E. (2009). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15(3), 232–246.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040802220029.
  131. Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. The American Journal of Psychology, 669–679.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1421465.
  132. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. *Swanson, H. L. (1999). Reading comprehension and working memory in learning-disabled readers: is the phonological loop more important than the executive system? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 1–31.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2477.
  134. Swanson, H. L., Howard, C. B., & Saez, L. (2006). Do different components of working memory underlie different subgroups of reading disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(3), 252–269.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390030501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Trabasso, T., Van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. Y. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12(1), 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538909544717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  138. *Van der Sluis, S., de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2004). Inhibition and shifting in children with learning deficits in arithmetic and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(3), 239–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2003.12.002.
  139. *van der Sluis, S., de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2007). Executive functioning in children, and its relations with reasoning, reading, and arithmetic. Intelligence, 35(5), 427–449.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.001.
  140. *Waters, G. S. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49(1), 51–79.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713755607.
  141. Wiebe, S. A., Espy, K. A., & Charak, D. (2008). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: I. Latent structure. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 575–587.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (2001). Gray oral reading tests—Fourth Edition. Austin: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  143. Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery tests—revised/normative update. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  144. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (1999). Woodcock–Johnson III tests of achievement (Research ed.). Itasca: Riverside.Google Scholar
  145. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca: Riverside.Google Scholar
  146. *Yeniad, N., Malda, M., Mesman, J., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Pieper, S. (2013). Shifting ability predicts math and reading performance in children: a meta-analytical study. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.004.
  147. Yin, S., & Peng, H. (2016). The role of inhibition in age-related off-topic verbosity: not access but deletion and restraint functions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00544.
  148. Yntema, D. B. (1963). Keeping track of several things at once. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 5(1), 7–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001872086300500102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Zelazo, P. D., & Frye, D. (1998). Cognitive complexity and control: II. The development of executive function in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(4), 121–126.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10774761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Zelazo, P. D., Blair, C. B., & Willoughby, M. T. (2016). Executive function: implications for education (NCER 2017–2000) Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  151. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: an event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations