Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 585–597 | Cite as

What College Instructors Can Do About Student Cyber-slacking

  • Abraham E. Flanigan
  • Kenneth A. Kiewra
Reflection on the Field

Abstract

Today’s traditional-aged college students are avid users of mobile technology. Commonly referred to as the Net Generation, today’s college students spend several hours each day using their smart phones, iPads, and laptops. Although some scholars initially opined that the Net Generation would grow into technologically savvy digital natives who would leverage their unprecedented access to technology for professional and academic betterment, contemporary research has rejected the digital native myth. Instead, college students frequently use mobile technology for off-task purposes while attending classroom lectures or doing schoolwork outside of class—a phenomenon known as cyber-slacking. This article provides college educators with an overview of the frequency and consequences of cyber-slacking inside and outside the classroom and seven instructional implications for curbing cyber-slacking. Proposed strategies for curbing cyber-slacking include rejecting the digital native myth, adopting and enforcing technology policies, consciousness raising, motivating students to relinquish their devices, incorporating active learning in the classroom, using mobile technology as a teaching tool, teaching students to be self-regulated learners, and motivating students to delay gratification from their mobile devices.

Keywords

College students Cyber-slacking Technology Pedagogy Self-regulation 

References

  1. Aagaard, J. (2015). Drawn to distraction: A qualitative study of off-task use of educational technology. Computers & Education, 87, 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilar-Roca, N. M., Williams, A. E., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2012). The impact of laptop-free zones on student performance and attitudes in large lectures. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1300–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldridge, M., & DeLucia, R. (1989). Boredom: The academic plague of first year students. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 1(2), 43–56.Google Scholar
  4. Atchley, P., Atwood, S., & Boulton, A. (2011). The choice to text and drive in younger drivers: Behavior may shape attitude. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(1), 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, W. M., Lusk, E. J., & Neuhauser, K. L. (2012). On the use of cell phones and other electronic devices in the classroom: Evidence from a survey of faculty and students. Journal of Education for Business, 87(5), 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellur, S., Nowak, K. L., & Hull, K. S. (2015). Make it our time: In class multitaskers have lower academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bembenutty, H. (2011). Academic delay of gratification and academic achievement. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(126), 55–65. doi: 10.1002/d.444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bembenutty, H. (2008). Academic delay of gratification and expectancy-value. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bembenutty, H. (2009). Academic delay of gratification, self-regulation of learning, gender differences, and expectancy-value. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bembenutty, H. (1999). Sustaining motivation and academic goals: The role of academic delay of gratification. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(3), 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (1998). Academic delay of gratification. Learning and Individual Differences, 10(4), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berry, M. J., & Westfall, A. (2015). Dial D for distraction: The making and breaking of cell phone policies in the college classroom. College Teaching, 63(2), 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bjornsen, C. A., & Archer, K. J. (2015). Relations between college students’ cell phone use during class and grades. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(4), 326–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boice, B. (1996). Classroom incivilities. Research in Higher Education, 37(4), 453–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bowman, L. L., Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., & Gendron, M. (2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging. Computers & Education, 54, 927–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Calderwood, C., Ackerman, P. L., & Conklin, E. M. (2014). What else do college students “do” while studying? An investigation of multitasking. Computers & Education, 75, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Calderwood, C., Green, J. D., Joy-Gaba, J. A., & Moloney, J. M. (2016). Forecasting errors in student media multitasking during homework completion. Computers & Education, 94, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A. (2013). An introduction to multitasking and texting prevalence and impact on grades and GPA in marketing classes. Journal of Marketing Education, 35(1), 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, M. (2012). The importance of self-regulation for college student learning. College Student Journal, 46(4), 892–902.Google Scholar
  20. Dietz, S., & Henrich, C. (2014). Texting as a distraction to learning in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dreikurs, R., Grunwald, B. B., & Pepper, F. C. (1971). Maintaining sanity in the classroom: Illustrated teaching techniques. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  23. Duncan, D. K., Hoekstra, A. R., & Wilcox, B. R. (2012). Digital devices, distraction, and student performance: Does in-class cell phone use reduce learning? Astronomy Education Review, 11(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
  24. Emanuel, R. C. (2013). The American college student cell phone survey. College Student Journal, 47(1), 75–81.Google Scholar
  25. Finn, A. N., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2013). Teacher power mediates the effects of technology policies on teacher credibility. Communication Education, 62(1), 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flanigan, A. E., & Babchuk, W. A. (2016). Cyber-slacking in the classroom: Comparing student and instructor experiences in the digital age. Paper presented at the 35th National Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult and Higher Education, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  27. Flanigan, A. E., & Babchuk, W. A. (2015). Social media as academic quicksand: A phenomenological study of student experiences in and out of the classroom. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. In B. Alberts (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (pp. 8410–8415). San Francisco: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  29. Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3), 906–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gerow, J. E., Galluch, P. S., & Thatcher, J. B. (2010). To slack or not to slack: Internet usage in the classroom. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(3), 5–23.Google Scholar
  31. Goetz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2014). Academic boredom. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 311–330). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Griffiths, M. D. (2000). Does internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3(2), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Griffiths, M. D. (2012). Facebook addiction: concerns, criticism, and recommendations—a response to Andreassen and colleagues. Psychological Reports, 110(2), 518–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hammer, R., Ronen, M., Sharon, A., Lankry, T., Huberman, Y., & Zamtsov, V. (2010). Mobile culture in college lectures: Instructors’ and students’ perspectives. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 6, 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harrison, M. A., & Gilmore, A. L. (2012). U txt WHEN? College students’ social contexts of text messaging. The Social Science Journal, 49(4), 513–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hill, L., Rybar, J., Styer, T., Fram, E., Merchant, G., & Eastman, A. (2015). Prevalence of and attitudes about distracted driving in college students. Traffic Injury Prevention, 16(4), 362–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  38. Imazeki, J. (2014). Bring-your-own-device: Turning cell phones into forces for good. The Journal of Economic Education, 45(3), 240–250.Google Scholar
  39. Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(5), 275–280. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson, Z. D., Claus, C. J., Goldman, Z. W., & Sollitto, M. (2017). College student misbehaviors: An exploration of instructor perceptions. Communication Education, 66(1), 54–69.Google Scholar
  41. Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education, 59, 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Katz, L., & Lambert, W. (2016). A happy and engaged class without cell phones? It’s easier than you think. Teaching of Psychology, 43(4), 340–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kornhauser, Z. G. C., Paul, A. L., & Siedlecki, K. L. (2016). An examination of students’ use of technology for non-academic purposes in the college classroom. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 5(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kraushaar, J. M., & Novak, D. C. (2010). Examining the affects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 241–251.Google Scholar
  46. Kuznekoff, J. H., Munz, S., & Titsworth, S. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: Examining the effects of texting, twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education, 64(3), 344–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kuznekoff, J. H., & Titsworth, S. (2013). The impact of mobile phone usage on student learning. Communication Education, 62(3), 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Langmia, K., & Glass, A. (2014). Coping with smart phone ‘distractions’ in a college classroom. Teaching Journalism & Mass Communication, 4(1), 13–23.Google Scholar
  49. Lawson, D., & Henderson, B. B. (2015). The costs of texting in the classroom. College Teaching, 63, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2015). The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of US college students. SAGE Open, 5(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mann, S., & Robinson, A. (2009). Boredom in the lecture theatre: An investigation into the contributors, moderators and outcomes of boredom amongst university students. British Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McCoy, B. R. (2013). Digital distractions in the classroom: Student classroom use of digital devices for non-class related purposes. Journal of Media Education, 4(4), 5–14.Google Scholar
  54. McCoy, B. R. (2016). Digital distractions in the classroom phase II: Student classroom use of digital devices for non-class related purposes. Journal of Media Education, 7(1), 5–32.Google Scholar
  55. McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., & Lin, Y. G. (1985). Teaching learning strategies. Educational Psychologist, 20(3), 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131.Google Scholar
  57. Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning. Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc..Google Scholar
  58. Mokharti, K., Delello, J., & Reichard, C. (2015). Connected yet distracted: Multitaskingamong college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 45(2), 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2011). Coping with boredom in school: An experience sampling perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pettijohn, T. F., Frazier, E., Rieser, E., Vaughn, N., & Hupp-Wildsde, B. (2015). Classroom texting in college students. College Student Journal, 49(4), 513–516.Google Scholar
  61. Pielot, M., Dingler, T., Pedro, J. S., & Oliver, N. (2015). When attention is not scarce-detecting boredom from mobile phone usage. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 825–836). ACM.Google Scholar
  62. Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ragan, E. D., Jennings, S. R., Massey, J. D., & Doolittle, P. E. (2014). Unregulated use of laptops in large lecture classes. Computers & Education, 78, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ravizza, S. M., Hambrick, D. Z., & Fenn, K. M. (2014). Non-academic internet use in the classroom is negatively related to classroom learning regardless of intellectual ability. Computers & Education, 78, 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roberts, J., Yaya, L., & Manolis, C. (2014). The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(4), 254–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schlehofer, M. M., Thompson, S. C., Ting, S., Ostermann, S., Nierman, A., & Skenderian, J. (2010). Psychological predictors of college students’ cell phone use while driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(4), 1107–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  70. Shon, H., & Smith, L. (2011). A review of poll everywhere audience response system. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 29(3), 236–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stebbins, R. (1971). The meaning of disorderly behavior: Teacher definitions of a classroom situation. Sociology of Education, 44, 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Switzer, J. S., & Switzer, R. V. (2013). The myth of the tech-savvy student: The role of mediaeducators in a web 2.0 world. Journal of Media Education, 4(4), 15–27.Google Scholar
  73. Svinicki, M. D., & McKeachie, W. J. (2014). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (14th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  74. Taneja, A., Fiore, V., & Fischer, B. (2015). Cyber-slacking in the classroom: Potential for digital distraction in the new age. Computers & Education, 82, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  76. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  77. Tessier, J. (2013). Student impressions of academic cell phone use in the classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(1), 25–29.Google Scholar
  78. Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tindell, D. R., & Bohlander, R. W. (2012). The use and abuse of cell phones and text messaging in the classroom: A survey of college students. College Teaching, 60(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vitak, J., Crouse, J., & LaRose, R. (2011). Personal Internet use at work: Understanding cyberslacking. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1751–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wei, F. Y., Wang, Y. K., & Klausner, M. (2012). Rethinking college students’ self-regulation and sustained attention: Does text messaging during class influence cognitive learning? Communication Education, 61(3), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wentworth, D. K., & Middleton, J. H. (2014). Technology use and academic performance. Computers & Education, 78, 306–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wolters, C. A., & Hoops, L. D. (2015). Self-regulated learning interventions for motivationally disengaged college students. In T. Cleary (Ed.), Self-regulated learning interventions with at-risk youth: Enhancing adaptability, performance, and well-being (pp. 67–88). Washingon DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Xu, J. (2015). Investigating factors that influence conventional distraction and tech-related distraction in math homework. Computers & Education, 81, 304–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations