Skip to main content
Log in

Metacognitive Theories Revisited

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 01 December 1995

Abstract

“Metacognitive theories,” an article Gregg Schraw and I published in Educational Psychology Review in 1995, has been cited in over a thousand scholarly publications. In this follow-up, dedicated to Gregg and written after his recent death, I provide a brief overview of our 1995 article and then reflect on it in four ways. First, I consider the development of the concept of metacognition prior to 1995, including its emergence and use in previous writings by each co-author. Then, I turn to the collaboration itself, including the interplay of complementary conceptions and the construction of new ideas. Third, I consider the article’s citation history and the role it has played in the subsequent literature. Finally, I discuss research on metacognition since 1995, including subsequent work on epistemic cognition by each of the co-authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brownlee, J., Schraw, G., & Berthelsen, D. (Eds.). (2011). Personal epistemology and teacher education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, J. L., Schraw, G., Walker, S., & Ryan, M. (2016). Changes in preservice teachers’ personal epistemologies. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 300–317). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Norby, M. M. (2011). Cognitive psychology and instruction (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. L., & Bickhard, M. H. (1986). Knowing levels and developmental stages. Basel: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Inhelder, B. (1974–1975). If you want to get ahead, get a theory. Cognition, 3, 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrudden, M. (2016). Remembering Gregg Schraw. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. A. (2012). Theory of mind: beyond the preschool years. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshman, D. (1979). To really get ahead, get a metatheory. In D. Kuhn (Ed.), Intellectual development beyond childhood (pp. 59–68). New Directions for Child Development, No. 5. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Moshman, D. (1990). The development of metalogical understanding. In W. F. Overton (Ed.), Reasoning, necessity, and logic: developmental perspectives (pp. 205–225). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshman, D. (1994a). Reasoning, metareasoning, and the promotion of rationality. In A. Demetriou & A. Efklides (Eds.), Intelligence, mind, and reasoning: structure and development (pp. 135–150). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moshman, D. (1994b). Reason, reasons, and reasoning: a constructivist account of human rationality. Theory & Psychology, 4, 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moshman, D. (1995). Reasoning as self-constrained thinking. Human Development, 38, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moshman, D. (2011). Adolescent rationality and development: cognition, morality, and identity (3rd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshman, D. (2015). Epistemic cognition and development: the psychology of justification and truth. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshman, D., & Franks, B. A. (1986). Development of the concept of inferential validity. Child Development, 57, 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moshman, D., & Tarricone, P. (2016). Logical and causal reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 54–67). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olafson, L., & Schraw, G. (2010). Beyond epistemology: assessing teachers’ epistemological and ontological worldviews. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 516–661). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. (1994). The effect of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. (2009a). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. (2009b). Measuring metacognitive judgments. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 415–429). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Impara, J. C. (Eds.). (2000). Issues in the measurement of metacognition. Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Nietfeld, J. (1998). A further test of the general monitoring hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 236–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., Bendixen, L. D., & Roedel, T. D. (1995). Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261–275). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Kuch, F., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2013). Measure for measure: calibrating ten commonly used calibration scores. Learning and Instruction, 24, 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarricone, P. (2011). The taxonomy of metacognition. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Lisa Bendixen, Jo Lunn, Matt McCrudden, John Nietfeld, Markeya Peteranetz, Rayne Sperling, and Pina Tarricone for feedback on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Moshman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moshman, D. Metacognitive Theories Revisited. Educ Psychol Rev 30, 599–606 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9413-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9413-7

Keywords

Navigation