Skip to main content

Individual and Institutional Productivity in Educational Psychology Journals from 2009 to 2014

An Erratum to this article was published on 28 December 2016


This article examines the productivity of both individuals and institutions, indexed through an examination of five educational psychology journals (Cognition and Instruction, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Educational Psychologist, Educational Psychology Review, and Journal of Educational Psychology) from 2009 to 2014. These results are discussed relative to four previous studies (Hsieh et al. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 333–343, 2004; Jones et al. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 11–16, 2010; Smith et al. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 173–181, 1998; Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 422–430, 2003). Vanderbilt University and Fred Paas replaced the University of Maryland and Richard E. Mayer as the top research institution and author, respectively. Sixteen of the top 19 researchers’ institutions were outside the USA, compared to only 10 of the top 32 during 2003–2008 and three of the top 20 during 1991–1996. Educational psychology research continues the trend of becoming more international.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  • Bishop, D. (2015). Editors behaving badly? Retrieved 21 Jul 2015 from

  • Davis, K. S., Zanger, D., Gerrard-Morris, A., Roberts, G., & Robinson, D. H. (2005). Productivity and collaboration of authors in school psychology journals, 1991–2003. The School Psychologist, 59(4), 129–133.

  • de la Cruz, B., Cannella-Malone, H. J., Edrisinha, C., Sigafoos, J., Robinson, D., & Son, S.-H. (2006). Author productivity and publication trends in autism-specific journals from 1997 to 2004. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21(4), 245–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, G. S., Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (1987). Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 42, 975–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, P., Acee, T., Chung, W., Hsieh, Y., Kim, H., Thomas, G. D., You, J., & Robinson, D. H. (2004). An alternate look at educational psychologist’s productivity from 1991 to 2002. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 333–343.

  • Jones, S., Fong, C., Torres, L., Yoo, J., Decker, M., & Robinson, D. H. (2010). Productivity in educational psychology journals from 2003–2008. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahlke, E., Lamb, L. M., Wilson, A., Cooper, C. E., Green, V. A., & Robinson, D. H. (2006). An examination of developmental psychologists’ productivity from 1995–2004. E-News, 24, 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. C., Locke, S. G., Boisse, S. J., Gallagher, P. A., Krengel, L. E., Kuczek, J. E., et al. (1998). Productivity of educational psychologists in educational psychology journals, 1991–1996. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 173–181.

  • Smith, M. C., Plant, M., Carney, R. N., Arnold, C. S., Jackson, A., Johnson, L. S., et al. (2003). Further productivity of educational psychologists in educational psychology journals, 1997–2001. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 422–430.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel H. Robinson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Greenbaum, H., Meyer, L., Smith, M.C. et al. Individual and Institutional Productivity in Educational Psychology Journals from 2009 to 2014. Educ Psychol Rev 28, 215–223 (2016).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: