Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 141–151

Flipped Classrooms: a Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice

Review Article

Abstract

Flipped classrooms refer to the practice of assigning lectures outside of class and devoting class time to a variety of learning activities. In this review, we discuss the range of approaches to the flipped classroom and focus on activities frequently used in these settings. Amongst these, we examine both out-of-class activities (e.g., video lectures) and in-class activities (e.g., quizzes, student discussions). We argue that the value of these activities reflects the particular cognitive processes engaged by the activity regardless of whether the setting is the traditional (lecture-based) classroom or the flipped classroom. Future work should continue to examine the influence of individual activities on student learning and behaviors, particularly when objective measures of learning, such as quizzes and exams, are held constant.

Keywords

Flipped classroom Active learning Instruction Review 

References

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1099–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appleton-Knapp, S. L., Bjork, R. A., & Wickens, T. D. (2005). Examining the spacing effect in advertising: encoding variability, retrieval processes, and their interaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birjandi, P., & Alemi, M. (2010). The impact of test anxiety on test performance among Iranian EFL learners. BRAIN Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 1, 44–58.Google Scholar
  6. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. In ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA Google Scholar
  7. Bjork, E. L., de Winstanley, P. A., & Storm, B. C. (2007). Learning how to learn: can experiencing the outcome of different encoding strategies enhance subsequent encoding? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: evidence from Australia. Business Education and Accredidation, 6, 33–43.Google Scholar
  9. Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carberry, A. R., & Ohland, M. W. (2012). A review of learning-by-teaching for engineering educators. Advances in Engineering Education, 3, 1–17.Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter, S. K., Lund, T. J., Coffman, C. R., Armstrong, P. I., Lamm, M. H., & Reason, R. D. (2015). A classroom study on the relationship between student achievement and retrieval-enhanced learning. Educational Psychology Review, 1–23.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conway, S. E., Johnson, J. L., & Ripley, T. L. (2010). Integration of team-based learning strategies into a cardiovascular module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74, Article 35.Google Scholar
  15. Critz, C. M., & Knight, D. (2013). Using the flipped classroom in graduate nursing education. Nurse Educator, 38, 210–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research & Development, 61, 563–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dobson, J. L. (2008). The use of formative online quizzes to enhance class preparation and scores on summative exams. Advances in Physiology Education, 32, 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 533–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. El Sayad, R., & El Raouf, S. (2013). Video-based lectures: an emerging paradigm for teaching human anatomy and physiology to student nurses. Alexandria Journal of Medicine, 49, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellis, L., & Mathis, D. (1985). College student learning from televised versus conventional classroom lectures: A controlled experiment. Higher Education, 14, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fay, N., Garrod, S., & Carletta, J. (2000). Group discussion as interactive dialogue or as serial monologue: the influence of group size. Psychological Science, 11, 481–486.Google Scholar
  22. Ferreri, S. P., & O’Connor, S. K. (2013). Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77, Article 13.Google Scholar
  23. Findlay-Thompson, S., & Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education and Accreditation, 6, 63–71.Google Scholar
  24. Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2014). Role of expectations and explanations in learning by teaching. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flynn, A. B. (2015). Structure and evaluation of flipped chemistry courses: organic & spectroscopy, large and small, first to third year, English and French. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foos, P. W., Mora, J. J., & Tkacz, S. (1994). Student study techniques and the generation effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forsey, M., Low, M., & Glance, G. (2013). Flipping the sociology classroom: towards a practice of online pedagogy. Journal of Sociology, 49, 471–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410–8415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gadgil, S., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Chi, M. T. (2012). Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 22, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J., & Chrisochoides, N. (2014, November). Reviewing the flipped classroom research: reflections for computer science education. In Proceedings of the Computer Science Education Research Conference, 23–29.Google Scholar
  32. Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47, 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332, 1213–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students: are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoffman, E. S. (2014). Beyond the flipped classroom: redesigning a research methods course for e3 instruction. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 7, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hung, H. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hurtubise, L., Hall, E., Sheridan, L., & Han, H. (2015). The flipped classroom in medical education: engaging students to build competency. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 2, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (2003). What learning patterns are effective for a learner’s growth. In Proc. of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Sydney, 219–226.Google Scholar
  39. Jamaludin, R., & Osman, S. Z. M. (2014). The use of a flipped classroom to enhance engagement and promote active learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 5, 124–131.Google Scholar
  40. Jensen, J. L., Kummer, T. A., & Godoy, P. D. M. (2015). Article improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE-L fe Sciences Education, 14, 1–12.Google Scholar
  41. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: what evidence is there that it works? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30, 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: united brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L., & Bar, S. K. (2004). Predicting one’s own forgetting: the role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 643–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Learning concepts and categories: is spacing the “enemy of induction”? Psychological Science, 19, 585–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). A stability bias in human memory: overestimating remembering and underestimating learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kornell, N., Rhodes, M. G., Castel, A. D., & Tauber, S. K. (2011). The ease-of-processing heuristic and the stability bias dissociating memory, memory beliefs, and memory judgments. Psychological Science, 22, 787–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lasry, N. (2008). Clickers or flashcards: is there really a difference? The Physics Teacher, 46, 242–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N., & Swift, A. W. (2014). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56, 430–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McCabe, J. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 39, 462–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Dunay, P. K., & Cobb, R. E. (1986). Encoding difficulty and memory: toward a unifying theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 645–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McLaughlin, J. E., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A, Davidson, C. A, Glatt, D. M., Roth, M. T, Mumper, R. J. (2013). Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(9), Article 196.Google Scholar
  56. McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. A., Griffin, L. M., & Mumper, R. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Meade, M. L., Nokes, T. J., & Morrow, D. G. (2009). Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task. Memory, 17, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Michaelsen, L., & Sweet, M. (2008a). Fundamental principles and practices of team-based learning. In L. K. Michaelson, D. X. Parmelee, K. K. McMahon, & R. L. Levine (Eds.), Team-Based Learning for Health Professions Education: A Guide to Using Small Groups for Improving Learning (pp. 9–34). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2008b). The essential elements of team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 116, 53–59.Google Scholar
  61. Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2011). Team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128, 41–51.Google Scholar
  62. Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52, 597–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morehead, K., Rhodes, M. G., & DeLozier, S. (2015). Instructor and student knowledge of study strategies. Memory, (ahead-of-print), 1–15.Google Scholar
  64. Mulligan, N. W., & Lozito, J. P. (2004). Self-generation and memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 45, 175–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nestojko, J. F., Bui, D. C., Kornell, N., & Bjork, E. (2014). Expecting to teach enhances learning and organization of knowledge in free recall of text passages. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1038–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2). K. A. Feldman (Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  69. Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76, Article 196.Google Scholar
  70. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? a review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 615–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2009). Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: effects on monitoring and control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 550–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Relativity of remembering: why the laws of memory vanished. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: an opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105, 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ross, S. M., & Di Vesta, F. J. (1976). Oral summary as a review strategy for enhancing recall of textual material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 689–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1432–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schlairet, M. C., Green, R., & Benton, M. J. (2015). The flipped classroom: strategies for an undergraduate nursing course. Nurse Educator, 39, 321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Seery, M. K. (2015). Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: emerging trends and potential directions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 758–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shimazoe, J., & Aldrich, H. (2010). Group work can be gratifying: understanding & overcoming resistance to cooperative learning. College Teaching, 58, 52–57.Google Scholar
  80. Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323, 122–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Krauter, K., & Knight, J. K. (2011). Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stephenson, J. E., Brown, C., & Griffin, D. K. (2008). Electronic delivery of lectures in the university environment: an empirical comparison of three delivery styles. Computers & Education, 50, 640–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12, 82–83.Google Scholar
  85. Wenz, H. J., Zupanic, M., Klosa, K., Schneider, B., & Karsten, G. (2014). Using an audience response system to improve learning success in practical skills training courses in dental studies – a randomised, controlled cross-over study. European Journal of Dental Education, 18, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wilson, S. G. (2013). The flipped class: a method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yan, V. X., Thai, K. P., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). Habits and beliefs that guide self-regulated learning: do they vary with mindset? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 140–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yeung, K., & O’Malley, P. J. (2014). Making “the flip” work: barriers to and implementation strategies for introducing flipped teaching methods into traditional higher education courses. New Directions, 10, 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Young, T. P., Bailey, C. J., Guptill, M., Thorp, A., & Thomas, T. L. (2014). The flipped classroom: a modality for mixed asynchronous and synchronous learning in a residency program. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15, 938–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information Management, 43, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations