Skip to main content

Student Instruction Should Be Distributed Over Long Time Periods

Educational Psychology Review volume 27, pages 635–643 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

In many academic courses, students encounter a particular fact or concept many times over a period of a few weeks and then do not see it again during the remainder of the course. Are these brief instructional periods sufficient, or should the same amount of instruction be distributed over longer periods of time? This question was the focus of several recent studies in which a fixed amount of instruction was distributed over time periods of varying duration and followed by a delayed posttest. With few exceptions, the results showed that longer instructional periods produced greater posttest scores if the posttest was delayed by at least a month or so. Notably, the search criteria for this review excluded several oft-cited studies favoring short foreign language courses over longer ones, but a closer look at these studies reveals limitations (e.g., no delayed posttest or confounding variables). In brief, the best reading of the data is that long-term learning is best achieved when the exposures to a concept are distributed over time periods that are longer rather than shorter.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Bahrick, H. P., & Phelps, E. (1987). Retention of Spanish vocabulary over eight years. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 344–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, A. S., & Tullis, J. (2010). What makes distributed practice effective? Cognitive Psychology, 61, 228–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, S. (2010). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 635–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). New York: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, K. C., & Shuell, T. J. (1981). Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 245–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., & Cepeda, N. J. (2009). Using tests to enhance 8th grade students’ retention of U. S. history facts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 760–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. K., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S. H. K., & Pashler, H. (2012). Using spacing toenhance diverse forms of learning: review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 11, 1095–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepeda, N. J., Mozer, M. C., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2009). Optimizing distributed practice: theoretical analysis and practical implications. Experimental Psychology, 56, 236–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L., Halter, R. H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 655–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, P. F., Verkoeijen, P. P., & Spirgel, A. (2010). Spacing and testing effects: a deeply critical, lengthy, and at times discursive review of the literature. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 53, 63–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don’t. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 795–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J. (2013). Strengthening the student toolbox: Study strategies to boost learning (pp. 12–21). Fall: American Educator.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, L. R. (1973). Temporal position of reviews and its effect on the retention of mathematical rules. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapler, I. V., Weston, T., & Wiseheart, M. (2015). Spacing in a simulated undergraduate classroom: Long-term benefits for factual and higher-level learning. Learning and Instruction, 36, 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küpper-Tetzel, C. E., & Erdfelder, E. (2012). Encoding, maintenance, and retrieval processes in the lag effect: a multinomial processing tree analysis. Memory, 20(1), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küpper-Tetzel, C. E., Erdfelder, E., & Dickhäuser, O. (2014). The lag effect in secondary school classrooms: Enhancing students’ memory for vocabulary. Instructional Science, 42(3), 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend on time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. H., & Glaser, R. (1964). Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of a complex learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 242–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Stershic, S. (2015). Interleaved practice improves mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology

  • Schwartz, B. L., Son, L. K., Kornell, N., & Finn, B. (2011). Four principles of memory improvement: a guide to improving learning efficiency. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 21, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabrook, R., Brown, G. D. A., & Solity, J. E. (2005). Distributed and massed practice: from laboratory to classroom. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, R. (2011). The time factor in EFL classroom practice. Language Learning, 61(1), 117–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, R., & Muñoz, C. (2007). Same hours, different time distribution: any difference in EFL? System, 35, 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M., & Rothkopf, E. Z. (1984). Contextual enrichment and distribution of practice in the classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, L. K., & Simon, D. A. (2012). Distributed learning: data, metacognition, and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toppino, T. C., & Gerbier, E. (2014). About practice: repetition, spacing, and abstraction. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 60, 113–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Özsoy, B. (2008). Distributed rereading can hurt the spacing effect in text memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. T. (2014). Strategies that make learning last. Educational Leadership, 72(2), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A110517. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Education. I thank Kelli Taylor Zarate, Andrew Butler, Shana Carpenter, and three anonymous reviewers for their suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, PCD4118G, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA

    Doug Rohrer

Authors
  1. Doug Rohrer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doug Rohrer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rohrer, D. Student Instruction Should Be Distributed Over Long Time Periods. Educ Psychol Rev 27, 635–643 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9332-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9332-4

Keywords

  • Distributed
  • Spaced
  • Learning
  • Foreign
  • L2