Abstract
We collected data at a large, very selective public university on what math and science instructors felt was the biggest barrier to their students’ learning. We also determined the extent of each instructor’s use of research-based effective teaching methods. Instructors using fewer effective methods were more likely to say the greatest barrier to student learning was the internal deficiencies of the students (the “fundamental attribution error”). They listed deficiencies such as poor preparation and work ethic. In total, 37 % of the instructor attributions were to student deficiencies, but this fraction varied dramatically between departments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gallimore, R., Ermeling, B., Saunders, W., & Goldenberg, C. (2009). Moving the learning of teaching closer to practice: teacher education implications of school-based inquiry teams. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 537–553.
McDougall, D., Saunders, W., & Goldenberg, C. (2007). Inside the black box of school reform: explaining the how and why of change at Getting Results schools. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54(1), 51–89.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York: Academic.
Wieman, C., & Gilbert, S. (2014). The teaching practices inventory: a new tool for characterizing college and university teaching in mathematics and science. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 552–569.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wieman, C., Welsh, A. The Connection Between Teaching Methods and Attribution Errors. Educ Psychol Rev 28, 645–648 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9317-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9317-3