Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intelligence and Creativity Are Pretty Similar After All

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reviews the history of thought on how intelligence and creativity, two individual differences important to teaching and learning, are connected. For decades, intelligence and creativity have been seen as essentially unrelated abilities. Recently, however, new theories, assessment methods, and statistical tools have caused a shift in the field’s consensus. New lines of work on creative thinking strategies, executive cognitive processes and abilities, and cognitive neuroscience have revealed that intelligence and creativity are much more closely linked than the field has thought. The deep connections between these concepts offer opportunities for a more fertile conception of both intelligence and creativity, one that emphasizes similarities between solving problems with right answers and thinking flexibly, critically, and playfully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avitia, M. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Beyond g and c: the relationship of rated creativity to long-term storage and retrieval (Glr). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, R. E. (2015). The neuroscience of musical improvisation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 108–117.

  • Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2013). Metaphorically speaking: cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language. Memory and Cognition, 41, 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Wilkins, R. W., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Silvia, P. J., Hodges, D. A., Koschutnig, K., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Creativity and the default network: a functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest. Neuropsychologia, 64, 92–98.

  • Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012a). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 480–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, M., Könen, T., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012b). Associative abilities underlying creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 273–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, M., Mühlmann, C., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, M., Beaty, R. E., Jauk, E., Koschutnig, K., Fink, A., Silvia, P. J., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014a). Creating metaphors: the neural basis of figurative language production. NeuroImage, 90, 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014b). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage, 88, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014c). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: the common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (2013). Learn to write badly: How to succeed in the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. M., & Mirels, H. L. (1970). Fluency as a pervasive element in the measurement of creativity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 83–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Barros, D. P., Primi, R., Miguel, F. K., Almeida, L. S., & Oliveira, E. P. (2010). Metaphor creation: a measure of creativity or intelligence? European Journal of Education and Psychology, 3, 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earleywine, M. (2010). Humor 101. New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: theory, research, and applications. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E. E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. V. (2007). Divergent thinking: strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greengross, G., & Miller, G. (2011). Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males. Intelligence, 39, 188–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64, 110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1979a). A comparison of statistical infrequency and subjective judgment as criteria in the measurement of originality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 297–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1979b). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D., & Michael, W. B. (1979). The effects of scoring formulas on the discriminant validity of tests of divergent thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 917–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howrigan, D. P., & MacDonald, K. B. (2008). Humor as a mental fitness indicator. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 652–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: new support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41, 212–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karwowski, M., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Threshold hypothesis: fact or artifact? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Using creativity to reduce ethnic bias in college admissions. Review of General Psychology, 14, 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Ungifted: intelligence redefined. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cropley, D. H., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Sinnett, S. (2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: how much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 332–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2014). Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(407), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: a latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41, 306–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 136–181). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primi, R. (2014). Divergent productions of metaphors: combining many-facet Rasch measurement and cognitive psychology in the assessment of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: the science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J. (2008a). Another look at creativity and intelligence: exploring higher-order models and probable confounds. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1012–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J. (2008b). Creativity and intelligence revisited: a latent variable analysis of Wallach and Kogan (1965). Creativity Research Journal, 20, 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2012). Making creative metaphors: the importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence, 40, 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., Martinez, J. L., & Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68–85.

  • Silvia, P. J., Martin, C., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2009). A snapshot of creativity: evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2013). Verbal fluency and creativity: general and specific contributions of broad retrieval ability (Gr) factors to divergent thinking. Intelligence, 41, 328–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (2008). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: norms-technical manual, verbal forms A and B. Bensenville: Scholastic Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartanian, O., Bouak, F., Caldwell, J. L., Cheung, B., Cupchik, G., Jobidon, M. E., Lam, Q., Nakashima, A., Paul, M., Peng, H., Silvia, P. J., & Smith, I. (2014). The effects of a single night of sleep deprivation on fluency and prefrontal cortex function during divergent thinking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(214), 1–12.

  • Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: a study of the creativity–intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 362–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, P. O. Box 26170, Greensboro, NC, 27402-6170, USA

    Paul J. Silvia

Authors
  1. Paul J. Silvia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul J. Silvia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silvia, P.J. Intelligence and Creativity Are Pretty Similar After All. Educ Psychol Rev 27, 599–606 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9299-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9299-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation