Skip to main content

Metacognition, Self Regulation, and Self-regulated Learning: A Rose by any other Name?

Abstract

This commentary reviews the distinctions researchers make in defining metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning along with the methods used to explore these constructs. Bandura’s notion of reciprocal determinism (1977) is revisited in the context of situated learning, whereby interactions between the person, behavior, and environment take on new meaning when examining learning and affect in specific contexts where knowledge is constructed through interacting with all that the environment affords, be that material or human. The interaction between the mind and environment continues to be an interesting question with regard to these three constructs, and this interaction can be explored by using computers as cognitive tools. Technology-rich environments are described that provide opportunities for assessing and validating metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning with future directions for assessing co-regulation of teams of learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Azevedo, R. (2005). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 193–197. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. The American Psychologist, 37, 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, 18, 199–210. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9013-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise pp. ix–xvii. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 88–108.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review (this issue).

  12. Ericsson, K. A. (2002). Attaining excellence through deliberate practice: Insights from the study of expert performance. In M. Ferrari (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence in education (pp. 21–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant’s comments: what is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14, 272–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Greeno, J. (1989). A perspective on thinking. The American Psychologist, 44, 134–141. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 693–719). New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lajoie, S. P. (2005). Cognitive tools for the mind: The promises of technology: Cognitive amplifiers or bionic prosthetics? In R. J. Sternberg, & D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: Impact of tools on the nature and development of human skills (pp. 87–102). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. A. Alexander, & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 803–821, 2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lajoie, S. P., & Derry, S. J. (Eds.).(1993). Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  22. Lajoie, S. P., Faremo, S., & Wiseman, J. (2001). Identifying human tutoring strategies for effective instruction in internal medicine. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(3), 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lajoie, S. P., Faremo, S., Wiseman, J., & Gauthier, G. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in medical students through the use of technology. Technology Instruction Cognition and Computing, 3(1–2), 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, M. J. P. Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review (this issue).

  26. Lu, J., & Lajoie, S. P. (2008). Supporting medical decision making with argumentation tools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 425–442. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maggioni, L., & Parkinson, M. M. The role of teacher epistemic cognition, epistemic beliefs, and calibration in instruction. Educational Psychology Review (this issue).

  28. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Learners as information processors: legacies and limitations of educational psychologies second metaphor. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nenniger, P. (1999). On the role of motivation in self-directed learning. The ‘two-shells-model of motivated self-directed learning’ as a structural explanatory concept. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(1), 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nietfeld, J. L., & Schraw, G. (2002). The effect of knowledge and strategy training on monitoring accuracy. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(4), 367–427. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0204_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Winne, P. H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 397–410. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Winters, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review.

  38. Witherspoon, A. M., Azevedo, R., & D’Mello, S. (2008). The dynamics of self-regulatory processes within self-and externally regulated learning episodes during complex science learning with hypermedia. In B. Woolf, E. Aimeur, R. Nkambou, & S. P. Lajoie (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2008 (pp. 260–269). New-York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne P. Lajoie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lajoie, S.P. Metacognition, Self Regulation, and Self-regulated Learning: A Rose by any other Name?. Educ Psychol Rev 20, 469–475 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9088-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Metacogniton
  • Self-regulation
  • Self-regulated learning
  • Computer based learning environments