Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

When Choice Motivates and When It Does Not

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses the controversy regarding the value of offering choices as a teaching practice. Inconsistent of results regarding the effects of choice in various settings suggest that choice can be either motivating or de-motivating. Based on the self-determination theory of motivation (Deci & Ryan, 2000), we propose that choice can be motivating when the options meet the students’ need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. For example, choice is motivating when the options are relevant to the students’ interests and goals (autonomy support), are not too numerous or complex (competence support), and are congruent with the values of the students’ culture (relatedness support). Given the many factors involved, it is not surprising that in some studies choice was not found to promote engagement. However, when choice was offered in a way that met the needs of the students, it was found to enhance motivation, learning, and well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfi, O., Assor, A., & Katz, I. (2004). Learning to allow temporary failure: Potential benefits, supportive practices and teacher concerns. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assor, A., Cohen-Melayev, M., Kaplan, A., & Friedman, D. (2005). Choosing to stay religious in a modern world: Socialization and exploration processes leading to an integrated internalization of religion among Israeli Jewish youth. In M. L. Maehr & S. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 14: Religion and motivation (pp. 105–150). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor, A., & Kaplan, H. (2001). Mapping the domain of autonomy support: Five important ways to enhance or undermine student’s experience of autonomy in learning. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 101–120). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good but relevance is excellent: Autonomy affecting teacher behaviors that predict students’ engagement in learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Roth, G., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battistisch, V., Solomon, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1997). Caring school communities. Educational Psychologist, 32, 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereby-Meyer, Y., Assor, A., & Katz, I. (2004). Children’s choice strategies: The effect of age and task demands. Cognitive Development, 19, 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. E. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M. (1987). Increased performance with increased personal control: A self-presentation interpretation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 350–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M. (1989). Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 246–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 474–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African American youth: Context, self, and action outcomes in school. Child Development, 65, 493–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, Vol. 23: Self processes and development (pp. 43–77). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ailly, H. (2004). The role of choice in children’s learning: A distinctive cultural and gender difference in efficacy, interest, and effort. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 36, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1991a). Children’s decision-making examined with an information-board procedure. Cognitive Development, 6, 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1991b). Developmental differences in children’s search of pre-decisional information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52, 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuit: Human needs and the self determination theory of behavior. Psychology Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Williams, G. C. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dember, W. N., Galinsky, T. L., & Warm, J. S. (1992). The role of choice in vigilance performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preferences for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flink, C., Boggiano, A. K., & Barrett, M. (1990). Controlling teaching strategies: Understanding children’s self-determination and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 916–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerday, T., & Schraw, G. (2000). Teachers’ beliefs about instructional choice: A phenomenological study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 634–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerday, T., & Schraw, G. (2003). Effect of choice on cognitive and affective engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerday, T., Schraw, G., & Stevens, J. (2004). The role of choice and interest in reader engagement. Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gracia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The effects of autonomy on motivation and performance in the college classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregan-Paxton, J., & John, R. D. (1995). Are young children adaptive decision makers? A study of age differences in information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 567–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregan-Paxton, J., & John, R. D. (1997). The emergence of adaptive decision making in children. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 508–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, M., & Iyengar, S. S. (2001). What drives whom? A cultural perspective on human agency. Social Cognition, 19, 269–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., Huberman, G., & Jiang, W. (2004). How much choice is too much? Contributions to 401(k) retirement plans. In O. S. Mitchell & S. P. Utkus (Eds.), Pension design and structure: New lessons from behavioral finance (pp. 83–97). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., & Lepper, R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., & Lepper, R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Roth, G. (2003). Is autonomy important for all students? Evidence from a longitudinal study with children of high and low parental education. Paper presented at the 84th annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Katz, I., & Assor, A. (2003). Is autonomy important for non-western students? Examining autonomy as a universal human propensity. Paper presented at the 84th annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Klayman, J. (1985). Children’s decision strategies and their adaptation to task characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. (1989). Mindfulness: Choice and control in everyday life. London: Harvill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, R. (1986). Autonomy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R, & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Flowerday, T. (2006). Students’ choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 186–207 (April).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. E., & Lepper, M. R. (1992). Effects of fantasy contexts on children’s learning and motivation: Making learning more fun. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 625–633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior Performance, 16, 366–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ motivation by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., Jang, H., Hardré, P., & Omura, M. (2002). Providing a rationale in an autonomy-supportive way as a strategy to motivate others during an uninteresting activity. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 183–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1960). Choice without preference. Kant-Studien, 51, 142–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. L., & Symons, S. (2001). Motivational variables and children’s text search. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy, and the self in psychological development. In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 40: Developmental perspectives on motivation. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Reisetter, M. (1998). The role of choice in reader engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 705–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafir, E., & Tverski, A. (1992). Thinking through uncertainty: Non-consequential reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 449–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCinto, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychology, 39, 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann-Margalit, E., & Morgenbesser, S. (1997). Picking and choosing. Social Research, 44, 757–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury Park, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task value: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Porac, J., Lathin, D., Smith, R., & Deci, E. L. (1978). On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel

    Idit Katz & Avi Assor

Authors
  1. Idit Katz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Avi Assor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Idit Katz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, I., Assor, A. When Choice Motivates and When It Does Not. Educ Psychol Rev 19, 429–442 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9027-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9027-y

Key words

Search

Navigation