Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 1–53 | Cite as

A Threefold Model of Intellectual Styles

Article

Abstract

The field of styles presents three major controversial issues: styles as value-laden versus value-free, styles as traits versus states, and styles as different constructs versus similar constructs with different labels. We address these issues by proposing an integrative model of styles—the Threefold Model of Intellectual Styles—which divides all styles into three basic kinds. The foundation of this model is Sternberg and Zhang’s body of empirical investigations into the thinking styles proposed in the theory of mental self-government. The model also draws upon others’ previous empirical findings in the literature. The model argues that most styles are value-laden rather than value-free; that they have both trait-like and state-like aspects, but for the most part are modifiable and hence more state-like; and that they overlap highly across theories.

Keywords

integrative model intellectual styles thinking styles learning styles cognitive styles 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, D. G. (2001). Cognitive styles in hearing impaired students. Educ. Psychol. 21(3): 351–364.Google Scholar
  2. Albaili, M. A. (1993). Inferred hemispheric thinking style, gender, and academic major among United Arab Emirates college students. Percept. Mot. Skills 76: 971–977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Albaili, M. A. (1996). Inferred hemispheric style and problem-solving performance. Percept. Mot. Skills 83: 427–434.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Albaili, M. A. (1997). Differences among low-, average-, and high-achieving college students on learning and study strategies. Educ. Psychol. 17(1 & 2): 171–177.Google Scholar
  5. Albert, J. (1969). Modification of the Impulsive Conceptual Style. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  6. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation, Holt, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Alpaugh, P. K., and Birren, J. E. (1977). Variables affecting creative contributions across the adult life span. Hum. Dev. 20(4): 240–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alter, C. E. (2001). Creativity styles and personality characteristics. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. B): Sci. Eng. 62(1B): 590.Google Scholar
  9. Alvi, S. A., Khan, S. B., Hussain, M. A., and Baig, T. (1988). Relationship between Holland’s typology and cognitive styles. Int. J. Psychol. 23: 449–459; and academic performance.Google Scholar
  10. Alvi, S. A., Khan, S. B., Hussain, M. A., and Baig, T. (1988). Relationship between Holland’s typology and cognitive styles. Educ. Psychol. 22(3): 331–348.Google Scholar
  11. Ausburn, L. J. (1979). Impact of Learning styles on Air Force Technical Training: Relationships Among Cognitive Style Factors and Perceptual Types (Report). US: AL/HRPP.Google Scholar
  12. Bagley, C., and Mallick, K. (1998). Field independence, cultural context and academic achievement: A commentary. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 68: 581–587.Google Scholar
  13. Bagozzi, R. P., and Foxall, G. R. (1995). Construct validity and generalizability of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Eur. J. Pers. 9(3): 185–206.Google Scholar
  14. Banta, T. J. (1970). Tests for the evaluation of early childhood education: The Cincinnati Autonomy Test Battery (CATB). In Hellmuth, J. (ed.), Cognitive Studies, Vol. 1, Brunner-Mazel, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Becker, L. D., Bender, N. N., and Morrison, G. (1978). Measuring impulsivity-reflection: A critical review. J. Learn. Disabil. 11(10): 626–632.Google Scholar
  16. Bennett, S. N. (1973). Divergent thinking abilities: A validation study. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 43(1): 1–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bever, T. G., and Chiarello, R. S. (1974). Cerebral dominance in musicians and non-musicians. Science 186: 537–539.Google Scholar
  18. Bickham, P. J., Miller, M. J., O’Neal, H., and Clanton, R. (1998). Comparison of error rates on the 1990 and 1994 revised self-directed search. Percept. Mot. Skills 86(3, Pt 2): 1168–1170.Google Scholar
  19. Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 48: 266–279.Google Scholar
  20. Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying, Australian Council for Educational Research, Hawthorn.Google Scholar
  21. Biggs, J. B. (1988). Assessing student approaches to learning. Aust. Psychol. 23(2): 197–206.Google Scholar
  22. Biggs, J. B. (1992). Why and How Do Hong Kong Students Learn? Using the Learning and Study Process Questionnaires, Education Paper No. 14, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  23. Block, J., Block, J. H., and Harrington, D. M. (1974). Some misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity. Dev. Psychol. 11: 611–632.Google Scholar
  24. Bloomberg, M. (1971). Creativity as related to field independence and mobility. J. Genet. Psychol. 118: 3–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bokoros, M. A., Goldstein, M. B., and Sweeney, M. M. (1992). Common factors in five measures of cognitive styles. Curr. Psychol. Res. Rev. 11(2): 99–109.Google Scholar
  26. Bolen, L. M., Wurm, T. R., and Hall, C. W. (1994). Factorial structure of the Study Process Questionnaire. Psychol. Rep. 75(3): 1235–1241.Google Scholar
  27. Bracken, B. A., Ledford, T. L., and McCallum, R. S. (1979). Effects of cerebral dominance on college-level achievement. Percept. Mot. Skills 49: 445–446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Brand, H. J., Van-Noorwyk, J. S., and Hanekom, J. D. (1994). Administering the Self-Directed Search on a group of Black adolescents. S. Afr. J. Psychol. 24(2): 47–52.Google Scholar
  29. Brown, G., and Lawson, T. W. (1975). Sex differences in the stability of reflectivity/impulsivity in infant school pupils. Educ. Stud. 1(2): 99–104.Google Scholar
  30. Buela-Casal, G., Carretero-Dios, H., De-los-Santos-Roig, M., and Bermudez, M. P. (2003). Psychometric properties of a Spanish adaptation of the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT-20). Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 19(2): 151–159.Google Scholar
  31. Cairns, E. (1977). The reliability of the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 47(2): 197–198.Google Scholar
  32. Cairns, E., and Cammock, T. (1978). Development of a more reliable version of the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Dev. Psychol. 14(5): 555–560.Google Scholar
  33. Cakan, M. (2003). Psychometric data on the Group Embedded Figures Test for Turkish undergraduate students. Percept. Mot. Skills 96(3): 993–1004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Campbell, S. B., and Douglas, V. I. (1972). Cognitive styles and responses to the threat of frustration. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 4: 30–42.Google Scholar
  35. Cantwell, R. H., and Moore, P. J. (1996). The development of measures of individual differences in self-regulatory control and their relationship to academic performance. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 21: 500–517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Cantwell, R. H., and Moore, P. J. (1998). Relationships among control beliefs, approaches to learning, and the academic performance of final-year nurses. Alta. J. Educ. Res. 44(1): 98–102.Google Scholar
  37. Carey, J. C., Fleming, S. D., and Roberts, D. Y. (1989). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a measure of aspects of cognitive style. Meas. Eval. Couns. Dev. 22: 94–99.Google Scholar
  38. Carlson, J. G. (1985). Recent assessments of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. J. Pers. Assess. 49: 356–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Carne, G. C., and Kirton, M. J. (1982). Styles of creativity: Test-score correlations between Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Psychol. Rep. 50: 31–36.Google Scholar
  40. Clapp, R. G. (1993). The stability of cognitive style in adults and some implications: A longitudinal study of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Psychol. Rep. 73(3): 1235–1245.Google Scholar
  41. Clapp, R. G., and de-Ciantis, S. M. (1989). Adaptors and innovators in large organizations: Does cognitive style characterize actual behavior of employees at work? An exploratory study. Psychol. Rep. 65(2): 503–513.Google Scholar
  42. Clements, D. H. (1986). Developmental differences in the learning of computer programming: Achievement and relationships to cognitive abilities. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 7(3): 251–266.Google Scholar
  43. Collins, J. N. (1994). Some fundamental questions about scientific thinking. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 12(2): 161–173.Google Scholar
  44. Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning styles theory and constructs. ERIC Doc. 235: 185.Google Scholar
  45. Curry, L. (1991). Patterns of learning style across selected medical specialties. Educ. Psychol. 11(3–4): 247–278.Google Scholar
  46. Danis, W., and Dollinger, M. J. (1998). A provisional comparison of factor structures using English, Japanese, and Chinese versions of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Psychol. Rep. 83(3): 1095–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Denney, D. R. (1972). Modeling effects upon conceptual style and cognitive tempo. Child Dev. 43: 105–119.Google Scholar
  48. Dirkes, M. A. (1977). Learning through creative thinking. Gifted Child Q. 21(4): 526–537.Google Scholar
  49. Donoghue, M. L. (1995). Problem solving effectiveness: The relationship of divergent and convergent thinking. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. A): Hum. Soc. Sci. 55(10A): 3073.Google Scholar
  50. Drummond, R. J., and Stoddard, A. H. (1992). Learning style and personality type. Percept. Mot. Skills 75(1): 99–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Drysdale, M. T. B., Ross, J. L., and Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cognitive learning styles and academic performance in 19 first-year university courses: Successful students versus students at risk. J. Educ. Stud. Placed Risk 6(3): 271–289.Google Scholar
  52. Dubois, T. E., and Cohen, W. (1970). Relationship between measures of psychological differentiation and intellectual ability. Percept. Mot. Skills 31: 411–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Eastwood, G. R. (1965). Divergent thinking and academic success. Ont. J. Educ. Res. 7(3): 241–254.Google Scholar
  54. Ehrman, M. E. (1994). The type differentiation indicator and adult foreign language learning success. J. Psychol. Type 30: 10–29.Google Scholar
  55. Elsberry, J. B. (1995). A comparison of selected variables of instructional choice and achievement between group lecture method and facilitated self-paced method in college health science physics. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. A): Hum. Soc. Sci. 55(7A): 1790.Google Scholar
  56. Entwistle, N. (1981). Styles of Teaching and Learning: An Integrated Outline of Educational Psychology for Students, Teachers, and Lecturers, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  57. Epstein, M. H., Hallahan, D. P., and Kauffman, J. M. (1975). Implications of the relectivity-impulsivity dimension for special education. J. Spec. Educ. 9(1): 11–25.Google Scholar
  58. Evans, F. J. (1967). Field dependence and Maudsley Personality Inventory. Percept. Mot. Skills 24: 526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Feather, N. T. (1967). Some personality correlates of external control. Aust. J. Psychol. 19: 253–260.Google Scholar
  60. Feldhusen, J. F., Treffinger, D. J., Van-Mondfrans, A. P., and Ferris, D. R. (1971). The relationship between academic grades and divergent thinking scores derived from four different methods of testing. J. Exp. Educ. 40(1): 35–40.Google Scholar
  61. Fleenor, J. W., and Taylor, S. (1994). Construct validity of three self-report measures of creativity. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 54(2): 464–470.Google Scholar
  62. Ford, N., and Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation and learning: An empirical study. J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia 9(4): 281–311.Google Scholar
  63. Gadzella, B. M., and Kneipp, L. B. (1990). Differences in comprehension processes as a function of hemisphericity. Percept. Mot. Skills 70: 783–786.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Gazzaniga, M. S. (1971). Changing hemisphere dominance by changing reward probability in split-brain monkeys. Exp. Neurol. 33: 412–419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Gelade, G. (1995). Creative style and divergent production. J. Creat. Behav. 29(1): 36–53.Google Scholar
  66. Glidden, R. C., and Greenwood, A. K. (1997). A validation study of the Spanish Self-Directed Search using back-translation procedures. J. Career Assess. 5(1): 105–113.Google Scholar
  67. Gough, H. G. (1987). California Psychological Inventory: Administrator’s Guide, Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  68. Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educ. Leadersh. 36: 234–236.Google Scholar
  69. Gregorc, A. F. (1982). Gregorc Style Delineator, Gabriel Systems, Maynard, MA.Google Scholar
  70. Gregorc, A. F. (1984). Gregorc Style Delineator: Development Technical and Administration Manual, Gabriel Systems, Maynard, MA.Google Scholar
  71. Gregorc, A. F. (1985). Inside Styles: Beyond the Basics, Gabriel Systems. Maynard, MA.Google Scholar
  72. Grigorenko, E. L., and Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In Saklofske, D., and Zeidner, M. (eds.), International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence, Plenum, New York, pp. 205–229.Google Scholar
  73. Grigorenko, E. L., and Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Styles of thinking, abilities, and academic performance. Except. Child. 63(3): 295–312.Google Scholar
  74. Gryskiewicz, N. D., and Tullar, W. L. (1995). The relationship between personality type and creativity style among managers. J. Psychol. Type 32: 30–35.Google Scholar
  75. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity research: Past, present and future. Am. Psychol. 5: 444–454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  77. Gullo, D. (1988). An investigation of cognitive tempo and its effects on evaluating kindergarten children’s academic and social competencies. Early Child Dev. Care 34: 201–215.Google Scholar
  78. Hahn-Rollins, D., and Mongeon, J. E. (1988). Increasing the acceptance of the MBTI in organizations. J. Psychol. Type 15: 13–19.Google Scholar
  79. Harasym, P. H., Leong, E. J., Juschka, B. B., Lucier, G. E., and Lorscheider, F. L. (1996). Relationship between Myer-Briggs Type Indicator and Gregorc Style Delineator. Percept. Mot. Skills 82: 1203–1210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Harnad, S. (1972). Creativity, lateral saccades, and the nondominant hemisphere. Percept. Mot. Skills 34: 653–654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Hassan, M. M., and Abed, A. S. (1999). Differences in spatial visualization as a function of scores on hemisphericity of mathematics teachers. Percept. Mot. Skills 88: 387–390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Helfeldt, J. P. (1983). Sex-linked characteristics of brain functioning: Why Jimmy reads differently. Reading World (March), 190–196.Google Scholar
  83. Holland, J. L. (1973). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  84. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (2nd ed.), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  85. Holland, J. L. (1994). Self-Directed Search, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.Google Scholar
  86. Holsworth, T. E. (1985). Perceptual style correlates for the MBTI. J. Psychol. Type 10: 32–35.Google Scholar
  87. Huey-You, P. A. (1985). A comparison of two cognitive behavior modification strategies designed to increase reflective test response of mildly language-impaired first graders. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. A): Hum. Soc. Sci. 46: 2996.Google Scholar
  88. Hyde, J. S., Geiringer, E. R., and Yen, W. M. (1975). On the empirical relation between spatial ability and sex differences in other aspects of cognitive performance. Multivar. Behav. Res. 10(3): 289–309.Google Scholar
  89. Ingham, J. (1989). An Experimental Investigation of the Relationships Among Learning Style Perceptual Strength, Instructional Strategies, Training Achievement and Attitudes of Corporate Employees. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, St. John’s University, New York.Google Scholar
  90. Jacobson, C. M. (1993). Cognitive styles of creativity: Relations of scores on the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator among managers in USA. Psychol. Rep. 72: 1131–1138.Google Scholar
  91. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology, Vol. 2, MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
  92. Joffe, R. T. (1987). Reflection-impulsivity and field independence as factors in reading achievement of children with reading difficulties. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. A): Hum. Soc. Sci. 48: 867.Google Scholar
  93. Johnson, J., and Kane, K. (1992). Developmental and task factors in LOGO programming. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 8(2): 229–253.Google Scholar
  94. Jonassen, D. H. (1980). Cognitive Style Predictors of Performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and technology, Denver. (ERIC Document Reproduction service No. ED 194 072).Google Scholar
  95. Jonassen, D. H., and Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences: Learning and Instruction, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  96. Jones, A. E. (1997a). Reflection-impulsivity and wholist-analytic: Two fledglings? or is R-I a cuckoo? Educ. Psychol. 17(1 & 2): 65–77.Google Scholar
  97. Jones, A. E. (1997b). Field Dependence Revisited: An Evaluation of Issues for Education and Psychology. Doctoral thesis, University of Lancaster, England.Google Scholar
  98. Joniak, A. J., and Isaken, S. G. (1988). The Gregorc Style Delineator: Internal consistency and its relationship to Kirton’s adaptive-innovative distinction. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 48(4): 1043–1049.Google Scholar
  99. Jung, C. (1923). Psychological Types, Harcourt Brace, New York.Google Scholar
  100. Kagan, J. (1966). Developmental studies in reflection and analysis. In Kidd, A. H., and Rivoire, J. L. (eds.), Perceptual Development in Children, International University Press, New York, pp. 487–522.Google Scholar
  101. Kagan, J. (1976). Commentary on reflective and impulsive children: Strategies of information processing underlying differences in problem solving. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 41(5) (Ser. No. 168).Google Scholar
  102. Kagan, J., and Messer, S. B. (1975). A reply to “Some misgiving about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity.” Dev. Psychol. 11: 244–248.Google Scholar
  103. Kagan, J., Rosman, B. L., Day, D., Albert, J., and Philips, W. (1964). Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychol. Monogr. 78(1) (Whole No. 578).Google Scholar
  104. Kaufman, J. C. (2001). Thinking styles in creative writers and journalists. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. B): Sci. Eng. 62(3B): 1069.Google Scholar
  105. Keefe, J. W., and Monk, J. S. (1989). Learning Style Profile, National Association of Secondary School Principals, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
  106. Keogh, B. K., and Donlon, G. (1972). Field dependence, impulsivity and learning disabilities. J. Learn. Disabil. 5: 331–336.Google Scholar
  107. Khan, S. B., and Alvi, S. A. (1986). A study of Validation and Structure of Holland’s Theory of Careers, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  108. Khan, S. B., Alvi, S. A., and Kwong, S. L. (1985). Field-Dependence and Field-Independence Cognitive Styles of Intermediate and High School Students in Relation to Differences in Age/Grade, Gender, and Academic and Vocational Orientations, The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto.Google Scholar
  109. Kim, J., and Michael, W. B. (1995). The relationship of creativity measures to school achievement and preferred learning and thinking style in a sample of Korean high school students. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 55(1): 60–74.Google Scholar
  110. Kinsbourne, M. (1982). Hemispheric specialization and the growth of human understanding. Am. Psychol. 37: 411–420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Kirchner-Nebot, T., and Amador-Campos, J. A. (1998). Internal consistency of scores on Matching Familiar Figures Test-20 and correlation of scores with age. Percept. Mot. Skills 86(3): 803–807.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Kirton, M. J. (1961). Management Initiative, Acton Society Trust, London.Google Scholar
  113. Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and a measure. J. Appl. Psychol. 61: 622–629.Google Scholar
  114. Kirton, M. J. (1988). Adaptors and innovators: Problem solvers in organizations. In Gronhaug, K., and Kaufman, G. (eds.), Innovation: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective, Norwegian University Press, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  115. Kirton, M. J. (1994). Adaptors and Innovators, 2nd ed., Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  116. Kirton, M. J., Bailey, A., and Glendinning, W. (1991). Adaptors and innovators: Preference for educational procedures. J. Psychol. 125(4): 445–455.Google Scholar
  117. Kogan, N. (1989). A stylistic perspective on metaphor and aesthetic sensitivity in children. In Globerson, T., and Zelniker, T. (eds.), Cognitive Style and Cognitive Development (Human Development, Vol. 3), Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ, pp. 192–213.Google Scholar
  118. Kolb, D. A. (1976). The Learning Style Inventory: Technical Manual, McBer, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  119. Krueger, T. H. (1976). Visual Imagery in Problem Solving and Scientific Creativity, Seal, Derby, CT.Google Scholar
  120. Kubes, M. (1998). Adaptors and innovators in Slovakia: Cognitive style and social culture. Eur. J. Pers. 12(3): 187–198.Google Scholar
  121. Kwang, N. A., and Rodrigues, D. (2002). A Big-Five personality profile of the adapter and innovator. J. Creat. Behav. 36(4): 254–268.Google Scholar
  122. Levy, N., Murphy, C., and Carlson, R. (1972). Personality types among Negro college students. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 32: 641–653.Google Scholar
  123. Lewin, Z. G. (1983). A study about the validity of the Group Embedded Figures Test. Arquivos Brasileiros Psicol. 35(2): 11–35Google Scholar
  124. Linden, W. (1973). Practicing of meditation by school children and their levels of field dependence-independence, test anxiety, and reading achievement. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 41(1): 139–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Liu, M., and Reed, W. M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 10(4): 419–434.Google Scholar
  126. Logan, J. W. (1983). Cognitive style and reading. Reading Teach. 36(7): 704–707.Google Scholar
  127. MacArthur, R. (1973). Some ability patterns: Central Eskimos and Nsenga Africans. Int. J. Psychol. 8(4): 239–247.Google Scholar
  128. MacLeod, C. M., Jackson, R. A., and Palmer, J. (1986). On the relation between spatial ability and field dependence. Intelligence 10(2): 141–151.Google Scholar
  129. Mansfield, E. A. (1998). Working memory development in adolescents: A neo-Piagetian investigation. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. A): Hum. Soc. Sci. 58(8A): 3001.Google Scholar
  130. Marton, F. (1976). What does it take to learn? Some implications on an alternative view of learning. In Entwistle, N. J. (ed.), Strategies for Research and Development in Higher Education, Swets and Zeitlenger, Amsterdam, pp. 200–222.Google Scholar
  131. Massari, D. J. (1975). The relation of reflection-impulsivity to field-dependence-independence and internal-external control in children. J. Genet. Psychol. 126: 61–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. McCaulley, M. H. (1981). Jung’s theory of psychological types and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In McReynolds, P. (ed.), Advances in Personality Assessment, Vol. 5, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 294–352.Google Scholar
  133. McCaulley, M. H. (1990). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in counseling. In Watkins, C. E., Jr., and Campbell, V. L. (eds.), Testing in Counseling Practice, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 91–134.Google Scholar
  134. McKay, E. (2000). Measurement of cognitive performance in computer programming concept acquisition: Interactive effects of visual metaphors and the cognitive style construct. J. Appl. Meas. 1(3): 257–291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Mehdi, B. (1974). Creativity, intelligence and achievement: Some findings of recent research. Indian Educ. Rev. 9(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
  136. Melancon, J. G., and Thompson, B. (1989). Measurement characteristics of the Finding Embedded Figures Test. Psychol. Sch. 26(1): 69–78.Google Scholar
  137. Melear, C. T. (1989). Cognitive Processes in the Curry Learning Style Framework As Measured by the Learning Style Profile and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Among Non-Majors in College Biology. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  138. Messer, S. B. (1976). Reflection-impulsivity: A review. Psychol. Bull. 83(6): 1026–1052.Google Scholar
  139. Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educ. Psychol. 19: 59–74.Google Scholar
  140. Messick, S. (1994). The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educ. Psychol. 29: 121–136.Google Scholar
  141. Messick, S. (1996). Bridging cognition and personality in education: The role of style in performance and development. Eur. J. Pers. 10: 353–376.Google Scholar
  142. Miller, A. (1987). Cognitive styles: An integrated model. Educ. Psychol. 7(4): 251–268.Google Scholar
  143. Miller, A. (1988). Toward a typology of personality styles. Can. Psychol. 29: 263–283.Google Scholar
  144. Miller, A. (1991a). Personality Types: A Modern Synthesis, University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
  145. Miller, A. (1991b). Personality types, learning styles and educational goals. Educ. Psychol. 11(3–4): 217–238.Google Scholar
  146. Mshelia, A. Y., and Lapidus, L. B. (1990). Depth picture perception in relation to cognitive style and training in non-Western children. J. Cross-cult. Psychol. 21(4): 414–433.Google Scholar
  147. Murdock, M. C., Isaksen, S. G., and Lauer, K. J. (1993). Creativity training and the stability and internal consistency of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Psychol. Rep. 72(3): 1123–1130.Google Scholar
  148. Murphy, H. J., Casey, B., Day, D. A., and Young, J. D. (1997). Scores on the Group Embedded Figures Test by undergraduates in information management. Percept. Mot. Skills 84(3): 1135–1138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual, Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  150. Myers, I. B., and McCaulley, M. H. (1988). Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  151. Neimark, E. D. (1975). Longitudinal development of formal operations thought. Genet. Psychol. Monogr. 91: 171–225.Google Scholar
  152. Niles, F. S. (1995). Cultural differences in learning motivation and learning strategies: A comparison of overseas and Australian students at an Australian university. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 19(3): 369–385.Google Scholar
  153. Noppe, L. D., and Gallagher, J. M. (1977). A cognitive style approach to creative thought. J. Pers. Assess. 41: 85–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. O’Brien, T. P. (1990). Construct validation of the Gregorc Style Delineator: An application of LISREL 7. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 50(3): 631–636.Google Scholar
  155. O’Brien, T. P. (1991). Relationships among selected characteristics of college students and cognitive style preferences. Coll. Stud. J. 25(1): 492–500.Google Scholar
  156. O’Brien, T. P. (1994). Cognitive learning styles and academic achievement in secondary education. J. Res. Dev. Educ. 28(1): 11–21.Google Scholar
  157. O’Brien, T. P., and Wilkinson, N. C. (1992). Cognitive styles and performance on the National Council of State Boards of Nursing Licensure Examination. Coll. Stud. J. 26(2): 156–161.Google Scholar
  158. Okabayashi, H., and Torrance, E. P. (1984). Role of style of learning and thinking and self directed learning readiness in the achievement of gifted students. J. Learn. Disabil. 17(2): 104–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Olive, H. (1972a). A note on sex differences in adolescents’ divergent thinking. J. Psychol. 82(1): 39–42.Google Scholar
  160. Olive, H. (1972b). The relationship of divergent thinking to intelligence, social class, and achievement in high school students. J. Genet. Psychol. 121(2): 179–186.Google Scholar
  161. O’Neil, M. J., and Child, D. (1984). Biggs’ SPQ: A British study of its internal structure. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 54: 228–234.Google Scholar
  162. Panek, P. E., Funk, L. G., and Nelson, P. K. (1980). Reliability and validity of the Group Embedded Figures Test across the life span. Percept. Mot. Skills 50(3): 1171–1174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Perchaluk-Kemppainen, M. M. (1997). Learning styles and their link to preferences and participation for medical business managers. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. A): Hum. Soc. Sci. 57(9A): 3781.Google Scholar
  164. Peterson, E. R., Deary, I. J., and Austin, E. J. (2003). The reliability of Riding’s cognitive style analysis test. Pers. Individ. Differ. 34: 881–891.Google Scholar
  165. Petty, G., and Haltman, E. (1991). Learning style and brain hemisphericity of technical institute students. J. Stud. Tech. Careers 13: 79–91.Google Scholar
  166. Prato-Previde, G. (1991). Italian adaptors and innovators: Is cognitive style underlying culture? Pers. Individ. Differ. 12(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
  167. Pysh, F. (1970). The relationship of field-dependence-independence to performance on Piagetian-type tasks incorporating the Euclidean coordinate system. West. Psychol. 1(4): 137–143.Google Scholar
  168. Renzulli, J. S., and Smith, L. H. (1978). Learning Styles Inventory, Creative Learning, Mansfield Center, CT.Google Scholar
  169. Reynolds, C. R., and Torrance, E. P. (1978). Perceived changes in styles of learning and thinking (hemisphericity) through direct and indirect training. J. Creat. Behav. 12, 247–252.Google Scholar
  170. Richardson, J. A., and Turner, T. E. (2000). Field dependence revisited I: Intelligence. Educ. Psychol. 20(3): 255–270.Google Scholar
  171. Riding, R. (1991). Cognitive Style Analysis User Manual, Learning and Training Technology, Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
  172. Riding, R. (1997). On the nature of cognitive style. Educ. Psychol. 17(1 & 2): 29–49.Google Scholar
  173. Riding, R., and Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles—An overview and integration. Educ. Psychol. 11(3 & 4): 193–215.Google Scholar
  174. Riding, R., and Pearson, F. (1994). The relationship between cognitive style and intelligence. Educ. Psychol. 14: 413–425.Google Scholar
  175. Riding, R. J., and Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies: Understanding Style Differences in Learning and Behavior, David Fulton, London.Google Scholar
  176. Robertson, E. D., Fournet, G. P., Zelhart, P. F., and Estes, R. E. (1987). Relationship of field dependence/independence to adaption-innovation in alcoholics. Percept. Mot. Skills 65(3): 771–776.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. Ross, J. L. (2000). An exploratory analysis of post-secondary student achievement comparing a Web-based and a conventional course learning environment. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. A): Hum. Soc. Sci. 61(5A): 1809.Google Scholar
  178. Russell, A. J. (1997). The effect of learner variables cognitive style on learning performance in a vocational training environment. Educ. Psychol. 17(1 & 2): 195–208.Google Scholar
  179. Sadler-Smith, E., and Tsang, F. (1998). A comparative study of approaches to studying in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 68: 81–93.Google Scholar
  180. Satterly, D. (1976). Cognitive styles, spatial ability, and school achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 68: 36–42.Google Scholar
  181. Schleifer, M., and Douglas, V. I. (1973). Moral judgments, behavior and cognitive style in young children. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 5: 133–144.Google Scholar
  182. Schmeck, R. R. (1983). Learning style of college students. In Dillon, R. F., and Schmeck, R. R. (eds.), Individual Differences in Cognition, Vol. 1, Academic, New York, pp. 233–279.Google Scholar
  183. Seidel, L. E., and England, E. M. (1999). Gregorc’s cognitive styles: College students’ preferences for teaching methods and testing techniques. Percept. Mot. Skills 88(3): 859–875.Google Scholar
  184. Shiomi, K., and Loo, R. (1999). Cross-cultural response styles on the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Soc. Behav. Pers. 27(4): 413–420.Google Scholar
  185. Skinner, N. F., and Drake, J. M. (2003). Behavioral implications of adaption-innovation: III. Adaption-innovation, achievement motivation and academic performance. Soc. Behav. Pers. 31(1): 101–106.Google Scholar
  186. Skinner, N. F., Hutchinson, L., Lukenda, A., Drake, G., and Boucher, J. (2003). National personality characteristics: II. Adaption-innovation in Canadian, American, and British samples. Psychol. Rep. 92(1): 21–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. Snyder, R. P. (1998). An assessment of the reliability and validity of scores obtained by six popular learning styles instruments. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. B): Sci. Eng. 58(11B): 6275.Google Scholar
  188. Spotts, J. X. V., and Mackler, B. (1967). Relationship of field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles to creative tests performance. Percept. Mot. Skills 24: 239–268.Google Scholar
  189. Stahl, S. A., Erickson, L. G., and Rayman, M. C. (1986). Detection of inconsistencies by reflective and impulsive seventh-grade readers. Natl. Reading Conf. Yearbook 35: 233–238.Google Scholar
  190. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Hum. Dev. 31: 197–224.Google Scholar
  191. Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Thinking styles: Theory and assessment at the interface between intelligence and personality. In Sternberg, R. J., and Ruzgis, P. (eds.), Intelligence and Personality, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 169–187.Google Scholar
  192. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking Styles, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  193. Sternberg, R. J., and Grigorenko, E. L. (1995). Styles of thinking in the school. Eur. J. High Abil. 6: 201–219.Google Scholar
  194. Sternberg, R. J., and Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? Am. Psychol. 52(7): 700–712.Google Scholar
  195. Sternberg, R. J., and Wagner, R. K. (1992). Thinking Styles Inventory, Unpublished test, Yale University, New Haven, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  196. Stricker, L. J., and Ross, J. (1962). A Description and Evaluation of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Research Bulletin, 62-6), Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  197. Stricker, L. J., and Ross, J. (1963). Intercorrelations and reliability of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicators scales. Psychol. Rep. 12: 287–293.Google Scholar
  198. Stuart, I. R. (1967). Perceptual style and reading ability: Implications for an instructional approach. Percept. Mot. Skills 24: 135–138.Google Scholar
  199. Stuber, S. R. (1997). Teaching behavior viewed as a function of learning style and personality type: A comparison of experienced and less experienced instrumental music teachers. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. A): Hum. Soc. Sci. 58(6A): 2127.Google Scholar
  200. Taft, R. (1971). Creativity: Hot and cold. J. Pers. 39(3): 345–361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. Tan-Willman, C. (1981). Cerebral hemispheric specialization of academically gifted and nongifted male and female adolescents. J. Creat. Behav. 15(4): 276–277.Google Scholar
  202. Taylor, J. (1994). The stability of school-children’s cognitive style: A longitudinal study of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Psychol. Rep. 74(3): 1008–1010.Google Scholar
  203. Thomas, C. R. (1983). Field independence and Myers-Briggs thinking individuals. Percept. Mot. Skills 57: 790.Google Scholar
  204. Thomas, S. A. W. (1971). The Role of Cognitive Style Variables in Mediating the Influence of Aggressive Television Upon Elementary School Children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  205. Torrance, E. P. (1988). Style of Learning and Thinking: Administrator’s Manual, Scholastic Testing Service, Bensenville, IL.Google Scholar
  206. Torrance, E. P., McCarthy, B., and Kolesinski, M. T. (1988). Style of Learning and Thinking, Scholastic Testing Service, Bensenville, IL.Google Scholar
  207. Torrance, E. P., Reigel, T., Reynolds, C. R., and Ball, O. (1976). Preliminary Manual: Your Style of Learning and Thinking, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  208. Torrance, E. P., and Reynolds, R. C. (1978). Images of the future of gifted adolescents: Effects of alienation and specialized cerebral functioning. Gifted Child Q. 22: 40–54.Google Scholar
  209. Tucker, R. W. (1999). An examination of accounting students’ thinking styles. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. B): Sci. Eng. 60(6B): 2977.Google Scholar
  210. Tullett, A. D. (1997). Cognitive style: Not culture’s consequence. Eur. Psychol. 2(3): 258–267.Google Scholar
  211. Vernon, P. E. (1973). Multivariate approaches to the study of cognitive styles. In Royce, J. R. (ed.), Multivariate Analysis and Psychological Theory, Academic, London, pp. 125–148.Google Scholar
  212. Watkins, D. A., and Dahlin, B. (1997). Assessing study approaches in Sweden. Psychol. Rep. 81: 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. Weisz, J. R., O’Neill, P., and O’Neill, P. C. (1975). Field-dependence-independence on the Children’s Embedded Figures Test: Cognitive style or cognitive level? Dev. Psychol. 11: 539–540.Google Scholar
  214. Williams, M. E. (2001). The effects of conceptual model provision and cognitive style on problem-solving performance of learners engaged in an exploratory learning environment. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. A): Hum. Soc. Sci. 62(3A): 983.Google Scholar
  215. Willis, J. H. (1995). Stress, cognitive style, and job satisfaction of computer programmers. Dissert. Abstr. Int. (Sect. B): Sci. Eng. 55(7B): 3002.Google Scholar
  216. Wilson, D. J., Mundy-Castle, A., and Sibanda, P. (1990). Field differentiation and LOGO performance among Zimbabwean school girls. J. Soc. Psychol. 130(2): 277–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. Wilson, K. L., Smart, R. M., and Watson, R. J. (1996). Gender differences in approaches to learning in first year psychology students. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 66: 59–71.Google Scholar
  218. Witkin, H. A. (1962). Psychological Differentiation: Studies of Development, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  219. Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., and Karp, S. A. (1962). Psychological Differentiation, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  220. Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., and Karp, S. A. (1971). Embedded Figures Test, Children’s Embedded Figures Test: Manual, Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  221. Yando, R. M., and Kagan, J. (1968). The effect of teacher tempo on the child. Child Dev. 39: 27–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  222. Yellin, D. (1983). Left brain, right brain, super brain: The holistic model. Reading World (October), 36–44.Google Scholar
  223. Zelniker, T., and Jeffrey, W. E. (1976). Reflective and impulsive children: Strategies of information processing underlying differences in problem solving. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 41(5): 59.Google Scholar
  224. Zelniker, T., and Oppenheimer, L. (1973). Modification of information processing of impulsive children. Child Dev. 44: 445–450.Google Scholar
  225. Zhang, L. F. (1999a). Further cross-cultural validation of the theory of mental self-government. J. Psychol. 133(2): 165–181.Google Scholar
  226. Zhang, L. F. (1999b). Short-Version Self-Directed Search, Unpublished test, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P. R. China.Google Scholar
  227. Zhang, L. F. (2000a). Relationship between Thinking Styles Inventory and Study Process Questionnaire. Pers. Individ. Diff. 29: 841–856.Google Scholar
  228. Zhang, L. F. (2000b). Are thinking styles and personality types related? Educ. Psychol. 20(3): 271–283.Google Scholar
  229. Zhang, L. F. (2001a). Thinking styles, self-esteem, and extracurricular experiences. Int. J. Psychol. 36(2): 100–107.Google Scholar
  230. Zhang, L. F. (2001b). Thinking styles and personality types revisited. Pers. Individ. Differ. 31(6): 883–894.Google Scholar
  231. Zhang, L. F. (2002a). Thinking styles and cognitive development. J. Genet. Psychol. 163(2): 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. Zhang, L. F. (2002b). Measuring thinking styles in addition to measuring personality traits? Pers. Individ. Differ. 33: 445–458.Google Scholar
  233. Zhang, L. F. (2002c). Thinking styles and the Big Five Personality Traits. Educ. Psychol. 22(1): 17–31.Google Scholar
  234. Zhang, L. F. (2002d). The role of thinking styles in psychosocial development. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 43(5): 696–711.Google Scholar
  235. Zhang, L. F. (2002e). Thinking styles and modes of thinking: Implications for education and research. J. Psychol. 136(3): 245–261.Google Scholar
  236. Zhang, L. F. (2002f). Thinking styles: Their relationships with modes of thinking and academic performance. Educ. Psychol. 22(3): 331–348.Google Scholar
  237. Zhang, L. F. (2003). Contributions of thinking styles to critical thinking dispositions. J. Psychol. 137(6): 517–544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  238. Zhang, L. F., and Huang, J. F. (2001). Thinking styles and the five-factor model of personality. Eur. J. Pers. 15: 465–476Google Scholar
  239. Zhang, L. F., and Postiglione, G. A. (2001). Thinking styles, self-esteem, and socio-economic status. Pers. Individ. Differ. 31: 1333–1346.Google Scholar
  240. Zhang, L. F., and Sachs, J. (1997). Assessing thinking styles in the theory of mental self-government: A Hong Kong validity study. Psychol. Rep. 81: 915–928.Google Scholar
  241. Zhang, L. F., and Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Are learning approaches and thinking styles related? A study in two Chinese populations. J. Psychol. 134(5): 469–489.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  242. Zhang, L. F., and Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Thinking styles and teacher characteristics. Int. J. Psychol. 37(1): 3–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongHong KongP. R. China
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyYale UniversityNew Haven
  3. 3.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations