Abstract
Acid deposition has declined across eastern North America and northern Europe due to reduced emissions of sulfur and nitrogen oxides. Ecosystem recovery has been slow with limited improvement in surface water chemistry. Delayed recovery has encouraged acid-neutralization strategies to accelerate recovery of impaired biological communities. Lime application has been shown to increase pH and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which could also drive increased mobilization of mercury (Hg) to surface waters. A four-year study was conducted within Honnedaga Lake’s watershed in the Adirondack region of New York to compare the effects of watershed and direct channel lime additions on Hg in stream water and macroinvertebrates. All treatments sharply increased stream pH and DOC concentrations, but large differences in the duration of impacts were apparent. The watershed treatment resulted in multi-year increases in concentrations and loads of total Hg (150%; 390%), DOC (190%; 350%) and nutrients, whereas total Hg and DOC increased for short periods (72–96 h) after channel treatments. No response of Hg in macroinvertebrates was evident following the watershed treatment, but a potential short-term and spatially constrained increase occurred after the channel treatment. Our observations indicate that both treatment approaches mobilize Hg, but that direct channel liming mobilizes considerably less than watershed liming over any period longer than a few days. During the final study year, increased methyl Hg concentrations were observed across reference and treated streams, which may reflect an extended dry period, highlighting that climate variation may also affect Hg dynamics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson C, Cabana G (2007) Estimating the trophic position of aquatic consumers in river food webs using stable nitrogen isotopes J North Am Benthol Soc 26:273–285. https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2007)26[273:ETTPOA]2.0.CO;2
Andersson S, Nilsson I, Valeur I (1999) Influence of dolomitic lime on DOC and DON leaching in a forest soil. Biogeochemistry 47:297–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992911
Appelberg M, Degerman E (1991) Development and stability of fish assemblages after lime treatment. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:546–554. https://doi.org/10.1139/f91-069
Baldigo BP, Lawrence GB, Bode RW et al. (2009) Impacts of acidification on macroinvertebrate communities in streams of the western Adirondack Mountains, New York, USA. Ecol Indic 9:226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.04.004
Battles JJ, Fahey TJ, Driscoll CT et al. (2014) Restoring soil calcium reverses forest decline. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1:15–19. https://doi.org/10.1021/ez400033d
Benoit JMM, Gilmour CCC, Heyes A et al. (2002) Geochemical and biological controls over methylmercury production and degradation in aquatic ecosystems. In: ACS symposium, p 262–297
Bradley DC, Ormerod SJ (2002) Long-term effects of catchment liming on invertebrates in upland streams. Freshw Biol 47:161–171. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00770.x
Bravo AG, Bouchet S, Tolu J et al. (2017) Molecular composition of organic matter controls methylmercury formation in boreal lakes. Nat Commun 8:14255. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14255
Broadley HJ, Cottingham KL, Baer NA, et al. (2019) Factors affecting MeHg bioaccumulation in stream biota: the role of dissolved organic carbon and diet. Ecotoxicology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-019-02086-2
Burns DA, McHale MR, Driscoll CT, Roy KM (2006) Response of surface water chemistry to reduced levels of acid precipitation: Comparison of trends in two regions of New York, USA. Hydrol Process 20:1611–1627. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5961
Burns DA, Riva-Murray K, Bradley PM et al. (2012) Landscape controls on total and methyl Hg in the upper Hudson River basin, New York, USA. J Geophys Res Biogeosciences 117. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001812
Chasar LC, Scudder BC, Stewart AR et al. (2009) Mercury cycling in stream ecosystems. 3. Trophic dynamics and methylmercury bioaccumulation. Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8027567
Chiasson-Gould SA, Blais JM, Poulain AJ (2014) Dissolved organic matter kinetically controls mercury bioavailability to bacteria. Environ Sci Technol 48:3153–3161. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4038484
Cho Y, Driscoll CT, Blum JD (2009) The effects of a whole-watershed calcium addition on the chemistry of stream storm events at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in NH, USA. Sci Total Environ 407:5392–5401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.030
Cirmo CP, Driscoll CT (1996) The impacts of a watershed CaCO3 treatment on stream and wetland biogeochemistry in the Adirondack Mountains. Biogeochemistry 32:265–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187142
Clair TA, Hindar A (2005) Liming for the mitigation of acid rain effects in freshwaters: a review of recent results. Environ Rev 13:91–128. https://doi.org/10.1139/a05-009
Clark JM, Bottrell SH, Evans CD et al. (2010) The importance of the relationship between scale and process in understanding long-term DOC dynamics. Sci Total Environ 408:2768–2775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.046
Clayton JL, Dannaway ES, Menendez R et al (1998) Application of limestone to restore fish communities in acidified streams. N Am J Fish Manag 18:347–360. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1998)0182.0.CO;2
Coleman Wasik JK, Engstrom DR, Mitchell CPJ et al. (2015) The effects of hydrologic fluctuation and sulfate regeneration on mercury cycling in an experimental peatland. J Geophys Res Biogeosciences 120:1697–1715. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG002993
Dalziel TRK, Wilson EJ, Proctor MV (1994) The effectiveness of catchment liming in restoring acid waters at Loch Fleet, Galloway, Scotland. For Ecol Manage 68:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)90142-2
Dennis IF, Clair TA, Driscoll CT et al. (2005) Distribution patterns of mercury in lakes and rivers of northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology 14:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-004-6263-0
DeWild JF, Olson ML, Olund SD (2002) Determination of methyl mercury by aqueous phase ethylation, followed by gas chromatographic separation with cold vapor atomic fluorescence detection. Open-File Report, US Geological Survey
Dittman JA, Shanley JB, Driscoll CT et al. (2010) Mercury dynamics in relation to dissolved organic carbon concentration and quality during high flow events in three northeastern U.S. streams. Water Resour Res 46:W07522. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008351
Driscoll CT, Cirmo CP, Fahey TJ et al. (1996) The experimental watershed liming study: comparison of lake and watershed neutralization strategies. Biogeochemistry 32:143–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187137
Driscoll CT, Driscoll KM, Fakhraei H, Civerolo K (2016) Long-term temporal trends and spatial patterns in the acid-base chemistry of lakes in the Adirondack region of New York in response to decreases in acidic deposition. Atmos Environ 146:5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.034
Driscoll CT, Han Y, Chen CY, Evers DC et al. (2007) Mercury contamination in forest and freshwater ecosystems in the northeastern United States. Bioscience 57:17. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570106
Driscoll CT, Mason RP, Chan HM et al. (2013) Mercury as a global pollutant: Sources, pathways, and effects. Environ Sci Technol 47:4967–4983. https://doi.org/10.1021/es305071v
Evers DC, Savoy LJ, Desorbo CR et al. (2008) Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on breeding common loons. Ecotoxicology 17:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-007-0168-7
Fakhraei H, Driscoll CT, Selvendiran P et al. (2014) Development of a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for acid-impaired lakes in the Adirondack region of New York. Atmos Environ 95:277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.039
Fiorentino I, Fahey TJ, Groffman PM et al. (2003) Initial responses of phosphorus biogeochemistry to calcium addition in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Can J For Res 33:1864–1873. https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-111
Fransman B, Nihlgaard B (1995) Water chemistry in forested catchments after topsoil treatment with liming agents in South Sweden. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 85:895–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00476943
French TD, Houben AJ, Desforges J-PW et al. (2014) Dissolved organic carbon thresholds affect mercury bioaccumulation in Arctic lakes. Environ Sci Technol 48:3162–3168. https://doi.org/10.1021/es403849d
Fuss CB, Driscoll CT, Campbell JL (2015) Recovery from chronic and snowmelt acidification: Long-term trends in stream and soil water chemistry at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, USA. J Geophys Res Biogeosciences 120:2360–2374. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003063
Gavin AL, Nelson SJ, Klemmer AJ et al. (2018) Acidification and climate linkages to increased dissolved organic carbon in high-elevation lakes. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR020963
George SD, Baldigo BP, Lawrence GB, Fuller RL (2018) Effects of watershed and in-stream liming on macroinvertebrate communities in acidified tributaries to an Adirondack lake. Ecol Indic 85:1058–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.048
Gilmour CC, Riedel GS, Ederington MC et al. (1998) Methylmercury concentrations and production rates across a trophic gradient in the northern Everglades. Biogeochemistry 40:327–345. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005972708616
Gorski PR, Armstrong DE, Hurley JP, Krabbenhoft DP (2008) Influence of natural dissolved organic carbon on the bioavailability of mercury to a freshwater alga. Environ Pollut 154:116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.004
Graham AM, Aiken GR, Gilmour CC (2012) Dissolved organic matter enhances microbial mercury methylation under sulfidic conditions. Environ Sci Technol 46:2715–2723. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203658f
Grieve IC (1990) Effects of catchment liming and afforestation on the concentration and fractional composition of aluminium in the Loch Fleet catchment, SW Scotland. J Hydrol 115:385–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90216-K
Håkanson L, Nilsson Å, Andersson T (1988) Mercury in fish in Swedish lakes. Environ Pollut 49:145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(88)90246-1
Hall LW, Killen WD, Fischer SA (1994) The efficacy of a limestone doser to mitigate stream acidification in a Maryland coastal plain stream: implication for migratory fish species. Environ Monit Assess 31:233–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00577256
Hammerschmidt CR, Fitzgerald WF (2006) Bioaccumulation and trophic transfer of methylmercury in Long Island Sound. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-005-0265-7
Hayhoe K, Wake CP, Huntington TG et al. (2007) Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the US Northeast. Clim Dyn 28:381–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0187-8
Herrero Ortega S, Catalán N, Björn E et al. (2017) High methylmercury formation in ponds fueled by fresh humic and algal derived organic matter. Limnol Oceanogr. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10722
Hindar A, Wright RF, Nilsen P et al. (2003) Effects on stream water chemistry and forest vitality after whole-catchment application of dolomite to a forest ecosystem in southern Norway. For Ecol Manage 180:509–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00647-3
Homan C, Beier C, McCay T, Lawrence G (2016) Application of lime (CaCO3) to promote forest recovery from severe acidification increases potential for earthworm invasion. For Ecol Manage 368:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.002
Hongve D, Haaland S, Riise G et al. (2012) Decline of acid rain enhances mercury concentrations in fish. Environ Sci Technol 46:2490–2491. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3002629
Hudy M, Downey DM, Bowman DW (2000) Successful restoration of an acidified native brook trout stream through mitigation with limestone sand N Am J Fish Manag 20:453–466. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(2000)0202.3.CO;2
Jardine TD, Kidd KA, O’ Driscoll N (2013) Food web analysis reveals effects of pH on mercury bioaccumulation at multiple trophic levels in streams. Aquat Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.01.013
Jiang T, Bravo AG, Skyllberg U et al. (2018) Influence of dissolved organic matter (DOM) characteristics on dissolved mercury (Hg) species composition in sediment porewater of lakes from southwest China. Water Res 146:146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.054
Johnson CE, Driscoll CT, Blum JD et al. (2014) Soil chemical dynamics after calcium silicate addition to a Northern hardwood forest. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:1458. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2014.03.0114
Josephson DC, Lawrence GB, George SD et al. (2019) Response of water chemistry and young-of-year brook trout to channel and watershed liming in streams showing lagging recovery from acidic deposition. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 230:144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4186-x
Josephson DC, Robinson JM, Chiotti J et al. (2014) Chemical and biological recovery from acid deposition within the Honnedaga Lake watershed, New York, USA. Environ Monit Assess 186:4391–4409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3706-9
Kerin EJ, Gilmour CC, Roden E et al. (2006) Mercury methylation by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7919–7921. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01602-06
Lawrence GB, Burns DA, Riva-Murray K (2016) A new look at liming as an approach to accelerate recovery from acidic deposition effects deposition effects. Sci Total Environ 562:35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.176
Lawrence GB, Roy KM, Baldigo BP et al. (2008) Chronic and episodic acidification of Adirondack streams from acid rain in 2003–2005. J Environ Qual 37:2264–2274. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0061
Lawrence GB, Simonin HA, Baldigo BP et al. (2011) Changes in the chemistry of acidified Adirondack streams from the early 1980s to 2008. Environ Pollut 159:2750–2758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.05.016
Likens GE, Buso DC (2012) Dilution and the elusive baseline. Environ Sci Technol 46:4382–4387. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3000189
Mangal V, Stenzler BR, Poulain AJ, Guéguen C (2019) Aerobic and anaerobic bacterial mercury uptake is driven by algal organic matter composition and molecular weight. Environ Sci Technol 53:157–165. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04909
Matthews DA, Babcock DB, Nolan JG et al. (2013) Whole-lake nitrate addition for control of methylmercury in mercury-contaminated Onondaga Lake, NY. Environ Res 125:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2013.03.011
Melvin AM, Lichstein JW, Goodale CL (2013) Forest liming increases forest floor carbon and nitrogen stocks in a mixed hardwood forest. Ecol Appl. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0274.1
Menendez R, Clayton JL, Zurbuch PE (1996) Chemical and fishery responses to mitigative liming of an acidic stream, Dogway Fork, West Virginia. Restor Ecol 4:220–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1996.tb00175.x
Millard GD, Driscoll CT, Burns DA et al. (2018) Response of mercury in an Adirondack (NY, USA) forest stream to watershed lime application. Environ Sci Process Impacts 20:607–620. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7em00520b
Monteith DT, Stoddard JL, Evans CD et al. (2007) Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry. Nature 450:537–540. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06316
Mulholland PJ, Driscoll CT, Elwood JW et al. (1992) Relationships between stream acidity and bacteria, macroinvertebrates, and fish: a comparison of north temperate and south temperate mountain streams, USA. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027525
National Drought Mitigation Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2016) U.S. Drought Monitor. https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu. Accessed 14 May 2019
Newton RM, Burns DA, Blette VL, Driscoll CT (1996) Effect of whole catchment liming on the episodic acidification of two adirondack streams. Biogeochemistry 32:299–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187143
NIDIS (2019) Drought in New York. https://www.drought.gov/drought/states/new-york. Accessed 19 Feb 2019
Olson ML, DeWild JF (1999) Techniques for the collection and species-specific analysis of low levels of mercury in water, sediment, and biota. Water Resources Investigation Report, US Geological Survey
Peters SC, Blum JD, Driscoll CT, Likens GE (2004) Dissolution of wollastonite during the experimental manipulation of Hubbard Brook Watershed. Biogeochemistry 67:309–329. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOG.0000015787.44175.3f
Post DM (2002) The long and short of food-chain length. Trends Ecol Evol 17:269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02455-2
Poulin BA, Ryan JN, Aiken GR (2014) Effects of Iron on optical properties of dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 48:10098–10106. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502670r
R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing
Rask M, Jones RI, Järvinen M et al. (2007) Changes in fish mercury concentrations over 20 years in an acidified lake subject to experimental liming. Appl Geochemistry 22:1229–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.03.015
Riva-Murray K, Burns DA (2020) Methylmercury and associated data in macroinvertebrates from tributaries of Honnedaga Lake and from the Middle Branch Black River in New York. Data release, U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9C17PA0
Riva-Murray K, Chasar LC, Bradley PM et al. (2011) Spatial patterns of mercury in macroinvertebrates and fishes from streams of two contrasting forested landscapes in the eastern United States. Ecotoxicology 20:1530–1542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0719-9
Sandheinrich MB, Wiener JG (2011) Methylmercury in freshwater fish: recent advances in assessing toxicity of environmentally relevant exposures. In: Beyer WN, Meador JP (eds) Environmental contaminants in biota: interpreting tissue concentrations. 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, US, pp 169–190
Scheuhammer AM, Meyer MW, Sandheinrich MB, Murray MW (2007) Effects of Environmental Methylmercury on the Health of Wild Birds, Mammals, and Fish. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[12:EOEMOT]2.0.CO;2
Schmidt KL, Sharpe WE (2002) Passive treatment methods for acid water in Pennsylvania. Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences
Schwarz CR, Wade EB (1990) The North American datum of 1983: Project methodology and execution. BGeod 64:28–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530614
Scudder BC, Chasar LC, DeWeese LR et al. (2008) Procedures for collecting and processing streambed sediment and pore water for analysis of mercury as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Open-File Report 2008–1279. National 63
Sebestyen SD, Boyer EW, Shanley JB (2009) Responses of stream nitrate and DOC loadings to hydrological forcing and climate change in an upland forest of the northeastern United States. J Geophys Res Biogeosciences 114:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000778
Shao S, Driscoll CT, Johnson CE et al. (2016) Long-term responses in soil solution and stream-water chemistry at Hubbard Brook after experimental addition of wollastonite. Environ Chem 13:528. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN15113
Shao S, Driscoll CT, Sullivan TJ et al. (2020) The response of stream ecosystems in the Adirondack region of New York to historical and future changes in atmospheric deposition of sulfur and nitrogen. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137113
Shastri Y, Diwekar U (2008) Optimal control of lake pH for mercury bioaccumulation control. Ecol Modell 216:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.03.019
Shen Y, Chapelle FH, Strom EW, Benner R (2015) Origins and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter in groundwater. Biogeochemistry 122:61–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-014-0029-4
Simonin HA, Loukmas JJ, Skinner LC, Roy KM (2008) Lake variability: key factors controlling mercury concentrations in New York State fish. Environ Pollut 154:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.032
Skyllberg U, Qian J, Frech W et al. (2003) Distribution of mercury, methyl mercury and organic sulphur species in soil, soil solution and stream of a boreal forest catchment. Biogeochemistry 64:53–76. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024904502633
Strock KE, Nelson SJ, Kahl JS et al. (2014) Decadal trends reveal recent acceleration in the rate of recovery from acidification in the northeastern U.S. Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404772n
Tsui MTK, Finlay JC (2011) Influence of dissolved organic carbon on methylmercury bioavailability across minnesota stream ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es200332f
Tsui MTK, Finlay JC, Nater EA (2008) Effects of stream water chemistry and tree species on release and methylation of mercury during litter decomposition. Environ Sci Technol 42:8692–8697. https://doi.org/10.1021/es800956q
US EPA (1995) Method 1669: sampling ambient water for trace metals at EPA water quality criteria levels. United States Environmental Protection Agency, pp 1–42
US EPA (2002) Method 1631, revision E: mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. United States Environmental Protection Agency, p 1–46
US EPA (2007) Method 1630 methyl mercury in water by distillation, aqueous ethylation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. United States Environmental Protection Agency, p 1–55
US Global Change Research Program (2018) Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, In: Reidmiller DR, Avery CW, Easterling DR, Kunkel KE, Lewis KLM, Maycock TK, Stewart BC (eds) US Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, Vol II pp. 1515 https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018
US Geological Survey (2020) USGS water data for the nation. U.S. Geological Survey, National Water Information System database. https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN. Accessed 21 Feb 2020
Ussiri DaN, Johnson CE (2004) Sorption of organic carbon fractions by spodosol mineral horizons. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:253. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0253
Waller K, Driscoll C, Lynch J et al. (2012) Long-term recovery of lakes in the Adirondack region of New York to decreases in acidic deposition. Atmos Environ 46:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.031
Ward DM, Nislow KH, Folt CL (2010) Bioaccumulation syndrome: Identifying factors that make some stream food webs prone to elevated mercury bioaccumulation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1195:62–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05456.x
Weishaar J, Aiken G, Bergamaschi B et al. (2003) Evaluation of specific ultra-violet absorbance as an indicator of the chemical content of dissolved organic carbon. Environ Sci Technol 37:4702–4708. https://doi.org/10.1021/es030360x
Acknowledgements
Support for this study was provided by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and the National Science Foundation through the National Science Foundation Research Training program through the Educational Model Program of Water Energy Research (EMPOWER). NYSERDA has not reviewed the information herein, and the opinions expressed in this report to not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York. The authors would also like to acknowledge the contributions of the USGS field group for assisting with sample collection, and the Adirondack League Club and Cornell University for access to our study sites. The load flex scripts we used to calculate loads for multiple sites and constituents were developed by W. David Watkins and Alison Appling with funding from the USGS and an agreement among USGS, the National Water Agency (ANA) of Brazil, and the Geological Survey of Brazil (CPRM). This research does not reflect the official positions and policies of the US Environmental Protection Agency. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Millard, G.D., Riva-Murray, K., Burns, D.A. et al. The impact of lime additions on mercury dynamics in stream chemistry and macroinvertebrates: a comparison of watershed and direct stream addition management strategies. Ecotoxicology 29, 1627–1643 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-020-02224-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-020-02224-1