The use of indicator species to test for environmental stability and functioning is a widespread practice. In aquatic systems, several daphniids (Cladocera: Daphniidae) are commonly used as indicator species; registration of new pesticides are mandated by the Environmental Protection Agency to be accompanied by daphniid toxicity data. This reliance upon a few species to infer ecosystem health and function assumes similar responses to toxicants across species with potentially very different life histories and susceptibility. Incorporating lab-derived life-history data into a simple mathematical model, we explore the reliability of three different daphniid species as surrogates for each other by comparing their responses to reductions in survivorship and fecundity after simulated exposure to toxicants. Our results demonstrate that daphniid species’ responses to toxicant exposure render them poor surrogates for one another, highlighting that caution should be exercised in using a surrogate approach to the use of indicator species in risk assessment.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Banks JE, Ackleh AS, Stark JD (2010) The use of surrogate species in risk assessment: using life history data to safeguard against false negatives. Risk Anal 30:175–182
Banks JE, Stark JD, Vargas RI, Ackleh AS (2011) Parasitoids and ecological risk assessment: can toxicity data developed for one species be used to protect an entire guild? Biol Control 59:336–339
Banks JE, Stark JD, Vargas RI, Ackleh AS (2014) Deconstructing the surrogate species concept: a life history approach to the protection of ecosystem services. Ecol Appl 24:770–778
Barata C, Alanon P, Gutierrez-Alonso S, Riva MC, Fernández C, Tarazona JV (2008) A Daphnia magna feeding bioassay as a cost effective and ecological relevant sublethal toxicity test for environmental risk assessment of toxic effluents. Sci Tot Environ 405:78–86
Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (2017) Title 40-ChapterI-Subchapter E-Part 158.Title 40: Protection of Environment PART 158—Data requirements for pesticides. Accessed 16 April 2017. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-1996-title40-vol11/pdf/CFR-1996-title40-vol11-part158.pdf
Caswell H (2001) Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation, 2nd Ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
Cushing JM (1998) An introduction to structured population dynamics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, vol. 71, pp. 193, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia PA
Damasceno de Oliveira LL, Nunes B, Antunes SC, Campitelli-Ramos R, Rocha O (2018) Water Air Soil Pollut 229:116
Deardorff AD, Stark JD (2009) Acute toxicity and hazard assessment of spinosad and R-11 to three cladoceran species and Coho salmon. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 82:549–553
Duchet C, Coutellec MA, Franquet E, Lagneau C, Lagadic L (2010) Population-level effects of spinosad and Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis in Daphnia pulex and Daphnia magna: comparison of laboratory and field microcosm exposure conditions. Ecotoxicology 19:1224–1237
Duchet C, Inafuku MM, Caquet T, Larroque M, Franquet E, Lagneau C, Lagadic L (2011) Chitobiase activity as an indicator of altered survival, growth and reproduction in Daphnia pulex and Daphnia magna (Crustacea: Cladocera) exposed to spinosad and diflubenzuron. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:800–810
Dyer SD, Versteeg DJ, Belanger SE, Chaney JG, Mayer FL (2006) Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 40:3102–3111
Han GH, Hur HG, Kim SD (2006) Ecotoxicological risk of pharmaceuticals from wastewater treatment plants in Korea: occurrence and toxicity to Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:265–271
Harmon SM, Specht WL, Chandler GT (2003) A comparison of the daphnids Ceriodaphnia dubia and Daphnia ambigua for their utilization in routine toxicity testing in the Southeastern United States. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 45:79–85
Lefkovitch LP (1965) The study of population growth in organisms grouped by stages. Biometrics 21:1–18
Leslie PH (1945) On the use of matrices in certain population dynamics. Biometrika 33:184–212
Murphy DD, Weiland PS, Cummins KW (2011) A critical assessment of the use of surrogate species in conservation planning in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California (USA). Conserv Biol 25:873–878
Muyssen BT, Janssen CR (2001) Multigeneration zinc acclimation and tolerance in Daphnia magna: Implications for water-quality guidelines and ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2053–2060
Nunes B, Antunes SC, Santos J, Martins L, Castro BB (2014) Toxic potential of paracetamol to freshwater organisms: A headache to environmental regulators? Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 107:178–185
Printes LB, Callaghan A (2004) A comparative study on the relationship between acetylcholinesterase activity and acute toxicity in Daphnia magna exposed to anticholinesterase insecticides. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1241–1247
Stark JD, Vargas RI (2003) Demographic changes in Daphnia pulex (Leydig) after exposure to the insecticides spinosad and diazinon. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 56:334–338
Taylor NS, Kirwan JA, Johnson C, Yan ND, Viantm MR, Gunn JM, McGeer JC (2016) Predicting chronic copper and nickel reproductive toxicity to Daphnia pulex-pulicaria from whole-animal metabolic profiles. Environ Poll 212:325–329
USEPA (2016) EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0154. Ecological Effects Test Guidelines. OCSPP 850.1010: Aquatic Invertebrate Acute Toxicity Test, Freshwater Daphnids. https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0154-0041
Wiens JA, Hayward GD, Holthausen RS, Wisdom MJ (2008) Using surrogate species and groups for conservation planning and management. Bioscience 58:241–252
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
About this article
Cite this article
Banks, J.E., Ackleh, A.S., Veprauskas, A. et al. The trouble with surrogates in environmental risk assessment: a daphniid case study. Ecotoxicology 28, 62–68 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-018-1999-0
- Surrogate species
- Population model
- Sublethal effects