Advertisement

Ecotoxicology

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 457–476 | Cite as

Reproductive success and contaminant associations in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) used to assess a Beneficial Use Impairment in U.S. and Binational Great Lakes’ Areas of Concern

  • Christine M. Custer
  • Thomas W. Custer
  • Matthew A. Etterson
  • Paul M. Dummer
  • Diana Goldberg
  • J. Christian Franson
Article

Abstract

During 2010-2014, tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) reproductive success was monitored at 68 sites across all 5 Great Lakes, including 58 sites located within Great Lakes Areas of Concern (AOCs) and 10 non-AOCs. Sample eggs were collected from tree swallow clutches and analyzed for contaminants including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins and furans, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and 34 other organic compounds. Contaminant data were available for 360 of the clutches monitored. Markov chain multistate modeling was used to assess the importance of 5 ecological variables and 11 of the dominant contaminants in explaining the pattern of egg and nestling failure rates. Four of 5 ecological variables (Female Age, Date within season, Year, and Site) were important explanatory variables. Of the 11 contaminants, only total dioxin and furan toxic equivalents (TEQs) explained a significant amount of the egg failure probabilities. Neither total PCBs nor PCB TEQs explained the variation in egg failure rates. In a separate analysis, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in nestling diet, used as a proxy for female diet during egg laying, was significantly correlated with the daily probability of egg failure. The 8 sites within AOCs which had poorer reproduction when compared to 10 non-AOC sites, the measure of impaired reproduction as defined by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, were associated with exposure to dioxins and furan TEQs, PAHs, or depredation. Only 2 sites had poorer reproduction than the poorest performing non-AOC. Using a classic (non-modeling) approach to estimating reproductive success, 82% of nests hatched at least 1 egg, and 75% of eggs laid, excluding those collected for contaminant analyses, hatched.

Keywords

Tree swallows Markov chain Organic contaminants Great lakes Areas of concern Reproductive success 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) and USGS, Environmental Health Mission Area. We thank Jennifer Herner-Thogmartin for data entry, and Christopher Balk, Greg Berner, Crystal Bole, Peggy Boone, Rod Booth Jr., Amanda Bosak, Andrew Haertel, Aaron Heimann, Yvette Hernandez, Melanie Iverson, Matthew Larkin, Adam Lorenz, Sean O’Mara, Ron Mayer, Patrick McKann, Karen McMullen, Melissa Meier, Kristina Artner Mott, Kelsey Prestby, Darin Ripp, Paul Ripple, Clif Schneider, Laura Solem, Dan Tagerson, Joshua Teslaa, Jocelyn Tschaikovsky, Max Weber, and Tesha Zimmerman for field assistance. This work could not have been done without the access granted by > 75 landowners; their accommodations for our activities were greatly appreciated. We also thank Christy Morrissey, Tom Stanley, Jack Waide, and two anonymous journal reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the ms.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain studies with human participants and all procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the studies were conducted.

Supplementary material

10646_2018_1913_MOESM1_ESM.docx (47 kb)
Supplementary Information
10646_2018_1913_MOESM2_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary Information
10646_2018_1913_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (52 kb)
Supplementary Information

References

  1. Bishop CA, Mahony NA, Trudeau S, Pettit KE (1999) Reproductive success and biochemical effects in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbon contaminants in wetlands of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River basin, USA and Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:263–271.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620180224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop CA, Collins B, Mineau P, Burgess NM, Read WF, Risley C (2000) Reproduction of cavity-nesting birds in pesticide-sprayed apple orchards in southern Ontario, Canada, 1988–1994. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:588–599Google Scholar
  3. Blancher PJ, McNicol DK (1988) Breeding biology of tree swallows in relation to wetland acidity. Can J Zool 66:842–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blancher PJ, McNicol DK (1991) Tree swallow diet in relation to wetland acidity. Can J Zool 69:2629–2637.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z91-370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brasso RL, Cristol DA (2008) Effects of mercury exposure on the reproductive success of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Ecotoxicology 17:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broman D, Näf C, Lundbergh I, Zebühr Y (1990) An in situ study on the distribution, biotransformation and flux of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in an aquatic food chain (Seston-Mytilus edulis L.-Somateria mollissima L.) from the Baltic: an ecotoxicological perspective. Environ Toxicol Chem 9:429–442Google Scholar
  7. Brunström B, Broman D, Näf C (1990) Embryotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in three domestic avian species, and of PAHs and coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the common eider. Environ Pollut 67:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information theoretic approach. Springer, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  9. Custer CM (2011) Swallows as a sentinel species for contaminant exposure and effect studies. In: Elliott JE, et al. (eds) Wildlife ecotoxicology: forensic approaches, emerging topics in ecotoxicology 3. Springer, New York, NY, p 45–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Custer CM, Custer TW, Allen PD, Stromborg KL, Melancon MJ (1998) Reproduction and environmental contamination in tree swallows nesting in the Fox River drainage and Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:1765–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Custer CM, Custer TW, Dummer PM, Munney KL (2003) Exposure and effects of chemical contaminants on tree swallows nesting along the Housatonic River, Berkshire County, Massachusetts, USA, 1998–2000. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1605–1621Google Scholar
  12. Custer CM, Custer TW, Rosiu CJ, Melancon MJ, Bickham JW, Matson CW (2005) Exposure and effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) nesting along the Woonasquatucket River, Rhode Island, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:93–109.  https://doi.org/10.1897/03-682.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Custer CM, Custer TW, Schoenfuss HL, Poganski BH, Solem L (2012) Exposure and effects of perfluoroalkyl compounds on tree swallows nesting at Lake Johanna in east central Minnesota, USA. Reprod Toxicol 33:556–562.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Custer CM, Custer TW, Dummer PM, Etterson MA, Thogmartin WE, Wu Q, Kannan K, Trowbridge A, McKann PC (2014) Exposure and effects of perfluoroalkyl substances in Tree Swallows Nesting in Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 66:120–138.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-013-9934-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Custer CM, Custer TW, Dummer PM, Goldberg D, Franson JC (2016) Concentrations and spatial patterns of organic contaminants in tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) eggs at United States and Binational Great Lakes Areas of Concern, 2010-1015. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:3071–3092.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Custer TW, Custer CM, Dummer PM, Goldberg D, Franson JC, Erickson RA (2017a) Organic contamination in tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) nestlings at United States and binational Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:735–748.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3598 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Custer TW, Custer CM, Dummer PM, Bigorgne E, Oziolor EM, Karouna-Renier N, Schultz S, Erickson RA, Aagaard K, Mattson CW (2017b) EROD activity, chromosomal damage, and oxidative stress in response to contaminants exposure in tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) nestlings from Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Ecotoxicology 26:1392–1407.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-017-1863-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dawson RD (2008) Timing of breeding and environmental factors as determinants of reproductive performance of tree swallows. Can J Zool 86:843–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Steven D (1978) The influence of age on the breeding biology of the tree swallow Iridoprocne bicolor. Ibis 120:516–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott JE, Martin PA, Arnold TW, Sinclair PH (1994) Organochlorines and reproductive success of birds in orchard and non-orchard areas of central British Columbia, Canada, 1990-91. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 26:435–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Etterson MA, Nagy LR, Robinson TR (2007a) Partitioning risk among different sources of nest-failure. Auk 124:432–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Etterson MA, Olsen B, Greenberg R (2007b) The analysis of covariates in multi-fate Markov chain nest failure models. Stud Avian Biol 34:55–64Google Scholar
  23. Etterson MA (2013) Technical Manual for MCestimate. EPA/600/B-13/164. p 22. http://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/markov-chain-nest-productivity-model-documentation
  24. Farmahin R, Manning GE, Crump D, Wu D, Mundy LJ, Jones SP, Hahn ME, Karchner SI, Giesy JP, Bursian SJ, Zwiernik MJ, Fredricks TB, Kennedy SW (2013) Amino Acid sequence of the ligand-binding domain of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 predicts sensitivity of wild birds to effects of dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol Sci 131:139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fox GA (1993) What have biomarkers told us about the effects of contaminants on the health of fish-eating birds in the Great lakes? The theory and a literature review. J Great Lakes Res 19:722–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fredricks TB, Zwiernik MJ, Seston RM, Coefield SJ, Tazelaar DL, Roark SA, Kay DP, Newsted JL, Giesy JP (2011) Effects on tree swallows exposed to dioxin-like compounds associated with the Tittabawassee River and floodplain near Midland, Michigan, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:1354–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilchrist TT, Letcher RJ, Thomas P, Fernie KJ (2014) Polybrominated diphenyl ethers and multiple stressor influence the reproduction of free-ranging tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) nesting at wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Environ 472:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (2012). http://binational.net/annexes/a1/. Accessed 22 Mar 2016
  29. Harris ML, Elliott JE (2011) Effects of polychlorinated biphenyls, dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in wild birds. In: Beyer WN, Meador JP (eds) Environmental contaminants in biota., 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p 477–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Head JA (2006) Variation in the cytochrome P4501A response to dioxin-like compounds in avian species. Dissertation, University of OttawaGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoffman DJ (1978) Embryotoxic effects of crude oil in mallard ducks and chicks. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 46:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hussell DJT (1983) Age and plumage color in female tree swallows. J Field Ornith 54:312–318Google Scholar
  33. Lebreton J-D, Nichols JD, Barker RJ, Pradel R, Spendelow JA (2009) Modeling individual animal histories with multistate capture recapture models. Caswell H (ed.) Advances in ecological research, vol 41. Academic, Burlington, MA, p 87–173Google Scholar
  34. Lederle PE (1995) Effects of female age on reproduction, parental care, and growth of young in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Dissertation, Michigan State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  35. Lozano GA, Handford PT (1995) A test of an assumption of delayed plumage maturation hypotheses using female tree swallows. Wilson Bull 107:153–164Google Scholar
  36. Mayfield HF (1975) Suggestions for calculating nest success. Wilson Bull 87:456–466Google Scholar
  37. Mengelkoch JM, Niemi GJ, Regal RR (2004) Diet of the nestling tree swallow. Condor 106:423–429.  https://doi.org/10.1650/7341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Näf C, Broman D, Brunström B (1992) Distribution and metabolism of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) injected into eggs of chicken (Gallus domesticus) and common eider duck (Somateria mollissima). Environ Toxicol Chem 11:1653–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neigh AM, Zwiernik MJ, Bradley PW, Kay DP, Park CS, Jones PD, Newsted JL, Blankenship AL, Giesy JP (2006a) Tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls at the Kalamazoo River superfund site, Michigan, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:428–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neigh AM, Zwiernik MJ, MacCarroll MA, Newsted JL, Blankenship AI, Jones PD, Kay DP, Giesy JP (2006b) Productivity of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) exposed to PCBs at the Kalamazoo River superfund site. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 69:395–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pearce N (2000) The ecological fallacy strikes back. J Epidemiol Community Health 54:326–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robertson RJ, Stutchbury BJ, Cohen RR (1992) Tree swallow. In: Poole A, Stettenhein P, Gill F (eds) Tree swallow, the birds of North America no. 11. Academy of Natural Sciences and American Ornithologists Union, Philadelphia and Washington DC, p 26Google Scholar
  43. Smits JE, Wayland ME, Miller MJ, Liber K, Trudeau S (2000) Reproductive, immune, and physiological end points in tree swallows on reclaimed oil sands mine sites. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2951–2960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. St. Louis VL, Barlow JC (1993) The reproductive success of tree swallows nesting near experimentally acidified lakes in northwestern Ontario. Can J Zool 71:109–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stapleton MK, Robertson RJ (2006) Female tree swallow home-range movements during their fertile period as revealed by radio-tracking. Wilson J Ornithol 118:502–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stickel LF, Wiemeyer SN, Blus LJ (1973) Pesticide residues in eggs of wild birds: adjustment for loss of moisture and lipid. Bull Contam Toxicol 9:193–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stutchbury BJ, Robertson RJ (1988) Within-season and age-related patterns of reproductive performance in female tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Can J Zool 66:827–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van den Berg M, Birnbaum L, Bosveld ATC, Brunströöm B, Cook P, Feeley M, Giesey JP, Hanberg A, Hasegawa R, Kennedy SW, Kubiak T, Larsen JCO, Rolaf van Leeuwen RX, Djien Liem AK, Nolt C, Peterson RE, Poellinger L, Safe S, Schrenk D, Tilllitt D, Tysklind M, Younes M, Waern F, Zacharewski T (1998) Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. Environ Health Perspect 106:775–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wayland M, Trudeau S, Marchant T, Parker D, Hobson K (1998) The effect of pulp and paper mill effluent on an insectivorous bird, the tree swallow. Ecotoxicology 7(4):237–251.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008942929560 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Winkler DW, Allen PE (1996) The seasonal decline in tree swallow clutch size: physiological constraint or strategic adjustment? Ecology 77:922–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyUpper Midwest Environmental Sciences CenterLa CrosseUSA
  2. 2.Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Mid-Continent Ecology DivisionU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyDuluthUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Geological SurveyNational Wildlife Health CenterMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations