Advertisement

Ecotoxicology

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 430–439 | Cite as

Protein profiling as early detection biomarkers for TiO2 nanoparticle toxicity in Daphnia magna

  • Paula Sá-Pereira
  • Mário S. Diniz
  • Liliana Moita
  • Teresa Pinheiro
  • Elsa Mendonça
  • Susana M. Paixão
  • Ana Picado
Article

Abstract

The mode of action for nanoparticle (NP) toxicity in aquatic organisms is not yet fully understood. In this work, a strategy other than toxicity testing was applied to Daphnia magna exposed to TiO2-NPs: the use of nuclear microscopy and the assessment of protein profile. D. magna is a keystone species broadly used as a model system in ecotoxicology. Titanium (Ti) was found in the D. magna digestive tract, mainly in the gut. The penetration of Ti into the epithelial region was greater at higher exposure levels and also observed in eggs in the brood pouch. The protein profile of individuals exposed to different concentrations showed that 2.8 and 5.6 mg/L TiO2-NP concentrations induced an over-expression of the majority of proteins, in particular proteins with molecular weight of ∼120, 85 and 15 kDa, while 11.2 mg/L TiO2-NP had an inhibitory effect on protein expression. The Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization with tandem time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF MS) analysis of these proteins consistently identified them as vitellogenin (Vtg)-like proteins, associated with enzymes involved in redox balance. These results indicate that Vtg-like proteins are up-regulated in D. magna exposed to TiO2-NPs. Vitellogenesis is associated with the reproduction system, suggesting that TiO2-NP exposure can impair reproduction by affecting this process. The precise mode of action of TiO2-NPs is still unclear and the results from this study are a first attempt to identify specific proteins as potential markers of TiO2-NP toxicity in D. magna, providing useful information for future research.

Keywords

TiO2 nanoparticles Daphnia magna 1D-electrophoresis Protein profiling Early biomarkers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Project funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, PTDC/CTM/099446/2008 and PEst-C/EQB/LA0006/2011 granted to Requimte. This work was also financed by national funds through FCT–Foundation for Science and Technology, under the project UID/BIO/04565/2013 and Programa Operacional Regional de Lisboa (LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007317). In addition, the authors would like to acknowledge Dr. José Carlos Roseiro, senior researcher from LNEG, and Dr. Andrew Wilbey, professor from University of Reading at UK, for carefully proof reading of the English in this article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aguer P, Alves LC, Ph Barberet, Gontier E, Incerti S, Michelet-Habchi C, Kertész Zs, Kiss AZ, Moretto P, Pallon J, Pinheiro T, Surlève-Bazeille JE, Szikszai Z, Veríssimo A, Ynsa MD (2005) Skin morphology and layer identification using different STIM geometries. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 231:292–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aruoja V, Dubourguier H-C, Kasemets K, Kahru A (2009) Toxicity of nanoparticles of CuO, ZnO and TiO2 to microalgae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Sci Total Environ 407:1461–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradford MM (1976) Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley BP, Kalampanayil B, O’Neill MC (2009) Protein expression profiling. Methods Mol Biol 519:455–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breese MB, Jamieson DN, King PJ (1996) Materials analysis using a nuclear microprobe. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, Sussex, Journals, Bans Lane PO 19 1 UD, UK, 1996. 428Google Scholar
  6. Chen S, Chen DF, Yang F, Nagasawa H, Yang WJ (2011) Characterization and processing of superoxide dsmutase-fused vitellogenin in the diapause embryo formation: a special developmental pathway in the brine shrimp, Artemia parthenogenetica. Biol Reprod 85:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chevalier J, Harscoët E, Keller M, Pandard P, Cachot J, Grote M (2015) Exploration of Daphnia behavioral effect profiles induced by a broad range of toxicants with different modes of action. Environ Toxicol Chem 34:1760–1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colbourne JK, Pfrender ME, Gilbert D, Thomas WK, Tucker A, Oakley TH et al. (2011) The Ecoresponsive genome of Daphnia pulex. Science 331:555–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dabrunz A, Duester L, Prasse C, Seitz F, Rosenfeldt R, Schilde C, Schaumann GE, Schulz R (2011) Biological surface coating and molting inhibition as mechanisms of TiO2 nanoparticle toxicity in Daphnia magna. PLoS ONE 6:e20112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Chaffoy CD, Kondo M (1980) Lipovitellin from the crustacean, Artemia salina: biochemical analysis of lipovitellin complex from the yolk granules. J Biol Chem 255:6727–6733Google Scholar
  11. Dhadialla TS, Raikhel AS (1990) Biosynthesis of mosquito vitellogenin. J Biol Chem 265:9924–9933Google Scholar
  12. Diniz MS, Matos AP, Lourenço J, Castro L, Peres I, Mendonça E, Picado A (2013) Liver alterations in two freshwater fish species (Carassius auratus and Danio rerio) following exposure to different TiO2 nanoparticles concentrations. Microsc Microanal 19:1131–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elendt BP, Bias WR (1990) Trace nutrient deficiency in Daphnia magna cultured in standard medium for toxicity testing. Effects of the optimization of culture conditions of life history parameters of Daphnia magna. Water Res 24:1157–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Exbrayat JM, Moudilou EN, Lapied E (2015) Harmful effects of nanoparticles on animals. J Nanotechnol 2015:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farhadian S, Shareghi B, Salavati-Niasari M, Amooaghaei R (2012) Spectroscopic studies on the interaction of nano-TiO2 with lysozyme. J Nanostr 1:95–103Google Scholar
  16. Federici G, Shaw BJ, Handy R (2007) Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): gill injury, oxidative stress, and other physiological effects. Aquat Toxicol 84:415–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galesio M, Vieira DV, Rial-Otero R, Lodeiro C, Moura I, Capelo JL (2008) Influence of the protein staining in the fast ultrasonic sample treatment for protein identification through peptide mass fingerprint and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 7:2097–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gopalan R, Osman I, Amani A, de Matas M, Anderson D (2009) The effect of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in the comet assay with UVA photoactivation of human sperm and lymphocytes. Nanotoxicology 3:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grime GW, Dawson M (1995) Recent developments in data acquisition and processing on the Oxford scanning proton microprobe. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 104:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grime GW (1996) The “Q factor” method: quantitative microPIXE analysis using RBS normalisation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 109–110:170–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guilhermino L, Diamantino T, Silva MS, Soares AMVM (2000) Acute toxicity test with Daphnia magna: an alternative to mammals in the prescreening of chemical toxicity? Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46:357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gulson B, McCall M, Korsch M, Gomez L, Casey P, Oytam Y, Taylor A, McCulloch M, Trotter J, Kinsley L, Greenoak G (2010) Small amounts of zinc from zinc oxide particles in sunscreens applied outdoors are absorbed through human skin. Toxicol Sci 118:140–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gulson B, McCall MJ, Bowman DM, Pinheiro T (2015) A review of critical factors for assessing the dermal absorption of metal oxide nanoparticles from sunscreens applied to humans, and a research strategy to address current deficiencies. Arch Toxicol 89:1909–1930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Havukainen H, Halskau Y, Skjaerven L, Smedal B, Amdam GV (2011) Deconstructing honeybee vitellogenin: novel 40 kDa fragment assigned to its N terminus. J Exp Biol 214:582–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hund-Rinke K, Simon M (2006) Ecotoxic effect of photocatalytic active nanoparticles (TiO2) on algae and daphnids. Environ Sci Pollut Res 13:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ISO 6341 (1996) Water quality – determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna straus (Cladocera, Crustacea) – Acute toxicity Test. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 6341Google Scholar
  27. Ivask A, Juganson K, Bondarenko O, Mortimer M, Aruoja V, Kasemets K, Blinova I, Heinlaan M, Slaveykova V, Kahru A (2014) Mechanisms of toxic action of Ag, ZnO and CuO nanoparticles to selected ecotoxicological test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a comparative review. Nanotoxicology Suppl 1:57–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kahru A, Dubourguier HC (2010) From ecotoxicology to nanoecotoxicology. Toxicology 269:105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kang HY (2010) A review of the emerging nanotechnology industry: materials, fabrications, and applications. Department of Toxic Substances Control Pollution Prevention and Green Technology, California, p 64 Google Scholar
  30. Kato Y, Tokishita S, Ohta T, Yamagata H (2004) A vitellogenin chain containing a superoxide dismutase-like domain is the major component of yolk proteins in cladoceran crustacean Daphnia magna. Gene 334:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kemp CJ, Kültz D (2012) Controlling proteome degradation in Daphnia pulex. J Exp Zool Part A 317A:645–651Google Scholar
  32. Khanna P, Ong C, Bay BH, Baeg GH (2015) Nanotoxicity: an interplay of oxidative stress, inflammation and cell death. Nanomaterials 5:1163–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kruger N (1994) The Bradford method for protein quantitation. In: Walker, J (ed) Basic Prot Pep Prot Humana Press, Department of Plant Sciences University of Oxford, UK, pp 9–15Google Scholar
  34. Lavicoli I, Fontana L, Leso V, Bergamaschi A (2013) The effects of nanomaterials as endocrine disruptors. Int J Mol Sci 14:16732–16801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li B, Ze YG, Sun QQ, Zhang T, Sang XZ, Cui YL, Wang XC, Gui SX, Tan DL, Zhu M, Zhao XY, Sheng L, Wang L, Hong FS, Tang M (2013) Molecular mechanisms of nanosized titanium dioxide-induced pulmonary injury in mice. PloS ONE 8(2):e55563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lovern SB, Klaper R (2006) Daphnia magna mortality when exposed to titanium dioxide and fullerene (C-60) nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1132–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Menard A, Drobne D, Jamec A (2011) Ecotoxicity of nanosized TiO2. Review of in vitro data. Env Poll 159:677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meusy JJ, Payen GG (1988) Female reproduction in malacostracan Crustacea. Zool Sci 5:217–265Google Scholar
  39. Ni M, Li F, Wang B, Xu K, Zhang H, Hu J, Tian J, Shen W, Li B (2015) Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on the reproduction of silkworm. Biol Trace Elem Res 164:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peters R, De Bernardi R (eds) (1987) Daphnia. Memorie Dell’Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia Dott. Marco de Marchi, 45, p 502, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Verbania PallanzaGoogle Scholar
  41. Pinheiro T, Moita L, Silva L, Mendonça E, Picado A (2013) Nuclear microscopy as a tool in TiO2 nanoparticles bioaccumulation studies in aquatic species. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 306:117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pinheiro T, Silva R, Fleming R, Gonçalves A, Barreiros MA, Silva JN, Morlière P, Santus R, Filipe P (2014) Primary hemochromatosis: distribution and quantitation of skin iron. Correlations with total body stores. Acta Derm-Venereol 94:14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raviv S, Parnes S, Segall C, Davis C, Sagi A (2006) Complete sequence of Litopenaeus vannamei (Crustacea: Decapoda) vitellogenin cDNA and its expression in endocrinologically induced sub-adult females. Gen Comp Endocrin 145:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reith M, Munholland J, Kelly J, Finn RN, Fyhn HJ (2001) Lipovitellins derived from two forms of vitellogenin are differentially processed during oocyte maturation in haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus). J Exp Zool 291:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sappington TW, Raikhel AS (1998) Molecular characteristics of insect vitellogenins and vitellogenin receptors. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 28:277–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schlich K, Terytze K, Hund-Rinke K (2012) Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles in the earthworm reproduction test. Environ Sci Eur Bridg Sci Regul Reg Eur Lev 24:5Google Scholar
  47. Shevchenko A, Tomas H, Havlis J, Olsen JV, Mann M (2006) In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat Prot 1:2856–2860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shi H, Magaye R, Castranova V, Zha J (2013) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of current toxicological data. Part Fibre Toxicol 10:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stein JR (1973) Handbook of Phycological Methods, Culture Methods, and Growth Measurements. Cambridge Univ. Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Takeda K, Suzuki KI, Ishihara A, Kubo-Irie M, Fujimoto R, Tabata M, Oshio S, Nihei Y, Ihara T, Sugamata M (2009) Nanoparticles transferred from pregnant mice to their offspring can damage the genital and cranial nerve systems. J Health Sci 55:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tokishita S, Kato Y, Kobayashi T, Nakamura S, Ohta T, Yamagata H (2006) Organization and repression by juvenile hormone of a vitellogenin gene cluster in the crustacean, Daphnia magna. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 345:362–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vasco MS, Alves LC, Corregidor V, Bettiol A, Watt F, Pinheiro T (2017) 3D map distribution of metallic nanoparticles in whole cells using MeV ion microscopy. J Microsc (doi: 10.1111/jmi.12561)Google Scholar
  53. Veríssimo A, Alves LC, Filipe P, Silva JN, Silva R, Ynsa MD, Gontier E, Moretto P, Pallon J, Pinheiro T (2007) Nuclear Microscopy: a tool for imaging elemental distribution and percutaneous absorption in vivo. Microsc Res Tech 70:302–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang J, Zhu X, Zhang X, Zhao Z, Liu H, George R, Wilson-Rawls J, Chang Y, Chen Y (2011) Disruption of zebrafish (Danio rerio) reproduction upon chronic exposure to TiO2 nanoparticles Chemosphere 83:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere 2010.12.069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wiench K, Wohlleben W, Hisgen V, Radke K, Salinas E, Zok S, Landsiedel R (2009) Acute and chronic effects of nano- and non-nano-scale TiO2 and ZnO particles on mobility and reproduction of the freshwater invertebrate Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 76:1356–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang H, Ji Z, Xia T, Meng H, Low-Kam C, Liu R, Pokhrel S, Lin S, Wang X, Liao YP, Wang M, Li L, Rallo R, Damoiseaux R, Telesca D, Mädler L, Cohen Y, Zink JI, Nel AE (2012) Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation. ACS Nano 22 6(5):4349–4368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhu X, Chang Y, Chen Y (2010) Toxicity and bioaccumulation of TiO2 nanoparticle aggregates in Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 78:209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INIAV—Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, IPOeirasPortugal
  2. 2.REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química, Centro de Química Fina e Biotecnologia, Faculdade de Ciências e TecnologiaUniversidade Nova de LisboaCaparicaPortugal
  3. 3.LNEG–Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia, IPAmadoraPortugal
  4. 4.Instituto de Bioengenharia e Biociências, Departamento de Engenharia e Ciências Nucleares, Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  5. 5.APA-Agência Portuguesa do AmbienteAmadoraPortugal

Personalised recommendations