Skip to main content
Log in

Relating fish health and reproductive metrics to contaminant bioaccumulation at the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston coal ash spill site

  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 4.1 million m3 coal ash release into the Emory and Clinch rivers in December 2008 at the Tennessee Valley Authority’s Kingston Fossil Plant in east Tennessee, USA, prompted a long-term, large-scale biological monitoring effort to determine if there are chronic effects of this spill on resident biota. Because of the magnitude of the ash spill and the potential for exposure to coal ash-associated contaminants [e.g., selenium (Se), arsenic (As), and mercury (Hg)] which are bioaccumulative and may present human and ecological risks, an integrative, bioindicator approach was used. Three species of fish were monitored—bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), redear sunfish (L. microlophus), and largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides)—at ash-affected and reference sites annually for 5 years following the spill. On the same individual fish, contaminant burdens were measured in various tissues, blood chemistry parameters as metrics of fish health, and various condition and reproduction indices. A multivariate statistical approach was then used to evaluate relationships between contaminant bioaccumulation and fish metrics to assess the chronic, sub-lethal effects of exposure to the complex mixture of coal ash-associated contaminants at and around the ash spill site. This study suggests that while fish tissue concentrations of some ash-associated contaminants are elevated at the spill site, there was no consistent evidence of compromised fish health linked with the spill. Further, although relationships between elevated fillet burdens of ash-associated contaminants and some fish metrics were found, these relationships were not indicative of exposure to coal ash or spill sites. The present study adds to the weight of evidence from prior studies suggesting that fish populations have not incurred significant biological effects from spilled ash at this site: findings that are relevant to the current national discussions on the safe disposal of coal ash waste.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams SM, Greeley MS (2000) Ecotoxicological indicators of water quality: using multi-response indicators to assess the health of aquatic ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut 123(1–4):103–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ankley GT, Bennett RS, Erickson RJ, Hoff DJ, Hornung MW, Johnson RD, Serrrano JA (2010) Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 29(3):730–741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartov G, Deonarine A, Johnson TM, Ruhl L, Vengosh A, Hsu-Kim H (2012) Environmental impacts of the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston coal ash spill. 1. Source apportionment using mercury stable isotopes. Environ Sci Technol 47(4):2092–2099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barwick M, Maher W (2003) Biotransference and biomagnification of selenium copper, cadmium, zinc, arsenic and lead in a temperate seagrass ecosystem from Lake Macquarie Estuary, NSW, Australia. Mar Environ Res 56(4):471–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck ML, Hopkins WA, Hallagan JJ, Jackson BP, Hawley DM (2014) Exposure to residual concentrations of elements from a remediated coal fly ash spill does not adversely influence stress and immune responses of nestling tree swallows. Conserva Physiol. doi:10.1093/conphys/cou018

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevelhimer MS, Adams SM, Fortner AM, Greeley MS, Brandt CC (2014) Using ordination and clustering techniques to assess multi-metric fish health response following a coal ash spill. Environ Toxicol Chem 33(8):1903–1913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan AL Jr., Hopkins WA, Parikh JH, Jackson BP, Unrine JM (2012) Coal fly ash basins as an attractive nuisance to birds: parental provisioning exposes nestlings to harmful trace elements. Environ Pollut 161:170–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deonarine A, Bartov G, Johnson TM, Ruhl L, Vengosh A, Hsu-Kim H (2013) Environmental impacts of the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston coal ash spill. 2. Effect of coal ash on methylmercury in historically contaminated river sediments. Environ Sci Technol 47(4):2100–2108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etnier DA, Starnes WC (1994) Fishes of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, p 696

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie RB, Baumann PC (1986) Effects of high tissue concentrations of selenium on reproduction by bluegills. Trans Am Fish Soc 115(2):208–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greeley MS Jr., Adams M, McCracken K (2012) Evaluating the effects of the Kingston fly ash release on fish reproduction: spring 2009–2010 Studies (No. ORNL/TM-2012/142). Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greeley MS Jr., Elmore LR, McCracken MK, Sherrard RM (2014) Effects of sediment containing coal ash from the kingston ash release on embryo-larval development in the Fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas (Rafinesque, 1820). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 92(2):154–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmidt CR, Sandheinrich MB (2005) Maternal diet during oogenesis is the major source of methylmercury in fish embryos. Environ Sci Technol 39(10):3580–3584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobasch C, Völker C, Giebner S, Völker J, Alsenz H, Potouridis T, Heidenreich H, Kayser G, Oehlmann J, Oetken M (2014) Long-term effects of nanoscaled titanium dioxide on the cladoceran Daphnia magna over six generations. Environ Pollut 186:180–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King KA, Custer TW, Weaver DA (1994) Reproductive success of barn swallows nesting near a selenium-contaminated lake in east Texas. USA Environ Pollut 84(1):53–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemly AD (1993) Teratogenic effects of selenium in natural populations of fresh water fish. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 26(2):181–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemly AD (2002) Symptoms and implications of selenium toxicity in fish: the Belews Lake case example. Aquat Toxicol 57:39–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemly AD (2014) Teratogenic effects and monetary cost of selenium poisoning of fish in Lake Sutton, North Carolina. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 104:160–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemly AD, Skorupa JP (2013) Wildlife and the coal waste policy debate: proposed rules for coal waste disposal ignore lessons from 45 years of wildlife poisoning. Environ Sci Technol 46(16):8595–8600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohner TW, Reash RJ, Willet VE, Fletcher J (2001) Assessment of tolerant sunfish populations (Lepomis sp.) inhabiting selenium-laden coal ash effluents: 3. Serum chemistry and fish health indicators. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 50(3):225–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews TJ, Fortner AM, Jett RT, Morris J, Gable J, Peterson MJ, Carriker N (2014) Selenium bioaccumulation in fish exposed to coal ash at the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston spill site. Environ Toxicol Chem 33(10):2273–2279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otter RR, Hayden M, Mathews T, Fortner A, Bailey FC (2013) The use of tetragnathid spiders as bioindicators of metal exposure at a coal ASH spill site. Environ Toxicol Chem 32(9):2065–2068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson MJ, Southworth GR, Crumby WD (1996) Monitoring mercury in fish in a stream system receiving multiple industrial inputs. Environ Monit Assess 40(1):91–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pracheil BM, Hogan JD, Lyons J, McIntyre PB (2014) Using hard-part microchemistry to advance conservation and management of North American freshwater fishes. Fisheries 39(10):451–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose KA (2000) Why are quantitative relationships between environmental quality and fish populations so elusive? Ecol Appl 10(2):367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl L, Vengosh A, Dwyer GS, Hsu-Kim H, Deonarine A, Bergin M, Kravchenko J (2009) Survey of the potential environmental and health impacts in the immediate aftermath of the coal ash spill in Kingston, Tennessee. Environ Sci Technol 43(16):6326–6333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl L, Vengosh A, Dwyer GS, Hsu-Kim H, Deonarine A (2010) Environmental impacts of the coal ash spill in Kingston, Tennessee: an 18-month survey. Environ Sci Technol 44(24):9272–9278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett DK, Aday DD, Rice JA, Cope WG, Buchwalter D (2010) Does proximity to coal-fired power plants influence fish tissue mercury? Ecotoxicology 19(8):1601–1611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Southworth GR, Peterson MJ, Ryon MG (2000) Long-term increased bioaccumulation of mercury in largemouth bass follows reduction of waterborne selenium. Chemosphere 41(7):1101–1105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Souza MJ, Ramsay EC, Donnell RL (2013) Metal accumulation and health effects in raccoons (Procyon lotor) associated with coal fly ash exposure. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 64(4):529–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart R, Grosell M, Buchwalter D, Fisher N, Luoma S, Mathews T, Orr P, Wang W (2010) Bioaccumulation and trophic transfer of selenium. SETAC Pellston workshop. CRC Press, pp 93–139

  • Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) (2009) Continuing investigation of the nature and extent of ash in the Emory, Clinch and Tennessee River bottoms. Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui MT, Wang WX (2005) Influences of maternal exposure on the tolerance and physiological performance of Daphnia magna under mercury stress. Environ Toxicol Chem 24(5):1228–1234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2012) Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Documentation Record for Clinch River Corporation, Atlanta. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/docrec/pdoc1873.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2014

  • Völker C, Oetken M, Oehlmann J (2013) The biological effects and possible modes of action of nanosilver. In: Whitacre DM (ed) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, vol 223. Springer, New York, pp 81–106

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and performed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, for the US Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. Accordingly, the United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. Special thanks to C. Brandt, J. Smith, K. McCracken, C. Dunn, R. Vitale, K. Abbot, E. Rodgers, B. Rogers, M. Cagley, T. Baker, and N. Carriker.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brenda M. Pracheil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This study was funded by the Tennessee Valley Authority. All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Animal consent

All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

S. Marshall Adams: Retired.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1670 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 133 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pracheil, B.M., Marshall Adams, S., Bevelhimer, M.S. et al. Relating fish health and reproductive metrics to contaminant bioaccumulation at the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston coal ash spill site. Ecotoxicology 25, 1136–1149 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1668-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1668-0

Keywords

Navigation