Advertisement

Ecotoxicology

, Volume 24, Issue 7–8, pp 1548–1556 | Cite as

Illumina-based analysis the microbial diversity associated with Thalassia hemprichii in Xincun Bay, South China Sea

  • Yu-Feng Jiang
  • Juan Ling
  • Jun-De Dong
  • Biao Chen
  • Yan-Ying Zhang
  • Yuan-Zhou Zhang
  • You-Shao WangEmail author
Article

Abstract

In order to increase our understanding of the microbial diversity associated with seagrass Thalassia hemprichii in Xincun Bay, South China Sea, 16S rRNA gene was identified by highthrough sequencing method. Bacteria associated with seagrass T. hemprichii belonged to 37 phyla, 99 classes. The diversity of bacteria associated with seagrass was similar among the geographically linked coastal locations of Xincun Bay. Proteobacteria was the dominant bacteria and the α-proteobacteria had adapted to the seagrass ecological niche. As well, α-proteobacteria and Pseudomonadales were associated microflora in seagrass meadows, but the interaction between the bacteria and plant is needed to further research. Burkholderiales and Verrucomicrobiae indicated the influence of the bay from anthropogenic activities. Further, Cyanobacteria could imply the difference of the nutrient conditions in the sites. γ-proteobacteria, Desulfobacterales and Pirellulales played a role in the cycle of sulfur, organic mineralization and meadow ecosystem, respectively. In addition, the less abundance bacteria species have key functions in the seagrass meadows, but there is lack knowledge of the interaction of the seagrass and less abundance bacteria species. Microbial communities can response to surroundings and play key functions in the biochemical cycle.

Keywords

Thalassia hemprichii Microbial communities Cyanobacteria α-Proteobacteria South China Sea Xincun Bay 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41276113, 41276114, 41406191 and 41430966), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Nos. 2012AA092104, 2013AA092901 and 2013AA092902), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA11020202), the Science and technology cooperation Projects of Sanya (No. 2013YD74), and the Sanya Station Database and the Information System of CERN, the Open Fund of Key Laboratory for Ecological Environment in Coastal Areas, State Oceanic Administration (No. 201304).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andrews JH, Harris RF (2000) The ecology and biogeography of microorganisms on plant surfaces. Annu Rev Phytopathol 38:145–180Google Scholar
  2. Aravindraja C, Viszwapriya D, Pandian SK (2013) Ultradeep 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of geographically similar but diverse unexplored marine samples reveal varied bacterial community composition. PLoS One 8:e76724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck MW et al (2001) The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. Bioscience 51:633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boetius A et al (2000) A marine microbial consortium apparently mediating anaerobic oxidation of methane. Nature 407:623–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caporaso JG et al (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caporaso JG et al (2012) Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6:1621–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chao A (1987) Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen M et al (2014) Dynamic succession of soil bacterial community during continuous cropping of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). PLoS One 9:e101355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crump BC, Koch EW (2008) Attached bacterial populations shared by four species of aquatic angiosperms. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:5948–5957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delille D, Canon C, Windeshausen F (1996) Comparison of planktonic and benthic bacterial communities associated with a Mediterranean Posidonia seagrass system. Bot Mar 39:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feng BW, Li XR, Wang JH, Hu ZY, Meng H, Xiang LY, Quan ZX (2009) Bacterial diversity of water and sediment in the Changjiang estuary and coastal area of the East China Sea. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 70:236–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frankovich TA, Fourqurean JW (1997) Seagrass epiphyte loads along a nutrient availability gradient, Florida Bay, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 159:37–50Google Scholar
  14. Gallego S, Vila J, Nieto JM, Urdiain M, Rossello-Mora R, Grifoll M (2010) Breoghania corrubedonensis gen. nov. sp. nov., a novel alphaproteobacterium isolated from a Galician beach (NW Spain) after the Prestige fuel oil spill, and emended description of the family Cohaesibacteraceae and the species Cohaesibacter gelatinilyticus. Syst Appl Microbiol 33:316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonenc IE, Wolflin JP (2004) Coastal lagoons: ecosystem processes and modeling for sustainable use and development. CRC Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Good IJ (1952) Rational decisions. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 14:107–114Google Scholar
  17. Gutierrez JL et al (2011) Physical ecosystem engineers and the functioning of estuaries and coasts. Functioning of Estuaries and Coastal Ecosystems. Academic press, WalthamGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamisi MI, Lyimo TJ, Muruke M (2007) Cyanobacterial occurrence and diversity in seagrass meadows in coastal Tanzania. West Indian Ocean J Mar Sci 3:113–122Google Scholar
  19. Herbert R (1999) Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Rev 23:563–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirano SS, Upper CD (2000) Bacteria in the leaf ecosystem with emphasis on pseudomonas syringae—a pathogen, ice nucleus, and epiphyte. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:624–653Google Scholar
  21. Jackson SA, Flemer B, McCann A, Kennedy J, Morrissey JP, O’Gara F, Dobson AD (2013) Archaea appear to dominate the microbiome of inflatella pellicula deep sea sponges. PLoS One 8:e84438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalyuzhnaya MG, Hristova KR, Lidstrom ME, Chistoserdova L (2008) Characterization of a novel methanol dehydrogenase in representatives of Burkholderiales: implications for environmental detection of methylotrophy and evidence for convergent evolution. J Bacteriol 190:3817–3823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kreyszig E (1979) Applied Mathematics. Wiley Press, New York, p 880Google Scholar
  24. Kurtz JC, Yates DF, Macauley JM, Quarles RL, Genthner FJ, Chancy CA, Devereux R (2003) Effects of light reduction on growth of the submerged macrophyte Vallisneria americana and the community of root-associated heterotrophic bacteria. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 291:199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kusel K, Pinkart HC, Drake HL, Devereux R (1999) Acetogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria inhabiting the rhizoplane and deep cortex cells of the sea grass Halodule wrightii. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:5117–5123Google Scholar
  26. Lovell CR, Decker PV, Bagwell CE, Thompson S, Matsui GY (2008) Analysis of a diverse assemblage of diazotrophic bacteria from Spartina alterniflora using DGGE and clone library screening. J Microbiol Methods 73:160–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Magoc T, Salzberg SL (2011) FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27:2957–2963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mcroy CP, Goering JJ (1974) Nutrient transfer between the seagrass Zostera marina and its epiphytes. Nature 248:173–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mengoni A, Pini F, Huang L-N, Shu W-S, Bazzicalupo M (2009) Plant-by-plant variations of bacterial communities associated with leaves of the nickel hyperaccumulator Alyssum bertolonii Desv. Microb Ecol 58:660–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohamed NM, Saito K, Tal Y, Hill RT (2009) Diversity of aerobic and anaerobic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in marine sponges. ISME J 4:38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Newby B-mZ, Cutright T, Barrios CA, Xu Q (2006) Zosteric acid—an effective antifoulant for reducing fresh water bacterial attachment on coatings. J Coat Technol Res 3:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nielsen JT, Liesack W, Finster K (1999) Desulfovibrio zosterae sp. nov., a new sulfate reducer isolated from surface-sterilized roots of the seagrass Zostera marina. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:859–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ning XR, Chai F, Xue H, Cai Y, Liu C, Shi J (2004) Physical-biological oceanographic coupling influencing phytoplankton and primary production in the South China Sea. J Geophys Res: Oceans (1978–2012) 109:1–20Google Scholar
  34. Nourisson DH, Scapini F, Massi L, Lazzara L (2013) Optical characterization of coastal lagoons in Tunisia: ecological assessment to underpin conservation. Ecol Inf 14:79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nubel U et al (1996) Sequence heterogeneities of genes encoding 16S rRNAs in Paenibacillus polymyxa detected by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. J Bacteriol 178:5636–5643Google Scholar
  36. Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM (2011) Interactive metagenomic visualization in a Web browser. BMC Bioinformatics 12:385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Palenik B et al (2003) The genome of a motile marine synechococcus. Nature 424:1037–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Partensky F, Hess W, Vaulot D (1999) Prochlorococcus, a marine photosynthetic prokaryote of global significance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:106–127Google Scholar
  39. Perez Pantoja D, Donoso R, Agullo L, Cordova M, Seeger M, Pieper DH, Gonzalez B (2012) Genomic analysis of the potential for aromatic compounds biodegradation in Burkholderiales. Environ Microbiol 14:1091–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pini F, Frascella A, Santopolo L, Bazzicalupo M, Biondi EG, Scotti C, Mengoni A (2012) Exploring the plant-associated bacterial communities in Medicago sativa L. BMC Microbiol 12:1471–2180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rabus R, Hansen TA, Widdel F (2006) Dissimilatory sulfate-and sulfur-reducing prokaryotes. The prokaryotes. Springer, New York, pp 659–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scanlan DJ, West NJ (2002) Molecular ecology of the marine cyanobacterial genera Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 40:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soetaert K, Heip C (1990) Sample-size dependence of diversity indices and the determination of sufficient sample size in a high-diversity deep-sea environment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 59:305–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sundqvist MK, Sanders NJ, Wardle DA (2013) Community and ecosystem responses to elevational gradients: processes, mechanisms, and insights for global change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 44:261–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Uku J (2007) Characterization and comparison of prokaryotic epiphytes associated with three East African seagrasses. J Phycol 43:768–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261–5267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weidner S, Arnold W, Stackebrandt E, Pühler A (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of bacterial communities associated with leaves of the seagrass Halophila stipulacea by a culture-independent small-subunit rRNA gene approach. Microb Ecol 39:22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang D, Huang DJ (2011) Impacts of Typhoons Tianying and Dawei on seagrass distribution in Xincun Bay, Hainan Province, China. Acta Oceanol Sin 30:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang D, Yang C (2009) Detection of seagrass distribution changes from 1991 to 2006 in Xincun Bay, Hainan, with satellite remote sensing. Sensors 9:830–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yu ZQ, Deng H, Wu KW, Du J, Ma M (2012) Nutrient contents of dominant seagrass species and their affecting factors in Hainan Province. J East China Norm Univ (Nat Sci) 4:017Google Scholar
  51. Zhang Y, Zhao Z, Dai M, Jiao N, Herndl GJ (2014) Drivers shaping the diversity and biogeography of total and active bacterial communities in the South China Sea. Mol Ecol 23:2260–2274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu-Feng Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Juan Ling
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jun-De Dong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Biao Chen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Yan-Ying Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yuan-Zhou Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • You-Shao Wang
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of OceanologyChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Tropical Marine Biological Research Station in HainanChinese Academy of SciencesSanyaChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of OceanologyChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouChina
  4. 4.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations