Abstract
Pet cats and dogs have been successfully used as indicators of environmental pollution by a great variety of chemicals, including metals. However, information on mercury (a well know priority environmental pollutant) concentrations in household pets tissues and/or organs is scarce. Thus, in the present work we quantified total mercury (HgTotal) in blood and hair samples from twenty-six household dogs. The obtained results disclose relatively low levels of total mercury in the surveyed dogs, with values ranging from 0.16 to 12.38 ng g−1 in blood; and from 24.16 to 826.30 ng g−1 in hair. Mercury concentrations were independent of gender, age and diet type. A highly significant positive correlation was established between total mercury in blood and hair, validating the latter as a surrogate, non-invasive matrix for mercury exposure evaluation. Additionally, the obtained blood to hair ratio (200) is similar to the one described for humans reinforcing the suitability of dogs as sentinels. Overall, the determination of total mercury levels in dogs’ hair samples proved to be a good screening method for the estimation of mercury burden in this species. We propose the quantification of HgTotal in hair as a screening method for sentinels like household pets to be performed in routine veterinary visits.
Access this article
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.


Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bastos V, Sousa A (2012) Indoor contaminants in pet cats and dogs. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany
Caldwell KL, Mortensen ME, Jones RL, Caudill SP, Osterloh JD (2009) Total blood mercury concentrations in the U.S. population: 1999–2006. Int J Hyg Environ Health 212:588–598
Chojnacka K, Górecka H, Chojnacki A, Górecki H (2005) Inter-element interactions in human hair. Environ Toxicol Phar 20:368–374
Clarkson TW (1993) Mercury: major issues in environmental health. Environ Health Persp 100:31–38
Clarkson TW, Magos L (2006) The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol 36:609–662
Costley CT, Mossop KF, Dean JR, Garden LM, Marshall J, Carroll J (2000) Determination of mercury in environmental and biological samples using pyrolysis atomic absorption spectrometry with gold amalgamation. Anal Chim Acta 405:179–183
Dietz R, Riget F, Born EW, Sonne C, Grandjean P, Kirkegaard M, Olsen MT, Asmund G, Renzoni A, Baagøe H, Andreasen C (2006) Trends in mercury in hair of greenlandic polar bears (Ursus maritimus) during 1892–2001. Environ Sci Technol 40:1120–1125
Doi R, Nakaya K, Ohno H, Yamashita K, Kobayashi T, Kasai S (1986) Metal content in the fur of domestic and experimental animals. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 37:213–218
Dunlap KL, Reynolds AJ, Bowers PM, Duffy LK (2007) Hair analysis in sled dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) illustrates a linkage of mercury exposure along the yukon river with human subsistence food systems. Sci Total Environ 385:80–85
EFSA (2008) Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the european commission on mercury as undesirable substance in feed. EFSA J 654:1–76
Glickman LT, Fairbrother A, Guarino AM, Bergman HL, Buck WB (eds) (1991) Animals as sentinels of environmental health hazards. National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, p 188
Hansen JC, Danscher G (1995) Quantitative and qualitative distribution of mercury in organs from arctic sledge dogs: an atomic absorption spectrophotometric and histochemical study of tissue samples from natural long-termed high dietary organic mercury-exposed dogs from thule. Greenland Pharmacol Toxicol 77:189–195
Hansen JC, Reske-Nielsen E, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Rungby J, Danscher G (1989) Distribution of dietary mercury in a dog. quantitation and localization of total mercury in organs and central nervous system. Sci Total Environ 78:23–43
Hansmann F, Stephan I, Wirtz A, Gruber AD, Wohlsein P (2009) Mercury poisoning in a German shepherd dog. Vet Rec 165:447–448
Issaro N, Abi-Ghanem C, Bermond A (2009) Fractionation studies of mercury in soils and sediments: a review of the chemical reagents used for mercury extraction. Anal Chim Acta 631:1–12
Lanocha N, Kalisinska E, Kosik-Bogacka D, Budis H (2012) Evaluation of dog bones in the indirect assessment of environmental contamination with trace elements. Biol Trace Elem Res 147:103–112
Lieske C, Moses S, Castellini J, Klejka J, Hueffer K, O’Hara T (2011) Toxicokinetics of mercury in blood compartments and hair of fish-fed sled dogs. Acta Vet Scand 53:66
López-Alonso M, Miranda M, García-Partida P, Cantero F, Hernández J, Benedito JL (2007) Use of dogs as indicators of metal exposure in rural and urban habitats in NW Spain. Sci Total Environ 372:668–675
Montuori P, Jover E, Alzaga R, Diez S, Bayona JM (2004) Improvements in the methylmercury extraction from human hair by headspace solid-phase microextraction followed by gas-chromatography cold-vapour atomic fluorescence spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1025:71–75
NRC (2000) Toxicological effects of methylmercury. The National Academies Press, Washington DC
Park SH, Lee MH, Kim SK (2005a) Studies on Cd, Pb, Hg and Cr values in dog hairs from urban Korea. Asian-Austral J Anim 18:1135–1140
Park SH, Lee MH, Kim SK (2005b) Studies on the concentrations of Cd, Pb, Hg and Cr in dog serum in Korea. Asian-Austral J Anim 18:1623–1627
Penumarthy L, Oehme FW, Hayes RH (1980) Lead, cadmium, and mercury tissue residues in healthy swine, cattle, dogs, and horses from the midwestern United States. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 9:193–206
Pereira E, Rodrigues SM, Otero M, Válega M, Lopes CB, Pato P, Coelho JP, Lillebø AI, Duarte AC, Pardal MA, Rocha R (2008) Evaluation of an interlaboratory proficiency-testing exercise for total mercury in environmental samples of soils, sediments and fish tissue. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 27:959–970
Rabinowitz P, Gordon Z, Holmes R, Taylor B, Wilcox M, Chudnov D, Nadkarni P, Dein F (2005) Animals as sentinels of human environmental health hazards: an evidence-based analysis. EcoHealth 2:26–37
Rabinowitz PM, Scotch ML, Conti LA (2010) Animals as sentinels: using comparative medicine to move beyond the laboratory. ILAR J 51:262–267
Sakai T, Ito M, Aoki H, Aimi K, Nitaya R (1995) Hair mercury concentrations in cats and dogs in Central Japan. Br Vet J 151:215–219
Takizawa Y (2002) Mercury-contaminated grain in Iraq. In: Environmental toxicology and human health, Vol 1. in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Developed under the auspices of the UNESCO, Eolss Publishers, Oxford. http://www.eolss.net
UNEP (2002) Global mercury assessment. Geneva, Switzerland
WHO (1990) World Health Organisation. International programme on chemical safety. Environmental health criteria 101: methyl mercury. WHO, Geneva
WHO (2007) Exposure to mercury: a major public health concern. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Wilkinson A, McNaught A (1997) IUPAC compendium of chemical terminology (the” gold book”). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford
Acknowledgments
To Zeca and Dona Maria Pia, the pets that inspired this study. The authors would like to thank all the dog owners who authorized the collection of blood and hair samples from their pets. The staff of the veterinary clinics involved in this project is also acknowledged, particularly their Medical Directors: Sónia Miranda, DVM and Joana Tuna, DVM. This study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) trough program COMPETE and the projects PEst-C/MAR/LA0017/2011 and PEst-C/SAU/UI0709/2011. A.C.A. Sousa also acknowledges FCT for the postdoctoral grant (SFRH/BPD/65884/2009).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sousa, A.C.A., de Sá Teixeira, I.S., Marques, B. et al. Mercury, pets’ and hair: baseline survey of a priority environmental pollutant using a noninvasive matrix in man’s best friend. Ecotoxicology 22, 1435–1442 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-013-1130-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-013-1130-5

