Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological risk assessment of water environment for Luanhe River Basin based on relative risk model

  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative risk model (RRM) was applied in regional ecological risk assessments successfully. In this study, the RRM was developed through increasing the data of risk source and introducing the source–stressor–habitat exposure filter (SSH), the endpoint–habitat exposure filter (EH) and the stressor–endpoint effect filter (SE) to reflect the meaning of exposure and effect more explicit. Water environment which include water quality, water quantity and aquatic ecosystems was selected as the ecological risk assessment endpoints. The Luanhe River Basin located in the North China was selected as model case. The results showed that there were three low risk regions, one medium risk region and two high risk regions in the Luanhe River Basin. The results also indicated habitat destruction was the largest stressor with the risk scores as high as 11.87 for the Luanhe water environment, the second was oxygen consuming organic pollutants (9.28) and the third was nutrients (7.78). So these three stressors were the main influencing factors of the ecological pressure in the study area. Furthermore, animal husbandry was the biggest source with the risk scores as high as 20.38, the second was domestic sewage (14.00), and the third was polluting industry (9.96). For habitats, waters and farmland were enduring the bigger pressure and should be taken considerable attention. Water deterioration and ecological service values damaged were facing the biggest risk pressure, and secondly was biodiversity decreased and landscape fragmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai JH, Cui BS, Chen B et al (2010) Spatial distribution and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in surface sediments from a typical plateau lake wetland, China. Ecol Modell. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.12.002

  • Bihari N, Fafandel M, Piskur V (2007) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and ecotoxicological characterization of seawater, sediment, and mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis from the Gulf of Rijeka, the Adriatic Sea, Croatia. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52:379–387. doi:10.1007/s00244-005-0259-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colnar AC, Landis WG (2007) Conceptual model development for invasive species and a regional risk assessment case study: the European Green Crab, Carcinus maenas, at Cherry Point, Washington USA. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 13:120–155. doi:10.1080/10807030601105076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domagalski J, Lin C, Luo Y et al (2007) Eutrophication study at the Panjiakou-Daheiting Reservoir system, northern Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China: chlorophyll-a model and sources of phosphorus and nitrogen. Agric Water Manag 94:43–53. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2007.08.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamamé M (2002) Regional risk assessment in Northern Chile Report 2002:1. Environmental systems analysis. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart HE, Landis WG (2004) Regional ecological risk assessment of a near shore marine environment: Cherry Point, WA. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10:299–325. doi:10.1080/10807030490438256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope BK (2005) Performing spatially—and temporally—explicit ecological exposure assessments involving multiple stressors. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 11:539–565. doi:10.1080/10807030590949645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis WG (2005) Chapter 1: Introduction. Regional scale ecological risk assessment: using the relative risk model. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis WG, Wiegers JK (1997) Design considerations and a suggested approach for regional and comparative ecological risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 3:287–297. doi:10.1080/10807039709383685

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis WG, Wiegers JK (2005) Chapter 2: Introduction to the regional risk assessment using the relative risk model. In: Landis WG (ed) Regional scale ecological risk assessment using the relative risk model. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 11–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis WG, Wiegers JK (2007) Ten years of the relative risk model and regional scale ecological risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 13:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YL, Liu JL, Cao ZG et al (2009) Spatial distribution and health risk of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the water of the Luanhe River Basin, China. Environ Monit Assess. doi:10.1007/s10661-009-0811-2

  • Liu JL, Li YL, Zhang B et al (2009) Ecological risk of heavy metals in sediments of the Luan River source water. Ecotoxicology 18:748–758. doi:10.1007/s10646-009-0345-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luxon M, Landis WG (2005) Chapter 5: Application of the relative risk model to the Upper Willamette River and Lower McKenzie River, Oregon. In: Landis WG (ed) Regional scale ecological risk assessment using the relative risk model. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 91–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Moolenaar SW, Lexmond TM (1999) Heavy metal balances, part I: general aspects of cadmium, copper, zinc and lead balance studies in agro-ecosystems. J Ind Ecol 2:45–60. doi:10.1162/jiec.1998.2.4.45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraes R, Landis WG, Molander S (2002) Regional risk assessment of a Brazilian rain forest reserve. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8:1779–1803. doi:10.1080/20028091057600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller NC, Nowack B (2008) Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447–4453. doi:10.1021/es7029637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Jones KB et al (1997) Monitoring environmental quality at the landscape scale. Bioscience 47:513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obery AM, Landis WG (2002) A regional multiple stressor risk assessment of the Codorus Creek watershed applying the relative risk model. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8:405–428. doi:10.1080/20028091056980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul J, Van den B, Steven JH et al (2009) Effects of a herbicide–insecticide mixture in freshwater microcosms: risk assessment and ecological effect chain. Environ Pollut 157:237–249. doi:10.1023/A:1015422815401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phenrat T, Liu Y, Tilton RD et al (2009) Adsorbed polyelectrolyte coatings decrease Fe0 nanoparticle reactivity with TCE in water: conceptual model and mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 43:1507–1514. doi:10.1021/es802187d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poole GC, Berman CH (2001) An ecological perspective on in-stream temperature: natural heat dynamics and mechanisms of human-caused thermal degradation. Environ Manage 27:787–802. doi:10.1007/s002670010188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sala S, Cavalli M, Vighi M (2010) Spatially explicit method for ecotoxicological risk assessment of pesticides for birds. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73:213–221. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.12.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum TA (1999) Thematic cartography and visualization. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter GW II (1990) Endpoints for regional ecological risk assessments. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:1640–1649. doi:10.1007/BF02394015

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter GW II (1991) Screening level risk assessment of off-site ecological effects in surface waters downstream from the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation. ORNL/ER-8. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter GW II (1993) Ecological risk assessment. Lewis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1998) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. Risk assessment forum. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • US NAS (1983) Risk assessment in the federal government managing the process [R]. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker R, Landis WG, Brown P (2001) Developing a regional ecological risk assessment: a case study of a Tasmanian agricultural catchment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 7:417–439. doi:10.1080/20018091094439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LL, Yang ZF, Niu JF et al (2009) Characterization, ecological risk assessment and source diagnostics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water column of the Yellow River Delta, one of the most plenty biodiversity zones in the world. J Hazard Mater 169:460–465. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegers JK, Feder HM, Mortensen LS et al (1998) A regional multiple-stressor rank-based ecological risk assessment for the fjord of Port Valdez, Alaska. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 4:1125–1173. doi:10.1080/10807039891285036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZF, Liu JL, Sun T et al (2006) Environmental flows in basins. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Basic Research Program (also called 973 Program) (Grant No. 2006CB403403) of the Ministry of Science and Technology and Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (No. IRT0809) of the People’s Republic of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingling Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, J., Chen, Q. & Li, Y. Ecological risk assessment of water environment for Luanhe River Basin based on relative risk model. Ecotoxicology 19, 1400–1415 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-010-0525-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-010-0525-9

Keywords

Navigation