Advertisement

Ecotoxicology

, Volume 19, Issue 7, pp 1174–1182 | Cite as

Effects of cadmium on life-cycle parameters in a multi-generation study with Chironomus riparius following a pre-exposure of populations to two different tributyltin concentrations for several generations

  • Christian VogtEmail author
  • Maren Heß
  • Carsten Nowak
  • João Barateiro Diogo
  • Jörg Oehlmann
  • Matthias Oetken
Article

Abstract

So far only a few studies have been performed to assess the effects of dynamic pollutant exposure on life-history parameters of invertebrates. In a previous multi-generation approach with the midge Chironomus riparius we tested if a chronic tributyltin pre-exposure alters the ability of a population to cope with subsequent cadmium stress. In the experiment two separate chironomid populations were exposed via sediments to different TBT-concentrations (4.46 and 8.93 μg Sn/kg dw) for several generations, followed by subsequent cadmium exposure (1.2 mg Cd/kg dw) for three generations. While the TBT-exposure to 4.46 μg Sn/kg dw had only small effects on the development and reproduction of C. riparius the higher TBT-concentration of 8.93 μg Sn/kg dw led to negative effects on life-history traits. Therefore, a higher adverse effect of the higher TBT-concentration and thus a higher susceptibility to other stressors could be assumed. Within, this paper only the results of the second stressor experiment were presented; clear effects of Cd on development and reproduction of C. riparius were determined independent of the pre-exposure scenario. While no differences in Cd-sensitivity were found between the population without pre-exposure to TBT and the population pre-exposed to the low TBT-concentration (4.46 μg Sn/kg dw), the pre-exposure of midges to the higher TBT-concentration (8.93 μg Sn/kg dw) resulted in a significantly higher susceptibility to subsequent Cd-stress. These results document that the exposure history may influence the reaction to altered chemical stress. Our findings are relevant to understand and predict the evolutionary fate of populations in rapidly changing, human-impacted environments. However, the fact that chemical-induced reduced genetic diversity, which is not necessarily linked to genetic adaptation, leads to a reduced fitness under altered stress conditions, is to our knowledge a novel finding.

Keywords

Organotin compounds Diptera Second stressor Sediment toxicity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The assistance of Dominic Kaiser and Simone Galluba is greatly appreciated. Furthermore, we would like to thank the staff of the Department Aquatic Ecotoxicology for the technical support and Claudia Schmitt for valuable comments on the manuscript. This research project has been funded by the BW-Plus program “Programm Lebensgrundlage Umwelt und ihre Sicherung” of the federal state Baden-Württemberg (contract number BWR 22018). Additional funding was provided from the Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiKF) under the Hessian initiative for scientific and economic excellence (“LOEWE—Landes-Offensive zur Entwicklung wissenschaftlich-ökonomischer Exzellenz”) of the Hessian Ministry of Higher Education, Research, and the Arts.

References

  1. Amos W, Balmford A (2001) When does conservation genetics matter? Heredity 87:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armbruster P, Reed DH (2005) Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bearden AP, Gregory BW, Schultz TW (1997) Growth kinetics of preexposed and naive populations of Tetrahymena pyriformis to 2-decanone and acetone. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 37:245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benoit DA, Sibley PK, Juenemann JL, Ankley GT (1997) Chironomus tentans life-cycle test: design and evaluation for use in assessing toxicity of contaminated sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:1165–1176Google Scholar
  5. Bickham JW, Smolen MJ (1994) Somatic and heritable effects of environmental genotoxins and the emergence of evolutionary toxicology. Environ Health Persp 102(Suppl. 12):25–28Google Scholar
  6. Bickham JW, Sandhu S, Herbert PDN, Chikhi L, Athwal R (2000) Effects of chemical contaminants an genetic diversity in natural populations: implications for biomonitoring and ecotoxicology. Mutat Res Rev Mut Res 463:33–51Google Scholar
  7. Chapman PM, Ho KT, Munns WR Jr, Solomon K, Weinstein MP (2002) Issues in sediment toxicity and ecological risk assessment. Mar Pollut Bull 44:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DIN 38406 (1983) German standard methods for the examination of water, waster water and sludgeGoogle Scholar
  9. DIN 13656 (2003) Characterisation of waste—microwave assisted digestion of hydrofluoric (HF), nitric (HNO3) and hydrochloric (HCl) acid mixture for subsequent determination of elements in waste; German version EN 13656:2002Google Scholar
  10. DIN 19744 (2003) Identification and quantitative determination of organic stannic compounds in solid materials (soils sediments wastes). Beuth Verlag, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  11. DIN 17294-2 (2005) Water quality—application of inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS). Part 2. Determination of 62 elements (ISO 17294-2:2003); German version EN ISO 17294-2:2004Google Scholar
  12. Frankham R (2005) Stress and adaptation in conservation genetics. J Evol Biol 18:750–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Hereford J (2009) A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Am Nat 173:579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karouna-Renier NK, Zehr JP (2003) Short-term exposures to chronically toxic copper concentrations induce HSP70 proteins in midge larvae (Chironomus tentans). Sci Total Environ 312:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kashian DR, Zuellig RE, Mitchell KA, Clements WH (2007) The cost of tolerance: sensitivity of stream benthic communities to UV-B and metals. Ecol Appl 17:365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knott NA, Aulbury JP, Brown TH, Johnston EL (2009) Contemporary ecological threats from historical pollution sources: impacts of large-scale resuspension of contaminated sediments on sessile invertebrate recruitment. J Appl Ecol 46:770–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee SE, Yoo D, Son J, Cho K (2006) Proteomic evaluation of cadmium toxicity on the midge Chironomus riparius Meigen larvae. Proteomics 6:945–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lehmann V, Tubbing GMJ, Admiraal W (1999) Induced metal tolerance in microbenthic communities from three lowland rivers with different metal loads. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 36:384–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martinez DE, Levinton J (1996) Adaptation to heavy metals in the aquatic oligochaete Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri: evidence for control by one gene. Evolution 50:1339–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Milani D, Reynoldson TB, Borgmann U, Kolasa J (2003) The relative sensitivity of four benthic invertebrates to metals in spiked-sediment exposure and applications to contaminated field sediment. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Navio JA, Marchena FJ, Cerrilos C, Pablos F (1993) UV photolytic degradation of butyltin chlorides in water. J Photochem Photobiol A 71:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nogaro G, Mermillod-Blondin F, Montuelle B, Boisson JC, Lafont M, Volat B, Gibert J (2007) Do tubificid worms influence organic matter processing and fate of pollutants in stormwater sediments deposited at the surface of infiltration systems? Chemosphere 70:315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nowak C, Hankeln T, Schmidt ER, Schwenk K (2006) Development and localization of microsatellite markers for the sibling species Chironomus riparius and Chironomus piger (Diptera: Chironomidae). Mol Ecol Notes 6:915–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nowak C, Jost D, Vogt C, Oetken M, Schwenk K, Oehlmann J (2007a) Effects of inbreeding and reduced genetic variation on tolerance to cadmium stress in the midge Chironomus riparius. Aquat Toxicol 85:278–284Google Scholar
  26. Nowak C, Vogt C, Barateiro Diogo J, Schwenk K (2007b) Genetic impoverishment in laboratory stocks of the test organism Chironomus riparius. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1018–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nowak C, Czeikowitz A, Vogt C, Oetken K, Streit B, Schwenk K (2008) Variation in tolerance to cadmium exposure among genetically characterized laboratory populations of the midge Chironomus riparius (Diptera: Chironomidae). Chemosphere 71:1950–2956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nowak C, Vogt C, Pfenninger M, Oetken M, Schwenk K, Streit B, Oehlmann J (2009) Rapid genetic erosion in pollutant-exposed experimental chironomid populations. Environ Pollut 157:881–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. OECD (1998) Daphnia magna reproduction test. OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals no. 211, adopted September 1998, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  30. OECD (2004a) Sediment-water chironomid toxicity test using spiked sediment. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals (Original guideline 218, adopted 13th April 2004)Google Scholar
  31. OECD (2004b) Sediment-water chironomid toxicity test using spiked water. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals (Original guideline 219, adopted 13th April 2004)Google Scholar
  32. Oetken M, Stachel B, Pfenninger M, Oehlmann J (2005) Impact of a flood disaster on sediment toxicity in a major river system–the Elbe flood 2002 as a case study. Environ Pollut 134:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oetken M, Jagodzinski LS, Vogt C, Jochum A, Oehlmann J (2009) Combined effects of chemical and temperature stress on Chironomus riparius populations with differing genetic variability. J Environ Sci Health A 44:955–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oliver MA (1997) Soil and human health: a review. Eur J Soil Sci 48:573–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Postma J, Davids C (1995) Tolerance induction and life-cycle changes in cadmium-exposed Chironomus riparius (Diptera) during consecutive generations. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 30:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ristola T, Parker D, Kukkonen JVK (2001) Life-cycle effects of sediment-associated 2,4,5-trichlorophenol on two groups of the midge Chironomus riparius with different exposure histories. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:1772–1777Google Scholar
  37. Shirley MDF, Sibly RM (1999) Genetic basis of a between-environment trade-off involving resistance to cadmium in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 53:826–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snape JR, Maund SJ, Pickford DB, Hutchinson TH (2004) Ecotoxicogenomics: the challenge of integrating genomics into aquatic and terrestrial ecotoxicology. Aquat Toxicol 67:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stoeppler M (1991) Cadmium. In: Merian E (ed) Metals and their compounds in the environment. Occurrence, analysis and biological relevance. VCH, Weinheim, Germany, pp 804–851Google Scholar
  40. Svensson JM, Enrich-Prast A, Leonardson L (2001) Nitrification and denitrification in a eutrophic lake sediment bioturbated by oligochaetes. Aquat Microb Ecol 23:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Straalen NM, Timmermans M (2002) Genetic variation in toxicant-stressed populations: an evaluation of the “genetic erosion” hypothesis. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8:983–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vogt C, Belz D, Galluba S, Nowak C, Oetken M, Oehlmann J (2007a) Effects of cadmium and tributyltin on development and reproduction of the non-biting midge Chironomus riparius (Diptera)-baseline experiments for future multi-generation studies. J Environ Sci Heal A 42:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vogt C, Nowak C, Barateiro Diogo J, Oetken M, Schwenk K, Oehlmann J (2007b) Multi-generation studies with Chironomus riparius—effects of low tributyltin concentrations on life history parameters and genetic diversity. Chemosphere 67:2192–2200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vogt C, Pupp A, Nowak C, Jagodzinski LS, Baumann J, Jost D, Oetken M, Oehlmann J (2007c) Interaction between genetic diversity and temperature stress on life-cycle parameters and genetic variability of Chironomus riparius populations. Clim Res 33:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walker CH, Hopkins SP, Sibly RM, Peakall DB (2005) Principles of ecotoxicology, 3rd edition edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  46. Watts M, Pascoe D (2000) Comparison of Chironomus riparius Meigen and Chironomus tentans Fabricius (Diptera: Chironomidae) for assessing the toxicity of sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1885–1892Google Scholar
  47. Wilson JB (1988) The cost of heavy-metal tolerance: an example. Evolution 42:408–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Vogt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maren Heß
    • 1
  • Carsten Nowak
    • 2
  • João Barateiro Diogo
    • 2
  • Jörg Oehlmann
    • 1
  • Matthias Oetken
    • 1
  1. 1.Department Aquatic Ecotoxicology, Institute of Ecology, Evolution and DiversityGoethe-UniversityFrankfurt am MainGermany
  2. 2.Conservation Research Group, Department of Limnology and ConservationSenckenberg Research InstituteGelnhausenGermany

Personalised recommendations