Ecotoxicology

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 391–404 | Cite as

Polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins, furans, and organochlorine pesticides in spotted sandpiper eggs from the upper Hudson River basin, New York

  • Thomas W. Custer
  • Christine M. Custer
  • Brian R. Gray
Article

Abstract

In 2004, spotted sandpipers (Actitis macularia) were studied on the Hudson River near Fort Edward south to New Baltimore, NY and on two river drainages that flow into the Hudson River. Concentrations of 28 organochlorine pesticides, 160 polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners, and 17 dioxin and furan (PCDD-F) congeners were quantified in eggs collected on and off the Hudson River. The pattern of organochlorine pesticides and PCDD-F congeners did not differ significantly between eggs collected on and off the Hudson River. In contrast, the pattern of PCB congeners differed significantly between the Hudson River and other rivers. Total PCBs were significantly greater in eggs from the Hudson River (geometric mean = 9.1 μg PCBs/g wet weight) than from the other two rivers (0.6 and 0.6 μg PCBs/g wet weight). Seven of 35 (20%) eggs exceeded 20 μg PCBs/g wet weight, the estimated threshold for reduced hatching in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) and some raptor species; the maximum concentration was 72.3 μg PCBs/g wet weight. Models that predicted nest survival and egg success (the proportion of eggs hatching in a clutch if at least one egg hatched) as functions of contaminant levels were poorly distinguished from models that presumed no such associations. While small sample size could have contributed to the inability to distinguish among contaminant and no toxicant models, we cannot rule out the possibility that contaminant concentrations on the Hudson River were not sufficiently high to demonstrate a relationship between contaminant concentrations and reproductive success.

Keywords

Spotted sandpiper Polychlorinated biphenyls Dioxins Hudson River Organochlorine pesticides 

References

  1. Alberico JAR (1995) Floating eggs to estimate incubation stage does not affect hatchability. Wildl Soc Bull 23:212–216Google Scholar
  2. Allison PD (1999) Logistic regression using the SAS system: theory and application. SAS® Institute Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson DR, Link WA, Johnson DH, Burnham KP (2001) Suggestions for presenting the results of data analyses. J Wildl Manag 65:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barron MG, Galbraith H, Beltman D (1995) Comparative reproductive and developmental toxicity of PCBs in birds. Comp Biochem Physiol 112C:1–14Google Scholar
  5. Blus LJ, Neely NS Jr, Belisle AA, Prouty RM (1974) Organochlorine residues in brown pelican eggs: relation to reproductive success. Environ Pollut 7:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke RK, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. PRIMER-E Ltd, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  8. Colwell MA, Oring LW (1989) Extra-pair mating in the spotted sandpiper: a female mate acquisition tactic. Anim Behav 38:675–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Custer TW, Mitchell CA (1987) Organochlorine contaminants and reproductive success of black skimmers in south Texas, 1984. J Field Ornithol 58:480–489Google Scholar
  10. Custer CM, Custer TW, Allen PD, Stromborg KL, Melancon M (1998) Organochlorine contaminants and tree swallows nesting along the Fox River and in Green Bay, Wisconsin. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:1786–1798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Custer TW, Custer CM, Hines RK, Gutreuter S, Stromborg KL, Allen PD, Melancon MJ (1999) Organochlorine contaminants and reproductive success of double-crested cormorants from Green Bay Wisconsin, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1209–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Custer CM, Custer TW, Dummer PM, Munney KL (2003) Exposure and effects of chemical contaminants on tree swallows nesting along the Housatonic River, Berkshire County, Massachusetts, USA, 1998–2000. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1605–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Custer CM, Custer TW, Rosiu CJ, Dummer PM, Melancon MJ, Bickham JW (2005) Exposure and effects of dioxins, furans, and other organochlorine chemicals on tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) nesting along the Woonasquatucket River, Rhode Island. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Custer CM, Custer TW, Hines JE, Nichols JD, Dummer PM (2007) Adult tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) survival on the polychlorinated biphenyl-contaminated Housatonic River, Massachusetts, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1056–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Custer TW, Custer CM, Gray BR (2010) Polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins, furans, and organochlorine pesticides in belted kingfisher eggs from the upper Hudson River basin, New York. Environ Toxicol Chem 29 (in press)Google Scholar
  16. Drouillard KG, Norstrom R (2001) Dietary absorption efficiencies and toxicokinetics of polychlorinated biphenyls in ring doves following exposure to Aroclor mixtures. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2707–2714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernie KJ, Smits JE, Bortolotti GR, Bird DM (2001) Reproduction success of American kestrels exposed to dietary polychlorinated biphenyls. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:776–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher SA, Bortolotti GR, Fernie KJ, Bird DM, Smits JE (2006) Behavioral variation and its consequences during incubation for American kestrels exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 63:226–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frame GM, Cochran JW, Boewadt SS (1996) Complete PCB congener distributions for 17 Aroclor mixtures determined by 3 HRGC systems optimized for comprehensive, quantitative, congener-specific analysis. J High Resolut Chromatogr 19:657–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Froese KL, Verbrugge DA, Ankley GT, Niemi GJ, Larsen CP, Giesy JP (1998) Bioaccumulation of polychlorinated biphenyls from sediments to aquatic insects and tree swallow eggs and nestlings in Saginaw Bay, Michigan, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:484–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haseltine SD, Prouty RM (1980) Aroclor 1242 and reproductive success of adult mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). Environ Res 23:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heinz GH, Swineford DM, Katsma DE (1984) High PCB residues in birds from the Sheboygan River, Wisconsin. Environ Monit Assess 4:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henny CJ, Elliott JE (2007) Toxicology. In: Bird DM, Bildstein KL (eds) Raptor research and management techniques. Hancock House Publishers, Blaine, pp 329–350Google Scholar
  24. Hoffman DJ, Melancon MJ, Klein PN, Rice CP, Eisemann JD, Hines RK, Spann JW, Pendleton GW (1996a) Development toxicity of PCB 126 (3, 3, 4, 4, 5-pentachlorobuphenyl) in nestling American kestrels (Falco sparverius). Fundam Appl Toxicol 34:188–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoffman DJ, Rice CP, Kubiac TJ (1996b) PCBs and dioxins in birds. In: Beyer WN, Heinz GH, Redmon-Norwood AW (eds) Environmental contaminants in wildlife: interpreting tissue concentrations. CRC/Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 165–207Google Scholar
  26. Hoffman DJ, Melancon MJ, Klein PN, Eisemann JD, Spann JW (1998) Comparative developmental toxicity of planar polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in chickens, American kestrels, and common terns. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:747–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees (2005) Data report for the collection of eggs from spotted sandpipers, American woodcock, belted kingfisher, American robin, red-winged blackbird, and eastern phoebe associated with the Hudson River from Hudson Falls to Schodack Island, New York. U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver SpringsGoogle Scholar
  28. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koval PJ, Peterle TJ, Harder JD (1987) Effects of polychlorinated biphenyls on mourning dove reproduction and circulating progesterone levels. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 39:663–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kruskal JB (1964) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lank DB, Oring LW, Maxson SJ (1985) Mate and nutrient limitation of egg-laying in a polyandrous shorebird. Ecology 66:1513–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCarty JP, Secord AL (1999) Reproductive ecology of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) with high levels of polychlorinated biphenyl contamination. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1433–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelson MM (1939) The biology of the spotted sandpiper (Actitis macularia, Linn.). Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  35. Oring LW, Reed JM, Alberico JAR (1994) Mate acquisition tactics in the polyandrous spotted sandpiper (Actitis macularia): the role of age and experience. Behav Ecol 5:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oring LW, Gray EM, Reed JM (1997) Spotted sandpiper (Actitis macularia). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America. No. 289. The Birds of North America Inc, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  37. Peakall DB, Peakall ML (1973) Effects of polychlorinated biphenyl on the reproduction of artificially and naturally incubated dove eggs. J Appl Ecol 10:863–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reed JM, Oring LW (1993) Philopatry, site fidelity, dispersal, and survival of spotted sandpipers. Auk 110:541–551Google Scholar
  39. Rubbelke DL (1976) Distribution and relative abundance of potential prey of spotted sandpipers (Actitis macularia L.) on Little Pelican Island, Leech Lake, Cass Co., Minnesota. Dissertation, University of North Dakota, Grand ForksGoogle Scholar
  40. SAS (2003) SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1. SAS Institute Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmidt CW (2001) Of PCBs and the river. Chem Innov 31:48–52Google Scholar
  42. Secord AL, McCarty JP, Echols KR, Meadows JC, Gale RW, Tillitt DE (1999) Polychlorinated biphenyls and 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin equivalents in tree swallows from the Upper Hudson River, New York State, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2519–2525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stickel LF, Wiemeyer SN, Blus LJ (1973) Pesticide residues in eggs of wild birds: adjustment for loss of moisture and lipid. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 9:193–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tori GM, Peterle TJ (1983) Effects of PCBs on mourning dove courtship behavior. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 30:44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. U.S. EPA (1976) PCBs in the United States industrial use and environmental distribution. Task I. EPA 560/6-76-005. February 25Google Scholar
  46. Van den Berg M, Birnbaum L, Bosveld ATC, Brunstrom B, Cook P, Feeley M, Giesey JP, Hanberg A, Hasegawa R, Kennedy SW, Kubiak T, Larsen JC, Rolaf van Leeuwen RX, Djien Liem AK, Nolt C, Peterson RE, Poellinger L, Safe S, Schrenk D, Tilllitt D, Tysklind M, Younes M, Waern F, Zacharewski T (1998) Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. Environ Health Perspect 106:775–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas W. Custer
    • 1
  • Christine M. Custer
    • 1
  • Brian R. Gray
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyLa CrosseUSA

Personalised recommendations