Ecotoxicology

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 396–409 | Cite as

Manufactured nanoparticles: their uptake and effects on fish—a mechanistic analysis

  • Richard D. Handy
  • Theodore B. Henry
  • Tessa M. Scown
  • Blair D. Johnston
  • Charles R. Tyler
Article

Abstract

There is an emerging literature reporting toxic effects of manufactured nanomaterials (NMs) and nanoparticles (NPs) in fish, but the mechanistic basis of both exposure and effect are poorly understood. This paper critically evaluates some of the founding assumptions in fish toxicology, and likely mechanisms of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) of NPs in fish compared to other chemicals. Then, using a case study approach, the paper compares these assumptions for two different NPs; TiO2 and C60 fullerenes. Adsorption of NPs onto the gill surface will involve similar processes in the gill microenvironment and mucus layer to other substances, but the uptake mechanisms for NPs by epithelial cells are more likely to occur via vesicular processes (e.g., endocytosis) than uptake on membrane transporters or by diffusion through the cell membranes. Target organs may include the gills, gut, liver and sometimes the brain. Information on metabolism and excretion of NPs in fish is limited; but hepatic excretion into the bile seems a more likely mechanism, rather than mainly by renal or branchial excretion. TiO2 and C60 share some common chemical properties that appear to be associated with some similar toxic effects, but there are also differences, that highlight the notion that chemical reactivity can inform toxic effect of NPs in a fundamentally similar way to other chemicals. In this paper we identify many knowledge gaps including the lack of field observations on fish and other wildlife species for exposure and effects of manufactured NMs. Systematic studies of the abiotic factors that influence bioavailability, and investigation of the cell biology that informs on the mechanisms of metabolism and excretion of NMs, will greatly advance our understanding of the potential for adverse effects. There are also opportunities to apply existing tools and techniques to fundamental studies of fish toxicology with NPs, such as perfused organs and fish cell culture systems.

Keywords

Fish Trout Zebrafish C60 fullerenes Titanium dioxide Nanoparticles Toxic mechanisms 

References

  1. Aitken RJ, Chaudhry MQ, Boxall ABA, Hull M (2006) Manufacture and use of nanomaterials: current status in the UK and global trends. Occup Med 56:300–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrievsky GV, Klochkov VK, Karyakina EL, Mchedlov-Petrossan NO (1999) Studies of aqueous colloidal solutions of fullerene C-60 by electron microscopy. Chem Phys Lett 300:392–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselmann R (2001) Nanoparticles and nanolayers in commercial applications. J Nanopart Res 3:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arbogast JW, Darmanyan AP, Foote CS, Rubin Y, Diedrich FN, Alvarez MM, Anz SJ, Whetten RL (1991) Photophysical properties of C60. J Phys Chem 95:11–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashwood P, Thompson RPH, Powell JJ (2007) Fine particles that adsorb lipopolysaccharide via bridging calcium cations may mimic bacterial pathogenicity towards cells. Exp Biol Med 232:107–117Google Scholar
  6. Barakat MA (2005) Adsorption behavior of copper and cyanide ions at TiO2-solution interface. J Colloid Interf Sci 291:345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beeby A, Eastoe J, Heenan RK (1994) Solubilization of C-60 in aqueous micellar solution. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 10:173–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bermudez E, Mangum JB, Wong BA, Asgharian B, Hext PM, Warheit DB, Everitt JI (2004) Pulmonary responses of mice, rats, and hamsters to subchronic inhalation of ultrafine titanium dioxide particles. Toxicol Sci 77:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borg-Neczak K, Tjalve H (1996) Uptake of Hg-203(2+) in the olfactory system in pike. Toxicol Lett 84:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boxall ABA, Chaudhry Q, Sinclair C, Jones A, Aitken R, Jefferson B, Watts C (2007) Current and future predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. Report by the Central Science Laboratory (CSL) York for the Department of the Environment and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), UK. Available at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/science/Project_Data/DocumentLibrary/CB01098/CB01098_6270_FRP.pdf
  11. Buffle J, van Leeuwen HP (eds) (1992) Environmental particles Vol. 1. IUPAC Environmental analytical and physical chemistry series. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 554 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell HA, Handy RD, Nimmo M (1999) Copper uptake kinetics across the gills of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) measured using an improved isolated perfused head technique. Aquat Toxicol 46:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng JP, Flahaut E, Cheng SH (2007) Effect of carbon nanotubes on developing zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:708–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christian P, Von der Kammer, F, Baalousha M, Hofmann Th (2008) Nanoparticles: structure, properties, preparation and behaviour in environmental media. Ecotoxicology (in press)Google Scholar
  15. Colvin VL (2003) The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Biotechnol 21:1166–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crane M, Handy RD (2007) An assessment of regulatory testing strategies and methods for characterizing the ecotoxicological hazards of nanomaterials. Report for Defra, London, UK. Available at: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?DocumentID=2270
  17. Defra (2007) Characterising the potential risks posed by engineered nanoparticles. A second UK government research report. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Deng H, Huang A, So SP, Lin YZ, Ruan KH (2002) Substrate access channel topology in membrane-bound prostacyclin synthase. Biochem J 362:545–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elimelech M, Gregory J, Jia X, Williams RI (1995) Particle deposition and aggregation: measurement, modelling and simulation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, 441 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Erickson RJ, Mckim JM (1990) A model for exchange of organic chemicals at fish gills – flow and diffusion limitations. Aquat Toxicol 18:175–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Federici G, Shaw BJ, Handy RD (2007) Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to rainbow trout, (Oncorhynchus mykiss): gill injury, oxidative stress, and other physiological effects. Aquat Toxicol 84:415–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fortner JD, Lyon DY, Sayes CM, Boyd AM, Falkner JC, Hotze EM, Alemany LB, Tao YJ, Guo W, Ausman KD, Colvin VL, Hughes JB (2005) C-60 in water: nanocrystal formation and microbial response. Environ Sci Technol 39:4307–4316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gamer AO, Leibold E, van Ravenzwaay B (2006) The in vitro absorption of microfine zinc oxide and titanium dioxide through porcine skin. Toxicol In Vitro 20:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grasso D, Subramaniam K, Butkus M, Strevett K, Bergendahl J (2002) A review of non-DLVO interactions in environmental colloidal systems. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 1:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Griffitt RJ, Weil R, Hyndman KA, Denslow ND, Powers K, Taylor D, Barber DS (2007) Exposure to copper nanoparticles causes gill injury and acute lethality in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ Sci Technol 41:8178–8186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hampton JA, Lantz RC, Goldblatt PJ, Lauren DJ, Hinton DE (1988) Functional units in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri, Richardson) liver. II. The biliary system. Anat Rec 221:619–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Handy RD, Eddy FB (1991) Effects of inorganic cations on Na+ adsorption to the gill and body surface of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, in dilute solutions. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:1829–1837Google Scholar
  28. Handy RD, Eddy FB (2004) Transport of solutes across biological membranes in eukaryotes: an environmental perspective. In: van Leeuwen HP, Köster W (eds) Physicochemical kinetics and transport at chemical–biological interphases, IUPAC series. Wiley, Chichester, pp 337–356Google Scholar
  29. Handy RD, Shaw BJ (2007) Toxic effects of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: implications for public health, risk assessment and the public perception of nanotechnology. Health Risk Soc 9:125–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Handy RD, Musonda MM, Phillips C, Falla SJ (2000) Mechanisms of gastrointestinal copper absorption in the African walking catfish: copper dose-effects and a novel anion-dependent pathway in the intestine. J Exp Biol 203:2365–2377Google Scholar
  31. Handy RD, Kammer Fvd, Lead JR, Hassellöv M, Owen R, Crane M (2008a) The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17:287–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Handy RD, Valsami-Jones E, Owen R (2008b) The ecotoxicology of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: current status, knowledge gaps, challenges, and future needs. Ecotoxicology. doi: 10.1007/s10646-008-0206-0
  33. Henry TB, Menn FM, Fleming JT, Wilgus J, Compton RN, Sayler GS (2007) Attributing toxicity of aqueous C60 nano-aggregates to tetrahydrofuran decomposition products in larval zebrafish by assessment of gene expression. Environ Health Perspect 115:1059–1065Google Scholar
  34. Hirano K, Nitta H, Sawada K (2005) Effect of sonication on the photo-catalytic mineralization of some chlorinated organic compounds. Ultrason Sonochem 12:271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kagan VE, Tyurina YY, Tyurin VA, Konduru NV, Potapovich AI, Osipov AN, Kisin ER, Schwegler-Berry D, Mercer R, Castranova V, Shvedova AA (2006) Direct and indirect effects of single walled carbon nanotubes on RAW 264.7 macrophages: role of iron. Toxicol Lett 165:88–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kashiwada S (2006) Distribution of nanoparticles in the see-through Medaka (Oryzias latipes). Environ Health Perspect 114:1697–1702Google Scholar
  38. Kelly SP, Wood CM (2001) Effect of cortisol on the physiology of cultured pavement cell epithelia from freshwater trout gills. Am J Physiol 281:R811–R820Google Scholar
  39. Kroto HW, Heath JR, O’Brien SC, Curl RF, Smalley RE (1985) C-60-Buckminster fullerene. Nature 318:162–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lanno RP, Hicks B, Hilton JW (1987) Histological observations on intrahepatocytic copper-containing granules in rainbow trout reared on diets containing elevated levels of copper. Aquat Toxicol 10:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lead JR, Wilkinson KJ (2006) Aquatic colloids and nanoparticles: current knowledge and future trends. Environ Chem 3:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee J, Fortner JD, Hughes JB, Kim J-H (2007) Photochemical production of reactive oxygen species by C-60 in the aqueous phase during UV irradiation. Environ Sci Technol 41:2529–2535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lovern SB, Klaper R (2006) Daphnia magna mortality when exposed to titanium dioxide and fullerene (C-60) nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1132–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McWilliams PG, Potts WTW (1978) Effects of pH and calcium concentrations on gill potentials in brown trout, Salmo trutta. J Comp Physiol 126:277–286Google Scholar
  45. Miyata N, Yamakoshi Y, Nakanishi I (2000) Reactive species responsible for biological actions of photo excited fullerenes. Yakugaku Zasshi-J Pharm Soc Japan 120:1007–1016Google Scholar
  46. Moore MN (2006) Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment? Environ Int 32:967–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oberdörster G (1996) Significance of particle parameters in the evaluation of exposure–dose–response relationships of inhaled particles. Particulate Sci Technol 14:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oberdörster E (2004) Manufactured nanomaterials (fullerenes, C60) induce oxidative stress in the brain of juvenile Largemouth Bass. Environ Health Perspect 112:1058–1062Google Scholar
  49. Oberdörster G, Ferin J, Gelein R, Soderholm SC, Finkelstein J (1992) Role of the alveolar macrophage in lung injury – studies with ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 97:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oberdörster E, Zhu SQ, Blickley TM, Clellan-Green P, Haasch ML (2006) Ecotoxicology of carbon-based engineered nanoparticles: effects of fullerene (C-60) on aquatic organisms. Carbon 44:1112–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2007) Concepts of nanoparticle dose metric and response metric. Environ Health Perspect 115:A290–A291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Owen R, Handy RD (2007) Formulating the problems for environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 41(16):5582–5588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Paquin PR, Gorsuch JW, Apte S, Batley GE, Bowles KC, Campbell PGC, Delos CG, Di Toro DM, Dwyer RL, Galvez F, Gensemer RW, Goss GG, Hogstrand C, Janssen CR, Mcgeer JC, Naddy RB, Playle RC, Santore RC, Schneider U, Stubblefield WA, Wood CM, Wu KB (2002) The biotic ligand model: a historical overview. Comp Biochem Physiol C 133:3–35Google Scholar
  54. Pedley TJ, Fischbarg J (1978) Development of osmotic flow through an unstirred layer. J Theor Biol 70:427–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pulskamp K, Diabate S, Krug HF (2007) Carbon nanotubes show no sign of acute toxicity but induce intracellular reactive oxygen species in dependence on contaminants. Toxicol Lett 168:58–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rajagopalan P, Wudl F, Schinazi RF, Boudinot FD (1996) Pharmacokinetics of a water-soluble fullerene in rats. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:2262–2265Google Scholar
  57. Roco MC (2003) Nanotechnology: convergence with modern biology and medicine. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Royal Society (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. Report by the Royal Society and The Royal Academy of Engineering. http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm
  59. Sayes CM, Fortner JD, Guo W, Lyon D, Boyd AM, Ausman KD, Tao YJ, Sitharaman B, Wilson LJ, Hughes JB, West JL, Colvin VL (2004) The differential cytotoxicity of water-soluble fullerenes. Nano Lett 4:1882–1887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sayes CM, Gobin AM, Ausman KD, Mendez J, West JL, Colvin VL (2005) Nano-C-60 cytotoxicity is due to lipid peroxidation. Biomaterials 26:7587–7595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sharma CS, Sarkar S, Periyakaruppan A, Barr A, Wise K, Thomas R, Wilson BL, Ramesh GT (2007) Single-walled carbon nanotubes induces oxidative stress in rat lung epithelial cells. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 7:2466–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith CJ, Shaw BJ, Handy RD (2007) Toxicity of single walled carbon nanotubes on rainbow trout, (Oncorhynchus mykiss): respiratory toxicity, organ pathologies, and other physiological effects. Aquat Toxicol 82:94–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stolpe B, Hassellöv M (2007) Changes in size distribution of fresh water nanoscale colloidal matter and associated elements on mixing with seawater. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:3292–3301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wakefield G, Stott J, Hock J (2005) Sunscreens and cosmetics containing manganese doped titanium oxide nanoparticles. SOFW-J 131:46–51Google Scholar
  65. Wang JX, Zhou GQ, Chen CY, Yu HW, Wang TC, Ma YM, Jia G, Gao YX, Li B, Sun J, Li YF, Jiao F, Zhao YL, Chai ZF (2007) Acute toxicity and biodistribution of different sized titanium dioxide particles in mice after oral administration. Toxicol Lett 168:176–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Warheit DB, Brock WJ, Lee KP, Webb TR, Reed KL (2005) Comparative pulmonary toxicity inhalation and instillation studies with different TiO2 particle formulations: impact of surface treatments on particle toxicity. Toxicol Sci 88:514–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Warheit DB, Webb TR, Sayes CM, Colvin VL, Reed KL (2006) Pulmonary instillation studies with nanoscale TiO2 rods and dots in rats: toxicity is not dependent upon particle size and surface area. Toxicol Sci 91:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Warheit DB, Webb TR, Reed KL, Frerichs S, Sayes CM (2007) Pulmonary toxicity study in rats with three forms of ultrafine-TiO2 particles: differential responses related to surface properties. Toxicology 230:90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Watanabe T, Nakajima A, Wang R, Minabe M, Koizumi S, Fujishima A, Hashimoto K (1999) Photocatalytic activity and photoinduced hydrophilicity of titanium dioxide coated glass. Thin Solid Films 351:260–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wood C, Kelly SP, Zhou BS, Fletcher M, O’Donnell M, Eletti B, Pärt P (2002) Cultured gill epithelia as models for the freshwater fish gill. Biochim Biophys Acta-Biomembr 1566:72–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yamakoshi Y, Sueyoshi S, Fukuhara K, Miyata N (1998) ·OH and O2· generation in aqueous C-60 and C-70 solution by photoirriadiation: and EPR study. J Am Chem Soc 120:12363–12364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yang K, Zhu LZ, Xing BS (2006) Adsorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by carbon nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 40:1855–1861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhu S, Oberdörster E, Haasch ML (2006) Toxicity of an engineered nanoparticle (fullerene, C-60) in two aquatic species, Daphnia and fathead minnow. Mar Environ Res 62:S5–S9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhu X, Zhu L, Li Y, Duan Z, Chen W, Alvarez PJJ (2007) Developmental toxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos after exposure to manufactured nanomaterials: Buckminsterfullerene aggregates (nC(60)) and fullerol. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:976–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard D. Handy
    • 1
  • Theodore B. Henry
    • 1
  • Tessa M. Scown
    • 2
  • Blair D. Johnston
    • 2
  • Charles R. Tyler
    • 2
  1. 1.Ecotoxicology and Stress Biology Research Group, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthUK
  2. 2.School of Biosciences, The Hatherly LaboratoryUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations