Ecotoxicology

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 117–131 | Cite as

Mercury and drought along the lower Carson River, Nevada: II. Snowy egret and black-crowned night-heron reproduction on Lahontan Reservoir, 1997–2006

  • Elwood F. Hill
  • Charles J. Henny
  • Robert A. Grove
Article

Abstract

Mercury concentrations in the floodplain of the Carson River Basin in northwestern Nevada are some of the highest ever reported in a natural system. Thus, a portion of the basin including Lahontan Reservoir was placed on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Natural Priorities List for research and cleanup. Preliminary studies indicated that reproduction in piscivorous birds may be at risk. Therefore, a 10-year study (1997–2006) was conducted to evaluate reproduction of snowy egrets (Egretta thula) and black-crowned night-herons (Nycticorax nycticorax) nesting on Gull Island in Lahontan Reservoir. Special attention was given to the annual flow of the Carson River, the resultant fluctuation of this irrigation reservoir, and the annual exposure of snowy egrets and night-herons to methylmercury (MeHg). The dynamic character of the river due to flooding and drought (drought effect) influenced snowy egret and night-heron reproduction more so than did MeHg contamination of eggs. During an extended drought (2000–2004) in the middle of the study, snowy egret nests containing eggs with concentrations of MeHg (measured as total mercury [THg] ∼ 100% MeHg) ≥0.80 μg THg/g, ww, all failed, but in 1997 and 2006 (wet years with general flooding), substantial numbers of young were produced (but fewer than at nests where eggs contained <0.80 μg/g). Thus, a variable reproductive threshold of tolerance to MeHg may be associated with habitat quality (food type and abundance). Clearly, drought was the most important factor affecting snowy egret annual productivity. In contrast to snowy egrets, night-herons generally had fewer nests meeting the 0.80 μg THg/g criterion, and those above the criterion were less sensitive to mercury than were snowy egrets. Furthermore, night-herons appeared more tolerant of drought conditions than snowy egrets because they nested earlier, selected more protected nesting sites, and had a more generalist diet that provided additional food options including terrestrial organisms, which also reduced exposure to MeHg. A putative biological effect threshold of 2.0 μg THg/g in whole blood for young of both species was evaluated, which was frequently exceeded, but with no evidence, while still in the colony, of an association with direct mortality. An evaluation of physiological associations with blood residues and post-fledging survival will be presented in future reports in this series.

Keywords

Mercury Snowy egret Reproduction Black-crowned night-heron Mining Drought 

References

  1. Blus LJ (1984) DDE in birds’ eggs: comparison of two methods for estimating critical levels. Wilson Bull 96:268–276Google Scholar
  2. Custer TW, Peterson DW Jr (1991) Growth rates of great egret, snowy egret and black-crowned night-heron chicks. Colonial Waterbirds 14:46–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ecology and Environment, Inc. (1998) Draft ecological risk assessment, 001-98, Carson River Mercury Site, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. Eisler R (2006) Mercury hazards to living organisms. Taylor and Francis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  5. Evers DC, Lance OP, Savog L, Goodale W (2004) Assessing the impacts of methylmercury on piscivorous wildlife using a wildlife criterion value based on the common loon, 1998–2003, Report BRI 2004–05 to Maine Depart. Environ. Prot., BioDiversity Res. Inst. Guram, MEGoogle Scholar
  6. Gustin MS, Chaven PV, Dennett KE, Marchand EA, Donaldson S (2006) Evaluation of wetland methylmercury export as a function of experimental manipulation. J Environ Qual 35:2352–2359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heinz GH (1979) Methylmercury: reproductive and behavioral effects on three generations of mallard ducks. J Wildl Manage 43:394–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Henny CJ, Herron GB (1989) DDE, selenium, mercury and white-faced ibis reproduction at Carson Lake, Nevada. J Wildl Manage 53:1032–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henny CJ, Hill EF, Grove RA, Kaiser JL (2007) Mercury and drought along the lower Carson River, Nevada: I. Snowy egret and black-crowned night-heron annual exposure to mercury, 1997–2006. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 53:269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henny CJ, Hill EF, Hoffman DJ, Spalding MG, Grove RA (2002) Nineteenth century mercury: hazard to wading birds and cormorants of the Carson River, Nevada. Ecotoxicology 11:213–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffman DJ, Sanderson CJ, LeCaptain LJ, Cromartie E., Pendleton GW (1992) Interactive effects of arsenate, selenium and dietary protein on survival, growth and physiology in mallard ducklings. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 22:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoffman RJ, Taylor RL (1998) Mercury and suspended sediment, Carson River Basin, Nevada – Loads to and from Lahontan Reservoir in flood year 1997 and deposition in reservoir prior to 1983. USGS Fact Sheet FS-001-98, Carson CityGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffman RJ, Thomas KA (2000) Methylmercury in water and bottom sediment along the Carson River system, Nevada and California, September 1998. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4013Google Scholar
  14. Lawrence SJ (1998) Trace-element enrichment in streambed sediment and crayfish, Carson and Truckee Rivers, Nevada and California, September 1992. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 97–4258Google Scholar
  15. Newton I, Haas MB (1988) Pollutants in merlin eggs and their effects on breeding. Br Birds 81:258–269Google Scholar
  16. SAS Institute (1999) SAS user’s guide: statistics, version 8.02. SAS Institute, Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
  17. Scheuhammer AM, Meyer MW, Sandheinrich MB, Murray MW (2007) Effects of environmental methylmercury on the health of wild birds, mammals and fish. Ambio 36:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith GH (1943) The history of the Comstock Lode, 1850–1920. Nevada Bureau Mines Geol Bull 37:1–305Google Scholar
  19. Stickel LF, Wiemeyer SN, Blus LJ (1973) Pesticide residues in eggs of wild birds: adjustment for loss of moisture and lipid. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 9:193–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Denburgh AS (1973) Mercury in Carson and Truckee River Basins in Nevada. USGS Open-File Report 73-352Google Scholar
  21. Wade GN, Schneider JE, Li HY (1996) Control of fertility by metabolic cues. Am J Physiol 270:E1–E19Google Scholar
  22. Wayne DM, Warwick JJ, Lechler PJ, Gill GA, Lyons WB (1996) Mercury contamination on the Carson River, Nevada: a preliminary study of the impact of mining wastes. Water Air Soil Pollut 92:391–408Google Scholar
  23. Weiner JG, Krabbenhoft DP, Heinz GH, Scheuhammer AH (2002) Ecotoxicology of mercury. In: Hoffman DJ, Rattner BA, Burton GA Jr, Cairns J Jr (eds) Handbook of ecotoxicology, 2nd edn. Lewis Publ., Boca Raton, pp 409–463Google Scholar
  24. Wolfe MF, Schwarzbach S, Sulaiman RA (1998) Effects of mercury on wildlife: a comprehensive review. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:146–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elwood F. Hill
    • 1
  • Charles J. Henny
    • 2
  • Robert A. Grove
    • 2
  1. 1.GardnervilleUSA
  2. 2.Forest & Rangeland Ecosystem Science CenterU.S. Geological SurveyCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations