Advertisement

Ecotoxicology

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 451–460 | Cite as

Chemical and biological evaluation of sediments from the Wadden Sea, The Netherlands

  • Paul J. Van den Brink
  • Belinda J. Kater
Original Paper

Abstract

We describe the results of an evaluation of marine sediments using chemical measurements and bioassays. Four groups of chemicals, i.e., heavy metals, PAHs, chlorinated aromatic compounds, and tin compounds, were measured at 16 locations in the Wadden Sea, The Netherlands. Extractions of sediments from each location also were assessed using five bioassays. Our objective was to identify chemicals likely to pose biological risks, characterize the relation between bioassay results and particular classes of chemical(s) and determine “clean” reference sites on the basis of the chemical and biological evaluations. A multivariate technique (Principal Component Analysis; PCA) was used to meet these objectives. Results of the PCA indicated that the response of the Microtox Solid Phase bioassay had a positive, significant relationship with the levels of PAHs and organotin compounds. The responses of the other bioassays did not consistently relate to the concentrations of the other measured chemicals. Our findings indicate that the organotin compounds may still be a stressor for aquatic invertebrates in the Dutch Wadden Sea. On the basis of the chemical and biological evaluations, four sites (Dantziggat, Malzwin, Richel and Lauwers) can be considered to be “clean” reference sites.

Keywords

Marine bioassays Multivariate techniques Marine sediments Principal component analysis Tributyltin PAHs 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Bert Brinkman, Nico van den Brink and Theo Brock are acknowledged for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. Joop Bakker, Martin Eggens, Greetje Werkman are thanked for initiating the Wadden Sea survey, RIKZ-ITL Haren for performing the chemical analyses, André Hannewijk for performing the bioassay with C. volutator, Johan Jol for performing the assay with E. cordatum, Marco Dubbeldam (AquaSense) for performing the MSP bioassay, and the bioassays with C. gigas and B. plicatilis.

References

  1. Alzieu C (2000) Impact of tributyltin on marine invetebrates. Ecotoxicology 9:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argese E, Bettoil C Ghirardini AV, Fasolo M, Giurin G, Ghetti PF (1998) Comparison of in vitro submitochondrial particle and Microtox® assays for determining the toxicity of organitin compounds. Env Toxicol Chem 17:1005–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltey GE, Burton GA, Chapman PM, Forbes VE (2002) Uncertainties in sediment quality weight-of-evidence (WOE) assessments. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8:1517–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernard C, Janssen CR, Le Dû-Delepierre A (1997) Estimation of the hazard of landfills through toxicity testing of leachates. 2. Comparison of physico-chemical characteristics of landfill leachates with their toxicity determined with a battery of tests. Chemosphere 35:2783–2796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cadée GC, Boon JP, Fischer CV, Mensink BP, Ten Hallers-Tjabbes CC (1995) Why the whelk (Buccinum undatum) has become extinct in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Neth J Sea Res 34:337–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davoren M, Ní Shúilleabháin S, Halloran JO’, Hartl MGJ, Sheehan D, O’Brien NM, van Pelt FNAM, Mothersill C (2005) A test battery approach for the ecotoxicological evaluation of estuarine sediments. Ecotoxicology 14:741–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Jong F, Bakker JF, Van Berkel CJM, Dahl K, Dankers NMJA, Gätje C, Marencic H, Potel P (1999) 1999 Wadden Sea quality status report. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 9. Common Wadden Sea secretariat, trilateral monitoring and assessment group, quality status report group. Wilhelmshaven, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  8. Del Valls TA, Lubián LM, Forja JM, Gómez-Parra A (1997) Comparative ecotoxicity of interstitial waters in litoral ecosystems using Microtox® and the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 16:2323–2332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doherty FG (2001) A review of the Microtox® test system for assessing the toxicity of sediments and soils. Water Qual Res J Canada 36:475–518Google Scholar
  10. Essink K, Wolff WJ (ed) (1978) Pollution of the Wadden Sea. Report 8 of the Wadden Sea working group. Corporation Veth for Support of Wadden Sea research. Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  11. Giesy JP, Graney RL (1989) Recent developments in and intercomparisons of acute and chronic bioassays and bioindicators. Hydrobiologia 188:21–60Google Scholar
  12. Heijerick DG, Vangheluwe ML, Janssen CR, Dumon G (2000) Selection and use of marine toxicity assess the quality of dredged sediments. In: Grandrass J, Salomons W, Föstners U (eds) Workshop on river sediment and related dredged material in Europe—scientific background from the viewpoints of chemistry, ecotoxicology and regulations. Geesthacht, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  13. Lourens JM, Vonck APMA, van de Guchte C, Hartnack J, Stronkhorst J (1995) Sediment toxicity testing of lightly contaminated dredged materiol in The Netherlands. J Aq Ecosys Health 4:271–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Magnusson K, Ekelund R, Dave G, Granmo Å, Förin L, Wennberg L, Samuelsson M-O, Berggren M, Brorstrøm-Lunden E (1996) Contamination and correlation with toxicity of sediment samples from the Skagerrak and Kattegat. J Sea Res 35:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mensink BP, Boon JP, Ten Hallers-Tjabbes CC, Van Hattum B, Koeman JH (1997) Bioaccumulation of organotin compounds and imposex occurrence in a marine food chain (Eastern Scheldt, The Netherlands). Env Techn 18:1235–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mowat FS, Bundy KJ (2001) Correlation of field-measured toxicity with chemical concentration and pollutant availability. Environ Int 27:479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. National Institute for Coastal, Marine Management (1999) RIKZ Handbook for Marine Dredged Sediments. The Hague, The Netherlands, ISBN-90–369–3493–1Google Scholar
  18. Oslo, Paris Commission (OSPARCOM), (1997) JAMP Guidelines for general biological effects monitoring, p 12Google Scholar
  19. Pedersen F, Bjornstad E, Andersen HV, Kjolholt J, Poll C (1998) Characterization of sediments from Copenhagen Harbour by use of biotests. In: Calmano W, Roeters P, Vellinga T (eds) Contaminated Sediments 37:233–240Google Scholar
  20. Peters C, Becker S, Noack U, Pfitzner S, Bülow W, Barz K, Ahlf W, Berghahn R (2002) A marine bioassay test set to assess marine water and sediment quality—its need, the approach and first results. Ecotoxicology 11:379–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shaw JL, Manning JP (1996) Evaluating macroinvertebrate population and community level effects in outdoor microcosms: use of in situ bioassays and multivariate analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:508–617Google Scholar
  22. Stephenson M, Mackie GL (1988) Multivariate analysis of correlations between environmental parameters and cadmium concentrations in Hyalella azteca (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from central Ontario lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:1705–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stronkhorst J, Van Hattum B, Bowmer T (1999) Bioaccumulation and toxicity of tributyltin to a burrowing heart urchin and amphipod in spiked, silty marine sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2343–2351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tanguy A, Fernandez Castro N, Marhic A, Moraga D (1999) Effects of an organic pollutant (tributyltin) on genetic structure in the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas. Mar Poll Bull 38:550–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tas JW (1993) Fate and effects of triorganotins in the aqueous environment. Bioconcentration kinetics, lethal body burdens, sorption and physico-chemical properties. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  26. Thain JE, Allen Y, Reed J, Murray L (2000) Use for bioassays in assessing the toxicity of dredge material: experience in England UK. In: J Grandrass, W Salomons, U Föstners (eds) Workshop on river sediment and related dredged material in Europe—scientific background from the viewpoints of chemistry, ecotoxicology and regulations. Geesthacht, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  27. Ter Braak CJF (1995) Ordination. In: Jongman RGH, Ter Braak CJF, Van Tongeren OFR (eds) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 91–173Google Scholar
  28. Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (1998) CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to CANOCO(??) for Windows: software for canonical community ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Tougaard S, Helweg Ovesen C (1981) Environmental problems of the Waddensea-region. Proceedings of the scientific symposium Ribe, Denmark 16–18 May 1979. Museum of Fisheries and Shipping, Esberg, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  30. Van den Brink PJ, Hattink J, Bransen F, Van Donk E, Brock TCM (2000) Impact of the fungicide carbendazim in freshwater microcosms. II. Zooplankton, primary producers and final conclusions. Aquat Toxicol 48:251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van den Brink PJ, Van den Brink NW, Ter Braak CJF (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecotoxicological data using ordination: demonstrations of utility on the basis of various examples. Aust J Ecotoxicol 9:141–156Google Scholar
  32. Wade TL, Garvia-Romero B, Brooks JM (1990) Butyltins in sediments and bivalves from US coastal areas. Chemosphere 20:647–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wolff WJ (2000) Causes of extirpations in the Wadden Sea, an estuarine area in The Netherlands. Cons Biol 14:876–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AlterraWageningen University and Research centreWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality ManagementWageningen University and Research centreWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.RIKZ/National Institute for Coastal and Marine ManagementMiddelburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations