Skip to main content
Log in

A New Interpretation of Avian and Mammalian Reproduction Toxicity Test Data in Ecological Risk Assessment

  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The long-term risks of pesticides to wildlife in the EU currently are assessed by comparing the lowest no-observed-effect concentration (NOEC) determined from the suite of endpoints measured in existing avian and mammalian laboratory reproduction tests with estimated exposure concentrations by calculating Toxicity to Exposure Ratios (TERs). Regulatory authorities experience difficulties when assessing long-term risks because of the lack of accepted methods to improve the ecological realism of exposure and toxicity estimates and understand risks at a population level. This paper describes an approach for interpreting existing avian and mammalian toxicity test data that divides breeding cycles into several discrete phases and identifies specific test endpoints as indicators of direct pesticide effects possible at each phase. Based on the distribution of breeding initiation dates for a species of concern and the dates of pesticide applications, this approach compares the phase-specific toxicity endpoint with the expected pesticide exposure levels during each of the breeding phases. The fate of each breeding attempt is determined through a series of decision points. The cumulative reproductive response of individuals in a breeding population based on this decision framework provides a means of examining the estimated risks over the course of the breeding season and deriving an overall metric of the impact of the pesticide on reproduction. Research needed to further improve the approach is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett G.W., (1968). The effects of an acute insecticide stress on a semi-enclosed grassland ecosystemEcology 49: 1019–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett G.W., (1988). Effects of Sevin on small-mammal populations in agricultural and old-field ecosystemsJ. Mammal. 69: 731–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett R.S., Williams B.A., Schmedding D.W., Bennett J.K., (1991). Effects of dietary exposure to methyl parathion on egg laying and incubation in mallardsEnviron. Toxicol. Chem. 10: 501–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Bildstein K.L., Forsyth D.J., (1979). Effects of dietary dieldrin on behavior of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) towards an avian predatorBull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 21: 93–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer L.W., Driver C.J., Kendall R.J., Zenier C., Lacher T.E. Jr. (1988). Effects of methyl parathion in ducks and duck broodsEnviron. Toxicol. Chem. 7: 375–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby D.G., White L.M., Pearce P.A., (1990). Effects of aerial spraying of fenitrothion on breeding white-throated sparrowsJ. Appl. Ecol. 27: 743–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Caslin T.M., Wolff J.O., (1999). Individual and demographic responses of the gray-tailed vole to vinclozolinEnviron. Toxicol. Chem. 18: 1529–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Omo G., Shore R.F., (1996a). Behavioral and physiological effects of acute sublethal exposure to dimethoate on wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus: I – laboratory studiesArch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 31: 91–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Omo G., Shore R.F., (1996b). Behavioral effects of acute sublethal exposure to dimethoate on wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus: II – field studies on radio-tagged mice in a cereal ecosystemArch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 31: 538–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECOFRAM. 1999. ECOFRAM Terrestrial Draft Report. Ecological Committee on FIFRA Risk Assessment Methods. ( http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/ecorisk/)

  • Fairbrother A., Meyers S.M., Bennett R.S., (1988). Changes in mallard hen and brood behaviors in response to methyl parathion-induced illness of ducklingsEnviron. Toxicol. Chem. 7: 499–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Franson J.C., Spann J.W., Heinz G.H., Bunck C., Lamont T., (1983). Effects of dietary Abate on reproductive success, duckling survival, behavior, and clinical pathology in game-farm mallardsArch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 12: 529–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry D.M., (1995). Reproductive effects in birds exposed to pesticides and industrial chemicalsEnviron. Health Perspect. 103: 165–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Grue C.E., Powell G.V.N, McChesney M.J., (1982). Care of nestlings by wild female starlings exposed to an organophosphate pesticideJ. Appl. Ecol. 19: 327–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Grue C.E., Shipley B.K., (1981). Interpreting population estimates of birds following pesticide applications–behavior of male starlings exposed to an organophosphate pesticideStud. Avian Biol. 6: 292–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall L.W. Jr., Giddings J.M., (2000). The need for multiple lines of evidence for predicting site-specific ecological effectsHuman Ecol. Risk Assess. 6: 679–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart A.D.M., (1993). Relationships between behaviour and the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase in birds exposed to organophosphorus pesticidesEnviron. Toxicol. Chem. 12: 321–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart A.D.M. (2001). Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Pesticides in Europe: Implementation & Research Needs. Report from European Workshop on Probabilistic Risk Assessment for the Environmental Impacts of Plant Protection Products, The Netherlands. 109 p

  • Hart A.D.M., Balluff D., Barfknecht R., Chapman P.F., Hawkes T., Joermann G., Leopold A., Luttik R. (2001). Avian Effects Assessment: A Framework for Contaminants Studies. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, FL. 216 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman D.J. (1990). Embryotoxicity and teratogenicity of environmental contaminants to bird eggsRev. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 115: 39–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttik, R., Balluff, D., Barfknecht, R., Chapman, P., Hart, A., Hawkes, T., Joermann, G. and Leopold, A. (2001). Sources of uncertainty in avian effects assessment. In A. Hart, et al. (eds). Avian Effects Assessment: A Framework for Contaminants Studies, pp. 23–31. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). 216 p

  • Luttik, R., Mineau, P. and Roelofs, W. (2005) A review of interspecies toxicity extrapolation in birds and mammals and a proposal for long-term toxicity data. Ecotoxicology, this volume

  • Matz A.C., Bennett R.S., Landis W.G. (1998). Effects of azinphos-methyl on northern bobwhite: A comparison of laboratory and field effectsEnviron. Toxicol. Chem. 17: 1364–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers S.M., Gile J.D. (1986). Mallard reproductive testing in a pond environment: A preliminary studyArch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 15: 757–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mineau P., (2002). Estimating the probability of bird mortality from pesticide sprays on the basis of field study recordEnviron. Toxicol. Chem. 21: 1497–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mineau, P. (2005) A review and analysis of study endpoints relevant to the assessment of ‘long term’ pesticide toxicity in avian and mammalian wildlife. Ecotoxicology, this volume

  • Mineau P., Boersma D.C., Collins B., (1994). An analysis of avian reproduction studies submitted for pesticide registrationEcotoxicol. Environ. Safety 29: 304–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1996). Report of the SETAC/OECD Workshop on Avian Toxicity Testing. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, OCDE/GD(96)166

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy S.E., Barrett G.W. (1975). Dynamics of enclosed small mammal populations in relation to an experimental pesticide applicationAm. Midl. Nat. 93: 91–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer E.W. Jr., Bowles W.A. Jr. (1985). Acute oral toxicity and repellency of 933 chemicals to house and deer miceArch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 14: 111–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, R.F., Crocker, D.R., Akcakaya, H.R., Bennett, R.S., Chapman, P.F., Clook, M., Crane, M., Dewhurst, I.C., Edwards, P.J., Fairbrother, A., Ferson, S., Fischer, D., Hart, A.D.M., Holmes, M., Hooper, M.J., Lavine, M., Leopold, A., Luttik, R., Mineau, P., Moore, D.R.J., Mortenson, S.R., Noble, D.G., O’Connor, R.J., Roelofs, W., Sibly, R.M., Smith, G., Spendiff, M., Springer, T.A., Thompson, H.M. and Topping, C. (2005) Case study Part 1: How to calculate appropriate deterministic long-term toxicity to exposure ratios (TERs) for birds and mammals. Ecotoxicology, this volume

  • Snyder R.L. (1974). Effects of dieldrin on homing and orientation in deer miceJ. Wildl. Manage. 38: 362–64

    Google Scholar 

  • White D.H., Mitchell C.A., Hill E.F. (1983). Parathion alters incubation behavior of laughing gullsBull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 31: 93–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe J.L., Esher R.J., Robinson K.M., Yarbrough J.D. (1979). Lethal and reproductive effects of dietary mirex and DDT on old-field mice, Peromyscus polionotusBull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 21: 397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousef M.I., Salem M.H., Ibrahim H.Z., Helmi S., Seehy M.A., Bertheussen K. (1995). Toxic effects of carbofuran and glyphosate on semen characteristics in rabbitsJ. Environ. Sci. Health B30: 513–34

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the Pesticides Safety Directorate, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK for funding the workshop, to all the workshop participants for their contributions to the discussions, and to their organizations for supporting their involvement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard S. Bennett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennett, R., Dewhurst, I., Fairbrother, A. et al. A New Interpretation of Avian and Mammalian Reproduction Toxicity Test Data in Ecological Risk Assessment. Ecotoxicology 14, 801–815 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-005-0029-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-005-0029-1

Keywords

Navigation