Skip to main content

School Responsiveness to Quality Rankings: An Empirical Analysis of Secondary Education in the Netherlands

Abstract

This paper assesses the response of Dutch secondary schools to the publication of relative quality ratings in a national newspaper (Trouw). Our research design exploits the discontinuities in the ranking formula that was used to generate five consecutive levels for the overall quality of schools.We find previous Trouw quality scores to have an offsetting effect on school quality performance, i.e. both average grades and the number of diplomas go up after receiving a negative score. These effects are confined to the lower support of the performance distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bacolod, M., DiNardo, J., & Jacobson, M. (2009). Beyond incentives: Do schools use accountability rewards productively? NBER working paper 14775.

  2. Carnoy M., Loeb S. (2003) Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24(4): 305–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiang H. (2009) How accountability pressure on failing schools affects student achievement. Journal of Public Economics 93(9–10): 1045–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Craig, S. G., Imberman, S. A., & Perdue, A. (2009). Does it pay to get an A? School Resource allocations in response to accountability ratings. Mimeo.

  5. De Lange, M., & Dronkers, J. (2007). Hoe gelijkwaardig blijft het eindexamen tussen scholen in Nederland? EUI working paper 2007/03.

  6. Dee T.S., Jacob B. (2011) The impact of no child left behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 30(3): 418–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dijkgraaf, E., Gradus, R. H. J. M., & de Jong, M. (2009). Competition and educational quality: Evidence from the Netherlands. Tinbergen institute discussion paper 2009-100/3.

  8. Dijkstra, A. B., Karsten, S., Veenstra, R., & Visscher, A. J. (2001) Het oog der natie: Scholen op rapport. Standaarden voor de publicatie van schoolprestaties. Assen, Koninklijke van Gorcum.

  9. Figlio, D. N., & Getzler, L. S. (2002). Accountability, ability and disability: Gaming the system, NBER Working Paper 9307.

  10. Figlio D. N., Lucas M. E. (2004) What’s in a grade? School report cards and the housing market. American Economic Review 94(3): 591–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Figlio D. N., Rouse C. E. (2006) Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools?. Journal of Public Economics 90(1–2): 239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanushek E. A., Raymond M. E. (2004) The effect of school accountability systems on the level and distribution of student achievement. Journal of the European Economic Association 2(2–3): 406–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanushek E. A., Raymond M. E. (2005) Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24(2): 297–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hastings J., van Weelden R., Weinstein J. (2008) Information, school choice and academic achievement: evidence from two experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4): 1373–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacob B. (2005) Accountability, incentives and behavior: Evidence from school reform in Chicago. Journal of Public Economics 89(5–6): 761–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koning, P., & Van der Wiel, K. (2012, forthcoming). Ranking the schools: How quality information affects school choice in the Netherlands. Journal of the European Economic Association.

  17. Pope D. G. (2009) Reacting to rankings: Evidence from “America’s best hospitals”. Journal of Health Economics 28(5): 1154–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rockoff J., Turner L. J. (2010) Short-run impacts of accountability on school quality. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2: 119–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rouse, C. E., Hannaway, J., Goldhaber, D., & Figlio, D. (2007). Feeling the Florida heat? How low-performing schools respond to voucher and accountability pressure. NBER working paper 13681.

  20. Van der Steeg, M. & Vermeer, N. (2011). Nederlandse onderwijsprestaties in perspectief. CPB Achtergronddocument.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Koning.

Additional information

We thank the editor, two anonymous referees, Lex Borghans, Elbert Dijkgraaf, Jaap Dronkers, Michael Lindahl, Marc van der Steeg, Sietzke Waslander and Dinand Webbink for useful comments to earlier versions of the paper. The Ministry of Economic Affairs is gratefully acknowledged for sponsoring the research. We also would like to thank seminar participants at the IFAU seminar in Uppsala on November 10, 2010; the Labour/Health seminar at Tilburg University on February 8, 2011; and the Day for Belgian Labour Economists in Ghent on April 29, 2011, for useful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koning, P., van der Wiel, K. School Responsiveness to Quality Rankings: An Empirical Analysis of Secondary Education in the Netherlands. De Economist 160, 339–355 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-012-9194-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • School quality
  • School accountability
  • Regression discontinuity designs

JEL Classification

  • H75
  • I20
  • D83