De Economist

, Volume 160, Issue 4, pp 339–355 | Cite as

School Responsiveness to Quality Rankings: An Empirical Analysis of Secondary Education in the Netherlands

  • Pierre Koning
  • Karen van der Wiel


This paper assesses the response of Dutch secondary schools to the publication of relative quality ratings in a national newspaper (Trouw). Our research design exploits the discontinuities in the ranking formula that was used to generate five consecutive levels for the overall quality of schools.We find previous Trouw quality scores to have an offsetting effect on school quality performance, i.e. both average grades and the number of diplomas go up after receiving a negative score. These effects are confined to the lower support of the performance distribution.


School quality School accountability Regression discontinuity designs 

JEL Classification

H75 I20 D83 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bacolod, M., DiNardo, J., & Jacobson, M. (2009). Beyond incentives: Do schools use accountability rewards productively? NBER working paper 14775.Google Scholar
  2. Carnoy M., Loeb S. (2003) Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24(4): 305–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiang H. (2009) How accountability pressure on failing schools affects student achievement. Journal of Public Economics 93(9–10): 1045–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craig, S. G., Imberman, S. A., & Perdue, A. (2009). Does it pay to get an A? School Resource allocations in response to accountability ratings. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  5. De Lange, M., & Dronkers, J. (2007). Hoe gelijkwaardig blijft het eindexamen tussen scholen in Nederland? EUI working paper 2007/03.Google Scholar
  6. Dee T.S., Jacob B. (2011) The impact of no child left behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 30(3): 418–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dijkgraaf, E., Gradus, R. H. J. M., & de Jong, M. (2009). Competition and educational quality: Evidence from the Netherlands. Tinbergen institute discussion paper 2009-100/3.Google Scholar
  8. Dijkstra, A. B., Karsten, S., Veenstra, R., & Visscher, A. J. (2001) Het oog der natie: Scholen op rapport. Standaarden voor de publicatie van schoolprestaties. Assen, Koninklijke van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  9. Figlio, D. N., & Getzler, L. S. (2002). Accountability, ability and disability: Gaming the system, NBER Working Paper 9307.Google Scholar
  10. Figlio D. N., Lucas M. E. (2004) What’s in a grade? School report cards and the housing market. American Economic Review 94(3): 591–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Figlio D. N., Rouse C. E. (2006) Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools?. Journal of Public Economics 90(1–2): 239–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanushek E. A., Raymond M. E. (2004) The effect of school accountability systems on the level and distribution of student achievement. Journal of the European Economic Association 2(2–3): 406–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanushek E. A., Raymond M. E. (2005) Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24(2): 297–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hastings J., van Weelden R., Weinstein J. (2008) Information, school choice and academic achievement: evidence from two experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4): 1373–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacob B. (2005) Accountability, incentives and behavior: Evidence from school reform in Chicago. Journal of Public Economics 89(5–6): 761–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koning, P., & Van der Wiel, K. (2012, forthcoming). Ranking the schools: How quality information affects school choice in the Netherlands. Journal of the European Economic Association.Google Scholar
  17. Pope D. G. (2009) Reacting to rankings: Evidence from “America’s best hospitals”. Journal of Health Economics 28(5): 1154–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rockoff J., Turner L. J. (2010) Short-run impacts of accountability on school quality. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2: 119–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rouse, C. E., Hannaway, J., Goldhaber, D., & Figlio, D. (2007). Feeling the Florida heat? How low-performing schools respond to voucher and accountability pressure. NBER working paper 13681.Google Scholar
  20. Van der Steeg, M. & Vermeer, N. (2011). Nederlandse onderwijsprestaties in perspectief. CPB Achtergronddocument.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VU University Amsterdam and IZAAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis and IZAThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations