Summary
The Market Abuse Directive came into effect on 1 October 2005. One of its purposes is to reduce illegal insider trading and leakage of information prior to official releases by increasing penalties. Applying an event study approach to a dataset of almost 5,000 corporate news announcements, the analysis reveals that the information value of announcements, measured by the announcement day abnormal return and abnormal volume, is not significantly different after the new regulation than it was before although the number of releases has increased significantly. Trading suspicious of illegal insider trading and leakage of information, measured in terms of cumulative average abnormal returns and volumes for the 30 days prior to the news announcement, has significantly declined for small capitalization firms, for announcements containing information about alliances and mergers and acquisitions and for firms in the technology sector.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ahmed A.S., Schneible R.A.: ‘The Impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure on Investors’ Prior Information Quality: Evidence from an Analysis of Changes in Trading Volume and Stock Price Reactions to Earnings Announcements’. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(2/3), 282–299 (2007)
Atiase, R.K. (1980), Predisclosure informational asymmetries, firm capitalization, financial reports, and security price behaviour. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Atiase R.K.: ‘Market Implications of Predisclosure Information: Size and Exchange Effects’. Journal of Accounting Research, 25(1), 168–176 (1987)
Autoriteit Financiële Markten. (2007). Ruim een jaar toezicht op marktmisbruik. Autoriteit Financiële Markten.
Bainbridge S.M.: Securities law: Insider trading. Foundation Press, New York (1999)
Beny L.N.: ‘Do Insider Trading Laws Matter? Some Preliminary Comparative Evidence’. American Law and Economics Review, 7(1), 144–183 (2005)
Beny L.N.: ‘Insider Trading Laws and Stock Markets Around the World: An Empirical Contribution to the Theoretical Law and Economics Debate’. Journal of Corporation Law, 32(2), 237–300 (2007)
Berument H., Inamlik A., Kiymaz H.: ‘Borsa degiskenliginde haftanin gun etkisi: Istanbul Menkul Kiymetler Borsasi’. (The Day of the Week Effect on Stock Return and Volatility: The Case of Istanbul Stock Exchange [ISE] With English summary.). Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, 19(223), 91–102 (2004)
Berument H., Kiymaz H.: ‘The Day of the Week Effect on Stock Market Volatility’. Journal of Economics and Finance, 25(2), 181–193 (2001)
Bhattacharya U., Daouk H.: ‘The World Price of Insider Trading’. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 75–108 (2002)
Bhattacharya U., Daouk H., Jorgenson B., Kehr C.-H.: ‘When an Event is Not an Event: The Curious Case of an Emerging Market’. Journal of Financial Economics, 55(1), 69–101 (2000)
Brown S.J., Warner J.B.: ‘Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies’. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31 (1985)
Collver C.D.: ‘Is There Less Informed Trading After Regulation Fair Disclosure’?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(2/3), 270–281 (2007)
Dubow, B. and N. Monteiro (2006), Measuring market cleanliness. Financial Services Authority.
Elliott J., Morse D., Richardson G.: ‘The Association Between Insider Trading and Information Announcements’. RAND Journal of Economics, 15(4), 521–536 (1984)
Hallock, K.F. and F. Mashayekhi (2003), Are formal corporate news announcements still newsworthy?: Evidence from 30 years of US data on earnings, splits, and dividends. University of Illinois.
Halpern P.J.: ‘Empirical Estimates of the Amount and Distribution of Gains to Companies in Mergers’. Journal of Business, 46(4), 554–575 (1973)
Jaffe J.P.: ‘Special Information and Insider Trading’. Journal of Business, 47(3), 410–428 (1974)
Jain P.C.: ‘Response of Hourly Stock Prices and Trading Volume to Economic News’. Journal of Business, 61(2), 219–231 (1988)
Kabir R., Vermaelen T.: ‘Insider Trading Restrictions and the Stock Market: Evidence from the Amsterdam Stock Exchange’. European Economic Review, 40(8), 1591–1603 (1996)
Keown A.J., Pinkerton J.M.: ‘Merger Announcements and Insider Trading Activity: An Empirical Investigation’. Journal of Finance, 36(4), 855–869 (1981)
Kiymaz H., Berument H.: ‘The Day of the Week Effect on Stock Market Volatility and Volume: International Evidence’. Review of Financial Economics, 12(4), 363–380 (2003)
MacKinlay A.C.: ‘Event Studies in Economics and Finance’. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13–39 (1997)
Meulbroek L.K.: ‘An Empirical Analysis of Illegal Insider Trading’. Journal of Finance, 47(5), 1661–1699 (1992)
Monteiro, N., Q. Zaman and S. Leitterstorf (2007), Updated measurement of market cleanliness. Financial Services Authority.
Polinsky A.M., Shavell S.: ‘The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law’. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 45–76 (2000)
Sanders R.W. Jr, Zdanowicz J.S.: ‘Target Firm Abnormal Returns and Trading Volume around the Initiation of Change in Control Transactions’. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(1), 109–129 (1992)
Wong, E. (2002), Investigation of market efficiency: An event study of insider trading in the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Unpublished Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We benefited from the comments made by seminar audiences at the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) and the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in Britain; and from very useful suggestions by two referees, Arnoud Boot and Hans Degryse to improve the paper.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Prevoo, T., ter Weel, B. The Effects of a Change in Market Abuse Regulation on Abnormal Returns and Volumes: Evidence from the Amsterdam Stock Market. De Economist 158, 237–293 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-010-9146-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-010-9146-1