Abstract
Most existing studies believe that vertical transfer payments (VTPs) can enhance the fiscal capacity of local governments, thus improving the environment. Taking China's VTPs to resource-exhausted cities as an example, we analysed the impact of the VTP on city haze pollution (CHP) by using a progressive difference-in-difference (DID) model. Instead of improving city haze control in other studies, our results show that VTPs given by the central government to resource-exhausted cities aggravate CHP. Robustness tests based on several methods still confirm the above findings. Dynamic feature analysis shows that the aggravating effect of VTPs on CHP in resource-exhausted cities may continue for years. The mediating effect results show that VTPs aggravate CHP by inhibiting technological innovation and high-tech industrial agglomeration, which partly confirm the path-dependence theory. In addition, environmental regulation reduces the aggravating effect of VTPs on the CHP. Our conclusion supplements the ecological effect research of the VTP and has important reference significance for developing countries to improve the ecological governance of resource-exhausted cities by building and improving fiscal transfer systems and ecological compensation institutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abeysinghe S (2012) ‘Because we all know that vaccines are an extremely effective public health tool’: path dependency, H1N1 and the World Health Organisation. Policy Stud 33:381–397
Auty R, Warhurst A (1993) Sustainable development in mineral exporting economies. Resour Policy 19:14–29
Bahl, R., Linn, J. 1992. Urban public finance in developing countries. Urban public finance in developing countries.
Bahl, R., Wallace, S. 2004. Intergovernmental transfers: The vertical sharing dimension. Fiscal Equalization: Challenges in the Design of Intergovernmental Transfers.
Bennett MT, Gong Y, Scarpa R (2018) Hungry birds and angry farmers: using choice experiments to assess “eco-compensation” for coastal wetlands protection in China. Ecol Econ 154:71–87
Bhat MG, Huffaker RG (2007) Management of a transboundary wildlife population: a self-enforcing cooperative agreement with renegotiation and variable transfer payments. J Environ Econ Manag 53:54–67
Bird R, Smart M (2002) Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: international lessons for developing countries. World Dev 30:899–912
Bird R, Tarasov A (2004) Closing the gap: Fiscal imbalances and intergovernmental transfers in developed federations. Eviron Plann C Gov Policy 22:77–102
Blanco E, Struwe N, Walker JM (2021) Experimental evidence on sharing rules and additionality in transfer payments. J Econ Behav Organ 188:1221–1247
Boadway R, Shah A (2007) Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers : Principles and Practice. Public Sector Governance and Accountability. World Bank, Washington, DC
Brimblecombe P, Zong H (2019) Citizen perception of APEC blue and air pollution management. Atmos Environ 214:116853
Bulmer S, Burch M (2001) The europeanisation of central government: The UK and Germany in historical institutionalist perspective. Manchester University Press, Manchester, The Rules of Integration
Cao H, Qi Y, Chen J, Shao S, Lin S (2021) Incentive and coordination: ecological fiscal transfers’ effects on eco-environmental quality. Environ Impact Assess Rev 87:106518
Chu Z, Bian C, Yang J (2021) Joint prevention and control mechanism for air pollution regulations in China: a policy simulation approach with evolutionary game. Environ Impact Assess Rev 91:106668
Corden WM, Neary J (1982) Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economy. Economic Journal 92:825–848
De Mello LR (2000) Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental fiscal relations: a cross-Country analysis. World Dev 28:365–380
Dijkstra BR (2022) Payments from households to distant polluting firms. Environ Resource Econ 82:681–715
Dongol Y, Heinen JT (2012) Pitfalls of cites implementation in Nepal: a policy gap analysis. Environ Manage 50:181–190
Du T, Zhang Y, Yang C (2019) Vertical fiscal imbalance, transfer payments and local government fiscal sustainability. Financ Trade Econ 40:5–19
Eyraud L, Lusinyan L (2013) Vertical fiscal imbalances and fiscal performance in advanced economies. J Monet Econ 60:571–587
Fan W, Yan L, Chen B, Ding W, Wang P (2022) Environmental governance effects of local environmental protection expenditure in China. Resour Policy 77:102760
Fell H, Kaffine DT (2014) Can decentralized planning really achieve first-best in the presence of environmental spillovers? J Environ Econ Manag 68:46–53
Fu T, Jian Z (2021) Corruption pays off: How environmental regulations promote corporate innovation in a developing country. Ecol Econ 183:106969
Fu W, Shen K (2012) Equalization of transfer payments and local fiscal expenditure structure. Econ Res 47:45–57
Galinato GI, Chouinard HH (2018) Strategic interaction and institutional quality determinants of environmental regulations. Resour and Energy Econ 53:114–132
Gan T, Liang W, Yang H, Liao X (2020) The effect of economic development on haze pollution PM25 based on a spatial perspective: urbanization as a mediating variable. J Cleaner Prod 266:121880
Gao S, Ling S, Liu X, Dou X, Wu R (2020) Understanding local government’s information disclosure in China’s environmental project construction from the dual-pressure perspective. J Clean Prod 263:121311
Gillroy JM (1999) American and Canadian environmental federalism; a game-theoretic analysis. Policy Stud J 27:360–388
Gong C, Zhang J, Liu H (2021) Do industrial pollution activities in China respond to ecological fiscal transfers? Evidence from payments to national key ecological function zones. J Environ Planning Manage 64(7):1184–1203
Greener I (2002) Theorising path-dependency: How does history come to matter in organisations? Manag Decis 40:614–619
Greenstone M, Hanna R (2014) Environmental regulations, air and water pollution, & infant mortality in India. Am Econ Rev 104:3038–3072
Guerrero OA, Castañeda G, Trujillo G, Hackett L, Chávez-Juárez F (2022) Subnational sustainable development: The role of vertical intergovernmental transfers in reaching multidimensional goals. Socioecon Plann Sci 83:101155
Guo L, Jiang X (2022) Decentralization of environmental management and enterprises’ environmental technology innovation: evidence from China. Appl Econ 54(36):4170–4186
Guo S, Pei Y, Xie Z (2022) A dynamic model of fiscal decentralization and public debt accumulation. J Public Econ 212:104692
Hao Y, Lu J (2018) The impact of government intervention on corporate investment allocations and efficiency: evidence from China. Financ Manage 47:383–419
He J, Liu Q, Tang S (2017) Transfer payments, industrial structure and carbon emissions - A theoretical and empirical analysis based on endogenous growth. J Northeastern Univ Sci 19:153–159
Jia K, Chen S (2019) Could campaign-style enforcement improve environmental performance? Evidence from China’s central environmental protection inspection. J Environ Manage 245:282–290
Jin Y, Zhang S, Bigus J (2020) “Anti-extortion” mechanism of indigenous innovation by technologically backward firms: Evidence from China. Technol Anal Strategic Manag 33:568–585
Jin Y, Zhou G, Liu Y, Sun H, Fu H (2022) Resilience difference between growing and shrinking resource-exhausted cities and its influencing factors. J Urban Aff. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2137034
Konisky DM (2007) Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: Is there a race to the bottom? Am J Polit Sci 51:853–872
Kou P, Han Y (2021) Vertical environmental protection pressure, fiscal pressure, and local environmental regulations: evidence from China’s industrial sulfur dioxide treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:60095–60110
Lee CY (2011) The differential effects of public R&D support on firm R&D: Theory and evidence from multi-country data. Technovation 31:256–269
Li T, Du T (2021) Vertical fiscal imbalance, transfer payments, and fiscal sustainability of local governments in China. Int Rev Econ Financ 74:392–404
Li X, Wang D (2022) Does transfer payments promote low-carbon development of resource-exhausted cities in China? Earth’s Future 10:e2021EF002339
Li H, Long R, Chen H (2013) Economic transition policies in Chinese resource-based cities: An overview of government efforts. Energy Policy 55:251–260
Liang SN, Jin ZH (2011) Development models of resource-dependent cities’ transformations and its experience and lessons-take baishan city’s development of transformations as an example. Energy Procedia 5:1626–1630
Limoeiro D (2015) Beyond income transfers: The decline of regional inequality in Brazil during the 2000s. Prog Dev Stud 15:6–21
Lin B, Jia Z (2018) Transfer payments in emission trading markets: a perspective of rural and urban residents in China. J Clean Prod 204:753–766
Lin W, Xiao Y, Yu H, Shen S (2022) Does vertical environmental protection pressure promote convergence of urban air pollution? J Innov Knowl 7:100186
Liu X (2018) Dynamic evolution, spatial spillover effect of technological innovation and haze pollution in China. Energy & Environment 29(6):968–988
Liu F, Fan Y, Yang S (2022) Environmental benefits of innovation policy: China’s national independent innovation demonstration zone policy and haze control. J Environ Manage 317:115465
Liu Y, Ren T, Liu L, Ni J, Yin Y (2023) Heterogeneous industrial agglomeration, technological innovation and haze pollution. China Econ Rev 77:101880
Long R, Li H, Wu M, Li W (2021) Dynamic evaluation of the green development level of China’s coal-resource-based cities using the TOPSIS method. Resour Policy 74:102415
Lu C, Wang D, Meng P, Yang J, Pang M, Wang L (2019) Research on resource curse effect of resource-dependent cities: Case study of qingyang, jinchang and baiyin in China. Sustainability 11:91
Lu H, Liu M, Song W (2022) Place-based policies, government intervention, and regional innovation: evidence from China’s resource-exhausted city program. Resour Policy 75:102438
Marconi N, Arvate PR, Moura Neto JS, Palombo PEM (2009) Vertical transfers and the appropriation of resources by the bureaucracy: the case of brazilian state governments. Public Choice 141:65–85
Naseer A, Su CW, Mirza N, Li JP (2020) Double jeopardy of resources and investment curse in South Asia: Is technology the only way out? Resour Policy 68:101702
Pan D, Tang J (2020) The effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on water pollution control: quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 751:141550
Patrick J (2020) Path dependency, the high court, and the constitution. J Judicial Admin 30:51–63
Qi Z, Yang S (2021) Can government subsidies promote the TFP of enterprises? the mediating effect of R&D decisions. Sci, Technol Soc 26:392–412
Qian W, Cheng X (2022) Managing the medical resources of a national insurance program: Lessons based on China’s NCMS. Int J Equity in Health 21:93
Qian Y, Weingast BR (1997) Federalism as a commitment to reserving market incentives. J Econ Perspectives 11:83–92
Ran R (2013) Perverse incentive structure and policy implementation gap in China’s local environmental politics. J Environ Planning Policy Manage 15:17–39
Ring I (2008) Integrating local ecological services into intergovernmental fiscal transfers: the case of the ecological ICMS in Brazil. Land Use Policy 25:485–497
Roolfs C, Gaitan B, Edenhofer O (2021) Make or brake-Rich states in voluntary federal emission pricing. J Environ Econ Manag 109:102463
Santos RF, Antunes P, Ring I, Clemente P (2015) Engaging Local Private and Public Actors in Biodiversity Conservation: The Role of Agri-Environmental Schemes and Ecological Fiscal Transfers. Environ Policy Gov 25:83–96
Schreifels JJ, Fu Y, Wilson EJ (2012) Sulfur dioxide control in China: policy evolution during the 10th and 11th Five-year Plans and lessons for the future. Energy Policy 48:779–789
Sigman H (2014) Decentralization and environmental quality: An international analysis of water pollution levels and variation. Land Econ 90:114–130
Sjöberg E, Xu J (2018) An empirical study of US environmental federalism: RCRA enforcement From 1998 to 2011. Ecol Econ 147:253–263
Song Y, Yang L, Sindakis S, Aggarwal S, Chen C (2022) Analyzing the role of high-tech industrial agglomeration in green transformation and upgrading of manufacturing industry: the case of China. J Knowl Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00899-x
Sun Y, Liao WC (2021) Resource-exhausted City Transition to continue industrial development. China Econ Rev 67:101623
Sun Y, Li Y, Yu T, Zhang X, Liu L, Zhang P (2021) Resource extraction, environmental pollution and economic development: Evidence from prefecture-level cities in China. Resour Policy 74:102330
Sun Y, Tang Y, Li G (2022) Economic growth targets and green total factor productivity: Evidence from China. J Environ Planning and Manag 1–17:2090–2106
Tosun J (2012) Environmental monitoring and enforcement in Europe: a review of empirical research. Environ Policy Gov 22:437–448
Van Rooij B (2006) Implementation of Chinese environmental law: Regular enforcement and political campaigns. Dev Chang 37:57–74
Wang Q, Wang N, Wang H, Xiu Y (2022) Study on influencing factors and simulation of watershed ecological compensation based on evolutionary game. Sustainability 14:3374
Woods ND (2006) Interstate competition and environmental regulation: A test of the race-to-the-bottom thesis. Soc Sci Q 87:174–189
Wu Y, Huang Y, Zhao J, Pu Y (2017) Transfer payment structure and local government fiscal efficiency: Evidence from China. China Financ Economic Review 5:1–15
Wu J, Xu M, Zhang P (2018) The impacts of governmental performance assessment policy and citizen participation on improving environmental performance across Chinese provinces. J Clean Prod 184:227–238
Yan C, Di D, Li G, Wang J (2022) Environmental regulation and the supply efficiency of environmental public services: Evidence from environmental decentralization of 289 cities in China. Growth Chang 53:515–535
Yang S, Li Z, Li J (2020) Fiscal decentralization, preference for government innovation and city innovation: evidence from China. Chin Manag Stud 14:391–409
Yang B, Zhan X, Tian Y (2021) Evaluation on the effect of the transformation policy of resource-exhausted cities—An empirical analysis based on the difference-in-difference model. Energy Rep 7:959–967
Yang H, Lin Y, Hu Y, Liu X, Wu Q (2022a) Influence mechanism of industrial agglomeration and technological innovation on land granting on green total factor productivity. Sustainability 14:3331
Yang S, Feng D, Lu J, Wang C (2022b) The effect of venture capital on green innovation: Is environmental regulation an institutional guarantee? J Environ Manage 318:115641
Yu W, Peng Y, Yao X (2022) The effects of China’s supporting policy for resource-exhausted cities on local energy efficiency: an empirical study based on 284 cities in China. Energy Econ 112:106165
Zhan X, Lo WH, Tang SY (2014) Contextual changes and environmental policy implementation: a longitudinal study of street-level bureaucrats in guangzhou, China. J Public Admin Res & Theory 24:1005–1035
Zhang KM, Wen ZG (2008) Review and challenges of policies of environmental protection and sustainable development in China. J Environ Manage 88:1249–1261
Zhang L, Mol APJ, He G (2016) Transparency and information disclosure in China’s environmental governance. Curr Opinion in Environ Sustainab 18:17–24
Zhang K, Zhang ZY, Liang QM (2017) An empirical analysis of the green paradox in China: from the perspective of fiscal decentralization. Energy Policy 103:203–211
Zhang H, Xiong L, Li L, Zhang S (2018a) Political incentives, transformation efficiency and resource-exhausted cities. J Clean Prod 196:1418–1428
Zhang L, Rong P, Qin Y, Ji Y (2018b) Does industrial agglomeration mitigate fossil CO2 emissions? an empirical study with spatial panel regression model. Energy Procedia 152:731–737
Zhang M, Yan T, Ren Q (2022) Does innovative development drive green economic growth in resource-based cities? evidence from China. Front Environ Sci 9:745498
Zhao D, Dou Y, Tong L (2022) Effect of fiscal decentralization and dual environmental regulation on green poverty reduction: the case of China. Resour Policy 79:102990
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22CJL033), Annual Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research Planning of Heilongjiang Province (Grant No. 22JYC328), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. HIT.HSS.202219) and Special Research Project on the Theory of the People's Political Consultative Conference of Jilin University (Grant No. 2021zx03019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, S., Bai, H. & Li, A. A futile help: do vertical transfer payments promote haze control?. Econ Change Restruct 56, 3411–3436 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09537-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09537-1