Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A futile help: do vertical transfer payments promote haze control?

  • Published:
Economic Change and Restructuring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most existing studies believe that vertical transfer payments (VTPs) can enhance the fiscal capacity of local governments, thus improving the environment. Taking China's VTPs to resource-exhausted cities as an example, we analysed the impact of the VTP on city haze pollution (CHP) by using a progressive difference-in-difference (DID) model. Instead of improving city haze control in other studies, our results show that VTPs given by the central government to resource-exhausted cities aggravate CHP. Robustness tests based on several methods still confirm the above findings. Dynamic feature analysis shows that the aggravating effect of VTPs on CHP in resource-exhausted cities may continue for years. The mediating effect results show that VTPs aggravate CHP by inhibiting technological innovation and high-tech industrial agglomeration, which partly confirm the path-dependence theory. In addition, environmental regulation reduces the aggravating effect of VTPs on the CHP. Our conclusion supplements the ecological effect research of the VTP and has important reference significance for developing countries to improve the ecological governance of resource-exhausted cities by building and improving fiscal transfer systems and ecological compensation institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeysinghe S (2012) ‘Because we all know that vaccines are an extremely effective public health tool’: path dependency, H1N1 and the World Health Organisation. Policy Stud 33:381–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auty R, Warhurst A (1993) Sustainable development in mineral exporting economies. Resour Policy 19:14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahl, R., Linn, J. 1992. Urban public finance in developing countries. Urban public finance in developing countries.

  • Bahl, R., Wallace, S. 2004. Intergovernmental transfers: The vertical sharing dimension. Fiscal Equalization: Challenges in the Design of Intergovernmental Transfers.

  • Bennett MT, Gong Y, Scarpa R (2018) Hungry birds and angry farmers: using choice experiments to assess “eco-compensation” for coastal wetlands protection in China. Ecol Econ 154:71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat MG, Huffaker RG (2007) Management of a transboundary wildlife population: a self-enforcing cooperative agreement with renegotiation and variable transfer payments. J Environ Econ Manag 53:54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird R, Smart M (2002) Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: international lessons for developing countries. World Dev 30:899–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird R, Tarasov A (2004) Closing the gap: Fiscal imbalances and intergovernmental transfers in developed federations. Eviron Plann C Gov Policy 22:77–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco E, Struwe N, Walker JM (2021) Experimental evidence on sharing rules and additionality in transfer payments. J Econ Behav Organ 188:1221–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway R, Shah A (2007) Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers : Principles and Practice. Public Sector Governance and Accountability. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Brimblecombe P, Zong H (2019) Citizen perception of APEC blue and air pollution management. Atmos Environ 214:116853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer S, Burch M (2001) The europeanisation of central government: The UK and Germany in historical institutionalist perspective. Manchester University Press, Manchester, The Rules of Integration

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao H, Qi Y, Chen J, Shao S, Lin S (2021) Incentive and coordination: ecological fiscal transfers’ effects on eco-environmental quality. Environ Impact Assess Rev 87:106518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu Z, Bian C, Yang J (2021) Joint prevention and control mechanism for air pollution regulations in China: a policy simulation approach with evolutionary game. Environ Impact Assess Rev 91:106668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corden WM, Neary J (1982) Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economy. Economic Journal 92:825–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mello LR (2000) Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental fiscal relations: a cross-Country analysis. World Dev 28:365–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra BR (2022) Payments from households to distant polluting firms. Environ Resource Econ 82:681–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dongol Y, Heinen JT (2012) Pitfalls of cites implementation in Nepal: a policy gap analysis. Environ Manage 50:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du T, Zhang Y, Yang C (2019) Vertical fiscal imbalance, transfer payments and local government fiscal sustainability. Financ Trade Econ 40:5–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyraud L, Lusinyan L (2013) Vertical fiscal imbalances and fiscal performance in advanced economies. J Monet Econ 60:571–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan W, Yan L, Chen B, Ding W, Wang P (2022) Environmental governance effects of local environmental protection expenditure in China. Resour Policy 77:102760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell H, Kaffine DT (2014) Can decentralized planning really achieve first-best in the presence of environmental spillovers? J Environ Econ Manag 68:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu T, Jian Z (2021) Corruption pays off: How environmental regulations promote corporate innovation in a developing country. Ecol Econ 183:106969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu W, Shen K (2012) Equalization of transfer payments and local fiscal expenditure structure. Econ Res 47:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinato GI, Chouinard HH (2018) Strategic interaction and institutional quality determinants of environmental regulations. Resour and Energy Econ 53:114–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan T, Liang W, Yang H, Liao X (2020) The effect of economic development on haze pollution PM25 based on a spatial perspective: urbanization as a mediating variable. J Cleaner Prod 266:121880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao S, Ling S, Liu X, Dou X, Wu R (2020) Understanding local government’s information disclosure in China’s environmental project construction from the dual-pressure perspective. J Clean Prod 263:121311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillroy JM (1999) American and Canadian environmental federalism; a game-theoretic analysis. Policy Stud J 27:360–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong C, Zhang J, Liu H (2021) Do industrial pollution activities in China respond to ecological fiscal transfers? Evidence from payments to national key ecological function zones. J Environ Planning Manage 64(7):1184–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greener I (2002) Theorising path-dependency: How does history come to matter in organisations? Manag Decis 40:614–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone M, Hanna R (2014) Environmental regulations, air and water pollution, & infant mortality in India. Am Econ Rev 104:3038–3072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero OA, Castañeda G, Trujillo G, Hackett L, Chávez-Juárez F (2022) Subnational sustainable development: The role of vertical intergovernmental transfers in reaching multidimensional goals. Socioecon Plann Sci 83:101155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo L, Jiang X (2022) Decentralization of environmental management and enterprises’ environmental technology innovation: evidence from China. Appl Econ 54(36):4170–4186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo S, Pei Y, Xie Z (2022) A dynamic model of fiscal decentralization and public debt accumulation. J Public Econ 212:104692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y, Lu J (2018) The impact of government intervention on corporate investment allocations and efficiency: evidence from China. Financ Manage 47:383–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J, Liu Q, Tang S (2017) Transfer payments, industrial structure and carbon emissions - A theoretical and empirical analysis based on endogenous growth. J Northeastern Univ Sci 19:153–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia K, Chen S (2019) Could campaign-style enforcement improve environmental performance? Evidence from China’s central environmental protection inspection. J Environ Manage 245:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin Y, Zhang S, Bigus J (2020) “Anti-extortion” mechanism of indigenous innovation by technologically backward firms: Evidence from China. Technol Anal Strategic Manag 33:568–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin Y, Zhou G, Liu Y, Sun H, Fu H (2022) Resilience difference between growing and shrinking resource-exhausted cities and its influencing factors. J Urban Aff. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2137034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konisky DM (2007) Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: Is there a race to the bottom? Am J Polit Sci 51:853–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kou P, Han Y (2021) Vertical environmental protection pressure, fiscal pressure, and local environmental regulations: evidence from China’s industrial sulfur dioxide treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:60095–60110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CY (2011) The differential effects of public R&D support on firm R&D: Theory and evidence from multi-country data. Technovation 31:256–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Du T (2021) Vertical fiscal imbalance, transfer payments, and fiscal sustainability of local governments in China. Int Rev Econ Financ 74:392–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Wang D (2022) Does transfer payments promote low-carbon development of resource-exhausted cities in China? Earth’s Future 10:e2021EF002339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Long R, Chen H (2013) Economic transition policies in Chinese resource-based cities: An overview of government efforts. Energy Policy 55:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang SN, Jin ZH (2011) Development models of resource-dependent cities’ transformations and its experience and lessons-take baishan city’s development of transformations as an example. Energy Procedia 5:1626–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limoeiro D (2015) Beyond income transfers: The decline of regional inequality in Brazil during the 2000s. Prog Dev Stud 15:6–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Jia Z (2018) Transfer payments in emission trading markets: a perspective of rural and urban residents in China. J Clean Prod 204:753–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin W, Xiao Y, Yu H, Shen S (2022) Does vertical environmental protection pressure promote convergence of urban air pollution? J Innov Knowl 7:100186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X (2018) Dynamic evolution, spatial spillover effect of technological innovation and haze pollution in China. Energy & Environment 29(6):968–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Fan Y, Yang S (2022) Environmental benefits of innovation policy: China’s national independent innovation demonstration zone policy and haze control. J Environ Manage 317:115465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Ren T, Liu L, Ni J, Yin Y (2023) Heterogeneous industrial agglomeration, technological innovation and haze pollution. China Econ Rev 77:101880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long R, Li H, Wu M, Li W (2021) Dynamic evaluation of the green development level of China’s coal-resource-based cities using the TOPSIS method. Resour Policy 74:102415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Wang D, Meng P, Yang J, Pang M, Wang L (2019) Research on resource curse effect of resource-dependent cities: Case study of qingyang, jinchang and baiyin in China. Sustainability 11:91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Liu M, Song W (2022) Place-based policies, government intervention, and regional innovation: evidence from China’s resource-exhausted city program. Resour Policy 75:102438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marconi N, Arvate PR, Moura Neto JS, Palombo PEM (2009) Vertical transfers and the appropriation of resources by the bureaucracy: the case of brazilian state governments. Public Choice 141:65–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naseer A, Su CW, Mirza N, Li JP (2020) Double jeopardy of resources and investment curse in South Asia: Is technology the only way out? Resour Policy 68:101702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan D, Tang J (2020) The effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on water pollution control: quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 751:141550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick J (2020) Path dependency, the high court, and the constitution. J Judicial Admin 30:51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi Z, Yang S (2021) Can government subsidies promote the TFP of enterprises? the mediating effect of R&D decisions. Sci, Technol Soc 26:392–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian W, Cheng X (2022) Managing the medical resources of a national insurance program: Lessons based on China’s NCMS. Int J Equity in Health 21:93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Weingast BR (1997) Federalism as a commitment to reserving market incentives. J Econ Perspectives 11:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ran R (2013) Perverse incentive structure and policy implementation gap in China’s local environmental politics. J Environ Planning Policy Manage 15:17–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring I (2008) Integrating local ecological services into intergovernmental fiscal transfers: the case of the ecological ICMS in Brazil. Land Use Policy 25:485–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roolfs C, Gaitan B, Edenhofer O (2021) Make or brake-Rich states in voluntary federal emission pricing. J Environ Econ Manag 109:102463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos RF, Antunes P, Ring I, Clemente P (2015) Engaging Local Private and Public Actors in Biodiversity Conservation: The Role of Agri-Environmental Schemes and Ecological Fiscal Transfers. Environ Policy Gov 25:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreifels JJ, Fu Y, Wilson EJ (2012) Sulfur dioxide control in China: policy evolution during the 10th and 11th Five-year Plans and lessons for the future. Energy Policy 48:779–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigman H (2014) Decentralization and environmental quality: An international analysis of water pollution levels and variation. Land Econ 90:114–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg E, Xu J (2018) An empirical study of US environmental federalism: RCRA enforcement From 1998 to 2011. Ecol Econ 147:253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Yang L, Sindakis S, Aggarwal S, Chen C (2022) Analyzing the role of high-tech industrial agglomeration in green transformation and upgrading of manufacturing industry: the case of China. J Knowl Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00899-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Liao WC (2021) Resource-exhausted City Transition to continue industrial development. China Econ Rev 67:101623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Li Y, Yu T, Zhang X, Liu L, Zhang P (2021) Resource extraction, environmental pollution and economic development: Evidence from prefecture-level cities in China. Resour Policy 74:102330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Tang Y, Li G (2022) Economic growth targets and green total factor productivity: Evidence from China. J Environ Planning and Manag 1–17:2090–2106

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosun J (2012) Environmental monitoring and enforcement in Europe: a review of empirical research. Environ Policy Gov 22:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooij B (2006) Implementation of Chinese environmental law: Regular enforcement and political campaigns. Dev Chang 37:57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Wang N, Wang H, Xiu Y (2022) Study on influencing factors and simulation of watershed ecological compensation based on evolutionary game. Sustainability 14:3374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods ND (2006) Interstate competition and environmental regulation: A test of the race-to-the-bottom thesis. Soc Sci Q 87:174–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Huang Y, Zhao J, Pu Y (2017) Transfer payment structure and local government fiscal efficiency: Evidence from China. China Financ Economic Review 5:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Xu M, Zhang P (2018) The impacts of governmental performance assessment policy and citizen participation on improving environmental performance across Chinese provinces. J Clean Prod 184:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan C, Di D, Li G, Wang J (2022) Environmental regulation and the supply efficiency of environmental public services: Evidence from environmental decentralization of 289 cities in China. Growth Chang 53:515–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Li Z, Li J (2020) Fiscal decentralization, preference for government innovation and city innovation: evidence from China. Chin Manag Stud 14:391–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang B, Zhan X, Tian Y (2021) Evaluation on the effect of the transformation policy of resource-exhausted cities—An empirical analysis based on the difference-in-difference model. Energy Rep 7:959–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Lin Y, Hu Y, Liu X, Wu Q (2022a) Influence mechanism of industrial agglomeration and technological innovation on land granting on green total factor productivity. Sustainability 14:3331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Feng D, Lu J, Wang C (2022b) The effect of venture capital on green innovation: Is environmental regulation an institutional guarantee? J Environ Manage 318:115641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu W, Peng Y, Yao X (2022) The effects of China’s supporting policy for resource-exhausted cities on local energy efficiency: an empirical study based on 284 cities in China. Energy Econ 112:106165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan X, Lo WH, Tang SY (2014) Contextual changes and environmental policy implementation: a longitudinal study of street-level bureaucrats in guangzhou, China. J Public Admin Res & Theory 24:1005–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang KM, Wen ZG (2008) Review and challenges of policies of environmental protection and sustainable development in China. J Environ Manage 88:1249–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Mol APJ, He G (2016) Transparency and information disclosure in China’s environmental governance. Curr Opinion in Environ Sustainab 18:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Zhang ZY, Liang QM (2017) An empirical analysis of the green paradox in China: from the perspective of fiscal decentralization. Energy Policy 103:203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Xiong L, Li L, Zhang S (2018a) Political incentives, transformation efficiency and resource-exhausted cities. J Clean Prod 196:1418–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Rong P, Qin Y, Ji Y (2018b) Does industrial agglomeration mitigate fossil CO2 emissions? an empirical study with spatial panel regression model. Energy Procedia 152:731–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Yan T, Ren Q (2022) Does innovative development drive green economic growth in resource-based cities? evidence from China. Front Environ Sci 9:745498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao D, Dou Y, Tong L (2022) Effect of fiscal decentralization and dual environmental regulation on green poverty reduction: the case of China. Resour Policy 79:102990

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22CJL033), Annual Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research Planning of Heilongjiang Province (Grant No. 22JYC328), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. HIT.HSS.202219) and Special Research Project on the Theory of the People's Political Consultative Conference of Jilin University (Grant No. 2021zx03019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to An Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, S., Bai, H. & Li, A. A futile help: do vertical transfer payments promote haze control?. Econ Change Restruct 56, 3411–3436 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09537-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09537-1

Keywords

Navigation