Skip to main content

The stationarity of inflation in Croatia: anti-inflation stabilization program and the change in persistence

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the anti-inflation stabilization policies on the behavior of inflation in Croatia in the early 1990s and through the subsequent post-stabilization period using fractional integration techniques. Indeed, the implementation of the stabilization program in October 1993 brought immediate deflation with a relative high degree of inflation stability in the post-stabilization period. With allowance for a structural break corresponding to the stabilization program in October 1993, the degree of persistence was substantially reduced with the fractional differencing parameter being positive but close to zero in the post-stabilization period.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sticky price models of Taylor (1979) implies stationarity of the price level whereas the Phillips curve models of Calvo (1983) and Ball (1993) allow a unit root in prices, but require inflation to be stationary.

  2. For the Fisher effect to hold the inflation rate should contain a unit root and be cointegrated with the nominal interest rate for the real interest rate to be I(0). See Nelson and Schwert (1977), Barsky (1987), Rose (1988), Chapman and Ogaki (1993), Wallace and Warner (1993), Evans and Lewis (1995), Crowder and Hoffman (1996), among others, for discussion of the Fisher effect. As noted by Garcia and Perron (1996), the nonstationarity of real interest rates is problematic for the pricing of options in the Black–Scholes model along with consumption capital asset pricing models as well.

  3. As noted by Yellen and Akerloff (2006), to keep the unemployment rate below the natural rate requires an ever-increasing rate of inflation which implies the non-stationarity of inflation.

  4. Note that stationarity and integration of order zero, I(0), are not the same concept. In the context of fractional integration or I(d) processes, covariance stationarity is satisfied as long as d is smaller than 0.5.

  5. See as examples Taylor (1985), Clarida et al. (1999), Orphanides and Wieland (2000), and Martin and Milas (2004) for discussion with respect to the importance of the stationarity of inflation for monetary policy.

  6. Studies by Culver and Papell (1997), Lee and Wu (2001), Osterholm (2004), Lee et al. (2007), Basher and Westerlund (2008), Cook (2009), Ho (2009), Romero-Avila and Usabiaga (2009), Narayan and Narayan (2010), and Tsong et al. (2012) utilize a variety of panel unit root tests. Henry and Shields (2004), Gregoriou and Kontonikas (2006; 2009), Nobay et al. (2010), and Zhou (2013) employ nonlinear unit root tests. Lee and Tsong (2009) and Tsong and Lee (2010) use bootstrap covariate stationarity tests while Lai (1997) and Cook (2005) employ modified Dickey-Fuller tests; Charemza et al. (2005) use a symmetric stable Paretian distribution with infinite variables in unit root tests; and Chang et al. (2013) utilize flexible Fourier stationarity tests. Hassler and Wolters (1995), Baillie et al. (1996), Baum et al. (1999), Bos et al. (1999), Lee (2005), Gadea and Mayoral (2006), and Meller and Nautz (2012) apply fractional integration techniques to examine the long memory and persistence behavior of inflation.

  7. See Begg (1996), Burton and Fischer (1998), Brada and Kutan (1999), Kutan and Brada (1999), and Ross (2000) regarding the experience of several transition economies in addressing post-stabilization inflation. Due to price liberalization and disruption in trade linkages, all transition economies suffered high inflation and major recessions in the early 1990s. Following initial stabilization programs of the early 1990 s, most transition economies succeeded in lowering inflation but only to moderate levels. According to Roaf et al. (2014), in some cases, such as Romania and Bulgaria, initial attempts at stabilization were unsuccessful. During the early stages of transition, stabilization programs were largely based on nominal anchors, primarily the exchange rate, but in some cases the wage rate, relying on direct controls and quantitative restrictions to implement monetary policy. As transition economies stabilized by the end of the 1990s, many countries began to face a number of additional challenges. For instance, increased capital flows placed pressure on domestic demand making it difficult to maintain a low inflation rate. For those countries with more developed financial institutions, the pegging of nominal exchange rates was abandoned in favor of indirect methods of monetary control. Several transition economies (Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia) adopted inflation targeting as a result.

  8. Much of the discussion regarding the anti-inflation stabilization program is drawn from Payne (2002).

  9. See Egert and Lang (2006) on the effectiveness of foreign exchange intervention with respect to the Croatian economy.

  10. In the years up to 2002, Deutche mark was the primary currency and afterwards the euro.

  11. For an overview, see Scheiber and Stixt (2009).

  12. For more on Maastricht criteria, see http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/adoption/who_can_join/index_en.htm.

  13. Broz (2010) investigates whether the introduction of the euro is justifiable in the case of Central an Eastern European countries with a special focus on Croatia. Moreover, new European Union members that entered after the euro was launched in 2002 are not eligible for an opt-out clause.

  14. Source for the data is Croatian Bureau of Statistics.

  15. Similar results were obtained with other “local” Whittle semiparametric approaches (Robinson, 1995; Abadir et al. 2007).

  16. We also examined inflation in the post-stabilization period using the ADF, Phillips-Perron, and KPSS unit root and stationarity tests with an intercept and trend in which the ADF and Phillips-Perron unit root tests reject the null hypothesis of a unit root with test statistics of −77.27 and −64.94, respectively, each statistically significant at the 1 percent level. The KPSS stationarity test fails to reject the null hypothesis of stationarity with a test statistic of 0.112.

References

  • Abadir KM, Distaso W, Giraitis L (2007) Nonstationarity-extended local whittle estimation. J Econom 141:1353–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anusic Z, Rohatinski Z, Sonje V (1995) A road to low inflation: Croatia 1993/1994. Government of the Republic of Croatia, Zagreb

    Google Scholar 

  • Arize AC (2011) Are inflation rates really nonstationary? New evidence from nonlinear STAR framework and African data. Int J Econ Finance 3:97–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Arize AC, Malindretos J, Nam K (2005) Inflation and structural changes in 50 developing countries. Atl Econ J 33:461–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babic A (1998) Stopping hyperinflation in Croatia, 1993–1994. Zagreb J Econ 2:71–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillie RT, Chung C-F, Tieslau MA (1996) Analysing inflation by the fractionally integrated ARFIMA-GARCH model. J Appl Econ 11:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball L (1993) The dynamics of high inflation, NBER working paper 4578

  • Barkoulas JT, Baum CF, Chakraborty A (2001) Waves and persistence in merger and acquisition activity. Econ Lett 70:237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsky RB (1987) The Fisher hypothesis and the forecastability and persistence of inflation. J Monet Econ 19:3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basher SA, Westerlund J (2008) Is there really a unit root in the inflation rate? More evidence from panel data models. Appl Econ Lett 15:161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batini N (2006) Euro area inflation persistence. Empir Econ 31:977–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum CF, Barkoulas JT, Caglayan M (1999) Persistence in international inflation rates. South Econ J 65:900–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beechey M, Osterhom P (2009) Time-varying inflation persistence in the Euro area. Econ Model 26:532–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begg DKH (1996) Monetary policy in Central and Eastern Europe: lessons after a half decade of transition. IMF Working Paper WP/96/108. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund

  • Ben Nasr A, Ajmi AN, Gupta R (2014) Modeling the volatility of the Dow Jones Islamic market world index using a fractionally integrated time varying GARCH (FITVGARCH) model. Appl Financ Econ 24:993–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield P (1973) An exponential model in the spectrum of a scalar time series. Biometrika 60:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos CS, Frances PH, Ooms M (1999) Long memory and level shifts: re-analyzing inflation rates. Empir Econ 24:427–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brada JC, Kutan AM (1999) The persistence of moderate inflation in the Czech Republic. Post-Sov Geogr Econ 40:121–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Broz T (2010) Introduction of the Euro in CEE countries—is it economically justifiable? The Croatian case. Post-Communist Econ 22:427–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton D, Fischer S (1998) Ending moderate inflations. In: Cottarelli C, Szapary G (eds) Moderate inflation: the experience of transition economies. International Monetary Fund and the National Bank of Hungary, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo G (1983) Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. J Monet Econ 112:383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale T, Paxton J (2011) From debt crisis to tequila crisis: inflation stationarity through Mexico’s turbulent decades. Appl Econ Lett 18:1609–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale T, Paxton J (2013) Inflation stationarity during Latin American inflation: insights from unit root and structural break analysis. Appl Econ 45:2001–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang T, Ranjbar O, Tang DP (2013) Revisiting the mean reversion of inflation rates for 22 OECD countries. Econ Model 30:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman R, Ogaki M (1993) Cotrending and the stationarity of the real interest rate. Econ Lett 42:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charemza WW, Hristova D, Burridge P (2005) Is inflation stationary? Appl Econ 37:901–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung YW (1993) Tests for fractional integration: a monte carlo investigation. J Time Ser Anal 14:331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarida R, Gali J, Gertler M (1999) The science of monetary policy: a new Keynesian perspective. J Econ Literat 37:1661–1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook S (2005) Rank-based unit root testing in the presence of structural change under the null: simulation results and an application to U.S. inflation. Appl Econ 37:607–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook S (2009) A re-examination of the stationarity of inflation. J Appl Econom 24:1047–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder WJ, Hoffman DL (1996) The long-run relationship between nominal interest rates and inflation: the Fisher equation revisited. J Money Credit Bank 28:102–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuestas JC, Harrison B (2010) Inflation persistence and nonlinearities in Central and Eastern European countries. Econ Lett 106:81–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culver SE, Papell DH (1997) Is there a unit root in the inflation rate? Evidence from sequential break and panel data models. J Appl Econom 12:435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlhaus R (1989) Efficient parameter estimation for self-similar process. Ann Stat 17:1749–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold FX, Inoue A (2001) Long memory and regime switching. J Econom 105:131–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egert B, Lang M (2006) Foreign exchange interventions in a small emerging market: the case of Croatia. Econ Change Restruct 39:35–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Smith AD (1999) Stochastic permanent breaks. Rev Econ Stat 81:553–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans MD, Lewis KK (1995) Do expected shifts in inflation affect estimates of the long-run fisher relation? J Finance 50:225–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadea MD, Mayoral L (2006) The persistence of inflation in OECD countries: a fractionally integrated approach. Int J Centr Bank 2:51–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia R, Perron P (1996) An analysis of the real interest rate under regime shifts. Rev Econ Stat 78:111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Alana LA (2005) Unit and fractional roots in the presence of abrupt changes with an application to the Brazilian inflation rate. Empir Econ 30:193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Alana LA (2008) Fractional integration and structural breaks at unknown periods of time. J Time Ser Anal 29:163–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraitis L, Kokoszka P, Leipus R (2001) Testing for long memory in the presence of a general trend. J Appl Probabil 38:1033–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Hyung N (2004) Occasional structural breaks and long memory with an application to the S&P 500 absolute stock return. J Empir Finance 11:399–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoriou A, Kontonikas A (2006) Inflation targeting and the stationarity of inflation: new results from an ESTAR unit root test. Bull Econ Res 58:309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoriou A, Kontonikas A (2009) Modeling the behavior of inflation deviations from the target. Econ Model 26:90–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassler U, Wolters J (1995) Long memory in inflation rates: international evidence. J Bus Econ Stat 13:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry OT, Shields K (2004) Is there a unit root in inflation? J Macroecon 26:481–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho T (2009) The inflation rates may accelerate after all: panel evidence from 19 OECD countries. Empir Econ 36:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisswani KM, Nusair SA (2014) Nonlinear convergence in Asian interest and inflation rates: evidence from Asian countries. Econ Change Restruct 47:155–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft E (2003) Monetary policy under dollarisation: the case of Croatia. Comp Econ Stud 45:256–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutan AM, Brada JC (1999) The end of moderate inflation in three transition economies? Working paper (No. 99-003A), Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • Lai KS (1997) On the disparate evidence on trend stationarity in inflation rates: a reappraisal. Appl Econ Lett 4:305–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J (2005) Estimating memory parameter in the U.S. inflation rate. Econ Lett 87:207–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C-F, Tsong C-C (2009) Bootstrapping covariate stationarity tests for inflation rates. Econ Model 26:1443–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H-Y, Wu J-L (2001) Mean reversion of inflation rates: evidence from 13 OECD countries. J Macroecon 23:477–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C-C, Chang C-P, Lee J-D (2007) Mean reversion of inflation rates in 19 OECD countries: evidence from panel LM unit root tests with structural breaks. Econ Bull 3:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobato IN, Savin NE (1998) Real and spurious long memory properties of stock market data. J Bus Econ Stat 16:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Majsterek M, Welfe A (2012) Price-wage nexus and the role of a tax system. Econ Change Restruct 45:121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin C, Milas C (2004) Modelling monetary policy: inflation targets in practice. Economia 71:209–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Meller B, Nautz D (2012) Inflation persistence in the euro area before and after the European Monetary Union. Econ Model 29:1170–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikosch T, Starica C (2004) Nonstationarities in financial time series, long range dependence and the IGARCH model. Rev Econ Stat 86:378–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Is there a unit root in the inflation rate? new evidence from panel data models with multiple structural breaks. Appl Econ 42:1661–1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR, Plosser CI (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: some evidence and implications. J Monet Econ 10:139–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR, Schwert GW (1977) Short-term interest rates as predictors of inflation: on testing the hypothesis that the real interest of inflation is constant. Am Econ Rev 67:478–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobay B, Paya I, Peel DA (2010) Inflation dynamics in the U.S.: global but not local mean reversion. J Money Credit Bank 42:135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly G, Whelan K (2005) Has Euro-area inflation persistence changed over time? Rev Econ Stat 87:709–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orphanides A, Wieland U (2000) Inflation zone targeting. Europ Econ Rev 44:1351–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterholm P (2004) Killing four unit root birds in the US economy with three panel unit root test stones. Appl Econ Lett 11:213–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne JE (2002) Inflationary dynamics of a transition economy: the Croatian experience. J Policy Model 24:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57:1361–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roaf J, Atoyan R, Joshi B, Krogulski K (2014) 25 years of transition post-communist Europe and the IMF. Regional Economic Issues Report, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM (1994) Efficient tests of nonstationary hypotheses. J Am Stat Assoc 89:1420–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM (1995) Gaussian semi-parametric estimation of long range dependence. Ann Stat 23:1630–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez G (2004) An empirical note about additive outliers and nonstationarity in Latin American inflation series. Empir Econ 29:361–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Avila D, Usabiaga C (2009) The hypothesis of a unit root in OECD inflation revisited. J Econ Bus 61:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose A (1988) Is the real interest rate stable? J Finance 43:1095–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross KL (2000) Post-stabilization inflation dynamics in Slovenia. Appl Econ 32:135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiber T, Stix H (2009) Euroization in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe—new evidence on its extent and some evidence on its causes, working paper, No, 159, Vienna: Austrian National Bank

  • Sonje V, Nestic D (1994) Stopping high inflation in an ex-socialist country: the case of Croatia, 1993–1994. Croatian Economic Survey, pp 19–59

  • Taylor JB (1979) Estimation and control of a macroeconomic model with rational expectations. Econometrica 47:1267–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JB (1985) What would nominal GNP targeting do to the business cycle? Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 22:61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsong C-C, Lee C-F (2010) Testing for stationarity of inflation rates with covariates. South African J Econ 78:344–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsong C-C, Lee C-F, Lee C-C (2012) A revisit to the stationarity of OECD inflation: evidence from panel unit root tests and the covariate point optimal test. Jpn Econ Rev 63:380–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace MS, Warner JT (1993) The Fisher effect and the term structure of interest rates: tests of cointegration. Rev Econ Stat pp 320–324

  • Yellen JL, Akerloff GA (2006) Stabilization policy: a reconsideration. Econ Inq 44:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon G (2003) The time series behavior of Brazilian inflation rates: new evidence from unit root tests with good size and power. Appl Econ Lett 10:627–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Clovis J (2009) Modeling U.S. inflation dynamics: persistence and monetary policy regimes. Empir Econ 36:455–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Clovis J (2010) China inflation dynamics: persistence and policy regimes. J Policy Model 32:373–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S (2013) Nonlinearity and stationarity of inflation rates: evidence from Euro-zone countries. Appl Econ 45:849–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Payne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gil-Alana, L.A., Mervar, A. & Payne, J.E. The stationarity of inflation in Croatia: anti-inflation stabilization program and the change in persistence. Econ Change Restruct 50, 45–58 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-016-9181-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-016-9181-2

Keywords

JEL Classification