Advertisement

Economic Change and Restructuring

, Volume 39, Issue 1–2, pp 35–62 | Cite as

Foreign exchange interventions in a small emerging market: the case of Croatia

  • Balázs ÉgertEmail author
  • Maroje Lang
Article

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of daily official foreign exchange interventions on the exchange rates in Croatia for the period from 1996 to 2004. Using the event study methodology and a variety of GARCH models reveals that the Croatian central bank was in a position to influence, to some extent, the level of the exchange rate during the period studied. This lends support to the view that foreign exchange intervention may be effective in emerging market economies.

Keywords

Central bank intervention Foreign exchange intervention Official interventions Foreign exchange market Effectiveness Exchange rate volatility Emerging economies Transition economies 

JEL Classification

F31 

References

  1. Aguilar J, Nydahl S (2000) Central bank intervention and exchange rates: the case of Sweden. J Int Financial Markets Inst Money 10:303–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bank for International Settlements (2005) Foreign exchange market intervention in emerging markets: motives, techniques and implicationsGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandner P, Grech H (2002) Why did central banks intervene in the EMS? The post 1993 experience, Oesterreichische Nationalbank Working Paper No. 77Google Scholar
  4. Brandner P, Grech H, Stix H (2001) The effectiveness of central bank intervention in the EMS: tahe post 1993 experience, Oesterreichische Nationalbank Working Paper No. 55Google Scholar
  5. Brissimis SN, Chionis DP (2004) Foreign exchange market intervention: implications of publicly announced and secret intervention for the euro exchange rate and its volatility. J Policy Model 26:661–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calvo GA, Reinhart CM (2000) Fear of floating, NBER Working Paper No. 7993Google Scholar
  7. Canales-Kirjenko I (2003) Foreign exchange intervention in developing and transition economies: results of a survey, IMF Working Paper No. 95Google Scholar
  8. Chmelarova V, Schnabl G (2006) Exchange rate stabilization in developed and underdeveloped capital markets. European Central Bank Working Paper No. 636. ECB, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  9. Croatian National Bank (2001, 2002, 2003) Annual ReportGoogle Scholar
  10. Disyatat P, Galati G (2005) The effectiveness of foreign exchange intervention in emerging market counties: evidence from the Czech koruna, BIS Working Papers No. 172Google Scholar
  11. Domac I, Mendoza A (2004) Is there room for forex interventions under inflation targeting framework? Evidence from Mexico and Turkey, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3288Google Scholar
  12. Dominguez KM (1998) Central bank intervention and exchange rate volatility. J Int Money Finance 17:161–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutta J, Leon H (2002) Dread of depreciation: measuring real exchange rate interventions, IMF Working Paper No. 63Google Scholar
  14. Edison H, Cashin P, Liang H (2003) Foreign exchange intervention and the Australian dollar: has it mattered? IMF Working Paper No 99Google Scholar
  15. Fatum R (2000) On the effectiveness of sterilised Foreign Exchange Intervention, ECB Working Paper No. 10Google Scholar
  16. Fatum R, Hutchison MM (2003) Effectiveness of official daily foreign exchange market intervention operations in Japan, NBER Working Paper No. 9648Google Scholar
  17. Guimaraes R, Karacadag C (2004) The empirics of foreign exchange intervention in emerging market countries: the case of Mexico and Turkey, IMF Working Paper 123Google Scholar
  18. Ísberg G, Pétursson TG (2003) Central Bank interventions in Iceland’s foreign exchange market and its effect on the exchange rate of the króna, Central Bank of Iceland, Monetary Bulletin 2003/1Google Scholar
  19. Kearns J, Rigobon R (2002) Identifying the efficacy of central bank interventions: the Australian case, NBER Working Paper No. 9062Google Scholar
  20. Kim S-J, Kortian T, Sheen J (2000) Central bank intervention and exchange rate volatility – Australian evidence. J Int Financial Markets Inst Money 10:381–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morana C, Beltratti A (2002) Central bank interventions and exchange rates: an analysis with high frequency data. J Int Financial Markets Inst Money 10:349–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramaswamy R, Samiei H (2000) The yen-dollar rate: have interventions mattered? IMF Working Paper No. 95Google Scholar
  23. Rogers JM, Siklos PL (2003) Foreign exchange market intervention in two small open economies: the Canadian and Australian experience. J Int Money Finance 22:393–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sarno, L, Taylor MP (2001) Official intervention in the foreign exchange market: is it effective, and, if so, how does it work? CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2690Google Scholar
  25. Tapia M, Tokman A (2004) Effects of foreign exchange intervention under public information: the Chilean case, Central Bank of Chile Working Paper No. 255Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ann ArborUSA
  2. 2.Croatian National BankZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations