Abstract
In this article we experimentally evaluate Colombia’s Think Equal program, which teaches socioemotional skills to children ages 3 to 6. Given the context of COVID-19, the original design was adapted as a hybrid model, alternating in-person and remote instruction and engaging families in the implementation of the curriculum. We found that the program had positive effects on children’s prosocial behavior, self-awareness, and cognitive learning. The intervention also had an impact on the education center’s personnel (community mothers) and caregivers implementing the activities. Treated community mothers had higher levels of empathy, lower negative health symptoms, better pedagogical practices, and a closer relationship with the children’s caregivers compared with those in the control group. Treated caregivers had better stimulation practices and lower negative health symptoms compared with those in the control group. These findings suggest that a well-designed intervention has the potential to develop socioemotional skills in children at an early age and, at the same time, to develop capacities in those who implement the activities. Our results have important implications for the design, implementation, and evaluation of early childhood socioemotional learning programs and provide novel evidence about the challenges faced by interventions combining face-to-face and remote learning.
This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In some cases, the terms used depend on the research discipline. For example, soft skills are typically discussed in business and management and noncognitive skills in economics. On the other hand, the United Nations focus on life skills. The term socioemotional skills is used more in psychology (Sánchez Puerta et al., 2016).
To be selected as a community mother or father, applicants must meet the following requirements: (i) have resided in the area of the HCB for at least one year; (ii) have completed secondary education or hold a teacher’s high school degree; (iii) be between 20 and 45 years of age at the time of applying; (iv) be fit for work, as certified by a doctor; (v) be recognized in their community for their solidarity, coexistence, and civic values; (vi) have family authorization for the use of the home; (vii) not have a judicial record (this also extends to relatives and nonrelatives who live in the dwelling); and (viii) have enough time to care for the children.
In a so-called traditional HCB, a community mother takes care of the children. An “integral HCB,” meanwhile, has additional social services provided by interdisciplinary teams, such as social workers and nutritionists (ICBF, 2022).
The details about how indexes and variables were calculated, the scales, and the specific questions considered can be requested from the authors.
Measuring Early Learning Quality and Outcomes.
This survey collects information on consumer confidence, subjective well-being, support networks, and knowledge and access to support policies in 23 departmental capital cities and metropolitan areas of Colombia.
Indicator calculated by the Colombia’s research team of Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA), to measure the cognitive learning of children.
“Pequeñas Aventureras” (“Little Adventurers”) is a multimedia program developed by “Taller Sésamo” with the support of “Dubai Cares” and the Inter-American Development Bank. The program seeks to promote the teaching and learning of mathematics and science at the preschool level with a gender approach.
The results of this analysis can be requested from the authors.
All estimations were implemented with Stata. The specific routines are regress, logit, ologist, and mlogit, respectively.
References
Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011). Personality Psychology and Economics. NBER Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.3386/w16822
Carneiro, P., Crawford, C., & Goodman, A. (2007). The Impact of Early Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Skills on Later Outcomes. Discussion Paper, 0092. Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics
Cuff, B., Brown, S., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. (2016). Empathy: A review of the Concept. Emotion Review, 8, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466.
Cunha, F., Heckman, J., & Schennach, S. (2010). Estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Econometrica, 78(3), 883–931. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6551.
Cunningham, W., Acosta, P., & Muller, N. (2016). Minds and behaviors at work: Boosting Socioemotional Skills for Latin America’s workforce. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/24659.
Darling-Churchill, K., & Lippman, L. (2016). Early childhood social and emotional development: Advancing the field of measurement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.02.002. 45(July–August), 1–7.
Duckworth, A., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for Educational Purposes. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15584327.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.
Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Frey, K. S., Greenberg, M. T., Haynes, N. M., Kessler, R., Schwab-Stone, M. E., & Shriver, T. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educators. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Emmet, S., Reeder, L., Turville, C., Schneider, K., & Bailey, C. (2021). Australian Randomised Control Trial: Think equal early childhood program. [Unpublished manuscript]. Federation University, Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence and Think Equal. Melbourne, AU.
FEN (Fundación Escuela Nueva). (2022). Reporte cualitativo: Reflexiones de las madres comunitarias sobre aprendizajes y retos del programa educar en Equidad. Bogotá, Colombia: FEN.
Gertler, P., Martínez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. (2016). Impact Evaluation in Practice, Second Edition. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank and World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/25030
Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.
Graduate School of Education, Harvard University (2022). Caregiver-Reported Early Development instrument. https://credi.gse.harvard.edu/
Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19(4), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014.
Heckman, J., Stixrud, J., & Urzúa, S. (2006). The Effects of Cognitive and noncognitive abilities on Labor Market Outcomes and Social Behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411–448. https://doi.org/10.1086/504455. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/.
ICBF (Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar (2022). Modalidad Comunitaria. Retrieved November 7, 2022, from https://www.icbf.gov.co/programas-y-estrategias/primera-infancia/modalidades-de-atencion/modalidad-comunitaria
Kautz, T., Heckman, J., Diris, R., ter Weel, B., & Borghans, L. (2014). Fostering and measuring skills: Improving cognitive and non-cognitive skills to promote lifetime success. NBER Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.3386/w20749
Killian, K. (2012). Development and validation of the emotional self-awareness questionnaire: A measure of Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(3), 502–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00233.x.
Kopper, S., & Sautmann, A. (2022, February). Randomization. Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL). Retrieved November 7, 2022, from https://www.povertyactionlab.org/resource/randomization
MEN (Ministerio de Educación de Colombia) (2022). Informe de Rendición de Cuentas de Paz—2021. Retrieved November 7, 2022, from https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/portal/micrositios-institucionales/Rendicion-de-Cuentas/Historico/385568:Informe-de-Rendicion-de-Cuentas-Acuerdo-de-Paz
Moffitt, T., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Roberts, B. W., Ross, S., Sears, M. R., Thomson, W. M., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of Childhood Self-Control Predicts Health, Wealth, and Public Safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(7), 2693–2698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108.
National Health Service (2022). Leadership Toolkit: (EI) Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire. Retrieved November 7, 2022, from https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/26776/1/Emotional_intelligence_questionnaire-LAL1.pdf
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2017). Social and emotional skills: Well-Being, connectedness, and Success. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/ses.
OECD. (2021). Beyond academic learning: First results from the Survey of Social and emotional skills. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/92a11084-en.
Sánchez Puerta, M. L., Valerio, A., & Gutiérrez Bernal, M. (2016). Taking stock of programs to develop socioemotional skills: A systematic review of Program evidence. Directions in Development. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0872-2.
Schultz, D., Izard, C., & Bear, G. (2004). Children’s emotion processing: Relations to emotionality and aggression. Development and Psychopathology, 16(2), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579404044566.
Sklad, M., De Ritter, M., Ben, J., & Gravesteijn, C. (2012). Effectiveness of School-Based Universal Social, Emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the Area of Skill, Behavior, and Adjustment? Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 892–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21641.
Think Equal Early Years Programme: Framework Summary. Think Equal, Think Equal, London, U. K., & Retrieved (2018). November 7, 2022, from https://thinkequal.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2019/04/THINK-EQUAL-Early-Years-Framework-Summary-updated-2019.pdf
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund), Brookings Institution, and World Bank (2017). Overview: MELQO: Measuring Early Learning Quality and Outcomes. Paris: UNESCO Publishing
US Bureau of Labor Statistics (1997). National Longitudinal Survey Youth. Retrieved November 7, 2022, from https://www.nlsinfo.org/content/cohorts/NLSY97
Funding
The authors are thankful to the Inter-American Development Bank for funding the research presented in this paper through its Early Childhood Development Fund. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Inter-American Development Bank, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose that are relevant to the content of this article.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 9.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Näslund-Hadley, E., Mateo-Berganza, M., Santos, H. et al. Socioemotional Learning in Early Childhood Education: Experimental Evidence from the Think Equal Program’s Implementation in Colombia. Early Childhood Educ J (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01503-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01503-w