Abstract
Today’s children are born immersed in a digital informational age, creating increased pressure on preservice teachers to prepare children to become digital citizens. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore Kuwaiti early childhood preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies in their future Kuwaiti classrooms. Findings were evaluated using the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior to examine factors that potentially influence the use of Web 2.0 technologies. The preservice teachers’ attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control positively and significantly affected the preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies. This study found teachers had intentions to use tools like YouTube, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Twitter in their future kindergarten classroom to improve student learning, communicate with parents, and share classrooms activities. Teachers believed that Web 2.0 technologies could improve kindergarten students’ learning, but they had concerns regarding inappropriate content.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Agir, A. (2014). What are the usage conditions of Web 2.0 tools Faculty of Education students? Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.91465.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg: Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Alajmi, M. (2011). Modeling student perception of Web 2.0 technologies adoption in Kuwait (Doctoral dissertation). Denton, TX: UNT Digital Library. Retrieved November 7, 2016, from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc67955/.
Alanba. (2011). Alanba purplish the negativities of using flash memory from the education field. Retrieved May 13, 2017, from https://bit.ly/2tDXJzP.
Alanba. (2016). Education: Stop using the tablet in schools. Retrieved February 3, 2017, from https://bit.ly/2nc16J4.
Alanzi, D. (2013). Alanzi prepared the first Arabic study about the impact of smart devices on children: 28% of Kuwaiti children spend more than 5 hours in front of smart devices. Alanba. Retrieved December 17, 2015, from https://bit.ly/2j4bIIP.
Al-Daihani, S. (2009). The knowledge of Web 2.0 by library and information science academics. Education for Information, 27(1), 39–55.
Alkhezzi, F. (2002). Internet use of graduate and undergraduate students in the College of Education (Doctoral dissertation). University of Northern Colorado. (AAT No.3071853)
Alkhezzi, F., & Abdelmagid, R. F. (2011). Technology integration: The use of computers by elementary school Kuwaiti teachers. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 15(2), 1–89.
Alqudsi-ghabra, T., Al-Bannai, T., & Al-Bahrani, M. (2011). The Internet in the Arab Gulf Cooperation Council (AGCC): Vehicle of change. International Journal of Internet Science, 6(1), 44–67.
Altun, A. (2005). Toward an effective integration of technology: Message boards for strengthening communication. The Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology, 4(1). Retrieved March 4, 2016, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492053.pdf.
Amirshokoohi, A. (2010). Elementary pre-service teachers' environmental literacy and views toward Science, Technology, and Society (STS) issues. Science Educator, 19(1), 56–63.
Angeli, C. (2004). The effects of case-based learning on early childhood pre-service teachers' beliefs about the pedagogical uses of ICT. Journal of Educational Media, 29(2), 139–151.
Armstrong, A., & Casement, C. (1998). The child and the machine: Why computers may put our children’s education at risk. Toronto: Key Porter Books.
Barak, M. (2018). Are digital natives open to change? Examining flexible thinking and resistance to change. Computers & Education, 121, 115–123.
Bradly, H., & Hill, S. (1984). Research in review: Young children and microcomputers: Research issues and directions. Young Children, 39(3), 49–61.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood. (2018, Aug 8). Advocates ask American Psychological Association to condemn tactics used to hook kids on screen devices. Retrieved September 5, 2018, from https://www.commercialfreechildhood.org/advocates-ask-american-psychological-association-condemn-tactics-used-hook-kids-screen-devices.
Cicconi, M. (2014). Vygotsky meets technology: A reinvention of collaboration in the early childhood mathematics classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(1), 57–65.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2016). Math, science, and technology in the early grades. Future of Children, 26(2), 75–94.
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Common Sense Media. (2017). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America. Retrieved January 20, 2018, from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/the-common-sense-census-media-use-by-kids-age-zero-to-eight-2017.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Davidson, J. (1989). Children and computers together in the early childhood classroom. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers.
Debell, M., & Chapman, C. (2003). Computer and Internet use by children, adolescents in 2001 (NCES 2004–014). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Ellis, K., & Blashki, K. (2004). Toddler techies: A study of young children’s interaction with computers. Information Technology in Children Education Annual. American Association for Computers in Education.
Ernest, J. M., Causey, C., Newton, A. B., Sharkins, K., Summerlin, J., & Albaiz, N. (2014). Extending the global dialogue about media, technology, screen time, and young children. Childhood Education, 90(3), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2014.910046.
Ertmer, P. A., Newby, T. J., Liu, W., Tomory, A., Yu, J. H., & Lee, Y. M. (2011). Students' confidence and perceived value for participating in cross-cultural Wiki-based collaborations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 213–228.
Gialamas, V., & Nikdopoulou, K. (2010). In-service and pre-service early childhood teachers’ views and intentions about ICT use in early childhood settings: A comparative study. Computers & Education, 55, 333–341.
Hartshorne, R., & Ajjan, H. (2009). Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Journal of Computing In Higher Education, 21(3), 183–198.
Hatch, L. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Haugland, S. W., & Wright, J. L. (1997). Young children and technology: A world of discovery. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Henninger, S. (1994). Using iterative refinement to find reusable software. IEEE Software, 11(5), 48–59.
Hertzog, N., & Klein, M. (2005). Beyond gaming: A technology explosion in early childhood classrooms. Gifted Child Today, 28(3), 24–31.
ISTE. (2015). International Society for Technology in Education. Retrieved December 5, 2016, from https://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards/standards-for-teachers.
Johnson, G., & Howell, A. (2005). Attitude toward instructional technology following required vs. optional WebCT usage. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 643–654.
Keengwe, J., & Onchwari, G. (2009). Technology and early childhood education: A technology integration professional development model for practicing teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(3), 209–218.
Kim, C., & Keller, J. M. (2011). Towards technology integration: The impact of motivational and volitional email messages. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(1), 91–111.
Kim, K., Jain, S., Westhoff, G., & Rezabek, L. (2008). A quantitative exploration of preservice teachers' intent to use computer-based technology. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(3), 275–287.
Kiyici, M., Akyeampong, A., & Balkan Kiyici, F. (2013). Comparison of Turkish and US pre-service teachers' Web 2.0 tools usage characteristics. Digital Education Review, 23, 74–98.
Konstantinidis, A., Theodostadou, D., & Pappos, C. (2013). Web 2.0 tools for supporting teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(4), 287–295.
Kul, U., & Celik, S. (2018). Investigating changes in mathematics teachers’ intentions regarding Web 2.0 technology integration. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 11(2), 89–104.
Kumar, S., & Vigil, K. (2011). The net generation as preservice teachers: Transferring familiarity with new technologies to educational environments. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 144–153.
Lau, A. (2011). Hospital-based nurses’ perceptions of the adoption of Web 2.0 tools for knowledge sharing, learning, social interaction and the production of collective intelligence. JMIR Publications Website. Retrieved November 17, 2016, from https://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e92/?trendmd-shared=1.
Lee, J., Cerreto, F. A., & Lee, J. (2010). Theory of planned behavior and teachers' decisions regarding use of educational technology. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 152–164.
Li, Y., & Ranieri, M. (2010). Are “digital natives” really digitally competent? A study on Chinese teenagers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 1029–1042.
Labbo, L. D., & Reinking, D. (1999). Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 478–492.
Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J., Lahmar, J., & Scott, F. (2018). Play and creativity in young children’s use of apps. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 870–882.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mohammad, M. (2007). Studying practicing Kuwaiti kindergarten teachers' attitudes, knowledge and reported practices regarding computer integration into the curriculum (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global: Social Sciences. (UMI No. 304706855)
Mohammad, M., & Mohammad, H. (2012). Computer integration into the early childhood curriculum. Education, 133(1), 97–116.
Myers, J. M., & Halpin, R. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes and use of multimedia technology in the classroom: Constructivist-based professional development training for school districts. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18, 133–140.
NAEYC & Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media (2012). Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. joint position statement. Washington, DC: NAEYC; Latrobe, PA: Fred Rogers center for Early Learning at Saint Vincent College.
National Education Association. (2012). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the four “Cs.” (D. Van Roekel, Ed.). Retrieved May 29, 2016, from https://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdf.
Obinger, D., & Obinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT? First steps toward understanding the net generation. In D. Obinger & J. Obinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation. Place: EduCAUSE.
Ofcom. (2017). Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. London: Ofcom. Retrieved April 17, 2018, from https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/108182/children-parents-media-use-attitudes-2017.pdf.
Pan, S. C., & Franklin, T. (2011). In-service teachers' self-efficacy, professional development, and Web 2.0 tools for integration. New Horizons in Education, 59(3), 28–40.
Powell, J. V., & Lord, L. M. (1998). Toward qualitative assessment of a computer-based simulation in pre-service field experience: A survey pilot study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2–3), 115–124.
Rogers, F. (1994). You are special: Words of wisdom from America’s most beloved neighbor. New York: Penguin Books.
Sabty, A. (2013). Electronic video games and reluctance of the study: Results and solutions in Kuwait. Retrieved September 19, 2016, from https://www.minshawi.com/vb.
Sadaf, A., Newby, T., & Ertmer, P. (2012). Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies using Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 171–195.
Shiue, Y. (2007). Investigating the sources of teachers' instructional technology use through the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 425–453.
Siu, K. M., & Lam, M. S. (2005). Early childhood technology education: A sociocultural perspective. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(6), 353–358.
Sivropoulou, I., Tsapakidou, A., & Kiridis, A. (2009). The opinions of the kindergarten teachers in relation to the introduction of computers to nursery school. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 2(1), 1430–2065.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.
Wang, F., Kinzie, M. B., McGuire, P., & Pan, E. (2010). Applying technology to inquiry-based learning in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 381–389.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alkhayat, L., Ernest, J. & LaChenaye, J. Exploring Kuwaiti Preservice Early Childhood Teachers’ Beliefs About Using Web 2.0 Technologies. Early Childhood Educ J 48, 715–725 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01036-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01036-6
