Allington, R. L. (2013). What really matters when working with struggling readers. The Reading Teacher,66(7), 520–530.
Google Scholar
Allor, J. H., Gifford, D. B., Al Otaiba, S., Miller, S. J., & Cheatham, J. P. (2013). Teaching students with intellectual disability to integrate reading skills: Effects of text and text based lessons. Remedial and Special Education,34, 346–356.
Google Scholar
Allor, J. H., Gifford, D. B., Jones, F. G., Al Otaiba, S., Yovanoff, P., Ortiz, M. B., et al. (2018). The effects of a text-centred literacy curriculum for students with intellectual disability. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,123(5), 474–494.
Google Scholar
Amendum, S. J., Conradi, K., & Hiebert, E. (2018). Does text complexity matter in the elementary grades? A research synthesis of text difficulty and elementary student’s reading fluency and comprehension. Educational Psychological Review,30(1), 121–151.
Google Scholar
Arizpe, E., & Styles, M. (2003). Children reading pictures: Interpreting visual texts. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Google Scholar
Baker, M. (2016). Statisticians issue warning on p values. Nature,531, 151.
Google Scholar
Beverly, B. L., Giles, M., & Buck, K. L. (2009). First-grade reading gains following enrichment: Phonics plus decodable texts compared to authentic literature read aloud. The Reading Teacher,53(4), 292–307.
Google Scholar
Brown, K. J. (2000). What kind of text—For whom and when? Textual scaffolding for beginning readers. The Reading Teacher,53(4), 292–307.
Google Scholar
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,19, 5–51.
Google Scholar
Cheatham, P., & Allor, H. (2012). The influence of decodability in early reading text on reading achievement: A review of the evidence. Reading and Writing,25, 2223–2246.
Google Scholar
Clark, M. M. (1976). Young fluent readers: What can they teach us?. London: Heineman Educational.
Google Scholar
Clark, M. M. (2014). Synthetic phonics and literacy learning. Birmingham: Glendale Education.
Google Scholar
Clarke, P., Snowling, M. J., Truelove, E., & Hulme, C. (2010). Ameliorating children’s reading-comprehension difficulties: A randomised controlled trial. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1–11.
Google Scholar
Coles, G. (2004). Real books in the Caboose. Knowledge Quest,33(2), 22–25.
Google Scholar
Department for Education [DfE]. (2010). Phonics teaching materials: Core criteria and the self-assessment process. London: HMSO.
Google Scholar
Department for Education [DfE]. (2012). Criteria for assuring high-quality phonic work. London: HMSO.
Google Scholar
Department for Education [DfE]. (2013). National curriculum for England. London: HMSO.
Google Scholar
Department for Education [DfE]. (2014). National curriculum for english key stages 1 and 2. London: HMSO.
Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, D. M., Sewell, J., Styles, B., Brzyska, B., Shamsan, Y., et al. (2009). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale (3rd ed.). London: GL Assessment.
Google Scholar
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Scaffolded reading instruction of content-area texts. The Reading Teacher,67(5), 347–351.
Google Scholar
Goodman, K. S. (1976). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist,6, 126–135.
Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Barnes, L., Mead, N., Power, A. J., & Leong, V. (2016). Prosodic similarity effects in short-term memory in developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1535.
Article
Google Scholar
Greene, J. F., & Wood, J. F. (2000). Language readers: Language readers level 1, book A, units 1-6 (pp. 4–7). Sopris West: Longmont, CO.
Google Scholar
Hall, C. S. (2016). Inference instruction for struggling readers: A synthesis of intervention research. Educational Psychological Review,28(1), 1–22.
Google Scholar
Hoffman, J. V., Sailors, M., & Patterson, E. U. (2002). Decodable texts for beginning reading instruction: The year 2000 basals. Journal of Literacy Research,34(3), 269–298.
Google Scholar
House of Commons Education and Skills Committee. (2005). Teaching children to read, eighth report of session 2004-5. London: The Stationery Office, House of Commons.
Google Scholar
Huey, E. D. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Google Scholar
Hutchison, D., & Styles, B. (2010). A guide to running randomised controlled trials for educational researchers. Slough: NFER.
Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. R., Peyton, J. A., Sanders, E. A., & Vadasy, P. F. (2004). Effects of reading decodable texts in supplemental first-grade tutoring. Scientific Studies of Reading,8(1), 53–85.
Google Scholar
Kachorsky, D., Moses, L., Serafini, F., & Hoelting, M. (2017). Meaning making with picturebooks: Young children’s use of semiotic resources. Literacy Research and Instruction,56(3), 231–249.
Google Scholar
Kelly, L. B., & Moses, L. (2018). Children’s literature that sparks inferential discussions. The Reading Teacher,72(1), 21–29.
Google Scholar
Lacey, P., Layton, L., Miller, C., Goldbart, J., & Lawson, H. (2007). What is literacy for students with severe learning difficulties? Exploring conventional and inclusive literacy. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs,7(3), 149–160.
Google Scholar
Marshall, B. (2011). English in the National Curriculum: A simple redraft or a major rewrite? The Curriculum Journal,22(2), 187–199.
Google Scholar
Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2008). Designing experiments and analysing data (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge Academic.
Google Scholar
McNally, J., & Murray, W. (1962). Key words to literacy. London: The Schoolmaster Publishing Co.
Google Scholar
Menter, I., Valeeva, R., & Kalimullin, A. (2017). A tale of two countries—Forty years on: politics and teacher education in Russia and England. European Journal of Teacher Education,40(5), 616–629.
Google Scholar
Mesmer, H. A. E. (2009). Decodable text: A review of what we know. Reading Research and Instruction,40(2), 121–141.
Google Scholar
Michaud, M., Dion, E., Barrette, A., Dupéré, V., & Toste, J. (2017). Does knowing what a word means influence how easily its decoding is learned? Reading & Writing Quarterly,33(1), 82–96.
Google Scholar
Morris, E. (2012). Managing change—The relationship between education and politics. Better Evidence-based Education,4(2), 4–5.
Google Scholar
Mosely, D. (2004). The diagnostic assessment of word recognition and phonic skills in five-year-olds. Journal of Research in Reading,27(2), 132–140.
Google Scholar
Moses, L., & Kelly, L. B. (2018). ‘We’re a little loud. That’s because we like to read!’: Developing positive views of reading in a diverse, urban first grade. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy,18(3), 307–337.
Google Scholar
Munton, G. (2006). Tab the cat. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Murray, B. A., McIlwain, M. J., Wang, C., Murray, G., & Finley, S. (2019). How do beginners learn to read irregular words as sight words? Journal of Research in Reading,41(1), 123–136.
Google Scholar
Nahachewsky, J. (2013). Understanding the importance of ethos in composing the “everyday” new literacies classroom. Language and Literacy,15(1), 74–92.
Google Scholar
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy. Washington D.C: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NICHHD]. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Nuzzo, R. (2014). Scientific method: Statistical errors. P values, the ‘gold standard’ of statistical validity, are not as reliable as many scientists assume. Nature,506, 150–152.
Google Scholar
Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted). (2019). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ofsted-inspection-handbooks-drafts-for-consultation Accessed 9 February 2019.
Pearson, P. D. (2004). The reading wars. Educational Policy,18(1), 216–252.
Google Scholar
Price-Mohr, R. M (2016). Comparing a controlled levelled text with a language rich text in a beginner reading scheme. University of York. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/12904/
Pring, R. (2015). Philosophy of educational research (3rd ed.). London: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar
Protopapas, A., Mouzaki, A., Sideridis, G. D., Kotsolakou, A., & Simos, P. G. (2013). The role of vocabulary in the context of the simple view of reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties,29(2), 168–202.
Google Scholar
Ricketts, J., Bishop, D. V. M., Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2011). The role of self-teaching in learning orthographic and semantic aspects of new words. Scientific Studies of Reading,15(1), 47–70.
Google Scholar
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research,79(4), 1391–1466.
Google Scholar
Smith, F. (1973). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Google Scholar
Smith, P. L., & Little, D. R. (2018). Small is beautiful: In defense of the small-N design. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,25(6), 2083–2101.
Google Scholar
Snowling, M., Stothard, S. E., Clarke, P., Bowyer-Crane, C., Harrington, A., Truelove, E., et al. (2009). York assessment of reading for comprehension. London: GL Assessment.
Google Scholar
Solar, J., & Openshaw, R. (2007). ‘To be or not to be?’: The politics of teaching phonics in England and New Zealand. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy,7(3), 333–352.
Google Scholar
Solity, J., & Vousden, J. (2009). Real books vs reading schemes: A new perspective from instructional psychology. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology,29(4), 469–511.
Google Scholar
Stahl, S. A., & Heubach, K. M. (2005). Fluency-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Literacy Research,37(1), 25–60.
Google Scholar
Stephen, C. (2010). Pedagogy: The silent partner in early years learning. Early Years,30(1), 1–14.
Google Scholar
Stokes, S. F., Kern, S., & DosSantos, C. (2012). Extended statistical learning as an account for slow vocabulary growth. Journal of Child Language,39(1), 105–129.
Google Scholar
Tesar, M. (2019). Global politics and local impacts on educational policy. Policy Futures in Education,17(3), 302–305.
Google Scholar
Torgerson, C. J., Brookes, G., & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature in the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling. London: Department for Education and Skills (DfES).
Google Scholar
Torgerson, D. J., & Torgerson, C. J. (2008). Designing randomised trials. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Victoria Liberal (2018). https://vic.liberal.org.au/News/2018-10-10/liberal-nationals-to-fund-decodable-readers-for-victorian-schools Accessed 9 February 2019.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). The role of play in development, mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Walsh, M. (2003). ‘‘Reading’ pictures: What do they reveal? Young children’s reading of visual texts. Literacy,37(3), 123–130.
Google Scholar
Wenz-Gross, M., & Upshur, C. (2012). Implementing a primary prevention social skills intervention in urban preschools: Factors associated with quality and fidelity. Early Education and Development,23(4), 427–450.
Google Scholar
Wilson, J., & Comar, S. (2008). Re-evaluating the significance of phonemic awareness and phonics in literacy teaching: The shared role of school counsellors and teachers. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling,18(2), 89–105.
Google Scholar