Of Course Scientists Haven’t Seen Dinosaurs on the Beach: Turkish Kindergartners’ Developing Understanding of the Nature of Science Through Explicit–Reflective Instruction
- 276 Downloads
Although the importance of nature of science (NOS) instruction for learners as young as kindergartners is emphasised in a great number of documents and studies, very little research has been conducted in early childhood contexts. Thus, researchers are still not able to see a comprehensive picture of young children’s understandings of NOS. The purpose of this qualitative study is to investigate kindergartners’ developmental ability to comprehend tenets of NOS. Using an explicit–reflective approach and activities designed to develop their understandings of NOS, we instructed eight kindergartners for 10 days over the course of a month to document changes in their thinking. To this end, they were interviewed individually using Young Children’s Views of Science before and after instruction. The results indicate that generally, the kindergartners had an inadequate understanding of NOS before instruction but had developed it by the end of instruction. Each child’s understanding of the individual aspects of NOS developed to different degrees, creative NOS improving most substantially. This study corroborates that kindergartners are not developmentally constrained to develop informed NOS understandings. On the contrary, they are able to develop an informed understanding of NOS that can be improved by the implementation of explicit–reflective instruction.
KeywordsEarly childhood education Nature of science Explicit–reflective instruction
This study was supported by Anadolu University Scientific Research Projects Commission under the Grant No. 1304E071.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044.
- Akerson, V. L., Buck, G. A., Donnelly, L. A., Nargund-Joshi, V., & Weiland, I. S. (2011). The importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9312-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Akerson, V. L., Buzzelli, C. A., & Donnelly, L. A. (2008). Early childhood teachers’ views of nature of science: The influence of intellectual levels, cultural values, and explicit reflective teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(6), 748–770. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bell, R. L., & St. Clair, T. L. S. (2015). Too little, too late: Addressing nature of science in early childhood education. In K. Cabe Trundle, M. Saçkes (Eds.), Research in early childhood science education (pp. 125–141). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Doğan, N., & Özcan, M. B. (2010). Tarihsel yaklaşımın 7.sınıf öğrencilerinin bilimin doğası hakkındaki görüşlerinin geliştirilmesine etkisi. [Influence of historical perspective approach on 7th grade students’ views about nature of science] Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(4), 187–208. Retrieved from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/aeukefd/article/view/5000086411/5000080365.
- Erdogan, R., Cakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Investigating Turkish Pre-service science teachers’ views of the nature of science. In C. V. Sunal & K. Mutua (Eds.), Research on education in Africa, The Caribbean and the Middle East (pp. 273–285). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, S., & Page, R. (2009). What do you do with a tail like this? Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Küçük, M. (2006). Bilimin doğasını ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerine öğretmeye yönelik bir çalışma [A study toward teaching the nature of science for seventh grade primary students] (Doctoral dissertation). Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp.
- Lederman, J. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2010). Development of a valid and reliable protocol for the assessment of early childhood students’ conceptions of nature of science and scientific inquiry. In M. F. Taşar & G. Çakmakçı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: International perspectives (pp. 227–236). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.Google Scholar
- Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding denatured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 83–126). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (1994). Anasınıfı programı [Kindergarten education program]. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.Google Scholar
- Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2002). 36–72 aylık çocuklar için okul öncesi eğitim programı [Preschool education program for 36–72 month children]. İstanbul: Ya-Pa Yayınları.Google Scholar
- Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2005). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programı [Elementary science and technology education program]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.Google Scholar
- Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2006). 36–72 aylık çocuklar için okul öncesi eğitim programı [Preschool education program for 36–72 month children]. İstanbul: Morpa.Google Scholar
- Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2013). İlköğretim kurumları fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [Elementary school science education program]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.Google Scholar
- Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2013). Okul öncesi eğitim programı. [Preschool education program]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
- Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2017). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [Elementary science education program]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.Google Scholar
- Ministry of National Education (2016). National education statistics: Formal education 2015/’16. Retrieved from http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/www/resmiistatistikler/icerik/64.
- National Association of Education of Young Children, (2005). NAEYC Early Childhood Program Standards. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/positionstatements.
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
- National Science Teachers Association. (2000). NSTA position statement: The nature of science. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/natureofscience.aspx .
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States, Appendix H—Understanding the scientific enterprise: The nature of science in the Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org.
- Türkmen, L., & Yalçın, M. (2001). Bilimin doğası ve eğitimdeki önemi [Nature of science and its importance in education]. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 189–195. Retrieved from http://www.sbd.aku.edu.tr/III1/16.pdf.
- Walls, L. (2009). A critical hermeneutic study: Third grade elementary African American students’ views of the nature of science (Doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, Indiana.Google Scholar