Redefining Leadership: Lessons from an Early Education Leadership Development Initiative
- 83 Downloads
This study examined how experienced early educators developed as change agents in the context of a leadership development program. Unlike in many other professions, experienced early educators lack opportunities to grow throughout their careers and access the supports they need to lead change in their classrooms, organizations, the profession, and beyond. This qualitative study brings a relational and entrepreneurial leadership theory lens to its analysis of the experiences of 43 early educators as they co-created pathways forward as leaders for change. The study defines leadership as a process of influencing change to improve early care and education, and not reserved just for those with a formal leadership position. Results show how educators came to see themselves as leaders and pursued different paths to making change and driving improvement. The study offers a new conceptual mapping of a leadership development ecosystem for supporting educators’ capacity to identify as leaders as well as lead improvement and innovation. The paper concludes with lessons learned and recommendations for strengthening the leadership infrastructure to support early educator leadership for change and innovation.
KeywordsEarly education leadership Teacher leadership Child care Leadership Change Leadership development Innovation
Funding was provided by Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care (Grant No. CTEEC0900ISAEECRTTT0806UMB13A).
- Ancona, D., & Bresman, H. (2007). X-teams: How to build teams that lead, innovate and succeed. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
- Bloom, P. J., & Bella, J. (2005). Investment in leadership training-the payoff for early childhood education. Young Children, 60(1), 32–40.Google Scholar
- Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
- Carr, V., Johnson, L. J., & Corkwell, C. (2009). Principle-centered leadership in early childhood education. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 37(3), 25–32.Google Scholar
- Douglass, A. (2011). Improving family engagement: the organizational context and its influence on partnering with parents in formal child care settings. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 13(2). Retrieved from ecrp.uiuc.edu/v13n2/douglass.html.
- Douglass, A. (2017). Leading for change in early care and education: Cultivating leadership from within. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Fletcher, J. K. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Gittell, J. H. (2016). Transforming relationships for high performance: The power of relational coordination. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Goffin, S. (2013). Building capacity though an early education leadership academy. Retrieved from http://ceelo.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/EELA_Goffin_WEB.pdf.
- Goffin, S. G., & Janke, M. (2013). Early childhood education leadership development compendium: A view of the current landscape. (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Goffin Strategy Group. Retrieved March 1, 2016 from http://www.researchconnections.org/childcare/resources/25544.
- Henderson-Kelly, L., & Pamphilon, B. (2000). Women’s models of leadership in the child care sector. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 25, 8.Google Scholar
- Hess, F. M. (2006). Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2003). The Breakthrough Series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. IHI innovation series white paper. Boston: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; (Available on http://www.IHI.org).
- Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. (2012). The early childhood care and education workforce: Challenges and opportunities-A workshop report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Institute of Medicine and Nation Research Council. (2015). Transforming the workforce for children birth through age 8: A unifying foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Kagan, S. L., & Kauerz, K. (2012). Early childhood systems: Transforming early learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Komives, S., Lucas, N., & McMahon, T. (2007). Exploring leadership: For college students who want to make a difference. [2nd ed]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Leonard, J. (2013). Innovation in the schoolhouse: entrepreneurial leadership in education. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
- Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Muhr, T. (2004). Atlas. ti: The knowledge workbench: v5. 0 user’s guide and reference. Berlin: Scientific Software Development.Google Scholar
- Ramgopal, P. S., Dieterle, K. P., Aviles, J., McCreedy, B., & Davis, C. F. (2009). Leadership development in the south: Where do we go from here? Dimensions of Early Childhood, 37(3), 33–38.Google Scholar
- Smith, K., & Petersen, J. L. (2006). What is educational entrepreneurship? In F. M. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship (pp. 21–44). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
- Uhl-Bien, M., & Ospina, S. (2012). Advancing relational leadership research: A dialogue among perspectives. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Whitebook, M., Kipnis, F., Sakai, L., & Austin, L. J. E. (2012). Early care and education leadership and management roles: Beyond homes and centers. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 14(1):n1. Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v14n1/whitebook.html.
- Wise, V., & Wright, T. (2012). Critical absence in the field of educational administration: Framing the (missing) discourse of leadership in early childhood settings. Connexious Project, 7(2), 1–9.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. New York: Sage.Google Scholar