Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Partners in Inquiry: A Collaborative Life Science Investigation with Preservice Teachers and Kindergarten Students

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article documents a collaborative project involving preservice early childhood education students’ development of inquiry-based learning experiences alongside kindergarten students within a science methods course. To document this project, I utilized a multiple methods approach and data included classroom observations, transcripts from lesson planning sessions, preservice teachers’ reflection journals, kindergarten science journals, and pre- and post-measurements for preservice teachers on the Draw-A-Scientist Test (DAST) (Chambers in Sci Educ 67(2):225–265, 1983) and the Science Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Inventory—B (STEBI-B) (Enochs and Riggs in Sch Sci Math 90(8):694–706, 1990). Analysis of the DAST, STEBI-B, and qualitative data revealed that the preservice teachers developed stronger understandings of inquiry-based science and self-efficacy beliefs related to their practice following participation in the collaborative project. While development of inquiry understandings and efficacy-related beliefs improved throughout the project, the preservice teachers voiced concerns over the challenges of integrating inquiry instruction within pedagogically restrictive contemporary classroom environments. Additionally, this research strongly suggests the need for early childhood teacher educators to take an active role in the construction of teaching and learning experiences that promote opportunities for preservice teachers to experience the process of developing effective inquiry-based, integrated science experiences within the supportive environment of a teacher education program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333, 1096–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blagojevic, B., & Thomes, K. (2008). Young photographers: Can 4-year-olds use a digital camera as a tool for learning? An investigation in progress. Young Children, 63(5), 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenneman, K., & Louro, I. (2008). Science journals in the preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, M. J. (1999). A new methodology, an old story? Gender differences in the “draw-a- computer-user” test. European Journal of Psychology and Education, 14, 375–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biological Sciences Curriculum Studies (BSCS). (2006). BSCS science: An inquiry approach. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 225–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clift, R. T., & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 309–424). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Adeline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A. (2012). Scientific thinking in young children: Theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science, 337(6102), 1623–1627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurvitch, R., & Metzler, M. (2009). The effects of laboratory-based and field-based practicum experience on pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 437–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2004). Learning by doing? Prospective elementary teachers’ developing understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1653–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C. M., & Berger, C. F. (2003). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffey, J. (2004). Appropriation, mastery and resistance to technology in early childhood preservice teacher education. Journal of research on technology in education, 36(4), 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maoldomhnaigh, M. O., & Hunt, A. (1989). Some factors affecting the image of the scientist drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science and Technological Education, 6(2), 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teacher Association. (2004). NSTA position statement: Scientific inquiry. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teacher Association. (2014). NSTA position statement: Early childhood science education. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M., & Chandler, W. (1999). Some tools common to art and science. Art Education, 52(3), 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann-Hinds, C. (2007). Picture science: Using digital photography to teach young children. St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, E. C. (1997). Black high school females’ images of the scientist: Expression of culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 745–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, C. V., & Gwekwerere, Y. N. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K-8 science teaching. Science Education, 91(1), 158–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D. P. (1997). Of butterflies and beetles: First graders’ ways of seeing and talking about insect lifecycles. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 873–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D. P., & Britsch, S. J. (2001). The role of children’s journals in elementary school science activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Anderson, C. (1999). Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 755–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J., & Kim, K. S. (1999). How Korean students see scientists: The images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 957–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., Christopher, J. E., & Sackes, M. (2010). The effect of guided inquiry-based instruction on middle school students’ understanding of lunar concepts. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wien, C. A. (2014). The power of emergent curriculum: Stories from early childhood settings. Washington, DC: NAEYC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worth, K. (2010). Science in early childhood classrooms: Content and process. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2), 1–7. Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v12n2/index.html

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Eckhoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eckhoff, A. Partners in Inquiry: A Collaborative Life Science Investigation with Preservice Teachers and Kindergarten Students. Early Childhood Educ J 45, 219–227 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0769-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0769-3

Keywords

Navigation