Skip to main content

Utilizing Nonfiction Texts to Enhance Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary in Primary Grades

Abstract

Many primary grade students are not afforded nonfiction-rich opportunities, with fiction comprising the majority of books read aloud in classrooms. With the Common Core Standards recommending that half of the texts made available to students be nonfiction, educators are increasing their use of informational text. The present study explored the impact of explicitly teaching reading comprehension and vocabulary strategies with nonfiction text compared to fiction text in primary-grade classrooms. Two first-grade (n = 39; 25 male, 14 female) and one second-grade class (n = 20; 13 male, 7 female) participated in the quantitative study that followed a repeated measures design in which the students alternated every 2 weeks between fiction-based instruction and nonfiction-based instruction for a total of 8 weeks. Vocabulary and use of comprehension strategies were assessed at the end of each 2-week period. Overall findings indicated that students were better able to apply the comprehension strategies and define vocabulary following nonfiction-based instruction; they also were more motivated to read informational text. The authors recommend that teachers use more nonfiction texts in the primary grades to support students’ reading comprehension and vocabulary development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bluestein, N. A. (2010). Unlocking text features for determining importance in expository text: A strategy for struggling readers. Reading Teacher, 63(7), 597–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bortnem, G. M. (2008). Teacher use of interactive read alouds using nonfiction in early childhood classrooms. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 5(12), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley, L. G., & Donovan, C. A. (2010). Information book read-alouds as models for second-grade authors. The Reading Teacher, 64(4), 246–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Community School District. (2015). Reading comprehension strategy definitions. District Curriculum Binder.

  6. Correia, M. P. (2011). Fiction vs. informational texts: Which will kindergartners choose? Young Children, 66(6), 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2010). Common core state standards initiative. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org

  8. Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 Minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fountas, I., & Pinnell, G. S. (2010). Benchmark assessment system 1: Grades K-2 levels A–N (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graves, M. A. (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. New York, NY: Teachers College Press and International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heard, G., & McDonough, J. (2009). A place for wonder: Reading and writing nonfiction in the primary grades. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henkes, K. (2006). Lilly’s purple plastic purse. New York: Greenwillow.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jeong, J., Gaffney, J. S., & Choi, J. (2010). Availability and use of informational texts in second-, third-, and fourth-grade classrooms. Research in the Teaching of English, 44(4), 435–456.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maloch, B. (2008). Beyond exposure: The use of informational texts in a second grade classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 42, 315–362.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maloch, B., & Bomer, R. (2013). Teaching about and with informational texts: What does research teach us? Language Arts, 90(6), 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maloch, B., & Horsey, M. (2013). Living inquiry: Learning from and about informational texts in a second-grade classroom. The Reading Teacher, 66(6), 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McMillan, J. H. (2012). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Palmer, R. G., & Stewart, R. A. (2005). Models for using nonfiction in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 58(5), 426–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reading A–Z. (2015). Reading AZ. Retrieved from https://www.readinga-z.com

  20. Wright, T. (2013). From potential to reality: Content-rich vocabulary and informational text. The Reading Teacher, 67(5), 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yopp, R., & Yopp, H. (2006). Informational texts as read-alouds at school and home. Journal of Literacy Research, 38, 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Young, T. A., & Moss, B. (2006). Nonfiction in the classroom library: A literacy necessity. Childhood Education, 82(4), 207–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Center for Educational Transformation at the University of Northern Iowa for generous support of this research project.

Ethical statement

This study was approved by the Human Subject Committee of the researchers’ university; all students included in the study and their parents were fully informed and provided written consent to participate.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah E. Montgomery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuhn, K.E., Rausch, C.M., McCarty, T.G. et al. Utilizing Nonfiction Texts to Enhance Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary in Primary Grades. Early Childhood Educ J 45, 285–296 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0763-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Nonfiction
  • Informational text
  • Comprehension
  • Vocabulary
  • Primary grades