Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 537–544 | Cite as

Literacy Through Photography: Multimodal and Visual Literacy in a Third Grade Classroom

  • Angela M. Wiseman
  • Marita Mäkinen
  • Reijo Kupiainen


This article reports findings from a diverse third grade classroom that integrates a literacy through photography (LTP) curriculum as a central component of writing instruction in an urban public school. A case study approach was used in order to provide an in-depth, multi-dimensional consideration of phenomena by drawing on multiple data sources to examine and describe the LTP program in this third grade classroom. Data were gathered, on average twice a week, throughout a full school year. The findings of this study demonstrate how utilizing different forms of communication, such as photography, alongside traditional school literacies, such as writer’s workshop, expands the options that children have of processing and expressing their understanding.


Qualitative research Visual literacy Literacy instruction Photography 


  1. Albers, P., & Cowan, K. (2006). Literacy on our minds: A student-inspired symposium. Language Arts, 83(6), 514–522.Google Scholar
  2. Albers, P., & Harste, J. C. (2007). The arts, new literacies, and multimodality. English Education, 40(1), 6–20.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, J., Fabregas, V., Hankins, K. H., Hull, G., Labbo, L., & Lawson, H. S. (2002). PhOLKS lore: Learning from photographs, families, and children. Language Arts, 79(4), 56–60.Google Scholar
  4. Allington, R. L., & Cunningham, P. M. (2002). Schools that work: Where all children read and write. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cappello, M. (2006). Under construction: Voice and identity development in writing workshop. Language Arts, 83(6), 482–491.Google Scholar
  7. Cappello, M., & Hollingsworth, S. (2008). Literacy inquiry and pedagogy through a photographic lens. Language Arts, 85(6), 442–449.Google Scholar
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Dyson, A. H., & Genishi, C. (2005). On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ewald, W. (2002). The best part of me: Children talk about their bodies in pictures and words. New York: Little, Brown Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
  11. Greene, M. (2000). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Hassett, D. D., & Curwood, J. S. (2009). Theories and practices of multimodal education: The instructional dynamics of picture books and primary classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 63(4), 270–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hilden, K. R., & Pressley, M. (2007). Self-regulation through transactional strategies instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jewett, C. (Ed.). (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Keat, J. B., Strickland, M. J., & Marinak, B. A. (2009). Child voice: How immigrant children enlightened their teachers with a camera. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(1), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kress, G. R. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Mavers, D. (2007). Semiotic resourcefulness: A young child’s email exchange as design. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7(2), 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Merriam, S. B. (2014). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Moline, S. (2011). I see what you mean: Visual literacy K-8. York, ME: Stenhouse.Google Scholar
  23. Moran, M. J., & Tegano, D. W. (2005). Moving toward visual literacy: Photography as a language of teacher inquiry. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 7(1). Retrieved July 13, 2014, from
  24. Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2005). Literacy and education. Understanding the new literacies studies in the classroom. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  25. Ranker, J. (2009). Redesigning and transforming: A case study of the role of semiotic import in early composing processes. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(3), 319–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rose, G. (2008). Using photographs as illustrations in human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rowsell, J., McLean, C., & Hamilton, M. (2012). Visual literacy as a classroom approach. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(5), 444–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schellings, G., Aarnoutse, C., & van Leeuwe, J. (2006). Third-graders’ think-aloud protocols: Types of reading activities in reading an expository text. Learning and Instruction, 16(6), 549–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schofield, D., & Kupiainen, R. (2015). Young people’s narratives of media and identity. Nordicom Review, 36(1), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Serafini, F. (2014). Reading the visual: An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  31. Siegel, M. (2006). Review of research: Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformation in the field of literacy education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65–77.Google Scholar
  32. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Stein, P. (2008). Multimodal instructional practices. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 871–898). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  34. Wissman, K. (2008). “This is what I see”: (Re)envisioning photography as a social practice. In M. Hill & L. Vasudevan (Eds.), Media, learning, and sites of possibility (pp. 13–45). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  35. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Young, K. A. (2005). Direct from the source: The value of ‘think-aloud’ data in understanding learning. Journal of Educational Inquiry, 6(1), 19–33.Google Scholar
  37. Zenkov, K., & Harmon, J. (2009). Picturing a writing process: Photovoice and teaching writing to urban youth. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(7), 575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela M. Wiseman
    • 1
  • Marita Mäkinen
    • 2
  • Reijo Kupiainen
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Elementary EducationNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.University of TampereTampereFinland
  3. 3.Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations