Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 209–216 | Cite as

Using the Teaching and Guidance Policy Essentials Checklist to Build and Support Effective Early Childhood Systems

  • Sarah M. Garrity
  • Sascha L. Longstreth
  • Nina S. Salcedo-Potter
  • April Staub
Article

Abstract

The prevalence of preschool expulsion, coupled with racial disparities in expulsion rates and the potential long term negative effects of challenging behaviors in the early years, has created an urgent need to build early childhood systems to address these issues. The teaching and guidance policy essentials checklist (TAG-PEC) has been developed to assess nine essential features of high quality early childhood discipline policies and can be used by early childhood programs in a variety of settings to evaluate, refine, and revise existing policies or guide in the development of new policies. Using data from 282 guidance policies assessed using the TAG-PEC, the authors use a framework for systems building developed by Coffman (A framework for evaluating systems initiatives, 2007) to position the TAG-PEC as a powerful tool that can be used to help build and support an effective and cohesive early childhood system. Findings indicate that, overall, discipline policies were not high quality and there was a great deal of variability in the TAG-PEC scores. By bringing evidence based practices to the field via a simple to use checklist, the authors hope to help contribute to the development of a comprehensive early childhood system and that supports programs in the provision of high quality services to children and families.

Keywords

Discipline policies Child guidance Early childhood systems Challenging behavior 

Supplementary material

10643_2015_713_MOESM1_ESM.doc (34 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 33 kb)

References

  1. Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, L. H., & Beckett, K. S. (2006). The role of the school district in student discipline: Building consensus in Cincinnati. The Urban Review, 38(3), 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, S. B. (1995). Behavior problems in preschool children: A review of recent research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 113–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, S. B., Spieker, S., Burchinal, M., & Poe, M. D. (2006). Trajectories of aggression from toddlerhood to age 9 predict academic and social functioning through age 12. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(8), 791–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciciolla, L., & Gerstein, E. D. (2013). Reciprocity among maternal distress, child behavior, and parenting: Transactional processes and early childhood risk. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43(5), 751–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coffman, J. (2007). A framework for evaluating systems initiatives. Prepared for the build initiative. Retrieved from www.buildinitiative.org.
  7. Colvin, G., Kameenui, E. J., & Sugai, G. (1993). School-wide and classroom management: Reconceptualizing the integration and management of students with behavior problems in general education. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 361–381.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, E., & Kaufmann, R. (2005). Early childhood mental health consultation. DHHS Pub. No. CMHS-SVP0151. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Google Scholar
  9. Conroy, M. A., Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., & Alter, P. J. (2005). A descriptive analysis of positive behavioral intervention research with young children with challenging behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 25(3), 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children. (1998). Position on services for children birth to age eight. Retrieved from http://www.dec-sped.org
  11. Doolittle, J. H., Horner, R. H., Bradley, R., Sugai, G., & Vincent, C. G. (2007). Importance of student social behavior in the mission statements, personnel preparation standards, and innovation efforts of state departments of education. The Journal of Special Education, 40(4), 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox, L., Carta, J., Strain, P. S., Dunlap, G., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2010). Response to intervention and the pyramid model. Infants and Young Children, 23(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fox, L., Dunlap, G., Hemmeter, M. L., Joseph, G. E., & Strain, P. S. (2003). The teaching pyramid: A model for supporting social competence and preventing challenging behavior in young children. Young Children, 58(4), 48–52.Google Scholar
  14. Gilliam, W. S. (2005). Prekindergartners left behind: Expulsion rates in state prekindergarten systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
  15. Gilliam, W. S. (2008). Implementing policies to reduce the likelihood of preschool expulsion. Foundation for Child Development Policy Brief, 7, 2–10.Google Scholar
  16. Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Koegel, R. L., Carr, E. G., Sailor, W., & Anderson, J. (1990). Toward a technology of “nonaversive” behavioral support. Journal for the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 125–132.Google Scholar
  17. Kagan, S. L., & Kauerz, K. (Eds.). (2012). Early childhood systems: Transforming early learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kagan, S. L., Kauerz, K., & Tarrant, K. (2007). The early care and education teaching workforce at the fulcrum: An agenda for reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kaiser, B., & Rasminsky, J. S. (2011). Challenging behavior in young children: Understanding, preventing, and responding effectively. New York, NY: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Longstreth, S., Brady, S., & Kay, A. (2013). Discipline policies in early care and education programs: Building an infrastructure for social and academic success. Early Education and Development, 24(2), 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martella, R. C., Nelson, J. R., & Marchand-Martella, N. E. (2003). Managing disruptive behaviors in the schools: A schoolwide, classroom, and individualized social learning approach. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  22. McCartney, K., Burchinal, M., Clarke-Stewart, A., Bub, K. L., Owen, M. T., & Belsky, J. (2010). Testing a series of causal propositions relating time in child care to children’s externalizing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1999). Statement of the position: Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/resources/position_statements/psacrpol.htm
  24. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. (2007). Effective classroom management: Teacher preparation and professional development. Retrieved from http://www.tqsource.org/topics/effectiveClassroomManagement.pdf
  25. Nelson, J. R., Martella, R. M., & Marchand-Martella, N. (2002). Maximizing student learning: The effects of a comprehensive school-based program for preventing problem behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Netzel, D., & Eber, L. (2003). Shifting from reactive to proactive discipline in an urban school district: A change in focus through PBIS. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports, 5(2), 67–71.Google Scholar
  27. Qi, C. H., & Kaiser, A. P. (2003). Behavior problems of preschool children from low-income families review of the literature. Topics in early childhood special education, 23(4), 188–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogers, Carl. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  29. Shaw, D. S., Bell, R. Q., & Gilliom, M. (2000). A truly early starter model of antisocial behavior revisited. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3(3), 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Snell, M. E., Voorhees, M. D., Berlin, R. A., Stanton-Chapman, T. L., Hadden, S., & McCarty, J. (2012). Use of interview and observation to clarify reported practices of Head Start staff concerning problem behavior: Implications for programs and training. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(2), 108–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Squires, J., Bricker, D., Heo, K., & Twombly, E. (2002). Ages and stages questionnaires: Social-emotional. A parent-completed, child-monitoring system for social-emotional behaviors. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  32. U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services U.S. Department Of Education (2014). Policy statement on expulsion and suspension policies in early childhood settings. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ecd/expulsion_suspension_final.pdf
  33. Webster-Stratton, C., & Taylor, T. (2001). Nipping early risk factors in the bud: Preventing substance abuse, delinquency, and violence in adolescence through interventions targeted at young children (0–8 years). Prevention Science, 2(3), 165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah M. Garrity
    • 1
  • Sascha L. Longstreth
    • 1
  • Nina S. Salcedo-Potter
    • 1
  • April Staub
    • 1
  1. 1.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations