Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transition Between Swedish Preschool and Preschool Class: A Question About Interweaving Care and Knowledge

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study highlights teachers’ experiences with transition from Swedish preschool to preschool class, i.e. from the daycare centre to the formal school. One assumption was that transition activities, to favour continuity in the long-term, need to focus on children’s learning within the target areas that the policy documents specify for preschool. Empirical data were collected through a combination of a questionnaire and interviews. The study shows that transition activities occur between institutions. These are in place to allow for a safe transition for children rather than to allow for continuous and long-term learning in the target areas in the curriculum. Care for children and beliefs about the types of school activities have an impact on the activities and standpoints in the transition processes. Professional assessment of children’s learning and the need for greater consensus within various types of schools in terms of the learning of the individual child in different fields are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackesjö, H. (2010). Läraridentiteter i förskoleklass. Berättelser från ett gränsland Licentiatstudie. [Teacher Identities in preschool. Stories from a borderland. Licentiate study]. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackesjö, H. (2012). Solidarity—to Whom? Perspectives of solidarity in the borderland between preschool and school. In E. Johansson & D. Berthelsen (Eds.), Spaces for solidarity and individualism in educational research (pp. 83–98). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackesjö, H. (2013). Children crossing borders: School visits as initial incorporation rites in transition to preschool class. International Journal of Early Childhood, 45, 387–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahtola, A., Silinskas, G., Poikonen, P.-L., Kontoniemi, M., Niemi, P., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2011). Transition to formal schooling: Do transition practices matter for academic performance? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data. Systematic approaches. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjervås, L.-L. (2011). Samtal om barn och pedagogisk dokumentation som bedömningspraktik i förskolan: en diskursanalys. [Talk about children and teaching dossier assessment practice in kindergarten: a discourse analysis]. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broström, S. (2002). Communication and continuity in the transition from kindergarten to school. In H. Fabian & A.-W. Dunlop (Eds.), Transitions in the early years. Debating continuity and progression for children in early education (pp. 52–63). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broström, S. (2007). Transitions in children’s thinking. In A.-W. Dunlop & H. Fabian (Eds.), Informing transitions in the early years. Research, policy and practice (pp. 61–73). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory and practice in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., & Taguchi, H. L. (1994). Förskola och skola: om två skilda traditioner och om visionen om en mötesplats. [Preschool and school: two distinct traditions and the vision of a venue]. Stockholm: HLS förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2007). Transitions to school: Perceptions, expectations, experiences. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, A.-W. (2003). Bridging early educational transitions in learning through children’s agency. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, Themed Mo., 67–86.

  • Early, D. (2004). Services and programs that influence young children’s school transitions. In R. E. Tremblay, R. G. Barr, & R. DeV. Peters (Eds). Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development Downloaded from http://www.child-encyclopedia.com/documents/EarlyANGxp.pdf. 2014-10-17.

  • Ecclestone, K. (2009). Lost and found in transition: Educational implications of concerns about ‘identity’, ‘agency’ and ‘structure’. In J. Field, J. Gallacher, & R. Ingram (Eds.), Researching transitions in lifelong learning (pp. 9–27). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, H. & Dunlop, A-W. (2007). Outcomes of good practice in transition processes for children entering primary school. Working paper 42 in Early Childhood Development. Downloaded from http://issuu.com/bernardvanleerfoundation/docs/outcomes_of_good_practice_in_transition_processes_. 2014-10-17.

  • Fast, C. (2007). Sju barn lär sig läsa och skriva: familjeliv och populärkultur i möte med förskola och skola. [Seven children learn to read and write: Family life and popular culture in contact with preschool and primary school]. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannerud, E., & Rönnerman, K. (2006): Innehåll och innebörd i lärares arbete i förskola och skola. En fallstudie ur ett genusperspektiv. [Content and meaning in the work of teachers in preschools and schools. A case study from a gender perspective]. Göteborgs universitet: Studies in Educational sciences 246.

  • Griebel, W., & Niesel, R. (2002). Co-constructing transition into kindergarten and school. In H. Fabian & A. W. A. Dunlop (Eds.), Transitions in the early years debating continuity and progression for children in early education (pp. 64–75). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsmar, N., & Jönsson, K. (2010). Lärandets vem, varför, när, vad och hur i förskolan och grundskolans tidiga år. [Who, why, when, what and how in learning in preschool and early school years.] In Skolverket. Perspektiv på barndom och barns lärande: en kunskapsöversikt om lärande i förskolan och grundskolans tidigare år, (pp. 121–166). [Perspectives on childhood and children’s learning: A knowledge about learning in preschool and early school years]. Stockholm: Skolverket.

  • Hjelte, J. (2005). Samarbete i gränsland: om relation och kommunikation i samarbete mellan skola och barnomsorg. [Cooperation in the border country: About the relationships and communication in collaboration between schools and childcare]. Umeå: Umeå universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, E., & Samuelsson, I. P. (2001). Omsorg—en central aspekt av förskolepedagogiken. Exemplet måltiden. [Caring—a central aspect of early childhood education. The example of the meal]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 6(2), 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauertz, K. (2006). Ladders of learning: Fighting fade-out by advancing PK-3 alignment. New America Foundation Early Education Initiative. Downloaded from http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/ladders_of_learning. 2014-10-10.

  • Ministry of Education and Research. (2008). (SOU 2008:109) En hållbar lärarutbildning. Betänkande av Utredningen om en ny lärarutbildning (HUT 07). [Sustainable Teacher Education. Report of Inquiry on New Teacher Education].

  • Ministry of Education and Research. (2011). (SOU 2011:58). Skolans dokumentinsyn och sekretess. [ The school documentstransparency and confidentiality].

  • Ministry of Education and Science. (1999). Early childhood education and care policy in Sweden.

  • Niesel, R., & Griebel, W. (2007). Enhancing the competence of transition systems through co-construction. In A. W. Dunlop & H. Fabian (Eds.), Informing transitions in the early years. Research, policy and practice (pp. 21–32). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ödman, P.-J. (2005). Tolkning, förståelse, vetande. Hermeneutik i teori och praktik. [Interpretation, understanding, knowledge. Hermeneutics in Theory and Practice]. Stockholm: Norstedts.

  • Roth, A.-C.V. (2001). Läroplaner för de yngre barnen. Utvecklingen från 1800-talets mitt till idag. [Curricula for the younger children. The trend from the mid-1800:s to today]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 6(4), 241–269.

  • Samuelsson, I. P., & Pramling, N. (2009). Children’s perspectives as ‘touch downs’ in time: assessing and developing children’s understanding simultaneously. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson, I. P., & Pramling, N. (2010). Vad betyder barns perspektiv för utvärdering och utveckling? [What does children’s perspectives on evaluation and development mean?]. Forskning om undervisning och lärande, 3, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson, I. P., & Pramling, N. (2013a). Orchestrating and studying children’s and teachers’ learning: Reflections on developmental research approaches. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson, I.P., & Pramling, N. (2013b). Early Childhood Education in Sweden. Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved December 9, 2014, from http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756810/obo-9780199756810-0081.xml?rskey=x1nA8q&result=1&q=pramling#firstMatch.

  • Sheridan, S., Williams, P., & Sandberg, A. (2012). Systematic Quality Work in Preschool. International Journal of Early Childhood, 45(1), 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivropoulou, I. & Vrinioti, K. (2009). Early Literacy in Transition from Preschool to Primary School: Connecting Curricula. Downloaded from http://www.ease-eu.com/documents/compendium/chapter10.pdf. 2014-10-17.

  • Swedish Schools Inspectorate. (2012). Förskola, före skolalärande och bärande. Kvalitetsgranskningsrapport om förskolans arbete med det förstärkta pedagogiska uppdraget. [Pre-school, pre-school - learning and supporting. Quality Review Report on preschool work with the enhanced educational mission]. Downloaded from http://www.skolinspektionen.se/Documents/Kvalitetsgranskning/forskola-2011/kvalgr-forskolan2-slutrapport.pdf 2014-10-17.

  • Taguchi, H. L. (2011). Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with relational materialist approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, H. L. (2012). Pedagogisk dokumentation som aktiv agent. [Pedagogical documentation as the active agent]. Malmö: Gleerups.

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Agency for Education. (2010). Läroplan för förskolan Lpfö 98. (Ny, rev. utg.). [Curriculum for the Preschool Lpfö 98. Revised 2010.] Stockholm: Skolverket.

  • The National Agency for Education. (2011). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011. [Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre, 2011]. Stockholm: Skolverket.

  • The National Agency for Education. (2012). Uppföljning, utvärdering och utveckling i förskolanpedagogisk dokumentation. [Monitoring, evaluation and development in preschoolpedagogical documentation]. Stockholm: Skolverket.

  • The Swedish Research Council (2002). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. [Ethical research principals within Humanistic-societal research; in Swedish]. Downloaded from http://www.codex.vr.se/texts/HSFR.pdf (2014-10-17).

  • Vygotsky LS (1978) Interaction between learning and development (M. Lopez-Morillas, Trans.). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79–91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarja Alatalo.

Appendix: Overall Interview Guide

Appendix: Overall Interview Guide

  • In general, what is the collaboration between preschool and preschool class like at your workplace?

  • Can you describe the transition activities?

  • Who are involved in the transition process?

  • Which information about the children is prioritized?

  • Is there any information sharing about children’s written language development?

  • Have you together specifically discussed language development and written language?

  • What kind of information do you think is the most important to share?

  • How could the cooperation and the information sharing be improved?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alatalo, T., Meier, J. & Frank, E. Transition Between Swedish Preschool and Preschool Class: A Question About Interweaving Care and Knowledge. Early Childhood Educ J 44, 155–167 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0700-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0700-y

Keywords

Navigation