Advertisement

Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 89–96 | Cite as

Increasing Completion of Classroom Routines Through the Use of Picture Activity Schedules

  • Kamille J. Watson
  • Cynthia F. DiCarloEmail author
Article

Abstract

Teachers spend the first few days of school teaching routines to children that will help transitions in the classroom between different activities. When children have difficulty, they move more slowly and/or require teacher prompting. A picture activity schedule intervention (Breitfelder in Teach Except Child Plus 4(5):2–15, 2008; Bryan and Gast in J Autism Dev Disord 30(6):553–567, 2000) was used to assist a 5-year-old boy in completing three routines within the kindergarten classroom. Results indicated that the picture activity schedule increased the child’s independent completion of each of the three routines, while also decreasing the need for teacher prompting.

Keywords

Kindergarten Transitions Classroom routines Picture activity schedules 

References

  1. Banda, D. R., Grimmett, E., & Hart, S. L. (2009). Activity schedules. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(4), 16–21.Google Scholar
  2. Breitfelder, L. M. (2008). Quick and easy adaptations and accommodations for early childhood students. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 4(5), 2–15.Google Scholar
  3. Breslin, C. M., & Rudisill, M. E. (2011). The effect of visual supports on performance of the TGMD-2 for children with autism spectrum disorder. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 28(4), 343–353.Google Scholar
  4. Bryan, L. C., & Gast, D. L. (2000). Teaching on-task and on-schedule behaviors to high-functioning children with autism via picture activity schedules. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(6), 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, M. (2004). Classroom management in photographs. New York, NY: Scholastic.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (1987). Applied behavior analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
  7. Duttlinger, C., Ayres, K. M., Bevill-Davis, A., & Douglas, K. H. (2013). The effects of a picture activity schedule for students with intellectual disability to complete a sequence of tasks following verbal directions. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28(1), 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayes, K., & Creange, R. (2001). Classroom routines that really work for bank street and kindergarten: A bank street teacher resource. New York, NY: Scholastic Professional Books.Google Scholar
  9. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Koyama, T., & Wang, H. (2011). Use of activity schedule to promote independent performance of individuals with autism and other intellectual disabilities: A review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2235–2242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leinhardt, G., Weidman, C., & Hammond, K. M. (1987). Introduction and integration of classroom routines by expert teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(2), 135–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lequia, J., Machalicek, W., & Rispoli, M. (2012). Effects of activity schedules on challenging behavior exhibited in children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(1), 480–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mc-Graw Hill. (2013). DSC and LaLista. Retreived from http://www.ctb.com/ctb.com/control/childNodesViewAction?categoryId=115&adjBrd=Y
  14. Milley, A., & Machalicek, W. (2012). Decreasing students’ reliance on adults: A strategic guide for teachers of students with autism spectrum disorders. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48, 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Newman, L. (2010). Anchor charts: Making thinking visible. Retrieved from https://www.engageny.org/sites/default/files/resource/attachments/anchor_charts.pdf
  16. Salmon, A. (2010). Engaging young children in thinking routines. Childhood Education, 86(3), 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sartini, E. C., Knight, V. F., & Collins, B. C. (2013). Ten guidelines to facilitate social groups for students with complex special needs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(3), 54–62.Google Scholar
  18. University of Oregon Center on Teaching and Learning. (2013). UO DIBELS Data System. Retrieved from https://dibels.uoregon.edu/
  19. U.S. Department of Education. (2004). New no child left behind flexibility: Highly qualified teachers. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/methods/teachers/hqtflexibility.html
  20. Vedora, J., Ross, R., & Kelm, K. (2008). Feeding frenzy: Using picture schedules to reduce mealtime struggles. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 4(6), 2–11.Google Scholar
  21. Wildenger, L. K., McIntyre, L. L., Fiese, B. H., & Eckert, T. L. (2008). Children’s daily routine during kindergarten transition. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(1), 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zachary Public School SystemZacharyUSA
  2. 2.Louisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations