Advertisement

Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 135–146 | Cite as

A Survey of Canadian Early Childhood Educators’ Psychological Wellbeing at Work

  • Nicole RoyerEmail author
  • Claire Moreau
Article

Abstract

The study aims to describe early childhood educators’ psychological wellbeing at work in terms of their interpersonal fit, thriving, feeling of competency, perceived recognition and desire for involvement. The study approach draws links between perceptions of autonomy at work and wellbeing. The analysis examines the results of a survey conducted among 1,535 early childhood educators in the province of Québec, Canada, using the Index of Psychological Well-Being at Work, developed by Dagenais-Desmarais (2010), an instrument presenting good internal consistency indicators, with alphas varying between .72 and .86. Additionally, a measure of perceived autonomy at work, producing an internal consistency of .83, has been adapted from an instrument originally designed to measure basic needs satisfaction in sports contexts (Gillet et al. 2008). The study results show that overall levels of wellbeing among early childhood educators are high, both among those working in centre-based settings and those working in home-based settings (private homes), throughout all career stages. However, a decrease in wellbeing levels is observed following the first 5 years of work, later followed by an increase in wellbeing levels among educators with 20 years of experience or more, in both work settings. The perception of autonomy proves to be related to wellbeing, accounting for 23 % of variance. The autonomy dimension, therefore, calls for greater attention from administrators concerned with the psychological wellbeing of workers in this sector of activity. The authors argue for the relevance and necessity of further research into the work lives of early childhood educators by emphasising that the issues raised in the study overlap with three areas of concern for a significant part of the population: early childhood educators’ profession, community family services, and the accumulation of knowledge in work psychology.

Keywords

Child care providers Early childhood educators Psychological wellbeing Workplace Survey Positive psychology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible by support from the Québec Council for Educational Daycare Services (Conseil Québécois des Services de Garde Éducatif à l’Enfance) and the Interdisciplinary Centre for The Study of Childhood and Family Development (Centre d’Études Interdisciplinaires sur le Développement de l’Enfant et de la Famille).

Ethical standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumgartner, J. J., Carson, R. L., Apavaloaie, L., & Tsouloupas, C. (2009). Uncovering common stressful factors and coping strategies among childcare providers. Child and Youth Care Forum, 38(5), 239–251. doi: 10.1007/s10566-009-9079-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belsky, J., Lowe Vandell, D., Burchinal, M., Clarke-Stewart, K. A., McCartney, K., & Tresch Owen, M. (2007). Are there long term effects of early child care? Child Development, 78(2), 681–701. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01021.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Child Care Human Ressources Sector Council. (2013). A survey of centre-based early childhood education and care in Canada. http://www.ccsc-cssge.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/Projects-Pubs-Docs/EN%20Pub%20Chart/YouBetSurveyReport_Final.pdf.
  5. Dagenais-Desmarais, V. (2010). Du bien-être psychologique au travail: fondements théhoriques, conceptualisation et instrumentation du construit [Psychological Well-Being at Work: The Theoretical Foundations, Conceptualisation, and Instrumentation of a Construct]. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Montreal, Montreal. Retrieved from https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1866/3916/Dagenais-Desmarais_Veronique_2010_these.pdf?sequence=4.
  6. Dagenais-Desmarais, V., & Savoie, A. (2011). What is psychological well-being, really? A grassroots approach from the organizational sciences. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi:  10.1007/s10902-011-9285-3.
  7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donaldson, S. I. (2011). Determining what works, if anything, in positive psychology. In S. I. Donaldson, M. Csikszentmihalyi, & J. Nakamura (Eds.), Applied positive psychology (pp. 3–11). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dutton, J. E., Morgan Roberts, L., & Bednar, J. (2011). Prosocial practices, positive identity, and flourishing at work. In S. I. Donaldson, M. Csikszentmihalyi, & J. Nakamura (Eds.), Applied positive psychology. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fauth, R., Jelicic, H., Lea, J., Willmott, N., & Owen, S. (2011). Childminding practice in England. Retrieved from National children’s bureau website: http://www.ncb.org.uk/media/496733/childminding_report_final.pdf.
  11. Gillet, N., Rosnet, E., & Vallerand, R. J. (2008). Développement d’une échelle de satisfaction des besoins fondamentaux en contexte sportif [Developing a Basic Needs Satisfaction Scale for Sports Contexts]. Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 48(4), 230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Government of Québec, Institute of Statistics (Institut de la Statistique). (2009). Taux d’activité des femmes, personne de référence ou conjointe, de 25 à 54 ans selon la présence d’enfants et l’âge du plus jeune enfant, Québec, Ontario et Canada, 19762008 [Participation rate of women, reference person or spouse, 25 to 54 years according to the number of children and age of the youngest, Quebec, Ontario and Canada, 1976–2008]. http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/statistiques/conditions-vie-societe/conciliation-travail/tab_web_fam_tab_9.htm.
  13. Government of Québec, Institute of Statistics (Institut de la Statistique). (2013a). Naissances, décès, accroissement naturel, mariages et divorces, Canada et provinces 1975-2012 [Births, deaths, natural growth, marriages, and divorces, Canada and provinces, 1975–2012]. http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/donstat/societe/demographie/struc_poplt/105.htm.
  14. Government of Québec, Institute of Statistics (Institut de la Statistique). (2013b). Salaires annuels moyens, heures régulières hebdomadaires de travail, salaires horaires et rémunération globale par heure travaillée, selon la Classification nationale des professions, ensemble des employés, Québec, 2012 [Average annual earnings, regular weekly hours at work, hourly wages, and overall hourly compensation, according to the National Occupational Classification, all employees, Québec, 2012]. http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/donstat/societe/march_travl_remnr/remnr_condt_travl/salaires_annuels/1_ensemble.htm.
  15. Government of Québec, Ministry of Family and Senior Citizens (Ministère de la Famille et des Ainés). (2013c). Guide concernant la classification et la rémunération du personnel salarié [Salaried personnel compensation and classification guide]. http://www.mfa.gouv.qc.ca/fr/publication/Documents/SG_guide_administratif_classification.pdf.
  16. Groeneveld, M. G., Vermeer, H. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Linting, M. (2010). Children’s wellbeing and cortisol levels home-based and center-based childcare. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(4), 502–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holochwost, S. T., DeMott, K., Buell, M., Yannetta, K., & Amsden, D. (2009). Retention of staff in the early childhood education workforce. Child and Youth Care Forum, 38, 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howe, N., & Prochner, L. (2012). Recent perspectives on early childhood education and care in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  19. Huebner, E. S., Gilman, R., Reschly, A. L., & Hall, R. (2009). Positive schools. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 561–568). Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Japel, C. (2012). The Quebec child care system: lessons from research. In N. Howe & L. Prochner (Eds.), Recent perspectives on early childhood education and care in Canada (pp. 285–307). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ko, I., & Donaldson, S. I. (2011). Applied positive organizational psychology: The state of the science and practice. In S. I. Donaldson, M. Csikszentmihalyi, & J. Nakamura (Eds.), Applied positive psychology: Improving everyday life, health, schools, work, and society (pp. 137–155). London: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar
  22. Kusma, B., Groneberg, D. A., Nienhaus, A., & Mache, S. (2012). Determinants of day care teachers’ job satisfaction. Central European Journal of Public Health, 20(3), 191–198.Google Scholar
  23. Kusma, B., Mache, S., Quarcoo, D., Nienhaus, A., & Groneberg, D. A. (2011). Educators’ working conditions in a day care centre on ownership of a non-profit organization. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Tocicology, 6(36). http://www.occup-med.com/content/6/1/36.
  24. Martin, S., Meyer, J., Jones, R. C., Nelson, L., & Ting, L. (2010). Perceptions of professionalism among individuals in the child care field. Child and Youth Care Forum, 39, 341–349. doi: 10.1007/s10566-010-9107-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mellor, N., Karanika-Murray, M., & Waite, E. (2012). Taking a multi-faceted, multi-level, and integrated perspective for addressing psychosocial issues at the workplace. In C. Biron, M. Karanika-Murray, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Improving organisationsal interventions for stress and well-being (pp. 39–59). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Mills, M. J., Flecka, C. R., & Kozikowski, A. (2013). Positive psychology at work: A conceptual review state-of-practice assessment, and a look ahead. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(2), 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakamura, J. (2011). Contexts of positive adult development. In S. I. Donaldson, M. Csikszentmihalyi, & J. Nakamura (Eds.), Applied positive psychology (pp. 185–202). London: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar
  28. Pound, L. (2011). Exploring leadership: roles and responsabilities of the early years professional. In A. Paige-Smith & A. Craft (Eds.), Developing reflective practice in the early years (pp. 40–55). Berkshire, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Reed, M., & Owen, S. (2012). Childminding: An essential part of quality childcare in the community. In M. Reed & N. Canning (Eds.), Implementing quality improvement and change in the early years (pp. 42–57). London: Sage publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shpancer, N., Dunlap, B., Melick, K. M., Coxe, K., Kuntzman, D., Sayre, P. S., et al. (2008). Educators or babysitters? Daycare caregivers reflect on their profession. Child Care in Practice, 14(4), 401–412. doi: 10.1080/13575270802267994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Straum, L. V., & Vitterso, J. (2012). Happiness, inspiration and the fully functioning person: Separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in the workplace. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wagner, B. D., & French, L. (2010). Motivation, work satisfaction, and teacher change among early childhood teachers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 24, 152–171. doi: 10.1080/025685410036335268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whitaker, R. C., Becker.D., Herman, A. N., & Gooze, R. A (2012) The physical and mental health of Head Start staff: The Pennsylvania Head Start staff wellness survey. Preventing Chronic Disease. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.130171.
  36. Whitebook, M., & Sakai, L. (2004). By a thread : How child care centers hold on teachers, how teachers build lasting careers. Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williamson, L., Davis, E., Priest, N., & Harrison, L. (2011). Australian family day care educators: A snapshot of their qualifications, training and perceived support. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(4), 63–68.Google Scholar
  38. Wright, T. A. (2010). More than meets the eye: The role of employee well-being in organizational research. In P. A. Linley, S. Harrington, & N. Garcea (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work (pp. 143–154). New York: Oxford Library of Psychology.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département des sciences de l’éducationUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresTrois-RivièresCanada

Personalised recommendations