Advertisement

Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 249–256 | Cite as

Effects of Toys on the Play Quality of Preschool Children: Influence of Gender, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status

  • Jeffrey Trawick-Smith
  • Jennifer Wolff
  • Marley Koschel
  • Jamie Vallarelli
Article

Abstract

This study examined the effects of nine toys on the play of 60 3- and 4-year-old children in culturally diverse preschool classrooms. The toys, which varied in their features and intended uses, were selected from a list of those that were nominated by teachers and parents as being developmentally beneficial. Each toy was video recorded for 240 h during free play time in four different classrooms. Researchers coded 828 two-minute segments of children’s play with these toys using a play quality with toys (PQT) rating instrument developed in a previous investigation. Toys were found to vary significantly in their impact on play quality. PQT scores were also found to vary for each toy depending on the gender, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity of the child playing with it, and the length of time it was available in the classroom. Implications for selecting toys for classrooms and observing children’s play with them are presented.

Keywords

Play Toys Preschool Ethnicity Socioeconomic status Gender 

References

  1. Bergen, D. (2001). The role of pretend play in children’s cognitive development. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 4, 1–12.Google Scholar
  2. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  3. Campenni, C. E. (1999). Gender stereotyping of children’s toys: A comparison of parents and nonparents. Sex Roles, 40, 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherney, I. D., Kelly, V. L., Glover, K. G., Ruane, A., & Ryalls, B. O. (2004). The effects of stereotyped toys and gender on play-based assessment in 18–48 months old children. Educational Psychology, 23, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doyle, A., Ceschin, R., & Tessier, O. (1991). The relation of age and social class factors in children’s social pretend play to cognitive and symbolic ability. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14, 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elias, C. L., & Berk, L. E.(2002). Self-regulation in young children: Is there a role for sociodramatic play? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 216–238.Google Scholar
  7. Ginsberg, H. (2006). Mathematical play and playful mathematics: A guide for early education. In D. Singer, R. M. Golinkoff, & K. Hirsh-Pasek (Eds.) Play = learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth (pp. 145-165). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Goncu, A., Mistry, J., & Mosier, C. (2000). Cultural variations in the play of toddlers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hale-Benson, J. E. (1986). Black children: Their roots, culture, and learning styles. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hanline, M. F., Milton, S., & Phelps, P. C. (2009). The relationship between preschool block play and reading and math abilities in early elementary school: A longitudinal study of children with and without disabilities. Early Child Development and Care, 189, 117–147.Google Scholar
  11. Hendrickson, J., Tremblay, A., Strain, P., & Shores, R. (1981). Relationship between toy and material use and the occurrence of social interactive behaviors by normally developing preschool children. Psychology in the Schools, 18, 500–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howes, C., & Matheson, C. C. (1992). Sequences in the development of competent play with peers: Social and social pretend play. Developmental Psychology, 28, 961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hughes, C., & Carter, M. (2002). Toys and materials as setting events for the social interaction of preschool children with special needs. Educational Psychology, 22, 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunter, M. A., Ross, H. S., & Ames, E. W. (1982). Preferences for familiar or novel toys: Effect of familiarization time in 1-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 18, 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ivory, J. J., & McCollum, J. A. (1999). Effects of social and isolate toys on social play in an inclusive setting. Journal of Special Education, 32, 238–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lloyd, B., & Howe, N. (2003). Solitary play and convergent and divergent thinking skills in preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18, 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McLoyd, V. C. (1983). The effects of structure of play objects on the pretend play of low income children. Child Development, 54, 626–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McLoyd, V. (1986). Scaffolds or shackles? The role of toys in preschool children’s pretend play. In G. Fein & M. Rivkin (Eds.), Young child at play: Reviews of research (pp. 63–78). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, C. L. (1987). Qualitative differences among gender–stereotyped toys: Implications for cognitive and social development in girls and boys. Sex Roles, 16, 473–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mundy, P., & Newell, L. (2007). Attention, joint attention, and social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pellegrini, A. D., & Bjorklund, D. F. (2004). The ontogeny and phylogeny of children’s object and fantasy play. Human Nature, 15, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prescott, E., Kritchevsky, S., & Jones, E. (1972). The day care environmental inventory. Pasadena, CA: Pacific Oaks College.Google Scholar
  23. Rabinowitz, F. M., Moely, B. E., Finkel, N., & McClinton, S. (1975). The effects of toy novelty and social interaction on the exploratory behavior of preschool children. Child Development, 46, 286–289.Google Scholar
  24. Rettig, M., Kallam, M., & McCarthy-Salm, K. (1993). The effect of social and isolate toys on the social interactions of preschool-aged children. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 252–256.Google Scholar
  25. Riojas-Cortéz, M. (2001). Preschoolers’ funds of knowledge displayed through sociodramatic play episodes in a bilingual classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roskos, K. A., Christie, J. F., Widman, S., & Holding, A. (2010). Three decades in: Priming for meta-analysis in play-literacy research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10, 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rubin, K. H. (1977). The social and cognitive value of preschool toys and activities. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 9, 382–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saltz, E., Dixon, D., & Johnson, J. (1977). Training disadvantaged preschoolers on various fantasy activities: Effects on cognitive functioning and impulse control. Child Development, 48, 367–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shutts, K., Banaji, M. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Social categories guide young children’s preferences for novel objects. Developmental Science, 13, 599–610.Google Scholar
  30. Smilansky, S. (1968). The effects of sociodramatic play on disadvantaged preschool children. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Sutton-Smith, B. (1986). Toys as culture. New York, NY: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sutton-Smith, B. (2009). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Tizzard, B., Phelps, J., & Plewis, L. (1976). Play in preschool centres: Play measures and their relation to age, sex, and IQ. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trawick-Smith, J. (1990). Effects of realistic vs. non-realistic play materials on young children’s symbolic transformation of objects. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 5, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trawick-Smith, J. (1992). A descriptive study of spatial arrangement in a family day care home. Child & Youth Care Forum, 21, 356–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trawick-Smith, J. (1993). Effects of realistic, non-realistic, and mixed-realism play environments on young children symbolization, social interaction, and language. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  37. Trawick-Smith, J. (2010). Drawing back the lens on play: A frame analysis of young children’s play in Puerto Rico. Early Education and Development, 21, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Trawick-Smith, J., & Dzuirgot, T. (2010a). “Good-fit” teacher–child play interactions and subsequent autonomous play in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 110–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trawick-Smith, J., & Dzuirgot, T. (2010b). Untangling teacher–child play interactions: Do teacher education and experience influence “good-fit” responses to children’s play? Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 31, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trawick-Smith, J., Russell, H., & Swaminathan, S. (2010). Measuring the effects of toys on the cognitive, creative, and social play behaviors of preschool children. Early Child Development and Care, 181, 909–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1976). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. In J. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 6–18). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Whiting, B. B., & Edwards, C. P. (1988). Children of different worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wolfgang, C. H., Standard, L., & Jones, I. (2001). Block play performance among preschoolers as a predictor of later school achievement in mathematics. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Trawick-Smith
    • 1
  • Jennifer Wolff
    • 1
  • Marley Koschel
    • 1
  • Jamie Vallarelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Early Childhood Education, CECE 216Eastern Connecticut State UniversityWillimanticUSA

Personalised recommendations