Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 77–88 | Cite as

Instruction Via Web-Based Modules in Early Childhood Personnel Preparation: A Mixed-Methods Study of Effectiveness and Learner Perspectives

Article

Abstract

Effective personnel preparation is critical to the development of a high quality early childhood workforce that provides optimal care and education for young children. This mixed-methods study examined the effectiveness of, and learner perspectives on, instruction via web-based modules within face-to-face early childhood personnel preparation courses. The specific modules selected were designed around an evidence-based decision-making framework and focused on evidence-based practices: embedded interventions, assistive technology, and tiered instruction. Nineteen undergraduate students studying early childhood participated in pre- and post-instruction surveys and post-instruction focus groups. Participants’ written module activities provided additional sources of data. Statistical analyses of quantitative survey data and thematic analyses of qualitative survey data and focus groups were conducted. Results found the web-based modules to be effective, as indicated by learners’ knowledge and competence ratings, written explanations of the specific evidence-based practices, and completed assignments. Examination of learner perspectives indicated that learners perceived web-based modules to be effective over and above other instructional methods and preferred web-based modules to traditional instruction, at least to some degree. Learners found videos and realistic practice dilemmas to be the most useful module resources. They reported technology challenges and identified preferred supports, including more in-class discussion. Implications for personnel preparation and further research are discussed.

Keywords

Teacher education Instructional technology Professional development Early childhood education Inclusion 

References

  1. Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buysse, V., Epstein, D., Winton, P., & Rous, B. (2012). CONNECT Module 7: Tiered instruction [Web-based PD curriculum]. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, CONNECT: The Center to Mobilize Early Childhood Knowledge (CONNECT).Google Scholar
  5. Buysse, V., & Hollingsworth, H. L. (2009). Program quality and early childhood inclusion: Recommendations for professional development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buysse, V., Wesley, P., Snyder, P., & Winton, P. (2006). Evidence-based practice: What does it really mean for the early childhood field? Young Exceptional Children, 9(4), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buysse, V., Winton, P., Rous, B., Epstein, D. J., & Lim, C. (2012b). Evidence-based practice: Foundation for the CONNECT 5-Step Learning Cycle™ in professional development. Zero to Three, 32(4), 25–29.Google Scholar
  8. Chang, F., Early, D. M., & Winton, P. J. (2005). Early childhood teacher preparation in special education at 2- and 4-year institutions of higher education. Journal of Early Intervention, 27, 110–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. CONNECT. (2013). CONNECT: The center to mobilize early childhood knowledge annual grant performance report. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  13. Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.Google Scholar
  14. Grossman, P. (2005). Pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 425–476). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Heirdsfield, A., Davis, J., Lennox, S., Walker, S., & Zhang, W. (2007). Online learning environments: What early childhood teacher education students say. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 28, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 59–71.Google Scholar
  17. Horm, D. M., Hyson, M., & Winton, P. (2013). Research on early childhood teacher education: Evidence from three domains and recommendations for moving forward. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 34, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K.-L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 108–122.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, K., & Choi, I. (2008). Learning classroom management through web-based case instruction: Implications for early childhood teacher education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 495–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maxwell, K., Lim, C.-I., & Early, D. M. (2006). Early childhood teacher preparation programs in the United States: National report. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Miller, P., Ostrosky, M., Laumann, B., Thorpe, E., Sanchez, S., & Fader-Dunne, L. (2003). Quality field experiences underlying performance mastery. In V. D. Stayton, P. S. Miller, & L. S. Dinnebeil (Eds.), Personnel preparation in early childhood special education: Implementing the DEC recommended practices (pp. 113–138). Missoula, MT: DEC.Google Scholar
  23. Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidenced-based practices. Exceptional children, 71, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., Burchinal, M. R., Clifford, R. M., Culkin, M. L., Howes, C., Kagan, S. L., et al. (2001). The relation of preschool child-care quality to children’s cognitive and social developmental trajectories through second grade. Child Development, 72, 1534–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sheridan, K. M., & Kelly, M. A. (2012). Teaching early childhood education students through interactive scenario-based course design. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 33, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Skinner, D., Rodriguez, P., & Bailey, D. B. (1999). Qualitative analysis of Latino parents’ religious interpretations of their child’s disability. Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Snyder, P., Hemmeter, M. L., & McLaughlin, T. (2011). Professional development in early childhood intervention: Where we stand on the silver anniversary of PL 99-457. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. United States Department of Education (USDOE), & Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  29. Weigel, D.J., Weiser, D. A., Bales, D. W., & Moyses, K. J. (2012). Identifying online preferences and needs of early childhood professionals. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 14(2). http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v14n2/weigel.html.
  30. Winton, P., Buysse, V., Rous, B., Epstein, D., & Pierce, P. (2011). CONNECT Module 5: Assistive technology [Web-based PD curriculum]. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, CONNECT.Google Scholar
  31. Winton, P. J., Buysse, V., Turnbull, A., Rous, B., & Hollingsworth, H. (2010). CONNECT Module 1: Embedded interventions [Web-based PD curriculum]. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, CONNECT.Google Scholar
  32. Zaslow, M., Tout, K., Halle, T., Whittaker, J. V., & Lavelle, B. (2010). Toward the identification of features of effective professional development for early childhood educators: Literature review. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationElon UniversityElonUSA
  2. 2.FPG Child Development InstituteUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations