Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 109–117 | Cite as

Head Start/Child Care Partnerships: Program Characteristics and Classroom Quality

  • Diane Schilder
  • Ashley Smith LeavellEmail author


As part of President Obama’s Early Education Plan, Congress authorized $500 million in the 2014 Omnibus Act to support states and communities in expanding high-quality early learning through the creation of a new Early Head Start-Child Care Partnership initiative. This initiative has placed renewed interest on research regarding the nature and benefits of Head Start and child care partnerships. In this study, we sought to confirm—or call into question—the benefits of Head Start and child care partnerships by performing secondary analysis of data collected from child care centers in partnership and matched non-partnering comparison centers. We analyzed survey data from 61 child care centers—approximately half of which were engaged in partnership with Head Start—and analyzed observational data from 66 classrooms within these centers. The observational data had been collected using two psychometrically valid and reliable measures of quality—the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Revised Edition (ECERS-R) and the Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation Toolkit (ELLCO). Results show that classrooms at partnership centers demonstrated higher observed global quality in all six subscales of the ECERS-R, as well as the total overall score compared to non-partnership classrooms. Moreover, classrooms in partnership performed higher on seven out of ten subscales, as measured by the ELLCO, with the largest difference seen in language and literacy practices. To further explore the potential benefits of partnerships on classroom quality, we developed hierarchical regression models. These results provided further evidence regarding the benefits of partnership.


Head Start Child care Partnerships Early childhood 


  1. Adams, G., & Rohacek, M. (2010). Child care instability: Definitions, context, and policy implications.
  2. Deming, D. (2009). Early childhood intervention and life-cycle skill development: Evidence from Head Start. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(3), 111–134.Google Scholar
  3. Edie, D., Adams, D., Riley, D., & Roach, M. (2003, April 8, 2011). Improving child care quality.
  4. Gennetian, L. A., Huston, A. C., Crosby, D. A., Chang, Y. E., Lowe, E. D., & Weisner, T. S. (2002). Making child care choices: How welfare and work policies influence parents’ decisions (Policy Brief). New York: MDRC.
  5. Harms, T., Clifford, R. M., & Cryer, D. (1998). ECERs-R: Language-reasoning, interaction, and activities scales. Carrboro, NC: University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Harms, T., Cryer, D., & Clifford, R. M. (2006). Infant/toddler environment rating scale (Revised ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Harms, T., Cryer, D., & Clifford, R. M. (2007). Family child care environment rating scale (Revised ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  8. Helburn, S. W. (1995). Cost, quality, and child outcomes in child care centers (Technical report). Denver, CO: University of Colorado, Department of Economics, Center for Research in Economic and Social Policy.Google Scholar
  9. Henly, J. R., & Lyons, S. (2000). The negotiation of child care and employment demands among low-income parents. Journal of Social Issues, 56(4), 683–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kagan, S. L., Verzaro-O’Brien, M., Kim, U., & Formica, M. (2000). Head Start-child care partnership study. New Haven, CT: Yale University, The Bush Center in Child Development and Social Policy. Retrieved Aug 28, 2006.
  11. Kiron, E. (2003). Blending early care and education funds: Issues, opportunities, and strategies (Res. Brief Vol. 1, No. 2). Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc. Retrieved Mar 3, 2004.
  12. Lim, Y., & Schilder, D. (2006). Child care/Head Start partnerships snapshot: Partnership predicts improved classroom quality. Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Lim, Y., Schilder, D., & Chauncey, B. (2007). Supporting parents through Head Start-child care center partnerships. International Journal of Economic Development, 9(3), 205–238.Google Scholar
  14. Marshall, N. L., et al. (2003). Family child care today: A report of the findings of the Massachusetts Cost/Quality Study: Family child care homes.
  15. Myers, D., & Dynarski, M. (2003). Random assignment in program evaluation and intervention research: Questions and answers. Retrieved Apr 18, 2007.
  16. NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2001). Nonmaternal care and family factors in early development: An overview of the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(5), 457–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. (2003). Ohio child care and development fund plan for FFY 20042005. Columbus, OH: Author. Retrieved July 21, 2004.
  18. Paulsell, D., Cohen, J., Stieglitz, A., Lurie-Hurvitz, E., Fenichel, E., & Kisker, E. (2002). Partnerships for quality: Improving infant-toddler child care for low-income families. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Phillipsen, L. C., Burchinal, M. R., Howes, C., & Cryer, D. (1997). The prediction of process quality from structural features of child care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12(3), 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Puma, M., Bell, S., Shapiro, G., Broene, P., Cook, R., Friedman, J., et al. (2001). Building futures: The Head Start Impact Study. Research design plan. Retrieved Apr 18, 2007.
  21. Ray, K. (2002). The nimble collaboration: Fine-tuning your collaboration for lasting success. St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2001). Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: A 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(18), 2339–2346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schilder, D. (2003). State strategies to support early care and education partnerships (Res. Brief Vol. 1, No. 3). Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc. Retrieved June 25, 2004.
  24. Schilder, D. (2004). Head Start/child care partnerships: Partnering programs more likely to provide comprehensive services (Res. Brief Vol. 2, No. 1). Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc.
  25. Schilder, D. et al. (2005). Child Care/Head Start Partnership Study: Final report. Newton, MA: Education Development Center. Retrieved June 27, 2007.
  26. Schilder, D., Kiron, E., & Elliott, K. (2003a). Early care and education partnerships: State actions and local lessons (Res. Brief Vol. 1, No. 1). Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc.
  27. Schilder, D., Kiron, E., & Elliott, K. (2003b). Early care and education partnerships: State actions and local lessons. Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Schilder, D., Broadstone, M., Chauncey, B., Kiron, E., Miller, C., & Lim, Y. (2009). Child care quality study: The impact of Head Start partnership on child care quality (Final report). Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Schumacher, R., Ewen, D., Hart, K., & Lombardi, J. (2005). All together now: State experiences in using community-based child care to provide pre-kindergarten. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy. Retrieved June 8, 2007.
  30. Selden, S. C., Sowa, J. E., & Sandfort, J. (2006). The impact of nonprofit collaboration in early child care and education on management and program outcomes. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 412–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Simpson, J., Jivanjee, P., Koroloff, N., Doerfler, A., & García, M. (2001). Promising practices in early childhood mental health. Systems of care: Promising practices in children’s mental health, 2001 Series, Volume III. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, M. W., Dickinson, D. K., Sangeorge, A., & Anastasopoulos, L. (2002). Early language and literacy classroom observation (ELLCO) toolkit (Research ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  33. Sowa, J. (2001). Why collaborate? Motivations for early childhood education partnerships (white paper). Lynchburg, VA: Investigating Partnerships in Early Childhood Education Study, Lynchburg College.Google Scholar
  34. Stebbins, H., & Scott, L. C. (2007, June 25, 2007). Better outcomes for all: Promoting partnerships between Head Start and pre-K.
  35. U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Guidance for the Early Reading First program. Retrieved August 26, 2003.
  36. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Administration for Children and Families/Administration on Children Youth and Families/Head Start Bureau. (1998). Head Start program performance standards and other regulations. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  37. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Administration for Children and Families/Office of Planning Research and Evaluation. (2010). Head Start Impact Study: Final report (Executive summary). Washington, DC: Author.
  38. Whitebook, M., Howes, C., Phillips, D., & Pemberton, C. (1989). Who cares? Child care teachers and the quality of care in America. Young Children, 45(1), 41–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Learning and Teaching DivisionEducation Development Center, Inc.WalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations