Abstract
The focus on standardized testing in the areas of reading and mathematics in early elementary education often minimalizes science and the arts in the curriculum. The science topics of health and nutrition were integrated into the reading curriculum through read aloud books. Inclusion of creativity skills through figural transformation drawings allowed students to display nutrition comprehension, modeling how these subject areas can fit into a narrowed curriculum. This repeated measures study examined the weekly effect of teacher lesson introduction on 19 second grade students’ (11 female, 8 male) creativity and content knowledge of nutrition under two conditions that alternated every 2 weeks over a 16-week period: a brief, positive, standard lesson introduction (control) compared to a more enhanced introduction promoting originality, risk-taking and persistence (experimental). Students listened to read-aloud books on nutrition and completed figural transformation drawings related to the stories. Findings showed that student work evidenced more creativity during the experimental condition with a very large effect size for breaking perceived boundaries; a large effect size for depicting movement in drawings; medium effect sizes for fluency, originality, storytelling articulateness, humor, wisdom, emotion, and total creative traits; and a small effect size for elaboration. Students also evidenced greater overall knowledge of health/nutrition content during the experimental condition with a small effect size. Small changes in the way a lesson was introduced had a significant impact on student knowledge and creative performance, indicating that early childhood teachers should implement similar lesson introductions to increase student creativity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, J., & Schnick, A. (2008). Motivation. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 423–447). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5–32.
Barrow, L. H., Concannon, J., & Wissehr, C. (2011). Looking back at the Sputnik era and its impact on science education. School Science and Education, 111(7), 368–375.
Claxton, G., Edwards, L., & Scale-Constantinou, V. (2006). Cultivating creative mentalities: A framework for education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 57–61.
Conrad, D. (2006). American music education: A struggle for time and curriculum. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 86(4), 31–34.
Craft, A., Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Chappel, K. (2007). Teacher stance in creative learning: A study of progression. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 136–147.
Cropley, D., Cropley, A., Kaufman, J., & Runco, M. (2010). The dark side of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Dee, T., & Jacob, B. (2010). The impact of no child left behind on students, teachers, and schools. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 59(2), 149–207.
Diener, M. (2010). Corsini encyclopedia of psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset, the new psychology of success: How we can learn to fulfill our potential. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
Ebbeling, C. B., Pawlak, D. B., & Ludwig, D. S. (2002). Childhood obesity: Public-health crisis, common sense cure. The Lancet, 360, 473–482.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hebert, T., Millar, G., & Silvian, A. (2002). E. Paul Torrance: His life accomplishments, and legacy.. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 69–90.
Hurley, D. (2010). Child’s plague: Inside the boom in childhood diabetes. Discover, 31(4), 51–57.
Johnson, P. (2009). The 21st century skills movement. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 11.
Ogden, C., Carroll, M., Kit, B., & Flegal, K. (2012). Prevalence of obesity in the United States. NCHS Data Brief, 82, 1–7.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2011). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/1.__p21_framework_2-pager.pdf.
Piirto, J. (2011). Creativity for 21st century skills: How to embed creativity into the curriculum. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
Renzulli, J. (2011). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(8), 81.
Robinson, A. (2008). Teacher characteristics. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 669–680). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Runco, M. A. (1990). The divergent thinking of young children: Implications of the research. Gifted Child Today, 13(4), 37–39.
Torrance, E. P. (1972). Predictive validity of the Torrance tests of creative thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(4), 236–262.
Torrance, E. P., Ball, O. E., & Safter, H. T. (2008). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Streamlined scoring guide for figural forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service Inc.
Webb, A. N., & Rule, A. C. (2012). Developing second graders’ creativity through literacy–science integrated lessons on lifecycles. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(6), 379–385.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Webb, A.N., Rule, A.C. Effects of Teacher Lesson Introduction on Second Graders’ Creativity in a Science/Literacy Integrated Unit on Health and Nutrition. Early Childhood Educ J 42, 351–360 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0615-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0615-4